Quote# 126977

We do need to address the issue of white-on-white hatred. Why do white gentile elites hate white people so much? More importantly, why do a majority of white gentiles want to destroy their own civilisation? How to explain the determination of the Swedes, the Germans, the French, to destroy themselves?
In fact there is an explanation. It has nothing whatever to do with race. What we’re seeing is pure class hatred. The hatred of upper-class and middle-class urban whites for working-class and rural whites.

dfordoom, Unz 4 Comments [5/8/2017 3:59:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 126975

Why are so many black men voting for Hillary in the primary?

I guess maybe they're just voting for her because of her husband, who was supposedly "the first black President". As Toni Morrison was writing, "Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas."
Plus he smoked weed and enjoyed fucking white chicks -- and he was persecuted for it by Republicans, JUST LIKE A BLACK MAN WOULD'VE BEEN.
Bernie Sanders actually gives a fuck about real issues that have been keeping the black man down for generations, and he was a bona fide activist for black issues in college, but he just doesn't ACT stereotypically black enough to suit these guys. He needs to start wearing a baseball cap backwards, let his pants sag below his ass, throw a few "my niggas" into his speeches, and maybe flash a gang signal now and then.
Also, Hillary is a feminist, and feminists and black men seem to share the same idea that it's best to destroy the institution of the family and just have a few gangsta thug motherfuckas (aka alphas) impregnate all the women, who will then use welfare to feed their families. Feminists see this as empowering because they don't have to be ruled over by a husband, while black men always imagine that they're going to be the ones who will be badasses enough to slay pussy everywhere they go in a system where marriage hasn't locked either them or these bitches down.
(When you think about it, there are A LOT of people who would like to destroy the traditional institution of the biological family. Evangelical Christians are on board that program too, because whenever a struggling, working-class family gets broken up by CPS, they get to show up as the saviors who adopt the kids and train them in their Christian ways.)
Plus, black men don't really like this idea of economic equality in which there's no longer a top 1 percent that gets to rule the world. Rather, they want to BE that 1 percent. Black men are always flipping through the "Mansion" section of the Wall Street Journal as they sit in their prison cells and imagining the yachts, fancy homes, etc. they're going to have after they get out and finally set up their crack empire the right way. They like to read hood novels that feature a black man as a Hollywood filmmaker who gets to fuck lots of (light-skinned) broads, and imagine that they could rise to that role somehow by hustlin' and makin' the right deals. Hey, why not.
In light of how blacks buy so much into the "rags to riches" narrative of economic mobility, it almost seems like they're actually Republicans at heart, but maybe the GOP turned them off with all of their Confederate flag waving to the point where the only Republican they're going to be willing to vote for is Donald Trump (who of course harbors no racism in his heart). Trump will likely appeal to them in the general election, because he's anti-Hispanic (notice how Hispanics and blacks never get along when they're put in the same prison cell?) and likes to flash his bling and young, hot (and white) wives around everywhere. They like how he didn't need a lot of fancy education to become rich, but just was able to get to the top seemingly through negotiation and sheer bravado alone.
His dominance also appeals to them. They like how he didn't slowly build up a career as a Republican politician the way Jeb Bush did, but instead seemingly just walked in there and took over that shit — like a GANGSTA. They admire anyone who can figure out a shortcut to success that involves mainly boldness, salesmanship, and a keen understanding of the psychology of the people one is dealing with as well as the politics of the situation, as opposed to a lot of hard work.

Men's Rights EXTREMIST, RationalWiki 3 Comments [5/8/2017 1:40:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126969

In terms of thought process, White people are high in conscientiousness (orderliness) and think somewhat like worker-bees. Jews are more free-flowing, critical, and argumentative. we'll never be able to hold a conversation because we think differently, genetically. to each his own

Rameses2, Reddit 5 Comments [5/8/2017 1:39:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 126876

East Asians are the only racial group that can contend with Whites for the title of Master Race. We're both intelligent and civilized, and so we tend to get along the easiest in my experience. We're also the only 2 racial groups that are genetically capable of carrying the torch of civilization into the future. So, if we are going to mass import non-Whites, then mass importing East Asians would obviously be preferable to mass importing low-IQ and crime-prone "Hispanics" (Amerinds/Mestizos) and blacks. However, White countries belong to White people. I don't support making Chinese people minorities in China, I therefore expect East Asians to show us the same amount of respect. But since they probably won't, then we have no choice but to deport them against their will. The terrorist weeb 5th column will also have to be crushed.

CertifiedRabbi, Reddit 10 Comments [5/5/2017 11:10:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 126908

The family is the smallest combat unit in the race war.

Anonymous, FSTDT 4 Comments [5/5/2017 10:14:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 126903

Just because a hiring manager wanted you, doesn't mean the rest of the German populace wants you and your people infesting their country. Germany is for Germans. Europe is for Europeans and your third world hovels is where you mestizos belong.

Want respect? Build up a semi decent country that's not bordering on a perpetual state of civil war. You're just another brown economic migrant in Europe. You can buy a fancy suit, but you will always be looked at as a beggar. Know your fucking place, boy.

UnrepentantPaddy, Reddit 7 Comments [5/5/2017 10:10:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126877

Degenerate White behavior is mostly a consequence of our degenerate popular culture. Implementing a top-down socially conservative cultural revolution by legislating morality (e.g., censoring the entertainment industry again) would mostly fix this problem. But to the degree that degenerate behavior is genetic, then it should obviously be fixed with eugenics.
People get freaked out whenever someone mentions eugenics in a positive light, but we now have the scientific technology and know-how to implement eugenics through humane means, or will in the near future. We can use genome sequencing, genetic analysis, precision gene editing, embryo selection, contraception, early term abortion, et cetera, to create a new Master Race without having to use forced sterilization or death camps.
There's also a definite elitist element to the Alt-Right. We don't really respect the anti-intellectual "redneck" culture that has dominated the American conservative movement for decades. In fact, we find it embarrassing. We want to elevate our race genetically, economically, and culturally. Eradicating the degenerate influences that have seeped into the White race is one of our main goals.

Certifiedrabbi, https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAltRight/comments/693obg/what_do_you_do_about_white_trash/ 10 Comments [5/4/2017 9:38:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 126873

It's really rather remarkable what these self-styled conservatives are willing to give up so that no one will call them, or their society, racist. Is the complete economic collapse of that block in Washington DC really a price worth paying to end segregation? Is the decline of Black America into a dependent feral state really worth the superficial integration and pretend equality it now enjoys?

One has to ask the question, at what point is the price of this social progress too high? Do we really have to wait until Africans are raping infants and butchering people on the street in order to practice mutu before we decide that perhaps they should not be permitted to live amongst us? Do we really have to wait until Jews own 100 percent of all the corporations and real estate before we decide that perhaps they should not be permitted to engage in usury? Do we really have to wait before Muslims impose sharia across the entire West before we decide that Charles Martel and the Spanish reconquistadors had the right idea? Do we really need to permit the Chinese to take 100 percent of the college enrollment before we decide that submitting to the rule of a Chinese provincial elite is not in our best interests?

Obviously, all of these things cannot happen; each one tends to preclude the others. But the point remains: how far is too far? The reactionary says: things have gone too far. The cuckservative says: things haven't gone so far that it is worth risking the possibility that someone will call me racist.

Of course, the fact that Rod Dreher and Andrew Sullivan are beginning to openly admit that there is a point to "neoreaction" is an early indicator that even the cuckservatives are beginning to crack. It is already clear to everyone that the liberal democratic order has failed. Sooner, rather than later, even the cuckiest of cucks will be forced to acknowledge that what they once considered enlightened moral and social progress is, in fact, dyscivilizational regress.

Soon we will all be Alt-Right.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 8 Comments [5/3/2017 9:33:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 126851

A suspected right-wing extremist German army officer is thought to have been planning an attack. As part of his preparation, he registered as a refugee from Syria. Now, Franco A. has been arrested in a perplexing case full of riddles.

By Jörg Diehl and Matthias Gebauer

In photos, Franco A. looks rather unremarkable. In one image, the dark-haired first lieutenant in gray uniform even has a slightly mischievous look on his face. Next to him in the picture, which was taken in the French town of Illkirch, stands a class of schoolchildren. The Bundeswehr soldier is stationed there with a German-French brigade.

