Quote# 96380

Evolution is unscientific for many reasons.
1: There is no evidence for it.
2: It fails to provide any rational basis for things necessary for science. For example, there is no basis to believe in uniformity in nature from an evolutionary perspective. Why does the universe behave in a consistent way that we are able to predict? You may say that the universe always has behaved consistently so it always will, but this is just assuming what you are trying to prove. Evolution cannot provide a rational reason to believe in unchanging laws of nature, it can neither account for the reason that like conditions will produce like results, why, in an ever changing universe do certain laws feel compelled to stay the same. If these laws weren’t consistent then we could never do any scientific experiment, and yet, evolution cannot provide any basis for why we should believe these laws will stay the same. It may sound like im repeating myself a lot here but thats because this is a very important point. Evolution cannot provide any basis for science whatsoever.
3: It contradicts the Bible, which does provide a rational basis for believing in uniformity. The Bible states that the universe is upheld by the power of God, and God never changes, so we can expect that certain laws will never change either. Therefore the Christian has a rational basis for doing science, the Evolutionist, has none.

Micah, Jason Lisle's blog 40 Comments [9/4/2013 2:56:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 39

Quote# 96379

Default Apple's Siri is Anti-Christian!
So I forgot her bias and just asked Siri about Jesus in the OT, hoping she would patch me through to Google without me having to type my question. Her response was, "Humans have religion, I just have silicon." I had forgotten that would be her likely answer.

To check out if Siri was so dead set about answering questions about just Christianity, I asked her questions about Buddhism and the New Spirituality and the New Age, and she offered to send me to the internet. Bingo! The only answer I could get out of her about Jesus was a fact sheet. Otherwise, just, "Humans have religion..."

WritetoLife, Rapture Ready 39 Comments [9/4/2013 2:55:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 35
Submitted By: Cindy

Quote# 96378

Logic supports the position that atheism is irrational

One of the laws of thought used in the field of logic is the Law of Rationality. This law states that a person should accept as true only those conclusions for which there is adequate evidence. This makes good sense, because a person who accepts conclusions for which there is no evidence, or inadequate evidence, would be irrational.
http://apologeticspress.org/pdfs/cou...df/hsc0103.pdf

Since no atheist here has presented evidence for atheism then the above demonstrates how atheism is irrational. So the question that begs to be asked "Why be irrational/an atheist?"



ferengi, CARM Discussion Forums 48 Comments [9/4/2013 2:55:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 31

Quote# 96369

Greek religions were a pagan religion... Pagan religions is the second oldest religion in the world.

The first known religion is Christianity(before christ juadism). We know that Christianity was the first religion, because even in the prehistoric period(before people learn how to write and record things) there are drawings of the creation story that match the one in the bible... therefore we know that Christianity was the first religion, because Pagan religions didn't come around until after the prehistoric period when people started to build civilizations.



Corner, Yahoo Answers 80 Comments [9/3/2013 3:37:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 83

Quote# 96366

[This is only a sample of the stupidity in the article]

In its ruling the Supreme Court unjustly and erroneously created three classes of marriage with vastly different reproductive, social, political, economic rights, and liabilities – depending solely on an individual's ability to naturally bear a child.

Class 1: Mother-mother marriages: The class of marriages having most advantageous rights is marriages between two women. When two women marry, it is a three-way contract among two women and the government. Most women will bear children by men outside the marriage – often by pretending they are using birth control when they are not. Entrapped men become economically-conscripted third parties to these marriages, but get nothing in return.

This is a significant advantage compelling women who would otherwise become (or are) single mothers to choose to marry a woman instead of a man. They can combine incomes, double-up on tax-free child support and welfare benefits, decrease costs, and double the human resources available to raise children and run their household. They are sexually liberated with boyfriends often cohabiting with them to provide additional undeclared income and human resources without worrying about what happens when they break up with their boyfriends.

Today, approximately 25% of single mothers cohabit with an undocumented boyfriend. Same-sex marriage allows women to double-up on everything, establishing sub-rosa polyandrous marriage as a common legal institution with men as peripheral servants without a stake in marriage or society.

The welfare state is an automatic statutory third party economically supporting these marriage contracts via welfare entitlements, some of which are "advances on child support collections."

The Supreme Court cannot explain away the unconstitutionality of same-sex marriage when the welfare state becomes a predatory, automatic, and unnatural statutory third-party-provider to a class of often structurally-polyandrous marriages, extracting substantial income from taxpayers and entrapped men, that other marriages do not qualify for.

Class 2: Heterosexual marriages. The second class of marriages is traditional marriages between men and women. Children of these marriages are almost always borne of the marriage and supported by husband and wife without governmental involvement. In these marriages, men and women have natural parental and economic rights, standing in society, and equal "gender power" before the law. Traditional marriages will be economically-disadvantaged compared to mother-mother marriages because they cannot draw large incomes from the welfare state and they will be taxed to support other marriages. They are treated in discriminatory fashion having to subsidize Class-1 and perhaps Class-3 entitlements (including ObamaCare) in their taxes.

Class 3: Male-Male marriages. Marriages between two men are destined to be the marital underclass. In most cases, these men will become un-consenting "fathers" by reproductive entrapment. Men in male-male marriages who become fathers by deceptive means will be forced to pay child support to women in bi-maternal marriages, and become economically enslaved to Class-1 marriages. The taxpayers will be guarantors of child support collections for low-income fathers who cannot afford to pay (as occurs in the existing welfare state).

Same-sex marriage is a multi-dimensional violation of 14th Amendment protections against sex discrimination. The 5th Amendment protection for life, liberty, and property without due process of law is structurally violated in cases of reproductive deception by women, regardless of marital status of the men involved.

Same-sex marriage takes welfare systems intended to be used in the absence of marriage and makes it a structural part of marriage. This is a massive restructuring of the relationship among government, the people, the Constitution, and the institution of marriage.

David R. Usher, Renew America 49 Comments [9/3/2013 3:34:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 56
Submitted By: Zagen30

Quote# 96365

Collegedale's decision to grant benefits to same-sex couples was a victory for Kat Cooper, a gay detective who championed the months-long effort that made the Chattanooga suburb the first city in Tennessee to offer benefits to same-sex spouses of its government employees.

Cooper's mother, Linda, stood by her side throughout the process. She held tight to her daughter's hand at a July meeting over the issue. And the two embraced after the City Council's 4-1 vote on Aug. 5.

But those small acts of support translated into collateral damage that left Linda Cooper and other relatives separated from their church family of more than 60 years. And one local advocate for gay families says the church's stance was the most extreme he's heard of in years.

Leaders at Ridgedale Church of Christ met in private with Kat Cooper's mother, aunt and uncle on Sunday after the regular worship service. They were given an ultimatum: They could repent for their sins and ask forgiveness in front of the congregation. Or leave the church.

Their sins?

"My mother was up here and she sat beside me. That's it," said Kat Cooper. "Literally, they're exiling members for unconditionally loving their children -- and even extended family members."

But the family's support of Kat Cooper was as good as an endorsement of homosexuality, said Ken Willis, minister at Ridgedale Church of Christ.

"The sin would be endorsing that lifestyle," Willis said. "The Bible speaks very plainly about that."

Willis, a father himself, said the church didn't expect the Cooper family to disown their daughter.

"But you certainly can't condone that lifestyle, whether it's any kind of sin -- whether they're shacked up with someone or living in a state of fornication or they're guilty of crimes," he said. "You don't condone it. You still love them as a parent."

Hunt Cooper, Kat's father, said his wife is still too distraught over the church's actions to comment.

"She is just so traumatized and so upset," he said. "It has been days and she's still crying. It's almost like losing a family member."

Linda Cooper's parents were practically founding members of the Dodds Avenue congregation, Hunt Cooper said. Her father was a church elder and his picture still hangs on the wall there. Kat Cooper grew up helping her grandfather clean the pews and helped her grandmother hang bulletin boards for Sunday school.

"This is not just some casual church they dropped in on," he said.

Hunt Cooper said his family rejects the notion that being gay is a lifestyle choice. And his wife, along with her brother and sister, believed repentance would be hypocritical. So the decision to leave, devastating as it was, was a simple one.

"There's no sin to repent for," he said. "And she's not going to turn her back on her daughter."


Ridgedale Church of Christ, Times Free Press 34 Comments [9/3/2013 3:31:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 35

Quote# 96364



A few months ago while attending a social function, two liberals were discussing how well socialism was going and would be fully in place within the next ten years. Standing in ear shot was a grizzled old Vietnam Vet who chuckled and asked if the two had ever heard of "The 530 Plan". The two responded they had not. The vet looked at the two of them and proceeded to educate them about the futility of their socialistic dream. He explained the Bill Ayers genocide plan to reduce resistance for the take over of America. To counter this he explained, "The 530 Plan" had been developed, it is the Bill Ayers approach on steroids, all taking place in a single day. He asked them to picture five million patriots, each identifying thirty liberals, picking a day they want to live in infamy and having at it. By using the plans of the
Left against them he explained, was all that will save the country and render liberals extinct.

Needless to say, the expression on their faces was one for the record books. One could see their brains running in overdrive as the mathematics of this man's scenario sunk in. The two also had this foreboding look about them that they may have just made someones top thirty list.

Their violence could become an extinction event for them.


aceofwands, WND 63 Comments [9/3/2013 3:31:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 43

Quote# 96356

The spirit of jezebel or the spirit of divination is upon this world. Our government and the brainwashing of teachers who are now mostly Democrats due to "unions" where you can't fire them for anything but make sure they get paid for life like our local and fed workers has made it impossible for the youth to learn anything about God, about Christ and Holy Spirit in this country lanymore. BUT they can teach and push islam all they want. UGH Parents must fight or find a home teacher and pay them to teach their children which will be less colstly or sent to a Christian school as then you will know they are actually being taught.

futurelife, WND 26 Comments [9/3/2013 3:29:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 96355

We are being tested with all this junk. There's the propaganda in the form of this documentary, there's al jazeera invading our airwaves, there is/are a judge(s) who has/have ruled that sharia law is acceptable in this country, we have a resident in our White House who has committed actions against our country, etc., etc. God is testing us and His next move will depend on what OUR next move will be. Will we act to save ourselves? If we don't, why would He save us? Food for thought.

jlbs, wnd 23 Comments [9/3/2013 3:07:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 96343

[Emphasis added.]

How long before an American soldier here leaves his base and is beheaded on an American street at high noon by a Muslim?

It seems to me that it’s not going to be long until the only Islam-unconquered land/continent left on earth is the contiguous United States --forget Canada, and I don’t know how long that’s going to last. If you get your hands on a globe, and draw a circle around all of the Muslim dominated, or soon-to-be-dominated lands, it’s pretty obvious that it’s going to take a Second Crusade to stop it. I don’t know if any nation on earth has the will, the United States included.

Look at Merry Olde England. Mohammad is the most chosen boy name there now; their soldiers are beheaded at high noon on public streets and citizens are told not to over-react, don’t judge Islam by that one act. One act? Have you followed the Muslim-perpetrated crime in England against infidels? It’s out of control, and no one is doing anything about it over there. Everyone is frozen in their tracks by Political Correctness –just like the United States of America.

England fought back Hitler and the Third Reich, but today they have no will to fight Islam; indeed, they seem perfectly content to roll over and play dead –and dead will be exactly what they all are when the Church of England goes out of business.

Dearborn, Michigan. Christian churches can not ring their chimes there now because it offends Muslims. Muslims took it ot court, and the Muslims won.

We all know what it's going to take to put a stop to the march of Islam, but to date, no one has the will to engage the enemy on the battlefield. It's easier to kow-tow and gravel and give in, than to gather up the guts to say, Enough!

Think Dresden. That's what it will take. A few billion dead Muslims --"innocent" men,women ad children, to stop it. If you kill enough of them, then tell the rest to stop it or they're next, you will stop it.

Now. Shooter will be along shortly to tell me how stupid I am.

Lubbock, Where Liberty Dwells 49 Comments [9/2/2013 7:23:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 41

Quote# 96342

Since God has made Himself inescapably known to all men, it just isn't true for a person to say that he or she is not convinced of God. Many people don't want to believe in God, and they work very hard to convince others and even themselves that they don't believe in Him. But their actions always reveal their suppressed knowledge of God.

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's Blog 45 Comments [9/2/2013 5:19:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 34

Quote# 96341

[On an upcoming "Million Muslim March" on Washington D.C.]

When a Muzzie claims to be loyal to America, he is either a non-practicing Muzzie or a liar. When a Muzzie demands civil rights in America, it is the "right" to impose sharia on the country.

"We are demanding that laws be enacted protecting our 1st amendment ."

Apparently a word is missing in the sentence, but one assumes that it is "rights".

First, pagan assholes, who is suppressing your 1A rights? Show us ONE incidence where you barbarians were silenced? If anything, America is fellating you in its obsession with catering to your evil lot.

Second, show us ONE example of an Islamocracy where non-Muzzies are allowed free speech. We won't hold our breaths waiting for your reply, because we all know that such a country is equivalent to NeverNeverLand.

"Lastly we are asking for the release of the 9/11 commission report to the American people."

Are you really sure you want that? Do you seriously think that it will say anything other than that pagan moon-god worshippers committed the atrocities?

"On 9.11.01 our country was forever changed by the horrific events in New York. The entire country was victimized by the acts done on that day. Muslim and Non Muslim alike were traumatized ..."

Well golly gee willikers all gosharootie, OF COURSE the Muzzies were "traumatized". That "trauma" evinced itself in worldwide celebrations by you hell-spawned savages, cheering the deaths of thousands of Americans. The video and printed evidence is overwhelming.

Don't even try to bullshit us, barbarians. You have only one goal and it is antithetical to everything that America represents. Serve your moon god and your psychopathic pedophile "prophet" if it pleases you, but unless Washington sells America out to you, your goal of an Islamic America is just a pipe dream.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 39 Comments [9/2/2013 5:19:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 37

Quote# 96340

When a person is asleep, he or she cannot feel or care what happens. Would if be okay in your worldview to assassinate someone as long as that person is sleeping? You see, your worldview just cannot make sense of morality. You instinctively that people have more value than plants and even animals, because you know in your heart-of-hearts that people are made in the image of God. You keep repeating the Christian principle of doing unto others as we would have them do unto us. But that principle makes no sense whatsoever in an evolutionary worldview.]

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's Blog 40 Comments [9/2/2013 4:28:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 33

Quote# 96338

An evolutionary worldview is any worldview that accepts particles-to-people evolution. I will grant that there are many different evolutionary worldviews. But they all have one thing in common: they are irrational. They cannot account for morality, science, laws of logic, or human rationality.

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's Blog 20 Comments [9/2/2013 4:27:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 26

Quote# 96337

You keep repeating the Christian principle of
"doing unto others as we would have them do unto us. ”
its not a christian principle it is a Chinese one, and Mozi and Laozi made those conclusions in strictly secular contexts

[Dr. Lisle: We have already covered this. Only the Christian worldview can make sense of objective morality. These other systems that you have proposed only motivate people to behave when they are being watched, and only if it will benefit them in the future. That's not morality.]

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's Blog 26 Comments [9/2/2013 4:27:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 96328

[In 2003 Moore was the Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, and was kicked out of office for putting up a 10 Commandments statue outside the state courthouse and then refusing a court order to remove it. He was re-elected as Chief Justice of AL last year]

You know, when I look back, I was proud to uphold the law, the Constitution of the United States and the First Amendment, which states basically we must acknowledge God to have a moral basis for our society and to retain that freedom of conscience which every person in this state and in this country recognizes is very important.

Roy Moore, MyFoxAL 31 Comments [9/2/2013 4:20:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 44
Submitted By: Zagen30

Quote# 96325

"Dr. Chaps" said that former FCC chairman Julius Genachowski failed to adequately enforce the decency standards during his time in office and that was because there was a "demonic spirit of tyranny or immorality inside of him."

And even though Genachowski outwardly appears very polished and successful, "the demonic spirit influences him to abuse and, dare I say, molest and visually rape your children"

Gordon Klingenschmitt, Right Wing Watch 12 Comments [9/2/2013 4:18:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Zagen30

Quote# 96324

So what has this discussion on climate change have to do with atheism? A few things and somewhat controversially I'm going to suggest that it is a Christian worldview which gives an imperative for climate action whereas the atheist worldview leads to the opposite. There are a few reasons why..

At its heart, atheism is a selfish, short-sighted worldview. Atheism drives people to live for themselves and live for today. In John Lennon's Imagine, Lennon imagines an atheistic world where people live without heaven and instead, 'live for today'. There is precious little in an atheist worldview to consider others, nor the future. The consistent message of atheism is to maximise our lives, our potential and opportunities now because this is the only life we get and we need to fill it with as much as possible. It is atheistic thinking which is driving the modern phenomenon of 'spending the inheritance'. Why shouldn't an atheist enjoy the money they've accumulated? The future in an atheist world is very short – to the end of our life, to the detriment of the inheritance and also to the detriment of the environment. I'm not suggesting that individual atheists can't consider the future beyond their lifetimes (many key environmental supporters are atheists). I'm proposing that there is nothing in a consistent atheist worldview to drive one to consider the future.

Secondly, the atheist worldview impedes costly sacrifice – why should atheists sacrifice unnecessarily? Why force unnecessary suffering on myself? The atheist worldview wishes costless action and advocacy. This view was reinforced when I saw Richard Dawkins at the Global Atheist Convention last year. In a discussion with other prominent atheists he explained that he wasn't as virulent in his criticism of Islam as compared to Christianity because "the threat of having your head cut off is somewhat of a deterrent" and "courage is a virtue but there are limits" [Four horsemen discussion -10 mins 30 secs in]. I was disappointed with Dawkins statement that someone so passionate about his beliefs wouldn't be willing to die for them. But then again, there is nothing in an atheist worldview to sacrifice unnecessarily. Atheists believe in costless action – an atheist speaks his or her views until there is serious danger. Why should an atheist sacrifice?

Robert Martin, Online Opinion 27 Comments [9/2/2013 4:17:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 25

Quote# 96321

Every hospital in America is effected by Our Dear Leader's apocalyptic health care system that is going to be the undoing of this once great nation. True liberty means dying if you can't afford hospital care. Give me liberty and give me death!

Libertarian Capitalist, Pleasanton Weekly 30 Comments [9/2/2013 4:16:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 96317

To see just how silly Scot's arguments are, consider the following. According to Scot, appeals to Scripture and nature arguments to reject homosexual practice must be rejected because slaveowners in the antebellum American South also made appeals to Scripture and nature arguments. Never mind that the latter were bad appeals based on misunderstandings of Scripture and the former are good appeals that are based on correct understandings of Scripture understood in its historical and literary context. Scot goes with the view that if a certain type of argument can ever be used badly then all such types of argument must be bad. So let's apply Scot's principles and see what we come up with.

Scot argues that homosexualist arguments are like abolitionist arguments: they both are good because they make general appeals "inspired by the larger arc of scripture," "the message of grace" and "justice and universal brotherhood." But hold the fort: modern polyamorists, proponents of "big love," argue on the basis of the same types of principles. So the Unitarian Universalist Polyamory Awareness group which even the president of the main UU seminary (Starr King) has endorsed. By Scot's reasoning since polyamorists use the same types of argument, but do it badly, then all such types of arguments, irrespective of how equal and accurate their general appeals to scripture and justice/love are, must be rejected. That's how bad Scot's reasoning his.


Robert A. J. Gagnon, Philosophical Fragments 19 Comments [9/2/2013 4:15:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 96316

Scot, as I’ve noted in my published work, an appeal to an alleged slavery analogy is simply a bad case of analogical reasoning. Such an appeal even contradicts the use of an exploitation and orientation argument that you adopt. If the Bible does not intend to indict committed homosexual unions entered into by homosexually oriented persons (as you erroneously believe), why make an argument from analogy that is grounded on the need to depart from Scripture’s stance?

As it is, the alleged slavery analogy actually has little in the way of substantive correspondence with the Bible’s view of homosexual practice. The Bible shows no vested interest in preserving slavery. In a society without a social welfare net slavery is sometimes the only alternative to starvation; otherwise it serves as a penal institution in place of standing prisons or as a means of processing prisoners of war. At a number of points Scripture exhibits a critical edge toward that institution: mandatory release dates, right of kinship redemption at any time, injunctions not to treat Israelites as slaves, protection of runaway slaves, the exodus from Egyptian as a symbol of Israel’s release from slavery, Paul’s letter to Philemon promoting the release of Onesimus, and so on. Relative to the surrounding cultures of the ancient Near East and of Greece and Rome, the biblical witness on slavery moves in the direction of curtailing that institution. Finally, there is no creation mandate for slavery. Slavery is not imaged as part of the pre-Fall structures of the world.

Scot, compare this certainly non-enthusiastic and often critical attitude toward the institution of slavery in Scripture with the Bible’s strong witness in favor of a male-female prerequisite: There is a strong creation mandate for such a prerequisite; the pages of Scripture show strong revulsion for homosexual practice and absolutely no accommodation; and ancient Israel, early Judaism, and early Christianity had the most rigorous opposition to homosexual practice of any known culture in the ancient Near East and Greco-Roman Mediterranean basin. Jesus in Mark 10 (parallel in Matt 19) treated a male-female prerequisite for marriage (and thus all sexual relations) as foundational for sexual ethics, including the limitation of sexual unions to two persons.

The only connection that homosexualist interpreters can make between the Bible’s critical tolerance of slavery and its deliberate abhorrence of all homosexual practice is that we have changed on the institution of slavery; therefore, they argue, we should change our position on homosexual practice. Yet that argument can be used arbitrarily for any and every belief and practice promoted in Scripture, for it takes no account of whether substantive points of correspondence exist apart from the desire of the interpreter to deviate from Scripture.

The better analogy is between slavery and support for homosexual practice, for those who argue for the latter on the basis of a “born that way” philosophy are promoting slavery to the desires of the flesh. And still better analogies are the Bible’s stance on incest and the New Testament opposition to polygamy since the reasons why these behaviors are proscribed are related to, or derived from, a male-female prerequisite for sexual relations. As you must know, when one uses remote analogues (here, slavery) and ignores more proximate analogues (incest and polyamory) one shows poor analogical reasoning.


Robert A. J. Gagnon, Philosophical Fragments 10 Comments [9/2/2013 4:15:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 96313

Badger you bet I'm a Tea Party. Try making a little more sense. Your Affordable Care Act is nothing but an Apocalypse to the Economy. It's all showing with Unions and members of your own Liberal Stooge members in Congress. 2014 Tea Party in total control of House and Senate. By your own hands, your party has self destruct. I guess you could go back to Mexico for a few more illegal votes. They'll just. take over your Cheese and Toilet Paper jobs. Hell they just might take your Box Seats at your next Packers Game. You Stooge Liberals call that American. Waaaa Hoooo. OH DARN I MISSED THE MOST IMPORTANT TOPIC ABOUT YOUR STOOGE PARTY. IT'S ALL ABOUT ABORTION AND GAY RIGHTS. WAAAAA HOOOO1

bronzestar77, MSNBC 19 Comments [9/2/2013 3:56:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 96312

Hello Liberal Stooges. Today topic toward solving our great nation problems are Abortion and Gay rights, Waaa Hooo. I would think you Stooges along with the entire MSNBC team with their ratings falling to the floor would be focusing on NOT loosing the Teamsters Union along with UAW and IFCWIU. You just Have to Love it. Waaa Hooo. Here's the funny part, shooting a Turkey out of season $1,000 fine. Killing an unborn child. No charge, Waaa Hooo. Can we call that NUTS.

bronzestar77, MSNBC 11 Comments [9/2/2013 3:55:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 96310

Indeed, being a husband is like being a master. Ever heard of animal husbandry?

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/husbandry

Go check out definition 2.

It’s not an equal relationship. That man is responsible for your safety and provisioning, your spiritual growth, maturity in faith, physical health (as far as it can be maintained), and emotional stability. He is responsible for cultivating you in much the same way a farmer is responsible for cultivating a crop. He must provide a safe environment, tend you, feed you, correct mistakes, and keep evil things that would consume you away. It’s not an equal relationship at all. Your job is to have children, do what he tells you, and support him with any gifts or talents you have. That is unless you can find something in scripture that I missed?


Jospeh of Jackson, Sunshine Mary and the Dragon 51 Comments [9/1/2013 6:33:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 48
Submitted By: Eselavar

Quote# 96306

[Re: Chris Christie banning reparative therapy.]
The thing is, that if a child in grade school is assumed he is gay, the "teachers" will be able to force the parents to let this child participate in homosexual "activities".

they will use the schools/state to force this on children and parents - if they think for one instance a child may be leaning toward "gay" tendencies, teachers trying to score points for "protecting" children from their "horrible" Christian/narrow minded" parents.. And this is going to make children vulnerable to pedophiles in the school system. Just as the RCC has become a haven for pedophiles, the NJ school districts will too. Mark my words.

Time to move out of NJ if you care about your children.

This is going to become a mess. I hate that it appears evil is winning. Our children are so precious and people are so gullible and uneducated or deliberately ignorant on what is going on. Satan's vicious attacks on our families is gaining ground (for now).

I tell my kids to home school my grandchildren. Or bring them here and I will home school them.

RaptureReady_7, Rapture Ready 31 Comments [9/1/2013 6:30:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 36
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy