Quote# 104102

It is incredibly frustrating to see any nation where Jews sink their claws into succumb to pushing homosexuality and other types of faggot behavior. Unfortunately, this just happened in Estonia. In a close vote, their legislature approved a law that would essentially legalize homosexual marriages.

This type of madness needs to stop. Homosexual behavior has no place in a moral and virtuous society. It is a mental illness that should be treated not embraced.

Daily Slave, Daily Stormer 20 Comments [10/16/2014 3:01:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 104101

When Darwin's ideas first started circulating, a lot of people were trying to interfere and prevent it. The platypus was kidnapped as it was brought to England. I have come to realize that it is not the conservatives who were conducting this thought control campaign, but liberals. The same liberals that today conduct their campaign against human bio diversity and the truth about genetic racial behavioral traits.

Before they were called "scientists" they called themselves "naturalists." Before they called themselves "naturalists" they called themselves "natural theologians." Plato was the first Natural Theologian. Science was invented by natural theologians; classical theistic philosophers.

Darwinism eradicates the boundaries of taxonomy. There is no such thing as a species in Darwinism. The concept of "species" is borrowed from natural theology, i.e. Genesis 6 "each after it's kind." All creatures are transitional fossils in Darwinism. All creatures are their own unique genetic taxonomic entity in Darwinism. This is easily proven by looking up the definition of "species." There are six definitions, therefore there is no definition.

Darwinism logically leads to a belief in shifting, unfixed, chemical laws. (From goo to you). Biological Darwinism implies chemical evolution. Chemical evolution implies that the laws of physics evolve. Evolving physics implies that logic is unfixed; a delusion. Unfixed logic means humans are not ever rational. Non-rational humans unable to use logic are unable to begin with the first sentence in this paragraph and arrive at the conclusion that the universe is not logical and humans are not rational.

Darwin renders the universe absurd, and those who believe in it consider themselves absurd.

In the beginning was nothing, and then nothing exploded, for no reason, and everything came out, and everything randomly rattled around until it turned into dinosaurs. Makes perfect sense.

Sgt POG, Return of Kings 30 Comments [10/16/2014 2:56:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 104095

In a world where it pays to belong to a designated victim tribe, a perhaps unsurprising phenomenon is the current rush by some whites, who can’t claim special status by ancestry, to have themselves elevated above criticism by the privileged status of their sexual orientation. Homosexuals have often formed pseudo-clans, perhaps the most famous being the Bloomsbury cabal to undermine Victorian virtues organized by biographer Lytton Strachey around John Maynard Keynes, E.M. Forster, and Virginia Woolf. When Harvard historian Niall Ferguson recently alluded unflatteringly to this immensely well-documented bit of history, he was denounced worldwide for his insensitivity to a powerless victim group. He’d never lecture in this town again!

Ferguson, a financial historian who knows which side his bread is buttered on, immediately apologized.

Steve Sailer, The American Conservative 29 Comments [10/14/2014 2:52:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 104090

The reason that more Transhumanists are not Reactionaries, in my view, is that they haven’t done their reading on molecular manufacturing, or they mistakenly think that Friendly AI or a Kurzweilian Singularity will come around in time to save the day. The writings describing the full picture of molecular manufacturing are rather long and technical, and most people — even Harvard graduates with beefy IQs — simply don’t have the time or inclination to read them. The standards of Transhumanism have fallen in the last decade as well. In the late 90s and the early 00s, when the primary transhumanist venues were the Extropians and SL4 mailing lists, the technical understanding of the average transhumanist was excellent. Today, it is quite poor. There’s an emergent brilliance produced when you put Spike Jones, Robin Hanson, Anders Sandberg, Chris Phoenix, Eliezer Yudkowsky, and Robert Bradbury on the same mailing list, which simply has no modern-day analogue. This environment was the forge that crafted the most capable Transhumanist leaders of today. Second-generation students of transhumanism are simply not the same.

When people understand the true extent of the feasibility and power of molecular manufacturing, a grim attitude tends to set in due to all the palpable risks. I’m pleased that the 3D-printed gun exists, because this is the first visceral, public example of the phenomenon I’ve been writing about and fearing since 2001. Unrestrained technological power in the hands of the masses. It’s nearly impossible to grasp the full picture until you understand the likely production capabilities and relative technological feasibility of molecular manufacturing. Many of the original visionaries are beginning to get quite old, and are falling silent without passing on their knowledge in detail to many students, so I fear that the baton is not being handed off properly, and will be dropped along the way. Those who have the responsibility to pass off this knowledge know who they are.

