Quote# 20260

Anyone who fails to believe in God, or who attempts to commune with him through false religion, is intrinsically opposed to God. Thus it would be accurate to say that all non-Christians are anti-God. People often wonder why God would send all non-Christians to hell. This is part of the answer.

Arunma, Christian Forums 51 Comments [2/4/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: UberLutheran

Quote# 20261

I think Athiests get a little bit of the cold shoulder. But can you honestly be surprised? I can't trust anyone that doesn't at least think that there is a posability there is some sort of higher power. Athiests are amoral and think they know better than everyone and think that there is nothing better than them and no one will hold them acountable for thier actions. But no one is fucking telling them what to do. They just get.. ignored. Boo-hoo.

_social_retard_, livejournal 45 Comments [2/4/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: ginasketch

Quote# 20202

I some young children's toys and books in Wal-Mart that looked pretty demonic:

-several books about dragonology (yes I know dragons could've been real animals or dinosaurs, but they also can represent Satan and demons, this is in the Bible)

-action figures of different types of dragons, and one was called the Cockatrice, It looked like a cross between a dragon/reptile and a bird, it was bright orange/red

Cokatrice is a demonic spirit that lays an egg of bitterness, and the person that it is laid in becomes bitter, infecting other people with bitterness-Kimberly Daniels, "Clean House, Strong House" (not a direct quote

It's so demonically sick the toys and books for CHILDREN that are made, and these were displayed right out in the open.

We need to pray that these people be stoppped in producing such sick toys, and especially that God would protect children from getting these.

aintzaJainkoari, Christian Forums 64 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Flumadiddle

Quote# 20203

my point is that if gravity brought asteroids and meteors together, the cells would be crushed by either the rock and/or the gravity.

but thats only hundreds of miles away. (between the core and the surface) its even stronger more towards the core of each planet. so, when the planets were first forming, the cells would be crushed under all that gravity, even when jupiter got started. we all know that the smaller the planet, the more gravity there is.

plus its hard to believe that cells have just landed on earth and started evolving w/o sever casulties from burning up in the atmosphere.

Agaro, Myspace 43 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 20209

(on why only men get the privilege of filing for divorce...)

This is going to get me hated by some... but here we go again... God gives women and men DIFFERENT rules to follow. The Bible is clear as a bell in this area. Much of this is in Genesis where it basically tells women 'obey your husbands.' It also tells husband to 'love your wife.' There are many other areas where the differences are clearly delineated between the sexes. We are judged based on what we do or fail to do. If your spouse fails Biblically it is no license for you to do likewise and vice versa.

desi, Christian Forums 35 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 20210

In 1986, [David Noebel] teamed up with Paul Cameron (see Family Research Institute) and then-Summit instructor Wayne Lutton, currently a leader in the white-supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens, to write Special Report: AIDS, which became one of the most controversial anti-gay tracts ever published.

Pat Buchanan's blurb on the back cover sums up the spirit of this Special Report: "In a healthy society," Buchanan writes, homosexuality is "contained, segregated, controlled and stigmatized."

Bolstered by Cameron's studies alleging that gay people were intentionally spreading the AIDS virus, Special Report proposes a number of means to "suppress" the outbreak, concluding that it might become necessary to "exile" all "active homosexuals" from America.

Summit continues to preach anti-gay propaganda to the next generation of fundamentalist activists, with Mike Haley, an "ex-gay" campaigner who is Focus on the Family's "youth and gender specialist" and author of a book called Straight Answers: Exposing the Myths and Facts about Homosexuality, currently on the faculty.

David Noebel and others, SPL Center 29 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 20212

Why are you so worried about you or your children having a social life outside of church? Ultimately all they need is one friend, and that is the Lord Jesus Christ. However, they can usually find a good friend or two at church. Why does a person have to have a ton of "friends" at school who most likely will not encourage him in the Lord or help him spiritually? I don't think we need to worry about socialization. When I was 5 and my parents began to homeschool me, my grandparents (who are unsaved) were so worried about it. Namely because I would not get the social experience that I "needed." I seem to be doing fine having never been to school, and I thank my parents so much for teaching me at home where the Bible was our main textbook. You don't get that at a public school and rarely at a Christian school.


saved4ever, Teens 4 Christ 57 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 20214

There are some parrots that have very high linguistic skills and perhaps they could collect in their brain and carry from one moment to another the teaching of the penal substitutionary atonement?

Dolphins? Whales? Chimpanzees? Dogs? I have seen some YouTube videos that make me genuinely concerned about the vicious nature of their behavior, and it is definitely worthwhile to find out how we can annoint them with the justifying blood of Christ shed on Calvary. I think inter-species evangelism will be the next frontier in the Christian missions movement.

Ceridwen, Christian Forums 73 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Jeremy PC

Quote# 20216

Proofs are great, and evidence is great.

absence of evidence for Atheism is also evidence of absence of Atheism. Keep that in mind.

Casey Powell, CARM 47 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 20217

I think the problem is you have to compensate for a silly concept such as a lack of belief.

But a belief is something, so you can't lack it.

Casey Powell, CARM 41 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 20218

Salty seas indicate that the Earth can't be any older than 62 million years old. That contradicts an Old Earth perspective.

Also, Saturns rings are properly dated back to 6000 years old. That would indicate the universe is much younger than presupposed by Evolutionists.

The list goes on and on really.

Losses of Genetic Information, destruction of DNA is a good case for people devolving, and not evolving, which means once again, advantage YECS. Being that YECS use the correct formulation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics (order to disorder)....once again, DNA is supporting a YECS viewpoint over Evolution.

As such, modern Science favors a Creation Science perspective on the matter.

Casey Powell, CARM 40 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 20219

The more I think about the "liberation of women" from their supposedly oppressed status under the heavy hands of men, the more astonished I am that such liberation would express itself in such determined willingness to murder helpless children, simply because of their stage of development.

The irony is breathtaking.

christdependent, CARM 36 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 20221

global warming drivel --- Their drivel is authoritarian not authoritative.

The Gov. workers that claim to be scientists are predicting year 2020 and 2050 and that way it can't be refuted. They use their computor models as generators of facts. All the stupid computors do is process assumptions dumped into the computor.

Weathermen can't go out over 7 days but these think they can 50 years.

Now the agenda.

The world hates industrialized America. If the tree hugger agenda can convince the UN, then they can pursue control of our free enterprise and prosperity.

The global warming agenda is perfect for secular progressive politicians.

As we see the globe warming as claimed, the Sahara desert will become a much more tropical rain forrest. Keep an eye on the Sahara.

coadie, CARM 39 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 20222

PARIS: France's Education Ministry has warned schools around the country against Islamic creationism theories after several thousand copies of an anti-Darwinist book from Turkey were mailed to them, an official said.

The lavishly illustrated Atlas of Creation by Harun Yahya, a shadowy figure who runs a large Islamic publishing operation from Istanbul, was sent to schools and universities over the past 10 days in a move that has baffled authorities, she said.

The Turkish original of the 768-page book, which rejects evolution, first appeared in Turkey late last year when it was also sent unsolicited to schools.

It sees Charles Darwin's theory of the "survival of the fittest" as the root of many of today's ills, including modern terrorism.

Islamic Creationists, stuff.co.nz 19 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Dave

Quote# 20223

1)Logic exist

2)Logic is absolute

3)Logic can't exist without a mind. (hence they are conceptual)

4) Logic transcends space and time.

Since logic is absolute, trascends space and time, and can't exist without a mind, therefore there must be an absolute, mind that exist and transcends space and time.

In Yeshua's name, CARM 47 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 20225

Why let the Feds have the money? We should privitize the system. Bring back indentured servitude. Have a national lottery. For a buck everyone gets a chance at a servant for 7 years. Or dole them out on the basis of need. Low income workers who need child care and the elderly who need caregivers get first preference.

Voegelin, Christian Forums 29 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Yogi

Quote# 20226

Youre preaching to the choir here, it is not we who violate these things, but YOU. When did I ever advocate the declaration of an official religion? Wait, that's right, I didnt. I do believe I condemned the one sided endorsement of atheism at the expense of all other belief systems.

"The Free Excersize Clause" is continually violated by leftists and evolutionists, who one sidedly preach evolutionism non-stop and continuously in the public media, and in the public schools, while never mentioning the alternatives except in ridicule. What if I resent you atheists for using my tax money to try to convert MY kids to YOUR religion? See the error that you people have, is that you somehow assume that atheism is a neutral position. Even if you could prove that atheism is not a religion, then at best it would be a position of anti-religion. Find in the constitution where the government is supposed to endorse atheism and/or pantheism and then we can talk.

“But I'm sure a big patriot such as yourself already knows these things.”—And yes, I do know these things kiddo.

The Treaty of Tripoli is irrelevant because it is not one of the founding documents. I have seen it before because another one of your people tried that on me about a year ago. Anyways whatever point you were trying to make is moot, I suggest you review the Declaration of Independence, which outlines the reasons for the initial dissent, as well as the principles on which the independence movement was based. There’s no grounds for it in atheism, and atheism is un-American, and has nothing more to do with Americanism or freedom than Islam has to do with Persia.

jmsnooks, DeviantArt 29 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Sayna

Quote# 20227

It only becomes "blasphemy" when you decide to turn a charlatan and a con man with a temper, prone to cursing and fits of pique, documented as a thief, into a "perfect" "god". There is no blasphemy, and obscenity is in the eye of the beholder - ergo YOU ARE REPRESSED!

He was an idiot. He thought he was special. He thought there was a global flood. He thought stars were stuck in the firmament. He cursed thousands of people to eternal hellfire because they didn't want to listen to his crap. He farted. He shat. He screwed guys - Mark was later edited to remove this. The church also systematically befouled Mary Magdelene and erased his relationship with her. He was a man. He lied. He cried. He admitted he came to start wars and cause division. He lied to the Pharisees. He thought epilepsy was caused my demons. He was arrogant. He was racist. He was a mysogynist. He condoned slavery. He was a complete hypocrite. He wanted to keep the Levitican Laws. He could only recite 6 of the 10 commandments and they were the revised set that matched Babylonian standards. He was a host to trillions of bacteria all over his skin, in his gut and mouth.

What part of this is your repressed pea brain having trouble with boy?

Julian, FSTDT 52 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pesto

Quote# 20228

None of the beliefs of atheists can be verified anywhere in history. Nowhere. So why do they have beliefs that can't be verified? Where is their evidence that Jesus isn't the Son of God? The answer is that they don't have any. None. zero. Zip. So how do they think they have a case? They don't because the facts are on our side, not theirs.

Yet they are the first ones to clamor for evidence from others. There is no book, no document, no witnesses, nothing that says that anything else happened in Jerusalem during the time of Christ than what the bible claims. Nothing. All they need is even one person who lived in Jerusalem during the time of Christ who says that Jesus never performed any miracles and that would be evidence. But they don't even have that.

So until atheists understand that it's futile to try to change history, they're fighting a losing battle. And for what? Just to risk eternal torment. They only prove Jesus right when he said; "They hated me for no reason." There's no reason to try to change history when you have no proof that it happened any differently unless one simply wants to defame someone else. Absolutely none.

Carico, CARM 54 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 20229

[In a thread about a woman who was sexually assaulted at a chuch in Las Vegas, misogynistic dickhead extraordinaire Coulter decides to continue an argument from another thread]

OK, smartass. I suggest you review the tax laws and see just how much obligation you have to pay taxes on your wages and you, YOU, frothed that suitable punishment for not paying taxes on income/a presumed legal debt or obligation, is that I be thrown in jail and raped.

This woman in Florida was raped. Just horrible. I made the comment that her dosage of instant abortion was denied, and that the article made THAT POINT out to be the overwhelming atrocity.

If you read the article, she was arrested for not paying A LEGAL DEBT OR OBLIGATION. A crime YOU state is worthy of rape as punishment. So, instead of being arrested AND THEN raped, she was raped AND THEN arrested. According to you, she received her just punishment.

NOW you want to get all teary eyed and ASSUME I was making fun of her plight.(and hope we never 'remembered' your compassionate recommendation for punishment if one refuses to pay their legal debts)

And then criticize me, ME!, for being cold and heartless. That is laughable. All the while your spirit filled parrot cackles in agreeance, "*CHIIIIRP! Yep, that's right, Yep, that's right. Good point.*CHIIIRP*!"

Mr. Coulter, God or Science 26 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 20230

At any rate, in real life Evolutionism has nothing to do with genetics. It's a belief system which essentially deifies nature by attributing to it creative properties. It is nothing but a rehashing of classical pantheism but gouged in modern terms. The only difference between Evolutionism and most classical pantheistic belief systems is that evolutionism glorifies death far FAR more, but just like its ancient predecessors, it is completely unsupported by empirical studies.


jmsnooks, DeviantArt 32 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Sayna

Quote# 20231

The way I see it is evolutionism is just another religion. I would say that a lot of the fossil graveyards we find are deposited by the flood. As far as God goes, I dont believe that earth or the universe we see is his only creation. He creates because its in his nature to create, just like me. I draw because its in my nature to draw. I sit back when I finish a drawing and say "it is good," sometimes, but then after a rest period I make something else. And of course it's in his nature to create, otherwise he wouldnt have done it in the first place.

jmsnooks, DeviantArt 25 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Sayna

Quote# 20233

After all, who can expect a creature to be more noble and altruistic than the process which created it. And if that process is the wholesale slaughter of the weak and imperfect than why should the pinnacle of that butchery be any less than a master butcher. By taking Darwinism to it's logical social extension you make genocide "the lord's work".

mindflenzing, DeviantArt 22 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Sayna

Quote# 20234

Anyway, Bob wants to be my friend. The only problem is that Bob is overweight. While it might not be within my right to judge anyone, I've always seen being overweight as a form of sinful nature. Seeing overweight people (gluttons) in church tends to bother me. It bothers me like those people who smoke or drink, even get tattoos or piercings. In fact, the Bible associates gluttons with drunkards - "And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard" (Deut 21:20). What they do is mostly bad for them. There's no way it pleases God to treat our bodies that way. He made us in His perfect image. We weren't made gluttons.

Romans15, Teens-4-Christ 66 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 20235

I do believe it is wrong for a woman to work outside the home for a couple of reasons.

-It causes the wife to not rely on the husband like she should. She is making her own money and she also is more likely to take control of the finances or spend money without her husband's blessings. I have seen this first-hand.

-God also describes the virtous woman as a keeper at home. God outlines a woman's responsibilities and none of them include jobs outside the home. She works yes, but within the home and under the leadership of her own husband. A woman who works outside the home is not only under her husband's authority but also under the authority of the person that she works for. The husband is the "head of the wife."

kevinmiller, Teens-4-Christ 41 Comments [2/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3