Quote# 95441

A Texas megachurch pastor is asking his congregation to help pay for upgrades to his helicopter blades after being advised by his “Aviation Department” that the upgrade would save the church $50,000.

Bishop I.V. Hilliard sent a newsletter to members of the New Light Christian Center in Houston asking his “Friends in Jesus” to help pay for the upgrade with $52 “favor seeds.” Hillard told the congregation that they would receive “breakthrough favor” within 52 days or 52 weeks.


“My Aviation manager stated that while repairing our helicopter they discovered that if we upgrade our blades today, it will save thousands in the days to come,” Hilliard wrote. “As I pondered and looked at the situation, I heard that still small voice of the Holy Spirit say tell your special partners who have special transportation needs and their obedience will release favor for their needs and desires.”


I V Hilliard, Holes in the foam 64 Comments [7/11/2013 3:31:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 51
Submitted By: Frostythesnowman

Quote# 95439

Limp-Wristed Cat Lovers, Beautiful Dog Lovers

Most everyone is either a cat person or a dog person.

You don’t have to hate one to like the other, but most people do.

I love dogs.

I hate cats.

That is the natural order for men.

Dogs are loyal, obedient, and affectionate.

Masculine men love these qualities in our companions, and they are qualities we want in our women as well.

Cats are selfish, independent, and alpha.

Masculine men hate these qualities in our companions. This is because masculine men are the owners, not the owned.

95% of men who love cats are either gay or have sub fantasies*. If you like cats, you like not being in control.

I stated this theory on twitter and I was very satisfied with it.

Rivelino then expanded on the theory, stating that more feminine women must like cats the most then.

This was a very logical extrapolation of my theory, but it didn’t match up to my experience at all.

The most feminine girls I’ve known have been dog lovers across the board, most have expressed a sincere dislike of cats.

Likewise, it is the masculine, ugly, old, short-haired, barren feminists who end up being cat ladies.

Shit, was my theory wrong, then?

I really don’t think so.

The reason is feminine girls love dogs for very different reasons than men do. While men love the loyalty and obedience, girls are much more likely to coo over a dogs unconditional love, furry cuddles, and “look how cute he looks when he does that thing with his paw” type stuff.

Feminine girls love their dogs but they don’t enjoy training them, letting them run in an open field and feeling pride when the dog comes right back when called, punishing them when necessary, etc.

Put another way: Psychologically, feminine girls don’t OWN their dogs, they see them as equals to be loved.

Most of the feminine dog lovers I know already have strong male dominance types in their life, be it a strong father, boyfriend, or husband, and they just like the dog as another source of love.

Ugly masculine girls, on the other hand, cannot find a male to dominate them in their social life because they lack the beauty. Since being dominated by a strong independent entity who doesn’t need her is so important to a woman, she must seek out that domination. Ugly girls find this in either a career, feminism, cats, or some combination of the three.

So in THEORY, beautiful feminine girls should like cats more, but cats are superfluous when you have a man to obey.

*There are a small percentage of straight alpha seducers that like to own cats. The reason is they love dominating an already dominant living thing. They like to stare down and dominate their cats just because they can.


laidnyc, LAIDNYC 117 Comments [7/11/2013 3:31:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 87
Submitted By: aebars

Quote# 95435

Atheists: if humans and dinosaurs didn't co-exist, then who buried the dino fossils?

Deluded scientists say that dinosaurs came millions of years before humans did. But the Bible, a book of absolute and irrefutable facts and knowledge, says that humans and animals were created almost at the same time frame! Want proof? Who do you think buried the bones of those dinosaurs deep under the ground? Bones just don't bury themselves, duh. Someone had to bury them, and that was us humans! Checkmate! Superior Christian intellect trumps delusional atheist beliefs once again!

Wait, I might be wrong actually. God himself could have possibly buried the fossils himself to test our faith. But either way, your stupid scientific myth is still wrong! You can't deny truth in the face of our factual Biblical evidence! Ha!

This Is The Painkiller, Yahoo Answers 59 Comments [7/11/2013 3:29:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 39
Submitted By: K. Plesner

Quote# 95434

Satan is running rampant and decieving many on this earth. Not all things are God's will. I will state that everything that has breadth is a creation of God and God loves all people, but maybe there is a reason ethnic groups are to be separated and not intertwined (I am not an expert on this), but I will reach for God's word. In Gen 11, the people all spoke the same language and rebelled against God, they rose and thought they could build a tower that would reach to heaven and essentially be Gods. God saw this and thwarted it by confusing the language all people spoke and scattered them each with his own across the face of the earth.