For investigators, the young man with parted hair and glasses represents both a puzzling and extremely dangerous case. On Wednesday morning, Germany's Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) arrested him in the Bavarian town of Hammelburg. Concurrently, his quarters in France, his car and the apartment of his suspected accomplice in Offenbach were searched. The suspected accomplice, Mathias F., was also detained.

Prosecutors in Frankfurt have been investigating Franco A. since February 17 on suspicions he was planning a significant act of violence. It is thought that A., who was taking part in a hand-to-hand combat training course, may have been planning an attack in Germany.

The scenario laid out by investigators is alarming: Despite his rather ordinary appearance, Franco A. is suspected of being a staunch right-wing extremist, full of hate for foreigners and prone to violence. Furthermore, at the end of 2015, he established a secret identity as a Syrian refugee. One of the theories investigators are pursuing is that Franco A. had hoped to implicate refugees in the act of violence he was planning.

The story began at the end of January. A technician performing maintenance work at Vienna International Airport found a loaded 7.65 caliber pistol in a restroom duct and informed police. After examining the weapon, the officers decided to outfit the duct with an alarm so as to identify the person who came to retrieve the weapon from its hiding place.

A Strange Double Life

The plan bore fruit on February 3 when Franco A. opened the duct and he was taken into temporary custody. Franco A. told police that he had found the weapon in a bush at the location of the January 20 officers' ball in Vienna. At the airport, he says, he suddenly realized that he wouldn't be able to take the pistol through security, which is why he hid it in the restroom.

Investigations undertaken following the discovery of the weapon revealed the soldier's strange double life, but they also cast light on the chaos that reigned at the height of the refugee crisis. The Austrians passed along Franco A.'s finger prints to the BKA, and before long the Germans found a match. But the match, oddly, was with a Syrian asylum-seeker.

At the end of 2015, Franco A. had adopted the alias David Benjamin and, in Bavaria, claimed to be a refugee. Although he speaks no Arabic and only broken French, he was registered -- as the Christian son of a fruit trader from Damascus. He said he had been born in 1988.

The files make clear the lengths Franco A. went to in developing his identity as a Syrian refugee. Shortly after he was registered, he applied for asylum and was granted just over 400 euros per month in benefits. He was even assigned a room at a group hostel. At the same time, he reported punctually for his military service -- and nobody noticed that anything was awry.

The BKA, though, received an additional interesting clue from Vienna: Investigators say that Austrian officials found files in Franco A.'s possession that clearly point to his right-wing extremist proclivities. That detail was enough to get prosecutors in Frankfurt involved. On Feb. 17, they opened an official investigation on suspicions that he was preparing a violent attack.

Intense Surveillance

Nobody believed his story about accidentally finding the weapon and, in the weeks that followed, the soldier was put under intense surveillance. Telephone surveillance revealed that Franco A. was a staunch xenophobe: Investigators say that he exchanged virulently bigoted texts with other right-wing extremists on WhatsApp and heatedly ridiculed foreigners.

These exchanges led investigators to suspected accomplice Mathias F., who is likely an old friend of Franco A.'s from Offenbach. The two communicated often. A soldier in the army reserve in Vienna, who investigators had thought of as a witness until that point, was also part of the chat group. The homes of several chat group members were searched on Wednesday. Investigators ultimately reached the conclusion that the young men may have been doing more than just venting their hatred of foreigners. They could have been planning an attack.

Still, the BKA asked the Bundeswehr, as the German military is called, to allow Franco A. to continue serving so that they could surreptitiously monitor him. But the officer behaved unobtrusively. He only told a few of his comrades about the pistol found in Vienna and that it was becoming a problem for him.

Only months later did Franco A. again hear from the authorities: On April 19, members of MAD, Germany's military intelligence agency, interviewed him. But A. chose his answers carefully, according to investigators, hiding his right-wing extremist views and repeating his story of how he found the firearm in Vienna.

Investigators still have to find out what exactly Franco A. was planning. Thus far he has remained silent. In their search of Mathias F.'s home in Offenbach, officials say they found ammunition, hand grenades and a small quantity of explosives. But it is still unclear what role he played. He says that Franco A. gave him the weapon that he had found and that he didn't think anything of it.

