Quote# 92931

10 Reasons To Oppose Gayness:

1. Gayness was considered a mental illness up until recently when gays infiltrated the APA and had the definition changed.
2. Disease is spread rapidly in the gay lifestyle, studies show that most gays have STD's, and many have AIDS
3. Poor innocent children are intentionally recruited into this sick lifestyle by those who call gays heroic and brave
4. A high percentage of gays are pedos (not all). They skew the statistics by designating MEN who molest BOYS as straight.
5. Throughout history, when gays have been accepted in society, the society collapsed shortly thereafter
6. Gays make it their purpose to infiltrate organizations with young boys, such as the Boy Scouts, and Christian institutions such as marriage and the church
7. The thousands of former gays who have turned away from the lifestyle, say that it is a miserable, depressing lifestyle
8. Gayism is just an attempt by the left to destroy the family, and to turn America into an "ANYTHING" goes culture
9. Gayness is the first step in the slippery slope to other sick perversions being accepted, such as bestial marriages
10. The Bible specifically condemns gayness as being an abomination.

Melanie, Yahoo! 55 Comments [3/2/2013 9:43:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 62

Quote# 92928

No thought or very little thought is amusing behavior, especially to those of us who know the truth and their game plans. The Wooley Mammoths were wiped out by post flood dust storms that trapped and suffocated them, which is far more interesting than the pathetic lies they tell to one another and try to get everyone to believe is what took place.

jamesalbright, WND 30 Comments [3/2/2013 9:41:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 42

Quote# 92926

This year will bring a fifth “Assessment Report.” As an expert reviewer I shall try to halt further fraud. It will not be easy. The weevils are at it again. This year’s new predictions, backcast eight years to 2005, bizarrely overstate already measured warming and project the exaggerations to 2050, forecasting unrealistically rapid warming.

A senior Australian police officer specializing in organized-crime frauds tells me the pattern of fraud on the part of a handful of climate scientists may yet lead to prosecutions.

When the cell door slams on the first bad scientist, the rest will scuttle for cover. Only then will the climate scare – mankind’s strangest and costliest intellectual aberration – be truly over.



Lord Monckton, WND 39 Comments [3/2/2013 4:17:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 51

Quote# 92924

But you are not “gay.”

Yes, you may be physically attracted to people of the same sex, but how you act on those attractions is entirely your choice. Who you are—your identity—is not defined by your sexual feelings, temptations or behaviors. The difference between who you are and what you feel or do is as the difference between night and day.



Matt Barber, charismanews 35 Comments [3/2/2013 4:16:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 33
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 92918

Asked if any good came from feminism, Bachmann said that realizing that “women are valuable and that women should be listened to is very important.” However, she continued, “But in my opinion, that wasn’t feminism, that was Jesus Christ who did that. Because Jesus Christ did more to lift up women … We didn’t need the 1960s to tell us that, all you have to do is read Proverbs 31.”

Michele Bachmann, Salon 59 Comments [3/1/2013 4:04:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 70
Submitted By: Zagen30

Quote# 92905

What most people call ghosts are actually demons masquerading as someone who has died. It's a cruel deception that often falls on people who are deep in grief and mourning.

It is interesting to note that most "hauntings" happen in catholic homes or involve someone of the catholic persuasion.

NoProvision, RR 41 Comments [3/1/2013 3:57:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 42

Quote# 92903

The above atheist is obviously quite ignorant about the difference between vicious circularity and simply being consistent. Both are circular reasoning. However as Van Til pointed out, only the Theist's worldview (in the classical sense which would include Divine Revelation) a) does not self-destruct (internally inconsistent with itself), b) is not destructive of epistemology (it destroys the possibility of knowledge), or c) is not arbitrary (based on the universalizing of a particular experience or speculative metaphysics).

Atheism usually fails (a) when it is in the non-nihilist form since universal and immutable ethical laws are only possible with a omnipresent, omnipotent, and immutable Being who can reward or punish all men according to their deeds. (Indeed, all non-Theistic worldviews fail this test.)

Atheism fails (b) since it places the origin of man's cognitive faculties in an impersonal, non-teleological, stochastic process of neo-Darwinian evolution which means that man's faculties are survival oriented and not necessarily truth oriented. In fact, the degree to which they are truth oriented is probably zero or inscrutable at best. This would undermine or destroy the possibility of warranted true belief. (Indeed, all non-Theistic worldviews fail this test since they place the origin of mind in a non-teleological, impersonal universe.)

Atheism fails (c) since one cannot logically derive a universal from a particular experience, and one has no epistemic warrant for believing in a universal based on philosophical speculation. In order to have epistemic warrant to believe in a certain universal, one must possess complete knowledge of the universe and how all particulars of the universe relate to each other. For this to be the case, one must be omniscient OR have this universal revealed to him by an omniscient Being. This necessitates propositional Divine Revelation. (Of course, all non-Theistic worldviews fail this test since they lack propositional Divine Revelation.)

Thus, the greatest proof that God exists is that without Him, everything would be absurd.

Saint and sinner, Amazon 57 Comments [3/1/2013 3:57:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 64
Submitted By: tony

Quote# 92902

["Well, duh, but that doesn't tell us anything about whether or not marriage should only be allowed for a male/female couple."]

Do you believe that the definition of gravity should be changed, too? Some people might think the current definition of gravity is unfair.

livingwordunity, Catholic Answers 45 Comments [3/1/2013 3:51:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 66

Quote# 92900

The maximalists, on the other hand, believe the Biblical accounts have solid historical and archaeological backing. Long a minority among archaeologists, their numbers are growing, since it seems that every year discoveries are found that support, rather than refute, the Biblical narrative.

Archaeologist Bryant Wood is an example of a Biblical maximalist who is slowly turning the tide in favor of the Biblical evidence. He argues that the archaeological data for the Exodus fall into place if the event is dated back to 1450 BC, the approximate date the Bible indicates for the Exodus. He mentions that the documented evidence of foreign slaves at that time in Egypt could well include the Israelites. He also adds that archaeological indications of the destruction of Canaanite cities some 40 years afterward support the account of Joshua’s conquests.

But Dr. Wood goes against the current. Although he sits in the forefront of archaeological digs and is excavating what he believes is the Biblical city of Ai, he notes that he can’t get his research published in serious archaeological journals because of an ingrained anti-Bible bias.

The tide of scholarly opinion on the Bible has shifted several times in the past centuries. During the later part of the 19th century there was much skepticism of the Bible, but in the 20th century, thanks to astonishing archaeological discoveries supporting the Scriptures, the tide turned somewhat in its favor.

Byrant wood, Associates for Biblical Research 38 Comments [3/1/2013 3:51:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 41