My concern are individuals and small groups that asymmetrically empower themselves through emerging technologies and don’t have the public good in mind. Given the current predominant political sympathies, which are ultra-egalitarian, there would be few restrictions on the routes to this power. Adopting Traditional principles, however, which are strictly hierarchical, would restrict the power in the hands of a few, providing fewer points of failure. Would you rather take the risk of a thousand elite leaders exploiting powerful manufacturing technologies to do damage, or the guarantee that if the technologies are available to a billion, many of them will certainly do damage?

The benefit of conferring responsibility on a comparatively small set of elite individuals is that these individuals can be educated for their responsibilities far in advance, groomed and cultivated for their important roles. They can be instilled with good morals, broad understanding, supportive familial and organizational structures, and mutual expectations worthy of their station. Common people tend to think only for themselves, and have trouble seeing personal responsibility for affairs of the state. Handing someone a nanofactory automatically gives them the power to influence affairs on a worldwide scale. Is this a power we really want being handed to those educated by reality television?

Students of political correctness will cringe at the thought of conferring superlative powers on an elite, but the long-term survival of the human species is more important than historically contingent factors that are based on nothing more than the preoccupations of an unexpectedly influential cadre of Berkeley students in the 1960s. Prior to the 1960s, high-level political thought was still based heavily on Traditional principles of sacred responsibility among a few men of power. The notion that true power and control should be shattered into 300 million little pieces and distributed evenly among the populace is a very recent idea, one we would do well without. If UC Berkeley never existed, progressivism may have never even manifested in its current form and risen to become the dominant ideology of the nation’s elite.

Michael Anissmov, More Right 46 Comments [10/14/2014 2:50:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 104088

You'd think at this point it's time for the Pharisees to cry 'uncle' and give credit to Jesus for a true miracle, right? Wrong. Now things get ugly as the Pharisees bring the man back in for round two.

The religious leaders begin by calling Jesus a sinner, which the man brushes off by stating: "Whether He is a sinner, I do not know; one thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see" (vs. 25). His reply is terrific because it forces the Pharisees to look past their presuppositions with Jesus and focus on the reality that's staring them (literally) in the face.

I love what happens next. The Pharisees ask the man to repeat his story yet again, to which he responds: "I told you already and you did not listen; why do you want to hear it again? You do not want to become His disciples too, do you?" (vs. 27).

Whenever I feel a discussion with a skeptic or atheist is going around in circles and I'm having to repeat myself with the evidence concerning Christ I've already supplied, I'll ask something along the lines of: "Before we cover this same ground again, let me ask you: what's the bottom line for you in this? Are you truly interested in knowing the truth about Jesus and ready to bow your knee to Him as Lord if your questions are satisfied?" You'd be surprised at the responses I get, a lot of which can be summarized as "No".

The reaction the once-blind man got from the Pharisees on this matter was visceral: "They reviled him" (vs. 28). The Pharisees aren't interested in following Jesus nor are they interested in hearing any more evidence or testimony that validates His Messiahship. They refuse to believe the truth they've found.

Robin Schumacher, Blogos 27 Comments [10/14/2014 2:48:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 104087

I strongly believe that the greatest threat to the world right now is not Islam. It is not Hinduism. It is not Catholicism. It is ATHEISM. I know without a doubt that the One World Government, when it is established, will be a form of Hyper-Humanism. It will exalt man as God, and dethrone God. That is the very heart of atheism. A peaceful atheist is content not knowing anything about God because he really has no need to believe in God. But a religiously zealous atheist wants nothing more than to see God dethroned, and man exalted. It is quite hellish to say the least.

Brian Price, Value of Truth 37 Comments [10/14/2014 2:46:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 104085

I wonder whether people in the American movie business are aware of the pink ghetto phenomenon, and are trying to preserve their dominance in the global movie industry. If the film industry were to become more female, like education, medicine and law, perhaps it would lose some of its vitality and prestige. Because the industry commands such awesome cultural power, its leaders are loathe to move in that direction.

Think about it: with the competition opened up to hordes of cheaper female labor, how much room would there be for mega-millionaire directors like Steven Spielberg and George Lucas?

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 29 Comments [10/14/2014 2:45:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 104084

An “analyst” trained in the very, very discredited “Bible Code” method, which tries to predict future events through letters in the Bible, has come out with some big news: President Obama is in the Bible Code, and he is probably the Antichrist.