Perplexing Elements

Prosecutors have been reticent about providing concrete details and a spokeswoman said on Thursday that investigators have found no clearly developed plans for an attack, though she added that the case includes a number of perplexing elements. Franco A.'s conspiratorial behavior has no doubt fueled suspicions that he has something to hide.

The German military must now provide an explanation for how the first lieutenant's right-wing convictions could have gone undiscovered for so long. And how Franco A. was able to conceal for more than a year that he regularly traveled to Bavaria to maintain his fake refugee identity.

Fears that a Bundeswehr soldier could commit an attack are not new. Thus far, though, the concern had been that an Islamist might infiltrate the military and then use his new skills in an act of terrorist violence. Indeed, this summer MAD will be introducing a new security check for all incoming recruits in the hopes of closing potential security holes.

Whether such a check might have weeded out Franco A. is doubtful.


Franco A., Spiegel Online 5 Comments [5/3/2017 11:12:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126838

Y'all sold your own damn people. Whites woulda never went to Africa if there weren't no slave markets there. Look how africans treat each other. It's everyone for themselves, dog eat dog. Y'all have no sense of fellowship or solidarity with one another plus you can't organize yourselves for shit. Thats the real reason Africa is in the mess it's in today. Not colonisim or the White man. It's the people. All countries were invaded or conqured by someone else at one time or another but they bounce back because the people organize for their greater good. Europe was colonized by the Romans, part of China was colonized by the British and others. We nuked Japan and look at them now! A people who don't love their own selves are the worst sinners. You talk about going to Hell but when y'all die y'all gonna be on the express train to the fiery pit, baby

Marcus Aurelius, Topix 4 Comments [5/2/2017 11:27:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 126817

We should love what we are, rather than conceding that the left is morally superior for wishing reality away.
It is great that women are what they are and men are what they are, otherwise I would have an absolutely terrible sex life. Vive la différence. It is good that men should lead, and women should follow.
It is great that whites are superior to all brown and black races in intelligence and prosocial conduct.
The east Asians are on average a bit smarter, though I think this is more that east Asian women are considerably smarter than white women than that east Asian men are smarter than white men. East Asian men are not all that overrepresented among competent engineers relative to white men, whereas east Asian women are way overrepresented among competent engineers relative to white women.
However, white men are more naturally manly than east Asians, and in some important ways more prosocial, hence better able to engage in large scale cooperation, hence white men are the most successful race at large scale war by far.
It is great that white males are better warriors than east Asian males, regardless of whether east Asian males might be slightly smarter.
East Asian men should build a great Chinese civilization, or maybe several east Asian civilizations, White men should build a multitude of great white civilizations (since whites will never form one nation) and the rest of mankind needs to be conquered and subdued.
I am not unduly worried about whether Japan gets absorbed into the greater Chinese co-prosperity sphere or vice versa, but it is a really bad thing that America rules the white world, this being contrary to our nature. We really need at least one white civilization west of the Hajnal line, and at least one white civilization east of the Hajnal line. One white civilization is far too few. (Hurrah Putin.)

Jim, Jim's Blog 3 Comments [5/2/2017 3:46:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126814



Anonymous, Whisper 9 Comments [5/2/2017 3:18:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126805

Pretty much anywhere you have ethnic minorities you have claims of discrimination and racism, the ironic part is being a minority is much easier in a white country than any other country. Just look up how kurds are treated in Turkey or central americans in Mexico or Sub-saharan blacks in the middle east and north Africa. The west is the best place to be a minority yet it's where they bitch the most about "muh oppression"

Justbantz1, Reddit 10 Comments [5/1/2017 2:33:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 126804

In light of this study (and there are many other studies showing that to this date white and blacks in the United States have not created a community with a sense of "we", and that Canada still has a marginalized native population), should we categorized past whites in BC as "irrational" in their insistence that Asians were not capable of assimilation? Were they altogether wrong in fearing that, if the borders were not regulated, they would be "swamped" by Asian immigrants?

Past whites assessed and forewarned us about the dangers of Asian swamping. Current whites offer us delusional dreams about racial assimilation and togetherness on the supposition that whites are the only ethnic groups capable of racism. It does not occur to them that the racism of non-Whites may be far cruder since they lack any notion of civic citizenship and a universal "we". Roy's work is all about white racism, of course, but in a sentence about the "leading anti-Asian agitators" among different white ethnics, she slips the following: "the Aboriginals lacked the franchise but when they came into contact with Asians, mainly Japanese fisherman, their views were similar to those of their white counterparts."

Ricardo Duchesne, Eurocanadian  2 Comments [5/1/2017 2:33:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 126803

The official interpretation of the Canadian government on race relations between Whites and Chinese immigrants is summarily articulated in the Library and Archives of Canada, under the heading, ARCHIVED — The Early Chinese Canadians 1858-1947. The essential explanation this web page offers as to why Whites "were so hostile" to Chinese immigration is "anti-Chinese racism". The document does not ignore other factors, such as the fear that "the Chinese could work for lower wages and would take jobs away from white workers", but the message of the web page is that anti-Chinese agitation was centered "around the idea of 'white supremacy', captured best in the phrase 'White Canada Forever'".

This explanation is rarely challenged by anyone in Canada today. It is part of the mainstream curriculum, widely disseminated by all the media outlets. This explanation has provided the rationale for the apologies and financial compensations by the Federal government in 2006, and, most recently, the apology from the British Columbia Legislature in May 2014. It is also the explanation embraced by Chinese leaders in Canada in their still ongoing demands for "inclusive redress".

The discursive apparatus sustaining this explanation is powerful, well-documented, and seemingly beyond dispute precisely because it is the only scholarly developed explanation today, and it is the only developed explanation because it is an integral component of Canadian elite efforts to create a nation in which the historic White majority population is obligated to accept a multiracial nation where the role of Whites as the founders of Canada will be marginalized. Once you accept this commitment to a multiracial culture, which by necessity implies believing that a White society dedicated to diversity is morally superior to a White society that is not, this explanation is inevitable.

Oxytocin Promotes Ethnocentrism

The most comprehensive study of British Columbia's effort to stop Chinese immigration is Patricia Roy's three-volume series: A White Man's Province: British Columbia Politicians and Chinese and Japanese Immigrants, 1858-1914, The Oriental Question: Consolidating a White Man's Province: 1914-41 and The Triumph of Citizenship: The Japanese and Chinese in Canada, 1941-67. While this study offers great details on the economic factors that influence the attitudes of whites towards Asians, its central preoccupation is the "race" factor in the creation of this province, premised on the idea that race is a "socially constructed" category, which can be deconstructed by writing critical books about "white superiority" and "racism" as prejudices that can and should be transcended as we go about creating a Canada that is open to all races.

No racial group in human history other than Whites has ever been committed to racial diversity. The peoples of the earth have always exhibited ethnocentrism, preference for their own culture and a disposition to judge other cultures by the standards of their religion, customs, and ethnicity. Research has been coming out lately showing that ethnocentrism is a natural and practical evaluation of one's ethnic identity and interests consistent with evolutionary theory and cultural sophistication. This argument was well articulated in Psychological and Cognitive Sciences (January 2011) under the fitting title: Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. This study was based on a series of experiments in which participants were administered doses of oxytocin wherein the researchers learned that "a key mechanism facilitating in-group cooperation is ethnocentrism, the tendency to view one's group as centrally important and as superior to other groups" at the expense of an out-group.

I said "fitting title", because "oxytocin" is commonly known as a hormone associated with breastfeeding and love, but this article showed that it is also associated with in-group favoritism and ethnic tribalism, that is, with behavioral traits commonly associated in the West with intolerance and conflict. How can the same "cuddle chemical" be associated with ostensibly opposite behaviors such as in-group bias or "out-group derogation"? But this is no contradiction at all — despite the equivocations of the authors as liberals who can't digest ethnic identities — since preference for one's ethnic group requires affection and attachment to one's own people, being loyal, reliable, trustworthy, and cooperative within one's group.

But in the "imagined" future that our Canadians elites envision for Canada, a nation in which multiple races are projected to be able to get along without biases, ethnocentrism is seen as an "irrational fear" that only exists, and has existed, due to human ignorance, which can be remedied through proper education. This is the belief underpinning the official interpretation of race relations in Canada's history. But there is a major dilemma in this way of thinking and program, and it is that a particular people, "white Canadians" — to use the official wording — are the only ones under the burden of overcoming their ethnocentric biases.

In the study of race relations in this nation, racial egalitarians cannot but be preoccupied with the dominant White group in its relations to minority out-groups since Whites have always constituted the vast majority in Canada. We thus have a situation in which early generations of Whites living in an extremely harsh environment, where a livelihood was hardly guaranteed, being subjected to the moral judgment of White liberal elites committed to racial equality living in comfortable settings made possible by past generations. The overplayed drama of "racism" is driven by well-off Whites condemning the actions of poor past Whites in the name of an imagined future free of ethnocentric favoritism. The non-Whites are always seen as the victims since Whites are the majority and only majorities can impose institutionalized racism.

The archived article, The Early Chinese Canadians, manifests this dilemma and blindness in almost every paragraph. There is never an effort to examine ethnocentrism as a human attribute partaking in all cultures. The only group standing in the court of judgment are Whites. Among many similar expressions we have: "White British Columbians firmly believed that their way of life was better than all others." "They said that Chinese people carried diseases and other bad habits." "Anti-Chinese racism reflected a belief in the superior power of the British Empire." "In daily life, white Canadians felt free to show their dislike of Chinese people without any concern for the consequences."

Why were Whites so malicious? No reasons are offered. One is simply left with the impression that humans are not naturally ethnocentric, but would prefer a universal communion of all races if not for the racist Whites standing in the way. The preference Whites had for their own group is portrayed as a historical anomaly; a mistake to be overcome in the world once we get all Whites to accept diversity. White racial acts are based on irrational fears. Other groups consist of normal humans beings eager to assimilate into a diverse Canada free of racial divisions.

Chinese Cheap Labor versus the White Native Workers

But when one examines the sources critically regrading the relationship between European settlers and Asian immigrants in the late 19th to early 20th century, one can detect the inherent flaws of this official interpretation. We can start by showing that in the most developed explanation of racism against the Chinese, namely the work of Patricia Roy, there are a number of implicit observations pointing towards a different, more realistic and scientific interpretation, of the events.

Obviously I can only offer a glimpse of what would constitute a new way of looking at Canada's race relations from the perspective that we are all ethnocentric. For this purpose the "Introduction" to the second volume of Roy's book, The Oriental Question, is quite useful. Right away, in acknowledging the role of economic competition, she says that "fear" of Asians, of being "swamped" by an inflow of Asians, was connected to the fact that Asians were competing against whites for jobs "in the fishing grounds, in the fields, in the market place, in the classroom". Citing her own words from the first volume, A White Man's Province, Roy adds that this competition was serious enough to "warrant deep fears about the ability of white British to maintain their dominant position in the province."1 Now, of course, Roy, is trying to bring attention to the role of economic competition, but what is important is that she is implicitly admitting that white "fears" about the Asians as a race were not irrational since fear of out-groups is always connected to competition for resources, which is more accentuated when resources and opportunities are scarce. In other words, what Roy says could be fitted within an interpretation that fully recognizes the reality of in-group ethnic bias, rather than assuming, as she does, that ethnicity is merely a "socially constructed" identity based on "erroneous" assumptions about the existence of different racial groups.2

Roy observes that during the years between 1914 and 1941, with the passing of the exclusionary Chinese Immigration Act in 1923, the fear about Asian "swamping" declined, and whites were able to consolidate "their white man's province". Excluding Asians, and episodic reactions against Japanese residents, serve as a way for whites to acquire their own identity; that is, the formation of BC as a viable province with its own culture and people entailed use of the Asian "other" as "part of their [white] self-definitions".3 Again, there is very little to work on here, but if we don't accept her premises, we can ask: has there ever been any other identity in human history that was not formed by identifying an "other"? Can a community be created in which everyone belongs and no one is excluded? Roy, and everyone who writes about the making of Canada's provinces, takes it for granted that we can have a universal inside-ness freed from any taint of xenophobia and in group-favoritism.

Ricardo Duchesne, Eurocanadian  3 Comments [5/1/2017 2:33:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 2