The muslims think that allah is God. They think he/it (the moon God) is the supreme creator/ruler, allah and God are not the same... In Noah's day (after the flood) when Gen 11 took place I will emphasize that God scattered the people. So why is it that today, we feel the need to undo what God did, to bring all the people back together again, to coexist our religious beliefs etc... I ask, is this of God?? Will God once again scatter the people? The only way I can see the muslims imposing "sharia" law on the public as the will of our God would be to further the cause of the end-times. I have often asked myself why did God scatter the people in Noahs day? Was it because of the rebellious attitude that would ensue if peoples were brought together or forced to live together and at odds, was it because of the power they would feel to disregard all things of God? I do not see any good coming from intertwining the muslims with the Christians... I see this as the work of Satan...

As in the days of Noah... Look up our redemption draweth nigh...

In Christ, Rapture Ready 36 Comments [7/11/2013 3:29:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 95433

Mr. O[bama] and his satanic minions are going to have much to answer for when they stand before the Almighty God and He metes out true justice on them. I just keep telling myself this is all only temporary and these corrupt thugs will not get away with their evil deeds forever, there is coming a day of reckoning at the White Throne of Judgment for them if they don't get saved. Sadly, I can't see many, if any, of them coming to faith in Jesus Christ because they've so willfully blinded and deluded themselves into thinking and acting like they are god, are above any and all laws, and don't answer to anyone but themselves. It is my personal hope that before these evil people are taken off to eternity in hell that they have to face every single child that was murdered via abortion and they are tormented by seeing those precious faces in their minds forever, knowing they had the power to stop these murders, but they not only chose not to do it, but passed laws for even later term abortions murders.

TimeWarpWife, Rapture Ready 27 Comments [7/11/2013 3:29:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 95432

“Life in America changed today to life in Mystery Babylon,” Wiles lamented, arguing that the DOMA ruling is part of a larger “war on the laws of God and the Christian heritage of the United States of America” that is leading America into a “moral sinkhole.”

[....]

"Why do I have this gnawing feeling in my gut that the real reason to militarize the border is not to keep the Mexicans out but to keep the Americans in? It is looking increasingly obvious that the national security apparatus is systematically locking down the country. At some point Americans desiring to flee the growing tyranny in the USA will not be allowed to leave, and we’ll have to float on rafts to Cuba to get away from El Presidente Obama’s Communist revolution."

Rick Wiles, Right Wing Watch 33 Comments [7/11/2013 3:28:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 28
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 95431

You might be wondering what gay marriage and secession have to do with one another. American society has changed to a society where there is no longer a sense of right and wrong. The Supreme Court ruled that gay people can now marry and have the same rights as Biblically ordained marriages between a man and a woman. It will only get worse from here. Next, Christians will be warned that spoken words based on the bible toward homosexuals will not be tolerated.

My opinion is that this day, June 26, 2013, is the beginning of the end for the United States of America. Christians, conservatives, and liberals to a small degree, who believe in the Judeo-Christian values of our forefathers will find them boxed in by the government police and men and women in society who will elect to stay quiet instead of facing pressure from society. We will no longer have a place to hide.

From my perspective, for us to follow the laws handed down by God, we have only one option and that is to secede from the union. Let's correct that, we as Americans under the sovereignty of God, need to first lift up prayers to our Lord in heaven for direction.

The big question is, what state or states would secede from the union? My belief is if just one state would secede others would shortly follow because things will only get worse. If a new nation is formed under the Laws given down by God and the values passed down by our forefathers, this new nation will be blessed. The new nation can take the constitution as handed down by our forefathers since America is in the process of abandoning it.

I may be ahead of my time on calling for secession, but unless things change it will become evident over time.

Paul Craft, Renew America 49 Comments [7/11/2013 3:28:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 36

Quote# 95430

After making a bizarre argument about the incompatibility of marriage equality and evolution, Gohmert claimed that Obama is merely a “proclaimed Christian” and contended that the president has “gone to war with Christianity.”

“The gloves have come off, there really is a war by this administration against not just the Catholic Church but the Christian Church,” he said. Gohmert charged that under Obama “you can’t practice what you believe about birth control, about abortion, this administration will tell you what religious practices you can participate in and what you can’t.”

He also suggested the government may begin collecting personal information such as medical and phone records and emails of Christians to use against them[.]

Rep. Louie Gohmert, Right Wing Watch 34 Comments [7/11/2013 3:28:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 95424

When you have a state where the House leadership is performing a homosexual act on the front page of the Denver Post two months ago? Does God read the Denver Post? Do you think He picks up a copy of the Denver Post? He gets it. God gets the Denver Post. How are we going to repent of the sexual sin that is paraded in front of us in the wider culture? Why do we have to submit to theses sexual sins again and again? How many young boys are running out and doing the metrosexual thing with the skinny pants and the little fairy shoes? They’re working on the gender blender for themselves and they don’t want to look like a man and God is just so upset, He hates it when men are not manly in their approach.

Pastor Kevin Swanson, Joe. My. God. 26 Comments [7/11/2013 3:26:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: Aspergus

Quote# 95423

Conscience is actually two words. “Con” which means “with”and “science” which means “knowledge”. So, this one word means “with knowledge” and it denotes an entire study of many scientists and other people.

Most people who deny God also want to deny the existence of a conscience because it doesn’t make much sense if we all evolved. How did we get a section of ourselves that can determine between good and bad if we are senseless primordial soup-remakes?

That is the very purpose of the conscience: to alert of us of what is bad and good. If you don’t have a good conscience running then there is something wrong that must be explored.

Jacob Howard, Already Answered 47 Comments [7/10/2013 3:33:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 38
Submitted By: the_ignored

Quote# 95421

Today I would like to expose buddhism.

buddhism pretends to be a moral ideology but it is not. It is evil due to its worshipping of idols and hence becomes an enemy of YHVH . Although this is the reason I as one of YHVH 's servants oppose buddhism, buddhism also has very severe evolutionary problems.

The reason that buddhism is a Satanic tool to destroy any sense of morality is its complete ban of marriage and sexual activities. In a buddhist society buddhism is indoctrinated to the population through schools. Everyone gets indoctrinated with buddhism. Not everyone is the same, so different people responds to buddhist indoctrination differently. People adopt the buddhist anti-sexual anti-marriage moral system, but not everyone practises it in real life. Actually if everyone does so buddhist countries such as Thailand will not even exist. There is another requirement in buddhism, namely to refrain from meat. Of course people in even the most buddhist countries do consume meat. Actually most buddhists are in name only. Few buddhists take their buddhism seriously which is actually a good thing, since otherwise many parts of Asia will be voluntarily depopulated. But there are people who take buddhism seriously. Who? Moral people. They actually take buddhist morality seriously and become buddhist monks and nuns, who do not participate in the society any more and do not reproduce.

The result?

In buddhist societies moral people are systematically removed from the society. Only people who are immoral enough to marry despite marriage be outlawed in buddhism have children. That's why buddhist countries have nearly the worst moral records in the world, even worse than athe-ist states.


Habakkuk, Love-Shy 48 Comments [7/10/2013 3:32:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 56
Submitted By: Zim!

Quote# 95419

The multiple earths are shown in God's Holy Word. The first heaven was made the second Day. Gen. 1:6-8 Other HeavenS were made at the beginning of the third Day. Gen. 2:4 This agrees with the New Testament and explains where Paul was taken, when he went to the THIRD Heaven. ll Corinthians 12:2

Within each of these 3 Heavens or Boundaries of the 3 Universes are many Earths. Adam lived on the first Earth, the Flat Earth, The Earth where there was NO rain until the Flood came. We live Today, in the second heaven or Cosmos, consisting of Billions upon Billions of Earths. When this Universe is burned, Christians will be taken to the 3rd Heaven, and be saved from the total destruction of our Universe.

Aman777, ChristianForums 42 Comments [7/10/2013 3:31:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 95417

[Insisting that Astrology is not pseudoscience]

You are repeatedly ignoring my questions and missing my points. It is factually self-evident to anyone with half a working brain cell that astrology is a protoscience and, as such, does not require any further evidence.

Mauricelavenant, Wikipedia 38 Comments [7/10/2013 3:31:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 35
Submitted By: afs189

Quote# 95416

Amend or go home

Remember when all the progressives and moderates were saying that a Defense of Marriage Amendment was unnecessary because Congress passed a law? Yeah, well, they lied:

A divided U.S. Supreme Court overturned the federal law that defines marriage as a heterosexual union, saying it violates the rights of married gay couples by denying them government benefits.

Between legalizing abortion and the government dismantling of marriage, the USA has now officially entered Sodom and Gomorrah territory. I wouldn't put too much confidence in that "God bless America" notion. The best-case scenario is that He's not paying attention. Following American politics these days feels like watching Gibbon on fast-forward; an imperial decline and fall measured in years rather than centuries.

I find it remarkable that Republicans still bother passing this sort of law when it has been clear since at least 1973 that the Supreme Court will simply overturn anything that is effectively conservative. Amend or don't bother.

UPDATE: And they effectively overturned Proposition 8 in California by refusing to hear it. Taken together, these two "rulings" make it official: American democracy is entirely dead.

The court avoided a ruling on the merits in a second gay-marriage case involving California's Proposition 8 ban on gay marriage, saying that both the Supreme Court and a federal appeals court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. That means a federal district court's ruling striking down Proposition 8 stands, which could clear the way for same-sex marriage to resume in California.

Notice how the Supreme Court will jump in and wave the Constitution whenever it wants to override something, but turn around and claim it has no jurisdiction whenever it wants to leave a lower court decision intact. Pass a law, pass a referendum, it doesn't matter. The black robes now rule.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 40 Comments [7/10/2013 3:30:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 35
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 95411

The government is about to grow exponentially. Unnatural “marriage” requires very expensive contortions.

Natural marriage actually limits government spending and control.

fwdude, Free Republic 41 Comments [7/9/2013 3:55:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 59

Quote# 95409

[Can homosexual marriages be stopped in California?]

Doubtful. California will be judged for this, going against the will and prayers of the people. It would be a good idea for true believers in California to go on vacation far away from the state so they can be ..out of the way..for God to do what He must. Get the @$#%^ out of Dodge!

the fox, Y!A 40 Comments [7/9/2013 3:02:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 95406

Its very easy to explain to an unbeliever theres a G-d. Sit down with them, give them as much paper as they want, and a calculator. List every item in the universe (the obvious ones) and then have them guess what are the odd's of that happening. When you're done calculating the odd's its so close to zero that we could exist the difference is the same as infinity squared and infinity cubed when compared to each other.

Trailltrader, christianforums 67 Comments [7/9/2013 3:02:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 95392

The way many women dress today, with half their breasts exposed, is an expression of total disrespect for men. Men are left with three possible responses. To grab the woman, which is illegal; to ogle the woman, which is socially unacceptable; or to affect not to notice the woman at all, which is emasculating. A culture that normalizes such female behavior—i.e. not only not noticing or objecting to it, but prohibiting any objection to it—is extremely sick.

Lawrence Auster, View From The Right 105 Comments [7/9/2013 2:58:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 50

Quote# 95391

Rand may have been an atheist, but she embraced reason and natural law. Christians must do likewise. As Aquinas writes, if Christians embrace laws that violate reason and natural law, such as wealth redistribution mandates, they are in fact embracing injustice.

When Rand’s hero, John Galt, explains justice, he does so in a manner that is consistent with Aristotle, Aquinas and the biblical definition justice—in relation to objective truth and goodness: “Justice is the recognition of the fact that… just as you do not pay a higher price for a rusty chunk of scrap than for a piece of shining metal, so you do not value a rotter above a hero—that your moral appraisal is the coin paying men for their virtues or vices, and this payment demands of you as scrupulous an honor as you bring to financial transactions…”

I think Christians should avoid rushing to judgment on Rand’s philosophy because, at core, she has much to say about living with integrity and pursuing true happiness. No matter what term a pastor uses (think “social justice”), socialism is neither ethical nor Christian. Next week I will delve deeper into explaining how Rand’s beliefs are compatible with Christianity.

Katie Kiefer, Town Hall 54 Comments [7/9/2013 2:55:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 33

Quote# 95388

Oh, I have absolutely no doubt that homosexual activists will purposely seek out the most conservative churches they can find as a target. The activists know they already have those other denominations/churches in their clutches; they need to infiltrate and destroy the ones that actually are Bible-based and adhere to the Bible. They will just go around to all the churches that received the "warning" letter the most conservative churches received just prior to the 2012 election, warning them about politicking from the pulpit, and demand to be married there. They already know which churches these are, courtesy of the IRS and Barry Lind. When the church refuses, which my pastor has very strongly stated he would, then they will file a civil rights violation with the feds. Eric Holder, anyone?

It was never about love and marriage. It is about the destruction of Christianity.

Carrie Grace, Rapture Ready 63 Comments [7/8/2013 3:56:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 36

Quote# 95383

Please do not ask of me what you do not ask of the atheist. edit - I am exempt from the normal honest rules of evidence and the burden of evidence as I lack belief - I lack a belief in atheism.

ferengi, CARM Discussion Forums 35 Comments [7/8/2013 3:47:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 35

Quote# 95382

***Angel says: Those equations are for a particle at rest E = mc2

Yet, moving particles or all things that move have kinetic energy.

K = 1/2 mv² (K = kinetic energy, v = velocity m = mass).

KE= mc2 - m0c2

With that in mind for a moving particle or object, Einstein's formula becomes:

E = mc^2 + K

Further, Einstein did not believe in a personal God. Had he realized Jesus, the personal God, was in fact the savior and the Holy Spirit was the source of light in the creation, Einstein would have made the connection that the sacred name of YHWH, the Tetragrammaton was fulfilled by Jesus as well.

E = mc^2 + K

E = Energy (God) the Father
m =mass (Jesus Christ) the Son
c = speed of light (Holy Spirit) the Mother
K = Kinetic Energy (Holy Ghost) the resurrected Christ

Fullfilling the sacred name YHWH or Tetragrammaton

Y = God the Father
H = Jesus the Son
W = Holy Spirit the Mother
H = Holy Ghost, the resurrected Jesus

Perhaps this is why Einstein was unable to make the connection to the Tetragrammaton.

As well, the speed of light squared may in fact be the speed of the light that is referred to as "The Holy Spirit," who lit the world during the creation, prior to the formation of the sun.

The Holy Spirit may, in fact, be the speed of light squared.

Angel, Amazon Atheist Forum 52 Comments [7/8/2013 3:47:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 60

Quote# 95381

The tony, elitist New Yorker magazine, read by those who fancy themselves our moral and intellectual superiors, is in effect promoting child endangerment on the cover of its latest issue, and shamelessly using Bert and Ernie to do it.

The cover features the two muppets, who according to Sesame Street "have no sexual orientation," cuddling romantically on a couch in a darkened room in front of a TV set picturing the Supreme Court, which of course has just issued a ruling overturning the federal definition of marriage as exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

This is shameless, using figures who are iconic to children to promote sexual deviancy. And worse, it is dangerous and irresponsible.

Bryan Fischer, Renew America 38 Comments [7/8/2013 3:47:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 34
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 95379

Texas Republican state senator Dan Patrick is not impressed by Wendy Davis. Despite Davis’ all day filibuster of an anti-choice bill, Patrick thinks he is the one that deserves the praise. Patrick, the sponsor of the bill, told Mike Huckabee today that he urged his fellow Republicans to break Senate tradition and stop the filibuster.

He compared his action to Jesus’ criticism of the Pharisees for placing too much importance on “laws and rules.” Patrick went on to encourage other senators to similarly cast off the law, asking, “Are we going to become the modern day Pharisees as Republicans of the Senate?”

Patrick also criticized the crowd that turned out to support Davis, calling it an “organized mob” carrying out an attack on the government. He blamed their behavior on the fact that they were Democrats, because “a tea party would never do this.”

Dan Patrick, Right Wing Watch 38 Comments [7/8/2013 3:46:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 32

Quote# 95378

On Wednesday, Religious Right broadcaster Janet Mefferd didn’t hold back in expressing her outrage over the Supreme Court’s decision to vacate the appeal of the Prop 8 case over standing, calling the court’s ruling “completely insane.”

“If you think this is just an attack on marriage, it isn’t; it’s an attack on your liberty, an attack on the rule of law and it’s an attack on every person in California who went to the polls and legally voted to change the constitution of the state of California,” Mefferd said, “and the Supreme Court basically spat on them today.” Mefferd had a dim view of California: “Look who you have running your state, all these people have done in the California legislature is it’s gay law here and gay law there and gay role models and ban gay reparative therapy for minors…it’s totalitarian.”

Janet Mefferd, Right Wing Watch 32 Comments [7/8/2013 3:46:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 29