Bible Code-breaker Jonathan Wright appeared on “Trunews” last week, where he told host Rick Wiles that Obama is either the Antichrist or the harbinger of the Antichrist. Not only does the Bible Code prove this to be the case, says Wright, but so does Obama’s non-existent Muslim wedding ring.

Wiles: So either Barack Obama is the Man of Sin, commonly known as the Antichrist, the Bible doesn’t say ‘Antichrist’ it says ‘Man of Sin.’

Wright: That’s right.

Wiles: Either Barack Obama is the Man of Sin or he is strongly connected to the Man of Sin or the spirit of Antichrist.

Wright: That’s right. Those are my only — I’ve tried to look at this as an investigation not with an agenda, by the way, but what I’ve come up with those have to be the possibilities. Let’s just face it, he’s got a ring on that says, ‘There’s no God but Allah and Mohammad is his Messenger.’ Now, by definition, that’s Antichrist.

[....]

The two also shared their belief that Obama is likely the Antichrist because a fly once landed on him, something that only has ever happened to Obama. “And there’s always the photos that you see everywhere with the flies landing on his face,” Wright told Wiles, “I can show you in the codes where he’s got a strong connection to the Lord of the Flies, Beelzebub.”

“I call him Beelze-lip,” Wiles added. “Because he had those flies stuck to his lip.”

Jonathan Wright and Rick Wiles, Right Wing Watch 26 Comments [10/14/2014 2:45:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 104082

This summer I had been spending a warm August evening talking to a friend in his backyard. We had a few beers and were discussing different issues and common acquaintances. He knows about my problem and this blog but doesn’t follow it that regularly.

During this year we had less contact than previous years due to various circumstances so he wasn’t aware of the shift in my thinking I experienced this year.

Anyway, we somehow got to these topics and I told him what I think the actual reasons for my incel are and what I plan to do about this. I told him about what society really is, how women actually are and how I think I might attract a woman and for which activities (which, sadly, don’t include a relationship, since they’re not capable of understanding the concept).

As I was telling him the horrible truth about why incel happens and what women want he kept getting paler and paler, looking at me with terrified eyes. By the time I finished telling him about what disgusting men and sickening acts women today want and with which barbaric actions I plan to attract one, he froze and, despite being a healthy man in his 20s who was in no way drunk that evening nor acutely or chronically ill, literally threw up.

caamib, CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger 126 Comments [10/14/2014 2:43:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 36

Quote# 104081

Homosexuals have the same rights that I have which is to marry an adult of the opposite sex. It is just as illegal for me, for example, to marry another man, to marry an animal or inanimate object like a bridge, to marry more than one person, to marry a close relative, or to marry someone who is underage. It’s true though, however, that Christian societies regulate sexuality and privilege married heterosexual monogamy as a social good in law and culture above other forms of deviant relationships.

Is this a slippery slope argument? Like I said at Crossroads, “equality” is an idea that is unable to coexist with any other idea, and our history bears this out. We have already traveled well down the slippery slope with devastating consequences. Thanks to the power of the US federal government, free love, miscegenation, and no-fault divorce are already in the rear view mirror. Christian marriage had already been fatally undermined since the Moynihan Report in 1965.

If relationships are to be held to the new US standard of “love,” “attraction” and “individual freedom,” what sense does it make to criminalize adultery? How is “love” reconciled with “individual freedom”? Is “love” even necessary between consenting adults? Why shouldn’t two heterosexual men who are best friends be prevented from getting married for the financial benefits of doing so?

Finally, I don’t agree with your assertion that my own Christian marriage is the equivalent of two or three or four butt banging homosexuals in a polygamous open relationship with a harem of underage boys. I agree, however, that is where the logic of “equal rights” will inevitably lead our culture, which is a destination that I oppose.

Hunter Wallace, Occidental Dissent 30 Comments [10/14/2014 2:42:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: TimeToTurn

Quote# 104080

Nothing is more ridiculous to me (and heartbreaking), than to see a professed atheist who enjoys God's wonderful creation (eating His delicious foods, enjoying His spectacular sunsets, adoring His incredible animals and plants, beholding His majestic universe with all its stars, et cetera) and then deny that God had a part in any of it. Instead they foolishly choose to believe that the amazing universe around us evolved from random cosmic chaos, cataclysmic coincidence and accidental aftermath. Literally, that's what Discovery channel teaches the world. Evolution is the ultimate satanic hoax!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious.org 46 Comments [10/13/2014 3:37:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 29
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 104077

Assalamu alaikum.

So now we know that Malala has just exited the fold of Islam via her heresy and blasphemy. May Allah (swt) guide Malala back to the straight path and may Allah (swt) help all of us in the ummah to expose the munafiqueen and avoid or fight them as needed. Ameen.

faithandpeace, Islamic Awakening 26 Comments [10/13/2014 3:36:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 104064

[On same-sex marriage]

Wootsauce: Canada? You use Canada, where one can be jailed for calling homosexuality a sin, as your example for "freedom and equality"??

jillybean: I do know something about this. You are free in Canada to say that the Bible teaches homosexual conduct is a sin. You are not free to use language that seems intended to incite hatred and violence towards homosexuals.

Wootsauce: Slippery slope there.

Wootsauce, BarbWire 22 Comments [10/13/2014 3:06:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 104063

The 1973 Roe v Wade high court will forever be stained with the blood of children on its collective hands.

The liberal majority in the 2014 Roberts court will now be labeled with the “C” word—for being cowards. These justices upended American civilization while standing on the sidelines.

Millions of voters in five states were assaulted in the public square, disenfranchised by this court’s decision to not overturn erroneous lower court rulings validating same sex “marriage.” Like Saul during the stoning of Stephen, they became bystanders, nodding their assent as terrible violence was committed.

The “gay” bullies got their way. Truth and morality were trampled but the black-robed bystanders will plead innocence.

The good news is that this, like Roe, is sure to galvanize the conservative base on the issue of homosexuality like nothing has in decades.

“No political momentum on the other side of this issue.” So declared Brit Hume of Fox News on October 6. He was referring to natural marriage advocacy as he reacted to the Supreme Court’s non-decision. I don’t agree with him about the past, but it’s an interesting reaction. The future will be, I predict, an unmistakably renewed fight, as many Americans are rightly furious. Why are we suddenly forced in many states to recognize homosexual unions as genuine marriage? Didn’t we vote on this in thirty- one states?

Roe didn’t change the sanctity of life and current court decisions do not change the truth about sodomy.

But while we are mulling this over, we need to be honest. Our side could deploy better arguments, frankly. I respect those fighting the specific battle against recognition of same sex unions. Yet can’t we revisit the worth of more boldly proclaiming the whole truth, playing our two trump cards: the deviance of homosexual behavior and the lack of evidence for a “gay gene?”

[...]

We can already see the rotting “fruits” of the homosexual movement. Despite the eagerness of some “gay Christian” advocates to twist the Lord’s teaching about trees and their good and bad fruits, it’s pretty obvious that what Jesus meant by “good” is following God’s standards. “Bad” would be rebellion against those standards. And where do we imagine homosexuality, the abomination, would fall on this continuum?

Vicious attacks have been launched by the Human Rights Campaign, the Southern Poverty Law Center and others against brave, compassionate, truthful Christian brothers like Peter LaBarbera, Dr. Scott Lively, Dr. Michael Brown and organizations like American Family Association and Family Research Council. Isn’t it obvious, isn’t this revelation enough, that the poison “fruit” of homosexual advocacy is ripening in today’s America, revealing lies and oppression, and it stinks to high heaven?

So going forward, let’s deploy a coordinated strategy involving several fronts in this war that might include, by choice, both a harder and a softer-sell approach. Both are needed to address the entire disease, to treat the primary cancer—homosexual behavior—and its metastasis, fraudulent marriage.

Linda Harvey, BarbWire 35 Comments [10/13/2014 3:06:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 104062

There is a multitude of things going on and it can only lead to bad. We can start with socialized medicine. It be a comin". We can add to that the break down of the black culture. Can't speak English, can't wear a hat properly, can't pull up their pants, and have absolutely no respect for human life. Especially their own. I'll add to that the homosexual lifestyle which is rife with STDs and pedophilia. Don't tell me I'm wrong. Internet web sites abound for you people just like girly sites for us. Let's continue with abortions. Dear God, Planned Parenthood has killed more humans than all of us "gun owners" will ever come close too. Then we can discuss the bashing of Christianity. Merry Christmas is out the door. Prayer in school is out the door. Nativity scenes are out the door. Etc., etc. And I read somewhere today that a Nebraska school district forbids teachers from calling students "boys" and "girls". They are to be referred to as "purple penguins" just to keep everything gender neutral. Thank you for that homosexual community. Nothing like perverting young minds early on.

Bob G, BarbWire 29 Comments [10/13/2014 3:05:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 104061

The genius Turing, an "open" fag, was arrested and convicted because he went to the police claiming that the uneducated teenage boy labor he was sodomizing was stealing from him. It may have been the case if Turing was sodomizing a man 21 years of age, there may have been no problem.

