1 2 3 4 5 10 | bottom
Quote# 104374

"Judge Pérez-Giménez not only rejected the constitutional arguments for redefining marriage, but succinctly made the case for natural marriage, noting that 'the very survival of the political order depends upon the procreative potential embodied in traditional marriage.' He is correct in saying that this is among the 'principles of logic and law that cannot be forgotten.'

Judge Perez Gimenez, Charisma News 34 Comments [10/29/2014 3:38:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 104372

All Women Are Whores
I have received well over a thousand supportive emails from women over the last 48 hours. Unsurprisingly to me, the topic they’re the most encouraging about is my comment on whores and all women being them.

All women are whores.

Keep in mind that I consider female anger to be the weather vane of truth and wisdom. When a woman finally has a heart attack after reading something I’ve written, I’m going to start calling myself Buddha.

King Buddha.

That’s why no women are allowed to read this.

Women know themselves almost as well as I know them. They know they’re prone to emotion and anger, and they know they’re all whores. That’s why they get so goddamn upset when I say it. To a woman, calling attention to her innate prostitution is more true than anything else I could possibly say.

But that’s only because women understand math and science about as far as a dog can shit.

Women crave money because they don’t have things like purple hearts, fist fights, and prom queens. They have nothing to validate their self-worth except how much a man will pay for access to their vagina. That’s why they spend money like it’s poison. The albatross of a 100 dollar bill is nothing but shame to a woman. It is a constant reminder of her nature.

All women are whores.


Classic Dick, Men Are Better Than Women 41 Comments [10/29/2014 3:37:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Count Zapolai

Quote# 104371

If parents were concerned about adolescents having sex, it would seem more logical to worry about a 13 y/o girl having sex with a 16 y/o boy than with a 36 y/o man. The latter is in a much better position to provide for her and make a potential husband than the younger guy.

Eric, Emma the Emo`s musings 31 Comments [10/29/2014 3:37:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: TheBody

Quote# 104370

When we pray for the dead, we are also declaring that fallen people are far more important to us than our Creator. We’re saying, “I know I’ll be in Your Presence in Heaven, Jesus, but that’s worthless to me unless my dead grandma is there also. I know she rejected You on earth, but I think You should overlook that and let her into Heaven anyway.” This is insane thinking. How can we possibly put our glorious God in the same class as fallen, self-centered humans? If we really can’t stand to be separated from people who hate our God, then we deserve to have our salvation revoked so we can join our precious friends and family members in the fires of Hell. There we can all burn and writhe together, soaking up the fellowship of idiots that we just can’t stand to be without.

There is nothing merciful about praying for the dead. There’s nothing Christlike about rejecting Christ’s boundaries, insulting His Person, and suggesting that the mercy He has already extended to someone on earth is somehow insufficient. Let’s be clear: there can be NO SYMPATHY WHATSOVER for those who end up in Hell. Not if we’re serious about honoring God. Not after all that He’s done to make eternal salvation so readily available.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 31 Comments [10/29/2014 3:35:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 104368

We know that God brings pain into our lives for different purposes, and that for the most part He always acts for our spiritual benefit. We also know that there is one particular context in which God actually takes pleasure in our pain and Hell is a perfect example of this. Within the context of extreme, blatant defiance, we will see God’s loyalty to Himself decrease His general compassion for us and He will act very aggressively towards us. In eternity, God’s satisfaction over humans suffering in Hell is continuous. On earth, we will only see God go into this merciless mode for very brief periods, during which He will inflict very intense human suffering for the sake of His own glory and honor.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 43 Comments [10/29/2014 3:35:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 104367

Darwin hated the Book of Genesis with a passion and the historical account of the Fall of Man:

To the woman he (JEHOVAH) said: "I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception; in pain you shall bring forth children; your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you” (Genesis 3:16).

That verse was the first great bulwark against women ruling over men, and Darwin was determined to substitute the ASCENT of man for the Fall of Man.

Darwin claimed to have found the missing link when he visited Argentina and saw the Fuegian natives with their primitive ways. As always, Darwin the dunce was dead wrong about the origin of species and wrong about the Fuegian language.

Darwin claimed to have found the missing link between monkeys and humans in Patagonia when he saw the primitive condition of the natives.

When Darwin heard them speak, he surmised that their language consisted of a few grunts.

In reality, it was more complex than English or Spanish.

[...]

Darwin knew that in the 5000 years of recorded history, nobody had reported one species changing into another. He grew up in a rural area near farms, and he must have known that mating a horse with a jackass produces a sterile mule.

Incredibly, there are over 1,000 Unnatural History Museums throughout the world based on the myth of evolution.

Like the rotating earth fallacy, Darwinism is a pathetic attempt to overthrow the Book of Genesis.

Evolutionists stole their millions of years from our 4500-year-old Grand Canyon!!

Darwin also hated the Biblical and genetic injunction against close relatives marrying. It was the illegality of King Henry's marriage to his dead brother's wife, Catherine of Aragon, that was the catalyst for the blessed Reformation in England.

"Kissin' Cousins" Darwin hated the Biblical and genetic injunction against consanguineous marriages.

In 1839, he married his first cousin, Emma Wedgwood.

His grotesque theory pulled down the barriers that protected society from the deadly effects of incest and inbreeding.

Close relatives marrying always leads to moral and physical degeneration....Darwin the Dunce had plenty of proof of that among the ruling dynasties of Europe . . . and the fake "Jews."

Darwin needed lots of time for his bizarre theory to work and that is why fellow spy John Wesley Powell was sent to "explore" the Grand Canyon.

[...]

Darwin the Druid also opened the door to pagan Druid cremation.

Don't let British Secret Service agent Charles Darwin make a monkey out of YOU with his science fiction evolution....If Darwin was alive at the time of fellow agent Harry Houdini . . . he would have learned how to instantly change a monkey into a man . . . and save himself the trip to Argentina!!

The Holy Bible says that the universe is only about 6,000 years old, and all the people alive today are descended from Noah and his family. Furthermore, all the geographic features of the present earth: high mountains, deep canyons, vast oceans, were formed rapidly during the year-long Flood of Noah.

St. Peter said that the Ark was a type of Christ:
For Christ also hath once suffered for our sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to Elohim, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; who formerly were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of Elohim waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water (I St. Peter 3:18-20).

Don't wait until it is too late to get on the Ark of safety. Heaven is a zillion times better than California and there are no spies there!!

Patrick Scrivener, Reformation 49 Comments [10/29/2014 3:27:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 104364

Re:Luke 14:26 If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.

Let’s paint the scene. In Luke 14:25, large crowds were travelling with Jesus because they had seen him healing people, feeding people and teaching people at no cost. Why not follow Jesus? You can get something for nothing. However, in this passage we see Jesus turn around to them that following him is not without cost - you have to place him before other important people in your lives. You even have to place him before yourselves.

To get his point across he uses very emotive and challenging language - you must hate everyone else. In so doing he is not saying that you do it literally but you must be prepared to put everything else second. So if your parent forbids you from following him then you must disobey them and so on.

Thankfully many of us have never been put in a situation where we have had to choose between Christ and our loved ones. But imagine if you had been captured by religious terrorists and they demand that you deny Christ or watch one of your friends die what would you choose? Jesus is saying you must choose him.

But it can be more subtle than this. In the stress of working and making ends meet we can be tempted to cut down of church activities, reading the bible or praying because we don’t have time. It may be the things you are working hard for are good things that will allow (say) your kids to have a better education. Jesus is saying don’t pursue these things at my expense - nothing, not even your wife and kids, is more important than following me and obeying me.


In his grip, christianity.net.au 37 Comments [10/28/2014 3:08:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 104360

If we managed to overcome men’s tyranny over us, how would we rebuild our world? I just want to throw some ideas here that I often come across these days. I dream for concrete, down-to-earth, simple and easily applicable measures of stepping out of patriarchy into a female-loving, biophilic world. This isn’t by any means a realistic plan of how to achieve it, but just reading it makes me feel happy. It makes it feel more real, more possible. Enjoy!

[...]

FAMILY, CHILD-RAISING AND REPRODUCTION
Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities.

It’s the inalienable right of each woman to control every phase of her reproduction and life creation. Abortion will be possible at any stage of pregnancy, however there will hardly be such a thing as undesired pregnancy since there won’t be any men forcing pregnancies on us any more. Abortion will nonetheless be recognised for the trauma, mutilation and loss of life that it is. The number of children and human population will naturally decrease to sustainable levels, so will the number of males born. Women will be free to experiment parthenogenesis or procreation with two female eggs.

The nuclear family will be abolished, in particular the parent’s property rights and absolute power over her child. Children will be considered as persons in need for autonomy and all form of punishment, authority or educational manipulation over children will equally be abolished. Raising and caring for children will be a collective responsibility for women, and motherhood / childcare and especially capacity to be empathetic towards children will be taken very seriously, as something that needs to be (re)learned and studied over years before being fully competent for this immense task.

Witchwind, radical wind 40 Comments [10/28/2014 3:06:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: What?

Quote# 104355

For context the 'Rapture Ready'ites are labeling other Rapturites as heretics.

Maybe we need a new acronym for this. How about Anti-Pre-Trib Rapture Derangement Syndrome? "APTRDS" Is that too hard to say? It seems familiar. Somebody else has probably suggested it already.

uplooker64, Rapture Ready 36 Comments [10/28/2014 3:03:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: solomongrundy

Quote# 104352

Jews and liberalism go together like Muslims and world domination.

Doctor Doom, Where Liberty Dwells 25 Comments [10/28/2014 3:02:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Elie Challita

Quote# 104351

Gays infected the blood supplies on purpose ages ago killing thousands and infecting hundreds of thousands with Aids . for just that purpose of making america find a cure to save their own butts.
so your saying O isn't capable of it playing Simon says.. follow the leader.. .?
or africans aren't capable of doing what militant gays already did to America once twice going going gone.. sold america. ? every bit as militant Terrorist attack against americans as any thing islam has done.
and they militantly murdered thousand of already sick people. and purposely infected thousands of children and healthy alike. . but the guberments did nothing.
I going to tell you, you really don't understand humanity at all dear.

NannaNae, christianforums 24 Comments [10/28/2014 3:01:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 104349

Notice how FOX news (so fair and balanced) spends all it’s time on ISIS and “the threat of Muslim extremists” and reports hardly anything on the advance of the Gay Agenda (especially the brainwashing now going on in schools). This is because FOX people actually supports faggotry. Do you really, honest-to-God still think this channel gives a flying monkey’s ass about decent White Christian America?

Phillip Marlowe, INCOGMAN 50 Comments [10/27/2014 3:46:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 26

Quote# 104347

My wife used to be Buddhist and she says that sometimes they will summon Devils on people as this happens a bit in Mongolia. I do not want this and I am not sure if God would allow the devil to bring havoc to the family so maybe I should send them stuff without a return address so the devil will not know how to find me. What say you?

Again witnessing to world religions is different than calling the savage wolves in the church to repentance so my approach would be entirely different. I would probably also send A God Loves you tract.
_______________

evangelist6589, www.baptistboard.com 38 Comments [10/27/2014 3:37:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: PT

Quote# 104332

The essential thrust of heterosexuality in the male is return to the womb. Since the vagina is the only pathway to the uterus, the vagina becomes the center of sexual attention. Sexual concern with other anatomical structures (such as breasts for the rectum) is quite beside the point, and a substantial segment of the heterosexual subculture looks askance at nonvaginal sex. The heterosexual male thrusts fingers, tongue, and penis into the vagina in a desperate, irrational attempt to find again the security of the womb, to return physically to the womb. Since that attempt can never succeed, heterosexuality is inevitably unsatisfying. But to the extent that the male can re-enter the vagina, through which he traveled when he was expelled by his mother at his birth, heterosexual sex approaches satisfaction. This explains why coitus is the preferred form of heterosexual sex: the tongue cannot penetrate very far into the vagina (and besides, the vagina is a very unsatisfactory object of oralism, for the essence of oralism is taking things into the mouth, not straining the tongue to reach out). Nor can a finger penetrate far. Of the parts of the male body, and the thrust into the vagina, the penis reaches farthest toward the ultimate object, the womb. This fact, combined with the fact that many heterosexual males find pleasurable the sensation arising from the penis's contact with the walls of the vagina, works to push coitus as the prime form of heterosexual sex.

Buddha1, Sciforums.com 42 Comments [10/27/2014 3:06:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
Submitted By: TheBody

Quote# 104329

Since pro-democracy protests erupted in the territory in late September, Hong Kong chief executive CY Leung has maintained that universal suffrage, a core demand of the protesters, would not be granted. On Monday, however, Leung offered a startling justification for his intransigence: Democratic reforms would disproportionately benefit the poor.

In comments to reporters gathered at his official residence, a stately mansion built by the British, Leung said "you have to take care of all the sectors in Hong Kong as much as you can," adding that "if it’s entirely a numbers game and numeric representation, then obviously you would be talking to half of the people in Hong Kong who earn less than $1,800 a month."

C.Y. Leung, The Atlantic 30 Comments [10/27/2014 3:03:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 104328

So today a lady from ABC 15 came and interviewed me to get my reaction on the Supreme Court ruling where the federal government is forcing Arizona to recognize homo marriage. The lady who interviewed me said she called at least 12 other pastors, and none of them were willing to come on the news and be negative about the Supreme Court ruling. They were all too busy "loving people instead of condemning what they do."

My message to lame pastors: "The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil." - John 7:7


Steven L Anderson, Blog of Steven L Anderson 19 Comments [10/27/2014 3:03:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 104325

(referring to Matt Slick's daughter Rachael)

In her post, even though she does her best to make the case that she couldn't believe something because of feelings alone and that unanswered questions drove her away from Christianity, she either knowingly or unknowingly admits why she really left the faith: the "freedom" to participate in a non-Christian lifestyle that she desired.

"Freedom is my God now, and I love this one a thousand times more than I ever loved the last one."

In other words, she left Christianity because she loved something more than God. Unanswered questions...living something you think isn't true...all these things really had nothing to do with it. She wanted to be "free."

Robin Schumacher, Blogos 24 Comments [10/26/2014 1:21:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 104324

Why do people think Co2 causes global warming?

If Co2 causes global warming why didn't it do it decades ago? It's clear that Co2 doesn't cause global warming.
I think the answer is clear. Global Warming was noticed in the 80's which was the same time the gay "rights" movement came into being. It's obvious that God is causing global warming because we are embracing sin! In the Bible it says that during the end times, natural disasters will be common such as extreme heat! It's obvious the Bible is talking about global warming! This is a part of the end times people! Better accept Jesus or face eternal damnation.

Kaykay, Yahoo! Answers 39 Comments [10/26/2014 1:20:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 28
Submitted By: Juicifur

Quote# 104322

See folks, this is what we’re talking about. See how convoluted they get in trying not to give a straight answer to a simple question. They can’t prove anything so they invent their own way of how evolution should take place. We love the part about there’s no such thing about partial evolution.

First, they said we were slimes that evolved all the way into a monkey which itself evolved into a man. But there was no partial evolution even though the evolution took place partially because ‘smooth gradients’ are themselves partial (it’s called bluffing in Poker). So, if there was no ‘partial evolution’ (we can’t even keep track anymore) the monkey just went poof and there was the monkey into a man. And notice when you ask for evidence what is said. Evidence is “NONSENSE”. So, he throws a red herring to confuse you (they love throwing red herrings) in order for you to look in another direction. And guess what that direction is: bones. Now, they’re grave diggers. :-)

And then evolution that could not be observed because there’s no partial evolution suddenly can be observed in bacteria in ‘real time’. But in real time, the other evolution where we want to see the mutant hybrids cannot be observed because it conveniently happens in ‘smooth gradients” which are in reality partial but to them are not really partial.

This is how messed up the thinking is. And then, did you notice on top of that the insults? Apparently, we’re the fools. Can you believe that? You’d need a full time staff to decipher the labyrinthine thinking of these monkey-upgrades. We need a vacation

Biblicism Institute, Biblicism Institute 24 Comments [10/26/2014 1:20:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 104321


Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle says beautiful young women should be excused from jury duty and should not vote

Co-host of 'The Five,' a former Victoria's Secret model, says young beauties don't have the right 'life experiences' to have a say in politics.

They're too hot to vote.

Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle believes that young, attractive women should be excused from voting so they could devote their time to online dating.

"It's the same reason why young women on juries are not a good idea. They don't get it!' said the co-host of 'The Five" on the right-leaning news channel's daily talk show.

Guilfoyle, 45, who helped pay her way through law school modeling for a variety of retailers including Victoria's Secret, said young, beautiful women don't have the proper "life experiences" to have a say in who holds elected office.

Instead, they should only be granted the privilege after they've gained wisdom from raising children, paying bills or dealing with real-world issues like a mortgage and health care.

'They're like healthy and hot and running around without a care in the world," said Guilfoyle.

When co-host Bob Beckel noted that young women have "every right in the world" to sit on a jury, Guilfoyle said: 'I just think, excuse them so they can go back on Tinder and Match.com."


Kimberly Guilfoyle, Fox News 29 Comments [10/26/2014 1:19:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Insult to Rocks

Quote# 104320

Thousands of Iranians took to the streets yesterday, protesting a wave of acid attacks against women across the country in recent weeks.

Hundreds of protesters gathered in front of the parliament building in Tehran, and thousands more in Isfahan City, where at least six women are believed to have suffered acid attacks in the last few weeks.

As many as 25 women have been targeted around the country. On Sunday it was reported that one of the victims had died of her injuries.

At least two acid attack survivors attended the Isfahan protest, as well as several prominent Iranian human rights activists.

One female protester who had herself been disfigured in an acid attack carried a sign that read "where is my face". Another bore the slogan "a secure street is my right”. Others targeted religious zealots and extremists, while chants of “Death to the Daesh [Islamic State] school of thought!” were heard, according to local media.


Hadi Ghaemi, the executive director of the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran, a New York based NGO, believes that the women were targeted for violating Islamic dress codes, and linked the surge in attacks to recent rhetoric from conservative leaders.

“This comes in the midst of a year-long verbal attack by conservative forces in Iran attacking women for their clothes,” Ghaemi told Newsweek. “There have been verbal warnings and calls that blood must be shed. These are not isolated incidents”, he added.

Iranian women are required by law to cover themselves in public with an enveloping head-to-toe veil. However many of them, especially younger women living in the larger cities, defy government regulations and societal convention by showing their hair or wearing supposedly “immodest” clothing.

It is common for Iranian police to caution women seen in public places sporting so-called “bad hijab”, a term which encompasses any veil offering less coverage than the traditional head-to-toe covering, the chador. The conservative lawmakers who dominate Iran’s parliament recently proposed a law which would allow vigilante patrols to carry out similar policing according to the Islamic principle of “enjoining good and forbidding wrong”.

Although the protesters in Isfahan obtained the necessary government permit, police used tear gas to break up the demonstration. Following the protest, several activists were detained and taken into custody.

Some human rights activists blame the empowering of conservative vigilante groups for the spike in acid attacks, either directly or indirectly.

According to the National Council of Resistance of Iran, up to 25 women across the country have been targeted in a recent wave of attacks. They recounted one of the incidents in Isfahan in a statement posted to their website earlier this week:

“[A] young woman was walking with two others when they [became the] target of an acid attack. The young woman died due to injuries received on her chest but the two others who received injuries in their faces and hands were transferred to hospital”, the report said.

The victims of this “heinous crime”, it added, “have suffered major injuries and are in danger of losing their eyesight.” Local media outlets reported that the attacks were carried out by men on motorbikes who were unknown to the victims.

In a separate incident in the same city, 26-year-old Soheila Jorkesh was driving a car when a motorbike drove past and one of the riders tipped acid through the open window. As well as suffering horrific burns, she has lost the sight from one eye while doctors are battling to save the other.

Hadi Ghaemi is clear that the surge in attacks is no coincidence, saying that the incidents represent a break from usual trends associated with a practice largely aligned with personal grudges and family honour.

Acid attacks, he said, are usually committed by “jealous boyfriends, husbands and family members, but there is no way that so many attacks in such a short space of time can be explained by personal revenge, it makes no rational sense.”

One of the groups which advertised the protests on its Facebook page referred to the perpetrators as “Iranian regime agents”, while several protesters chanted "we know who's throwing acid at our women - it's government agents".

Although “three or four” suspects have reportedly been arrested in connection with the Esfahan attacks, Iranian authorities have refused to comment on any potential motivations for the crime.


Iranian Government and unnamed attackers, Newsweek-World 16 Comments [10/26/2014 1:18:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Insult to Rocks

Quote# 104319

While some hetero couples cannot conceive children, no homo couples can. Also, the complimentary aspects of both sexes are far and away more optimal for raising children than two of the same sex. Gay adoption has led to the objectification of women in the surrogate mills. It has also increased the risk for child molestation and homosexual molding. Homosexual marriage has disrespected God and God fearing Americans. It has also unconstitutionally stripped American citizens of their 1st amendment rights. Pushing for it is contributing to the downfall of society! Thank you Judge for standing up to the bullies and for the people. Your decision is just. Well done sir!

david ramseur, Charisma News 29 Comments [10/26/2014 7:23:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 104318

Now that a majority of states are no longer legally recognizing heterosexual marriages, maybe it's time to move to Puerto Rico.

Ronald L, Charisma News 50 Comments [10/26/2014 4:59:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 44
Submitted By: AJ Williams

Quote# 104313

Halloween is filled with all sorts of pagan characters and customs that Christians need to avoid.

The black cat, for example, was believed by the Druids to be evil spirit friends of witches, and even witches themselves. These cats were often kept in wicker cages and burned in animal sacrifices.

Witches are worshipers of Satan, and they are an abomination to God (Exo. 22:18; Deu. 18:10-11). Why would a God-fearing Christian want to dress-up their child like something that God hates?

Scary masks were worn by the Celts to scare away evil spirits. The jack-o-lantern was used for the same purpose, although a turnip was originally used.

What the world thinks of as "ghosts" are not the spirits of dead people, but rather EVIL spirits which we are warned about in the Bible (Lev. 19:31; 20:27; II Kgs. 23:24; Mat. 10:1; Mar. 3:11; Acts 8:7; Rev. 16:13). Why would a Christian want to decorate their home with such wickedness? Does God want you to dress your child up like an evil spirit?

Even the orange and black colors of Halloween have a wicked origin. At the Druid Festival of Death for Samhain huge bon fires were used for offering human and animal sacrifices. So the colors of the night were orange flames glowing in the dark.

Trick-or-treating finds it's origin in the custom of peasants going house to house begging for money to purchase necessities for a feast for Muck Olla, the Druid sun god. A blessing was promised to generous givers, while threats were often made to those who were stingy.

Apple bobbing probably comes from the Roman festival of Pomona, the goddess of fruit and trees. This festival was merged with the festival of Samhain after Rome conquered Britain. In honor of Samhain, subjects were forced to bob for apples in boiling hot water. Those who lived through this ordeal were set free.

Friend, Halloween is Satanic! You may pretend that it's a harmless game for kids, but in reality it represents paganism, Satanism, human sacrifice, torture, rape, murder, idolatry, witchcraft, and spiritualism! Did you know that October 31st is considered by Satanists to be their most important day of the year? Friend, WAKE UP! Don't honor the Devil! Honor God instead by refusing to observe Halloween this year. The Lord Jesus Christ wouldn't dress innocent children up like the devils of Hell and march them around town, so why should you? Are you a TRUE follower of Jesus Christ? Then SKIP Halloween this year and tell others to do likewise!

James L. Melton, Biblebelievers.com 39 Comments [10/26/2014 4:39:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 104312

Homosexuals cluster meaning they promote each other secretly.

Use the law against this clustering. Where there is a clustering of homosexuals, use the law to break them up. Such clusters are prima facie evidence of discrimination against heterosexuals.

Use anti-discrimination laws against homosexuals everywhere in the workplace including courts.

Expose, do not be afraid to out homosexuals at every opportunity. “Are you homosexual?” Try not to use the word ‘gay’. That is part of the deceit in the movement. When your usage of the word ‘homosexual’ is taken as an indication of your opposition, use ‘same-sex’ as a replacement but do not use ‘gay’.

“Do you have a same-sex lifestyle? A same-sex partner>”

“Are you in support of Churches being required by law to marry same-sex partners?”

And so on. Find out and record who is homosexual and count their numbers. They should not number more than 2% of the people in your workplace and your community organizations.

hostage, Free Republic 47 Comments [10/25/2014 7:20:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
1 2 3 4 5 10 | top