Quote# 128272

3 THINGS I LEARNED FROM DATING A LATINA FOR ONE YEAR


In keeping with Kyle Trouble’s recent post, this article will look at three key observations I’ve gathered from dating a Latina for over a year. Prior to this relationship, I never seriously dated any Latin American women and only heard secondhand what this breed of dames were like—in and outside the bedroom.

With a year of experience under my belt, I really haven’t looked back to the emotionless, tired, bland and masculinized (feminist translation: strong, independent) pool of women that lurch limply around my city, Toronto, like zombified worker bees. After you go Latina, there is really no need to look back.

As Toronto is virtually ground zero for non-feminine women, I was very fortunate to meet and hook up with a real lady here—one who embraces her femininity, believes in God, and cherishes traditional family values (naturally, she wasn’t raised in Toronto, but El Salvador). While those three qualities of Latinas were discussed in this ROK article, there are some other things I’ve learned from dating a Latina that, like with Mr. Trouble, have modified my overall views of male-female relationships.

1. It’s okay to put her on a pedestal—if she’s earned it

Only if Sofia’s earned it…
Rightfully, red-pill men believe that putting a girl on a pedestal is a bad decision and will eventually lead to her taking advantage of this freebie chivalry. This is certainly true with Western women because, despite their feminist facade, deep-down they know they are not behaving in a way that deserves male courtly love. In a progressive society, all things being equality™, women see themselves as men after given the ability to game the system by manipulating their other half’s chivalrous impulses that have been warped and suppressed by our anti-male culture.

In turn, red-pill men have rejected the pedestal and regard it as a man’s willingness to be exploited by Western women. This essentially boils down to the idea if women don’t act like women, why should we treat them like women? But Latinas do act like women and actually view the pedestal as a very masculine gesture. It shows that you care—that you respect and appreciate their feminine gifts.

However, the pedestal is not to be hoisted up indiscriminately. Latinas are not perfect and can lapse into bad female habits (lateness, attention-seeking behaviour, jealousy traps, annoying shit tests), at which point you drop the pedestal immediately and hold frame. Latinas are very intuitive creatures and will detect your display of discipline and self-respect. Once she realizes your pedestal is conditional, this will only strengthen the relationship and ensure you both cherish each other according to your own masculine/feminine principles.

2. They reject feminism, value motherhood

Motherhood first is the Latina mantra.
Let’s put it this way: there have been times when I, a writer at Return of Kings, have to cool down my Latina girlfriend after she powers through an anti-feminist rant. She endorses my standing at ROK and I constantly catch her reading articles on the site and snickering in response by saying “this is sooooo true.” Regularly, she comes home from her job, slams down her bags, and bickers, “I honestly don’t know how men survive here.” (The answer: they don’t, they just leave).

After my Latina girlfriend took up her 9-5 corporate gig, she now comes home, crashes to the bed with exhaustion, and admits that this job makes her want to become a mother even more. She sees all the sour women around her, riddled with penis envy and bitchy attitudes, and fears the prospect of becoming “that”. She rues the degenerateness of a gender neutral-equal society where non-traditional lifestyles are celebrated over nuclear families.

Further, when I audited one of Jordan Peterson’s lectures, she insisted on attending with me. When we heard the University of Toronto professor explain in-person what women can do about receiving better pay, she went out and bought a book on how to become a better negotiator.

The rare thing about Latinas is they are sort of, almost a little… accountable. While wild in the sack, they are not promiscuous if held in check by a strong, protective man. They are truly independent, as they value themselves but also understand the role of a man in their life and admit that there are times when they want and need a man—her novio.

3. They have a healthy “daddy complex”

Latinas tend to have strong, alpha, masculine fathers — which informs their expectations of men.
It’s true that all women view men as a reflection of their father (or lack of one). A weak or absent father generally produces a woman with poor expectations of men. A strong or involved father generally produces a woman with high expectations of men. For the latter, she dates up the dominance hierarchy and expects her man to treat her with the same level of reverence and love given by papi.

In turn, you are expected to fulfill your role as the alpha male, be a provider, and make decisions on your and her behalf. You must lead unapologetically. Latinas love men who stand by what they say, even if that stance enrages them. With a Latina: YOU MUST ALWAYS HOLD FRAME. They can be firecrackers—real vixens—but that passion is just them testing their man’s boundaries—to see if he can take them and if he really cares about the relationship.

Since Latinas tend to hold their fathers in very high regard, they hold their men to that same standard. In turn, you will find you grow as a man because you constantly have to stay sharp, firm, and honorable if you want to keep her. In return, you will have her committed loyalty.

Dating a Latina is built on a productive exchange of your most masculine virtues in return for hers. It is a rewards-based arrangement that brings out the best in your manhood—because that is what the relationship demands of you for it to last. While there are always exceptions to the rule, there is a good reason why Latinas are in such high demand in Toronto for men. They are part of a dying breed of strong, genuinely feminine group of women.

Harry Lime, Return of Kings 7 Comments [6/19/2017 5:29:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128271

I saw an airshow awhile back where they had pictures of Amelia Earhart on the advertizements. It was advertized as a regular air show but near the end at the concession stands/awards they had a couple of feminist speakers suddenly appear who spoke of some drive to get more women into flying. They had the majority of podium time drolling out facts like "It's ashame that less than 10% of pilots are women" and how "we" all need to encourage all our girls to learn to fly. After the speeches, some fat matriarch looking white woman who couldn't stand up clapped the loudest with an almost angry clap, audibly breathing as she socked her hands together like the way you punch a catchers mit. She looked like someone's 40ish divorcee mother but a mad one. I had no idea the show was doubling as a feminist set up. The two parked prop planes in front of the lines being shown off had girl names painted on the sides. After the speeches my radar went up and I noticed hardly anyone chatting up the few hot girls there. Some were with their family/group but there were plenty of planes/props to open anyone with chat. It seemed like an awfully white knighty crowd, like standing around a sensitivity trained fire hall or co-ed campus police dept.

[...]

If you search 'famous childless women' she's right at the top. Every year on 'Amelia Earhart day' childless older women celebrate in solace. They too will all vanish into nothingness along with their seedlines.

I remember relatives who grew up in flyover conntry during the 40s-50s. The public elementary schools made Earhart out to be a goddess and at the same time, Hitler was demonized to no ends of the Earth. Hirohito wasn't so much demonized but Hitler was the Devil incarnate. This Hitler hate and Amelia love still is evident in a lot of the parents of midwestern boomers.

MCGOO, Return of Kings 10 Comments [6/19/2017 5:29:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128270

[Note: this is the "MAN UP YOUR DICKS and FIRE UP YOUR BALLS" guy from here.]

The hypergamy chart shows the current HB9-10 women not pairing.

Are the 9-10s lavishing themselves on Epstein's yaht or globtrotting with rich playboys? If they stay off their breeding years until it's too late, that results in an ongoing 'shaving' effect off the top tier of genestock. As per the chart, the HB10 men are diffusing their traits with 3s (unbelievably) all the way up through the 8.9-9.0 but not the top tier 9+.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 9+ females? Where did they go? Are they not breeding anymore!

Here's what will happen if the 9-10 women aren't bred. The overall top barscale will keep falling. Women worldwide will become raunchier, beastlier and less beautiful if WE DON'T BREED THE TIPPY TOP for nothing more than the sake of expediting her development of all palpable eggs. If the top women keep being capped and not bred, the bar will go lower and lower until short fat rough Samoan women with the characteristic oily ruddy complexions will be considered desirable. The top must be bred with impunity and divine purpose and I mean it - - (abuwalalalala) [speaking in tongues] - Hail the patriarchy!

So I searched 'hb10' to find a pic and see if any of the superfine women of the world were breeding at all. To my surprise, the top result in searching 'hb10' was 'House Bill 10, Georgia General Assembly' - assault weapons bill. ((we'd better keep an eye on that one))

So then instead I just googled 'most beautiful women'. Just what I wanted. It turned up mostly models. It seems unlikely they'll breed this year or next. At their peak of hotness:

Russian model Ekaterina Fetirina:



German actress Candice Swanepoel:



And this poor lass. It's doubtful she'll ever find the time to breed.



The opportunity passing her is so giant. I hear the eerie low pitched sound of wind blowing through the cables of the Golden Gate bridge when I look at her. It's a low vibe that registers in your balls is best I can describe. It's the sound of her telemeres wailing before they groan and become silent within the next 8-10 years.

This is why game is so important. Industrious prodigies and even regular Joes with IQs and matching egos could have gamed any one of these broads in their teen years before they sold their souls to their respective sterile industries. If you're red pill and desire to pass on your bloodline, then keep the game sharp and keep the radar out for the young budding 9-10s because they will ALL be snatched up quickly and very likely by forces and individuals that really do not have much concern for the future of the west. Bless the west. It's TURKEY SHOOT season on 9-10s. It is too bittersweet to see them modeling and being vacuumed up by jew pornographers. May western men domesticate them and keep them stuffed like breeding turkeys. Amen.

(babawinngaboooyaaah) [more tongues]

Hail!

MCGOO, Return of Kings 16 Comments [6/19/2017 5:29:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128260

[What would be your position on, for example, lesbian porn directed by a feminist woman or a team of feminist women? Are you simply opposed to how men treat women in porn? Or are you opposed to the concept of porn completely?]

“Feminist” pornography is an oxymoron. The word pornography refers to the graphic depiction of the lowest whores. Here at fucknopornblogs we don’t believe in the support of prostitution or calling women whores.

fucknopornblogs, Tumblr 7 Comments [6/19/2017 5:27:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128245

[Source NSFW]

Social justice warriors with dyed hair are invariably sluts. It’s hilarious. Think about how much time that could be spent fighting the patriarchy is wasted dying your hair for a man’s attention. Get them alone and they’ll drop to their knees like any other whore–I’m sorry, “sex-positive feminist.”

cantfightnature, Tumblr 9 Comments [6/19/2017 1:33:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128229

https://www.yahoo.com/style/high-school-student-makes-yearbook-quote-dress-code-162834794.html

I find it surprising that a self-described “AP student” has difficulty understanding the concept of a dress code. Dress codes are enforced to ensure that a person’s choice of dress – male or female – does not become a distraction to education.

Since she did not cite any specific incident that reflects the sexism she alleges, we are left to believe that this is her opinion and not based on any official justification of the dress code policy.

Ms. DiPaolo as states, “I’ve spent hours sitting in principal’s offices because 40-year-old men were offended by my back showing.” Again, she doesn’t cite any incident in which the principal stated that he was offended. Whether or not he is offended, he has the task of determining if she is in violation of the dress code.

She also states, “How much of my skin is exposed when it’s 90 degrees out is more important than me receiving an education at a school?” as her “classic response” to being told to go home. The fact that it is 90 degrees outside does not mean that you get to violate the dress code inside. When it rains, we use umbrellas. When it is snowing we wear boots and heavy coats that we take off when we come indoors.

I took the time to comment on this as it relates to another similar issue, reported by CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/09/us/topless-beach-confusion/index.html

A woman in Ocean City, MD is insisting that she has the right to sunbathe topless on a public beach. The City Council there unanimously passed an emergency ordinance stating that whatever right she may have to be topless in private, she does not have the right to do so publicly in Ocean City.

This is not an example of an individual’s rights being violated, but rather the rights of the majority taking precedence over the rights of an individual. There are beaches where nudity is allowed, and Ms. Covington is welcome to go to one. I’m sure that if a family with children walked onto a nude beach and insisted that everyone else put clothes, Ms. Covington would be outraged – and rightfully so.

Women, as I have previously written, are subjects of desire. Men and women are physiologically different, and female breasts are sexually arousing. No one is suggesting that women must wear a burka. There are places however, where it is inappropriate to dress (or not dress) in a manner that is revealing or suggestive. Do you really want see men walking around in Speedo Banana Hammocks? Sure, there are some you might enjoy, but by and large you don’t want to see it.

The overall thesis here is that your rights and the rights of all individuals are necessarily limited by the rights of those around you, and you have the responsibility to ensure that the free exercise of your rights does not infringe upon the rights of others. Where you prove yourself incapable of doing this, governments intervene.

deadboxprime, Tumblr 4 Comments [6/18/2017 3:25:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 128221

Salaam

Another comment piece on the damage feminism has done to western society. Lessons to be learned.

Why Men (and Women) Hate Feminism

A while ago I received an e-mail from one of my female readers. She was being honest and polite, but wanted to know precisely what I had against feminism. It was along the lines of "feminism is about the equal treatment of women, so what is so bad about that?" However, like many other women, I don't believe she was fully aware as to just how far the feminist movement has gone, co-opting women and how far from the truth it is. Thus, I believe it would be to everybody's benefit to explain in detail why most readers here in the Capposphere and elsewhere are against feminism (and to see if I'm missing any other reasons).

Reason #1 - Myopic View of the Sexes

If there is a "primary" reason I would have to say this is it. Feminism started demanding changes in regards to women, with no consideration as to what would happen to the other half of society, ie - men. They also did not think it through and consider children as well. It was a very female-centered approach and nobody considered (let alone, cared) how actions/changes/etc. in women would affect the rest of society. You still see this today based on the policies advocated by feminism in that it is all about women. A secondary concern is given to the children (more often than not, using children as a means to extract government resources), and maybe a tertiary concern is given to men.

Reason #2 - Lies About Human Nature

A close second is the ludicrous concept that men and women are not just equal, but the same. Women can do what men can do. There are no biological differences. And any difference is viewed as sexism or oppression.

The problem is these differences are what makes men and women great. Men like women. Women like men. Men don't like manly women, and women don't like girly men. We enjoy the difference. All feminism has done is ruined the love lives of millions of other women (and men's as well) lying to youth about "being a sensitive 90's man"or a "strong independent woman." That men are "shallow" and "cheap" for liking long legs and big boobs, and that any man who is worth his weight in salt will "like you for you." Women now ignore these basic biological facts about male sexuality, even mocking and scorning them, and fail to attract men.

These lies about the "exact sameness" of men and women also destroy a vital component of our economy and society - the division of labor. Though nobody is ordained or condemned to play these roles, traditionally the wife would stay home, while the husband would work. This allowed for not only better families, but better reared children. It also allowed for happier people (as men are predisposed to go out and work and women are predisposed to stay at home and rear a family). Neither role was inferior to the other. Both were vital, but it was feminism that lied to millions of younger women telling them the grass was greener on the other side. The result has been an increase in divorce, less stable family, less financially stable families, and problem children incapable of becoming functioning adults in society. This has also resulted in women being less happy.

Reason #3 - False Claims of Sexism

The thoroughly debunked "wage gap" is getting mighty tiresome. It is a false argument used only to gain "victim" status by feminists to result in legislation that unfairly benefits women. Affirmative action is nothing more than discrimination against men. Most men resent this

Reason #4 - Not Pulling Your Weight

The wage gap, however, does prove something. Women, for all their clamor of independence and "what you can do I can do better" are failing miserably and only achieving about 76% of what men do. This in spite of all the handicaps of affirmative action, a media that is always supportive, and limitless educational and government programs. Of course, the wage gap is not 100% "proof women aren't pulling their own weight." Many women still take on traditional roles and rear children, some drop out of the work force to take care of their families. But when it comes to majoring in rigorous studies, producing things of economic value, and being economically-contributing members of society, they disproportionately fail. They account for more government workers than men, they account for easier subjects in college than men, and they are nowhere to be seen in dangerous or risky jobs. Women on the whole are NOT equal when it comes to economic production.

Reason #5 - Poor Stewardship of the Right to Vote

This is more of an opinion, but I believe it is an opinion held by the majority of men (and surprisingly, women) who hate feminism (so you may not agree the the political opinion, but it IS a reason some people hate feminism). In short, feminists have been poor stewards of their right to vote. I say this because they have consistently as a group voted for more government and less freedom since given the right to vote. I believe this is because it is in women's nature to be more caring than men, and thus tend to vote for "nicer" things. Children, health care, education, etc. However, "feelings" and "caring" have no place in government finances. That requires passionless thought and consideration, research, mathematics, and an understanding of history and economics. It also requires an appreciation for the freedom granted to us by our forefathers and an understanding of the role government was intended to play. Feminists have proven ignorant about these topics and vote with their hearts, not their heads (and more recently, just for plain politics).

Reason #6 - Replacing Men With the State

Closely related to #5 is that feminists and feminism advocates essentially replacing the husband and father with the state. This is abundantly clear when you see how much money and support single mothers get not to mention this macabre desire by some feminists to eliminate men from the birthing process altogether. Not only does this take away the two most important things in a man's live (his theoretical would-be wife and children), but essentially forces men to compete against the government as a much-better financed suitor. Not only do men lose out on love and family, any children brought into this world via Daddy Government are missing a real father and will suffer incredibly later in life.

Reasons #7 - Hypocrisy

While most hard core feminists will claim they're "independent," they're anything but. They are usually the first to have some kind of make-work government job, some kind of professorship nobody asked for, or begging and pleading for donations to some kind of "activist group." They typically produce nothing of value and require the state to transfer other people's money to create jobs for them. They even point out, point blank, they want more government money for them and/or their children in government policy. And while, yes, there may be that one feminist computer engineer, the vast majority of them are hopelessly dependent.

Reason #8 - Backlash for the Ruination of Women/Men/Lives

In general and summarizing some of the above, most people haven't sat down to think things through to the point they can articulate why the are so frustrated or angry with the opposite sex, let alone what role feminism played in this angst. But both sexes are painfully aware of the lower quality men and women of today. Modern day western women are on the whole unmarriageable, and modern day western men are no where near capable of being a provider or protector. As they ponder these things, however, they will start to realize just what a bunch of BS and lies they were fed in their youth. Lies about the sexes, the roles people were supposed to play, how the sexes were to interact with one another, and what people "should and should not like." As people age, they will see the best thing in their lives (namely, members of the opposite sex) ruined and spoiled, and consequentially the quality of their own lives ruined as well. Men now have to settle for women they're not attracted to, women have to settle for men who are effeminate and clueless, all because a bunch of women in the 1970's were miserable with their lives and (as far as I can tell) merely wanted everybody else to be miserable like them. When people put two and two together, they will see it was feminism that warped and thus ruined this aspect of their lives and they will get angry.

Those are the 8 primary reasons I could come up with. I think there may be more, but at minimum I hope it debunks feminism as simply being the "equal treatment of women" and clears up some things on both sides of the aisle.

Junon, IslamicBoard 7 Comments [6/18/2017 3:02:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 128220

Does Islam need feminism?

Salaam

No, judging by the damage it has done in western societies.

The book The Garbage generation was released in 1990. Gives a good insight into he kind of society feminists want to create.

The Garbage generation

The feminist/sexual revolution is not a breakthrough but a throwback. Its program, highly successful thanks to the betrayal of the family by the legal system, is to undermine and destroy patriarchal social organisation, based on male kinship, and to restore matriliny, the female kinship system whose results can be seen in the ghettos, on Indian reservations, in the islands of the Caribbean, and in surviving Stone Age societies.

In primitive tribal society matriliny is well adapted to the peoples needs. In civilised society it is pathological – the source of most crime, delinquency, illegitimacy, educational failure, drug addiction, infantilism, gang violence, demoralisation and sexual confusion.

According to todays lawmakers and judges, society must provide props for the strongest link in the family, the mother infant tie. According to Daniel Amneus, society must instead provide props for the weakest link, the fathers role. Mom got along without patriarchal society and the legal system for two hundred million years, but Dad has got to have them and have them on his side or there will be no two parent family.

The solution: place the children of divorce in the custody of the fathers rather than the mothers. This was the 19th century practice and it made the Victorian family a stable institution. There were only 7000 divorces annually in the 1860s, when John Stuart Mill wrote, ‘They are by law his children’.

Todays judges are virtual accessories to child abuse when they place children in female headed households where they are far more likely to be mistreated, neglected, impoverished and delinquent.

Junon, IslamicBoard 6 Comments [6/17/2017 2:25:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 128215

Romance novels are fiction and are proven to break up marriages because they are fantasy. You are never going to get a man to act like a woman, with women's emotions like they have in them

Aribunny, Ministering Deliverance 6 Comments [6/17/2017 8:35:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 128200

I would say it would be fair and rational to have :

age of consent – 12
voting age – 18
combat role age – 21

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 13 Comments [6/16/2017 12:42:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: X

Quote# 128197

I’m 37, very sexually attractive (Not a lie!), good job, lots of hobbies and interests, excellent guitar player etc. and yet incapable of getting
women because I refuse to be a two-faced psychopath bully. I despise those entitled princesses, those soulless underdeveloped unphilosophical trivial
pathetic little personalities.
For compensation I go to sex clubs as well. Once I had sex with one that was acting exactly like an entitled princess, even though she was a prostitute,
and at first really didn’t want to have anything to do with me. And because of that I of course absolutely had to fuck her.
First she just tried to make me cum as soon as possible but I knew what she was trying to do and I have excellent self-control and demanded penetration.
Because I knew I was fucking an entitled princess I had a very good orgasm. Justice!

The Adversary, Anti-Feminist Theory of Men's Rights, Male Sexuality, Feminism 7 Comments [6/16/2017 12:42:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: X

Quote# 128196

‘Paedophilia’ used to mean (BEFORE feminists twisted it and fought for new (male persecutory) laws relating to it), having a sexual interest in PRE-PUBESCENT children – i.e. under 10 years old.

Alan Vaughn, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 5 Comments [6/16/2017 12:42:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: X

Quote# 128179

It is unfair that women have to be twice as weak as men and it is unfair that men have to have sex drives twice as strong as women that they can't ever satisfy for them, but it doesn't have to be this way.

To solve both these problems, just remove one testicle from each man. This will cause both his strength and sex drive to be cut in half and make him equal to a woman.

Make it a law that every man has to show up either willingly or by force with added punishment for not showing up willingly to have one of his testicles removed unless he is already missing one or both testicles.

Any problem can be solved if we put our minds to it, don't you forget it.

Please hand this up to Great Leader so he can sign it.

Peace! Make America great again!

RetroSpriteResources, http://retrospriteresources.deviantart.com/art/A-great-new-law-I-thought-up-to-balance-genders-686636308 7 Comments [6/16/2017 12:37:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 128157

anyway women are powerful and mystical and men are not. penises have no power. our wombs are connected to the moon and the ocean and mens penises are connected to nothing.

olanzapinegirl, Tumblr 10 Comments [6/16/2017 12:36:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128170

Women are retarded. They are literally stupid, irrational, inferior human beings. They're literal only value is that they can carry seed. That's not an exaggeration, it's not hyperbole, it's legitimately the only use a woman has.

Because sexual dynamics are at an all time low, and worsening by the day, it enables a woman to treat you like shit. Why? Because she replace you in 10 seconds flat whereas even above average men will struggle to replace a bitch. You are inherently disposable, therefore, why should she place value upon you? You're nothing to her. A bus she can watch pass by, because there's another one coming guaranteed.

Same can't be said for men. Even Brad fucking Pitt can't keep a woman happy. Why even bother?

DThrillard, MGTOW 12 Comments [6/16/2017 3:49:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: ScrappyB

Quote# 128145

Oh, and why is that? Could it be that gender relations between white men and white women have deteriorated so badly thanks to "White feminists" that White men are looking elsewhere?

Epik2017, Reddit 9 Comments [6/14/2017 8:54:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 128141

Feminism is the most Satanic stench you will ever smell.
God put the man in charge, and ordered the woman to be a mother and a keeper at home. That is her calling. The Devil wants it swapped. I'm not bying your satanic lies.

sjurdurkjv, Youtube 10 Comments [6/14/2017 8:53:55 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 128130

The most stable, happy, lasting marriages I've observed are ones where the wife shows Godly submission. Not a doormat, not walking on eggshells because she's afraid of upsetting her husband, not meek and quiet. A woman who has personality, strength, and wisdom--a helpmeet who treats her husband the way God intended. Putting her husband before her children, her job, her friends, or herself. Of course, in the marriages I've observed, this is a mutual thing where the husband respects, honors, and loves his wife, and their treatment of each other builds a beautiful relationship that becomes more precious as the years go by.


Elldee, Lies Young Women Believe 17 Comments [6/14/2017 2:00:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 128117

[Thread "White Women are clearly the most priveleged group to exist in the history of the human race." - OP by screwaroundaccount]

But they act like they're an oppressed minority. I have nothing to elaborate on this, just felt like saying it.

[Comments]

Well they are probably going to go from most priveleged to most raped in the not too distant future. If the pendulum goes to one extreme like we are seeing with western women at the moment than it will naturally overcompensate to the other extreme in order to find balance again... so women and girls got something coming.

They're getting their just desserts.

screwaroundaccount, hiper4 and MRALawyer, Reddit - r/MGTOW 4 Comments [6/14/2017 2:47:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 128105

Men CONSTANTLY infantilise and have done basically for as long as society has been around…these cretins are desperate to control us and so they love trying to act like we need a man to do (Insert thing here)
When the actual truth of the matter that these pathetic wastes of space are so afraid of is that we don’t need males for ANYTHING…other than for them to wank in a cup every now and again so the species can continue
And honestly we only really need gay and bisexual men for that…heterosexual males literally serve zero function of any importance or worth in human society. Modern day technology has rendered them utterly obsolete (THANKFULLY) and I imagine the knowledge of how worthless they are is part of the reason why their hatred for women seems to have grown even more intense in recent years…they can’t stand the fact that we don’t need them

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:, tumblr 14 Comments [6/13/2017 9:57:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 128099

Re: The psychological pain a manlet has to go though is worse than the psychological pain a rape victim goes though

yeh, it's fucking over if you're not six foot or taller
you are LITERALLY invisible towards women, and everyone gives you a smug look when walking past you because of your short stature
nobody will respect you and being confident will only make you look like a major fool
it's over man, it's NOT FUCKING FAAAAIR

(I'm 5'6" and have been sexually active since I was 15 and am in a wonderful relationship with the girl I love and who loves me back. Being shorts not that big of a deal.)

You're her supplemental income, there is no such thing as love for a 5'6 man, stop coping. She's banging a male model on the side

itsjustnotfairwhy & Looks-are-everything, r/Incels 14 Comments [6/13/2017 9:55:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 128097

I think most white people are like you were, blissfully ignorant of the dating struggles of minority males. A white Normie lives in a world in which anybody can get anybody, regardless of race. They don't realize that they are projecting their experiences onto others and can not picture a world in which their race would be detrimental to their dating mating pursuits. It's like a middle class American person saying "fuck those refugees ! Go fight for your damn country you cowardly fucks!" They cannot understand the horror of war and poverty because their lives have been fundamentally different from that of the refugees. A white Normie cannot get it. Race is an obstacle.
I also find it disgustingly ironic how normies will be so anti racist and anti bigot until sexual preferences get involved. "Equality" "anti bigotry" "fairness" all of those empty platitudes they spew get chucked clean out of the window once mating is the subject of interests. Then it's "biology" and "nature". I saw a post on one of those subreddits that likes fucking with incels once, they were talking about some post that brought racial preferences up, all of a sudden, all the "progressives" were talking about racial preferences being totally fine and natural, absolutely nothing wrong with them. Of course not acknowledging the fact that sexual preference is a form of bigotry. Anti racism, anti bigotry, egalitarianism, gender equality are all fucking memes. When push comes to shove, people are racist. Some white liberal Cunt will experiment with some minority when she's drunk off her Ass in college so she can tell her self she's "open-minded" and "bridging the racial divide" and post "another proud black man shot, fuck white people, fuck colonialism, the white man is a virus, it's (current year) racism needs to stop" then go to her 95% white frat party a few hours later and laugh at the Asian PUA "gaming" white women. She'll marry some slightly attractive white dude, Shit out some kids and coincidentally move into a 70%+ white area. When Shit hits the fan, people are sexist. Women will never be sent into a battle zone of a legitimate war, they will never be given any significant control over anything that could decide the fate of humanity, they will never have to actually be treated like the average man (a commodity, a piece of the machine).
It's right in all of our faces, people are racist, people are sexist, egalitarianism is a fucking lie. Normies just go "LALALAALLALALALALALALA, I can't see you, I can't hear you!" And this is why I can't stand these fuckers. Normies, the bubbles of privilege you have occupied your entire existence has given you the ability to act like the world is only as bad as those near your level of privilege, oh how much do I hope that bubble is one day popped.

Museum_Of_Strange, r/Incels 14 Comments [6/13/2017 1:50:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 128092

(juliath83): Women are basically children. They just want to eat the cake, not have a hand in baking it. That’s the adult’s job. So, place that analogy into the business world. The want to PLAY doctor, lawyer and CEO, not do the actual work. That’s the adult’s (men) job.


(Tea): Equality is a myth. That’s what. What I do support is the reduction of artificial barriers that undercut achievement potentials based on sex, race, etc. However, going out of the way to achieve outcome based equality is utter bull.
I still think that feminists’ collateral arguments for equality are moot unless they register for draft. Either sign up or STFU. That’s my stance. Simple and sweet.


Juliath83 and Tea, Notes from a Red Pill Girl 8 Comments [6/13/2017 1:20:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 128089

@theantifeminist
Did you actually READ any of this sad, pathetic and ugly old woman’s comments?

I only ask because I can’t be bothered – so no idea what it’s trying to say.

Alan Vaughn, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 5 Comments [6/13/2017 1:20:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: X

Quote# 128088

Muslims teach and genuinely believe that if you die for Islam you will get seventy two 13 year old girls for eternity (not to mention the daughters and wives of conquered enemies in this life). Christianity teaches that if you so much as fap once, you’ll spend eternity with a pitchfork up your arse. In the meantime, stay chained to your hag wife or else. You have to spend eternity with her in ‘heaven’ too.

If I was a testosterone fuelled angry young man I know which one I’d choose.

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 8 Comments [6/13/2017 1:19:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: X