In fact, the whole incident may have be a "lovers" spat in which the teen boy threatened and/or blackmailed Turing and Turing tried to preemptively file false charges against the teen. Once feces is involved, who knows what the truth is.

With regards to the constant claim of "chemically castrated", what is the difference between "chemically castrated" and the "treatment" that children are put on to prepare them for genital mutilation when they turn 18 years old in a sadistic "gender transformation"?

Tintin, VNN 25 Comments [10/13/2014 3:05:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 104058

Originally Posted by Armoured:
"Is it immoral for all the people claiming to have divinely given healing powers not to be on the first plane to Liberia and making all us skeptics eat our words by proving they're the real thing?"

NannaNae: "but why you wouldn't believe it anyway! I don't have healing powers.. I but I do know people who do and they will be there if god tells them too. but I suspect they are to stay here for when it gets here .
but really the question is why doesn't any one there believe enough to heal ? if we ask that question only the real answer to that question then you will know why that disease is there in the first place.

because why is the disease there ?
why is it effecting them ?
why aren't they immune to the disease in their environment if evolution is true?
I mean they have been eating monkey there a long time..
why aren't they immune .. if first they are monkeys or came from monkeys.. if they have had that monkey disease there for billions and billions of years ?
why aren't they immune from even eating it if they had been eating monkeys for hundreds of thousands of years.. ? so much for survival of the fittest !
the fittest don't survive but the Paranoid and Schizophrenic survive.
and that explains how man has de -evolved in 6000 years to what we are now."

NannaNae, Christian Forums 45 Comments [10/12/2014 9:29:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 35
Submitted By: FacePalmer

Quote# 104057

"Rights" to me fall into two categories: things essential for your survival, and non essential things that have no impact on others (either now or in the future). Due to the latter, I accept gay sex/marriage, but not interracial sex/marriage. I think you have a right to work but not a right to vote. You have a right to shoot intruders but not to carry a gun around with you. Etc...

Lone Wolf, INTJ Forum 24 Comments [10/12/2014 9:29:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 104053

We're not fighting Jews but rather we're fighting demonic forces that use wicked Jews and their dumb gentile sheep to create a one world dictatorship (New World Order) ruled by the Devil.

But Jesus' 2nd coming and His angels shall defeat the devil and the anti Christ. The problem is figuring out what we must do in the meantime to help bring about their defeat.

Seek The Truth, Real Jew News 23 Comments [10/12/2014 9:27:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 104049

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins released the following statement in response to the Supreme Court's refusal to accept appeals in marriage cases involving the five states of Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin:

"The Supreme Court decision to not take up these lower court rulings, which undermine natural marriage and the rule of law, for now, puts the issue of marriage back before the US Congress. This decision, in part, is an indication that those on the Court who desire to redefine natural marriage recognize the country will not accept a Roe v. Wade type decision on marriage.

"Unfortunately, by failing to take up these marriage cases, the High Court will allow rogue lower court judges who have ignored history and true legal precedent to silence the elected representatives of the people and the voice of the people themselves by overturning state provisions on marriage. Even more alarming, lower court judges are undermining our form of government and the rights and freedoms of citizens to govern themselves. This judicially led effort to force same sex 'marriage' on people will have negative consequences for our Republic, not only as it relates to natural marriage but also undermining the rule of and respect for law.

"The Court decision ensures that the debate over natural marriage will continue and the good news is that time is not on the side of those who want to redefine marriage. As more states are forced to redefine marriage, contrary to nature and directly in conflict with the will of millions, more Americans will see and experience attacks on their religious freedom. Parents will find a wedge being driven between them and their children as school curriculum is changed to contradict the morals parents are teaching their children. As more and more people lose their livelihoods because they refuse to not just tolerate but celebrate same-sex marriage, Americans will see the true goal, which is for activists to use the Court to impose a redefinition of natural marriage on the entire nation.

"Congress should respond to today's announcement by moving forward with the State Marriage Defense Act, which is consistent with last year's Windsor ruling and ensures that the federal government in its definition of marriage respects the duly enacted marriage laws of the states," concluded Perkins.

Tony Perkins, Family Research Council 23 Comments [10/12/2014 4:50:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 104048

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said Monday that he plans to introduce a constitutional amendment barring the federal government or the courts form overturning state marriage laws.

Citing the Supreme Court's "tragic and indefensible" refusal to take up same-sex marriage cases - essentially legalizing same-sex marriage in another 11 states - Cruz announced the proposal in a statement. He said he has already introduced legislation in the Senate to "protect the authority of state legislatures to define marriage," because "marriage is a question for the states."

"And that is why, when Congress returns to session, I will be introducing a constitutional amendment to prevent the federal government or the courts from attacking or striking down state marriage laws," the potential 2016 GOP presidential contender announced.

[...]

"Traditional marriage is an institution whose integrity and vitality are critical to the health of any society," Cruz said. "We should remain faithful to our moral heritage and never hesitate to defend it."

Ted Cruz, Breitbart News Network 36 Comments [10/12/2014 4:49:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 104047

Liberty Counsel chairman Mat Staver delivered a blistering response to the Supreme Court's decision this week not to take-up marriage equality appeals, telling host Jim Schneider of "Crosstalk" yesterday that the court is endangering public health by effectively legalizing same-sex marriage in several states.

Staver said same-sex marriage should remain illegal because "we know male-male sexual relationships are notoriously harmful, physically as well as mentally, and also female-female, same kinds of things."

"It's harmful to the individuals and those harms ultimately effect those around because they're communicable and other kinds of serious and deadly disease," he added.

Staver lamented that America is witnessing "a debasing of morals" as county clerks in new marriage equality states begin to issue marriage licenses, with even "people on the sidelines who don't necessarily participate directly in the debasing acts cheering on those that do."

"This is not something to cheer about, this is a shameful day in American history, it's a shameful day that the Supreme Court has ultimately engulfed itself with," Staver said.

"It's shameful for the Supreme Court for what they have done to marriage as it has been shameful in the history of the court with regards to the Dred Scott decision or the Buck v. Bell decision, where they said that the state of Virginia can forcibly sterilize her because of this eugenics idea that they want to eliminate the undesirables of the world. That was the shameful day that we ultimately look back with shame upon and I think this is going to be one of those same kind of situations."

Mat Staver, Right Wing Watch 21 Comments [10/12/2014 4:49:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 104046

[This is in response to the Supreme Court's decision to decline to hear five cases on same-sex marriage, allowing the rulings in favor of it to stand instead.]

The damage to marriage as an institution, to the family as the linchpin of our culture, to freedom itself, especially the religious freedom of dissenters from the redefinition of marriage - all this will be reckoned up over time as a consequence of today's refusal by the judges to take any of the cases that have so far come up to it. But the cert denials also evince a deep disrespect for the rule of law, for the Constitution, and for the people's right of self-government.

[...]

The Republican Party was founded in the 1850s with its first platform (in the 1856 presidential election) denouncing slavery and polygamy, both of which the party wanted the federal government to outlaw where it had power to do so, in the territories. These were the "twin relics of barbarism." One year later, after Dred Scott, the Republican Party added the defense of republican government against judicial tyranny to its portfolio of fundamental principles. The GOP was founded as a party standing for human liberty, the sanctity of the family, and a free self-governing people. As we re-enact a slow-motion Dred Scott for the twenty-first century, it remains to be seen whether any political party in America will continue to stand for those principles.

Matthew J. Franck, National Review Online 25 Comments [10/12/2014 4:49:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 104045

I believe in global warming, but not the kind the world believes in.
I don't lose sleep over the thought of the ozone messing up or the icecaps melting or the sun exploding or any of that nonsense.
God's word says the world will continue to exist until He decides to remake it.
So I don't worry about it.

The global warming I do believe in is when God will destroy the earth in order to make a new earth.
But I still don't worry about it, because I'll be in heaven when that's happening.

ExaltGod, Deviant Art 23 Comments [10/12/2014 4:48:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 104044

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee says he will leave the GOP if Republicans abandon their ardent opposition to gay marriage and abortion.

Appearing on the American Family Association’s radio show this week, Huckabee was discussing gay marriage and said: “If the Republicans want to lose guys like me — and a whole bunch of still God-fearing Bible-believing people — go ahead and just abdicate on this issue, and why you’re at it, go ahead and say abortion doesn’t matter, either.”

“Because at that point, you lose me,” Huckabee said. “I’m gone. I’ll become an independent. I’ll start finding people that have guts to stand. I’m tired of this.”

“I am utterly exasperated with Republicans and the so-called leadership of the Republicans who have abdicated on this issue when, if they continue this direction they guarantee they’re gonna lose every election in the future,” Huckabee said. “Guarantee it.”

Mike Huckabee, Yahoo.com 25 Comments [10/12/2014 4:48:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas