1 2 3 4 5 9 | bottom
Quote# 100238

The Creationist group Answers In Genesis, which was already incensed about Neil deGrasse Tyson’s revival of Cosmos, is now complaining that the show lacks scientific balance because it fails to provide airtime for evolution deniers.

Danny Faulkner of Answers In Genesis and the Creation Museum appeared on The Janet Mefferd Show yesterday to criticize Cosmos for not providing airtime for Creationism adherents. When Mefferd asked if Cosmos will “ever give a Creationist any time,” Faulkner responded by lamenting that “Creationists aren’t even on the radar screen for them, they wouldn’t even consider us plausible at all.”

Mefferd agreed that the show isn’t being very fair and balanced: “Boy, but when you have so many scientists who simply do not accept Darwinian evolution it seems to me that that might be something to throw in there, you know, the old, ‘some scientists say this, others disagree and think this,’ but that’s not even allowed.”

“Consideration of special Creation is definitely not open for discussion it would seem,” Faulkner added.

Arguing that evolution, the foundation of modern biology, and one of many theological beliefs on human creation are simply “two sides” that merit competing time on a science program is much like the equally absurd argument Creationists use when trying to undermine the teaching of evolution in public schools.

Danny Faulkner & Janet Mefferd, Right Wing Watch 55 Comments [3/28/2014 3:38:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 33

Quote# 100235

I agree with [the Westboro Baptist Church's] foundational message, that God is judging our nation because of our descent into depravity. I can certainly understand their frustration that our nation bows to the sins of abortion, adultery and homosexuality, to the exclusion of obedience to God. The simple formula is that God blesses obedience and punishes disobedience.

It’s the protesting at military funerals that has been wrongheaded and downright counterproductive. They should’ve confined their protests to homosexuals’ funerals. With AIDS and all the cancers they contract because of their deathstyle, there shouldn’t be any shortage of them.

afsnco, Free Republic 39 Comments [3/28/2014 3:37:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 100234

what kind of rapey shithole are we living in, afterall, if we would have separatism by default if men were (finally) punished with jailtime for raping and contributing to men raping women. i mean if all men who were guilty of the range of offenses between actual rape and not adequately protecting women in their own communities and proximities from rape, were actually sent to jail, including every man within a 20-mile radius (say) of any and all instances of a boy or a man raping a girl or a woman, within just a few minutes there would be no men left in many places in the world. justice for women, in other words, would create female separatism by default, where all male offenders were separated from us, and allowed to do their male-culture thing with each other and not allowed to do it to us anymore. we would be alone. because justice.

(...)

and what kind of violent hell is waiting just beyond the horizon, what is it, exactly, that we are actively preventing from happening with our female blood, sweat and tears, when women put their energies into placing and enforcing social controls on men and male behavior, including mens violence against other men? and, why do we bother doing this at all? this is a serious question.

(re)consider: how many men would just kill themselves voluntarily if left to their own devices? how many resources in the form of suicide hotlines, drug rehabs, DWI checkpoints and the like are being actively put towards preventing men from killing themselves, and is this really the best use of these resources? says who?

(re)consider: how many men would kill each other if they werent prevented from doing so, both actively and passively, and how much energy is dedicated to achieving that ends daily? weekly? annually? is it worth it? this is a serious question. what would happen if we just let men do to themselves and each other what they do, unabated? im not talking about *us* doing a fucking thing to hurt men at all. im just talking about not stopping them from harming — even eliminating — themselves. do we owe it to them or something to save them from themselves? really? because we are acting as if we do, but why? i dont think women owe men a fucking thing.

and sure, women have our own interests in preventing male violence against other men, but our interests here are complicated, and worth parsing. for starters, women and girls often get caught in mens crossfire, literally and more literally. when boys and men are killed, so is the gynergy of the mothers, grandmothers and others who spent their lives and their very selves in raising and nurturing them.

perhaps our greatest fear is that if men are allowed to do what they do, and if “culture” — otherwise known as patriarchy — were allowed to be as hellishly brutal, as bloody and awful as it would be if men were allowed to just be men, unmodified, that men will simply and finally go mad, unleashing an heretofore unimaginably lawless, vicious violence, raping and slaughtering us all. and this is a realistic fear, i think. but obviously it begs the question, doesnt it — why are they worth saving, again?

what if we just got out of their way and let nature (or whatever) take its course? im just asking. we likely wouldnt have to do it for very long — i think even *i* could stand the trials and tribulations of “womens land” and passing the communal nut butter (or whatever) for the five minutes (or 5 years) it would take for men to render themselves, well, dead. after that, we could all go our own ways if we wanted. or not! either way, aaaahhhhhhh. heaven.

Factcheckme, Femonade 43 Comments [3/28/2014 3:36:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 32
Submitted By: Cyclonus

Quote# 100232

Sodomy is a normal part of muslim life, but it is boys, like with the Samurai and Spartans, that they prefer. Walid Shoebat stated in a book and on the radio (and he should know) ...the Saudi elites all prefer boys for sex.

Why do you think the minute the muslim in the white house came to power, he made sodomy and bestiality “normal” and “good” in the military, and why now Kindergartens are forced to sexualize children and destroy their innocence and put the vile ideas of sodomy in their heads. It is to warp them and destroy normal sexual identity formation. The object of sex is culturally determined and can be warped especially by child abuse and sexualization of children. Innocence is essential during Latency for dignity and mystery and respect for the opposite sex. Romance period is essentially a Christian invention, as is selflessness (true Love).

Without Virtue in the children, there is no possibility of Freedom....and the Cultural Marxists have been writing curricula for a long time to fill children with stupidity and Lies and flip Good and Evil by destroying Christian Ethics.

The little secret the Leftists/feminists are keeping and why they never condemn muslims, is that they hate the natural family and Christianity as much as the Marxists/Muslims...and sodomy is normal among muslims as us totalitarianism, although, they are forced to marry women, simply for procreation. It is why they mutilate, and kill their women and kids/girls. They are puerile and narcissistic and fixated in Latency because of child abuse.

Like the Samurai, all homosexual cultures hate women....women are just reduced to breeders, and polygamy is usually the norm.

savagesusie , Free Republic 37 Comments [3/28/2014 3:35:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 35

Quote# 100231

Drag Queenery is a mockery of the Natural female form and beauty. It is an exaggeration that is just as offensive as “Black face” is to people of color. It shows how hateful gay men are concerning how they feel about women.

GraceG, Free Republic 26 Comments [3/28/2014 3:34:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 100230

Know what baffles me? Most gay men loathe women on any number of levels. I mean “Bleeder” is a pretty common derogatory term in their ‘culture’. They consider their own ‘orafi’ a superior replacement for a female.

So why is it that women are their biggest supporters? It’s like battered wife syndrome without a marraige.

Norm Lenhart, Free Republic 31 Comments [3/28/2014 3:34:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 100228

Sady Doyle is a feminist blogger with a problem. She is concerned that for years she and her sisters in the struggle have been harassed, stalked, threatened, called names and otherwise made to feel uncomfortable. She’s written herself a little advice piece over at inthesetimes.com, called The Girls Guide to Staying Safe Online, in which she claims to have received a death threat, hate mail, rape threats and the like. She also claims that her photo inspired someone to pontificate about fucking her in the ass.

Doyle doesn’t mention precisely why she thinks all this is (allegedly) happening, except to say that apparently being a feminist blogger, or even having a female screen name, is enough. All these women have to do is screech online about men being pigs; lie about everything from phony wage gaps to domestic violence to an imaginary rape culture – while they glorify their own bigotry and sense of entitlement. And then for some inexplicable reason they end up getting an occasional bit of nastiness via email or in the comment sections of men’s websites.

Fuck sake, what has happened to the world that a grrl can’t even trash half the human race based on sex without someone getting all huffy about it?

Of course, Sady, I ask that question rhetorically because I know the answer. The reactions you have seen over the past several years are just the beginning of a boil over that was inevitable from the moment gender feminism raised its ugly head.

For the last fifty years, feminist ideologues like yourself have been given free reign to lie, distort, vilify and practice open hatred toward men and boys. You have been given pathological enabling by politicians, police, and a more than sizable portion of the well trained and obsequious male population. You have been given almost godlike power over families and sufficient hegemony over the lives of men that you can effectively destroy them with no more effort than it takes to point a finger. And you have not hesitated to support a culture that embraces the use and abuse of those powers, and writes them into law.

You have trumped over truth, reason and justice with an ersatz victim card, over and over again, and you even attempt to do so now, inferring that anyone who says things you don’t like, about your ass or otherwise, is some sort of threat that must be dealt with – socially and legally.

But no matter what you do, you are going to see a lot more of the things you don’t like in the future. I don’t mean that in the way of violent threats and continued fixation on your rectum, but in much more organized, high impact consequences for those of your ilk, courtesy of the men’s movement.

Simply put, we are coming for you. All of you.

And by the time we are done you will wax nostalgic over the days when all you had to deal with was someone expressing a desire to fuck you up your shopworn ass.

The fact is, Sady, you are a corrupt, hate-spreading bigot. I would ask you to remember that when you whine about a little rough talk, but it is pointless to ask someone to remember something they can’t or won’t acknowledge in the first place.

It is your bigotry that is at the source of all your troubles, just as it is your bigotry that is spawning troubles that you cannot imagine, but that are nonetheless coming down the pike.

Misandry will find its way to the graveyard of failed ideas. It will die its quiet death alongside racism and other social pathogens. In that light, there is no “safety” for you and your kind. You will all be exposed, and publicly excoriated; forced into the shadows alongside other bigots.

Ask Pamela O’Shaughnessy. She is a Harvard educated attorney and a best-selling author that goes by the online name of Vliet Tiptree. By any definition she is a person of means and some influence. She is also a feminist advocating eugenic shaping and control of men.

We have exposed her publicly, which has outraged her. But she is powerless to do anything about it. She will take whatever we dish out and her only reaction will be to slink further into the darkness, hidden away in private forums where the disease of her thinking won’t see much sunlight, or be allowed to gain a growing audience.

She will take all this because she has to. And she has to because she is a bigot. Bigots only have two choices when it comes to public discourse. One is to retreat, which O’Shaughnessy has wisely done. Two is to stay and pretend not to be a bigot. That pretense becomes more difficult to maintain as an individual’s words fall under real scrutiny – and as more people stand up publicly to the hate.

There’s a lot more standing up going on these days.

The harshness you and your ilk have been subjected to is just the first signs of an approaching tipping point; the place where the misandry bubble is stretching toward the inevitable explosion. And yes, Doyle, that would be the explosion that will take you out; not with violence or rape, but with the illuminating light of truth.

Unfortunately, just because your moral superiors are organizing to take you down with truth and reason, it does not mean that the inklings of violence you are now seeing are going to stop. There is little you can do about that either. Hate begets hate.

You will just have to deal with increasing hostile reactions that will mirror the virulence you practice. Alongside the wholesale razing of civil rights under the feminist agenda, a little rough talk up the pooper just doesn’t amount to much.

Paul Elam, A Voice for Men 34 Comments [3/28/2014 3:33:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 26

Quote# 100222



You are right, the time has come for the parting of Christianity and the GOP. The majority of Republicans in the Senate and Congress are RINOs (Republican in name only). They no longer hold to the Republican beliefs of smaller government and individual freedoms. The Republican Leadership has sided with evil. Witness the complete focus now by Boehner on legalizing the illegals which is exactly what 0bama wants. What does 0bama not want? Repeal of 0bamaCare and spending reductions. What has the House indicated on these? It will not do anything to repeal 0bamaCare or restrain spending. Who does the Republican leadership identify as their enemy? The Tea Party. What does the Tea Party represent in this battle? Goodness and the American way. So, the Republican Leaders are now operating as an elite few who see their role as that of shepherds, moving the conservatives of America into the new Liberal World Order.

With that said, the other side of the coin is the Democrat/socialist/Liberalism view which is not only the "religion" of the new age progressives, it is their porn. It truly is a mental disorder that is being used as an offering to the childish, dependent, and weak minded as an alternative to personal responsibility and self reliance, and in exchange for absolute human rights. It empowers the most vile aspects of humanity via the "tolerance" of the "group think" to believe that their selfish hedonism is "freedom". The United States now exports the true concept of freedom in smaller quantities than ever before. Freedom isn't free and that is a lesson lost on the chronically self indulgent.

afchief, Charisma News 34 Comments [3/28/2014 3:15:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 100220

We did not evolve from primates. Yet our common ancestor the serpent/caveman did. The original sin was an sex act between the woman and the serpent/caveman. Their offspring was cain Abel' half brother. Cain' family tree is portrayed in Genesis ch 4 completely separate from Adam' in ch 5. These two separate and distinct gene-pools crossed in Genesis ch 6 and whala you have us as modern men and women. I and I alone have walked the earth and have solved the riddle of creation. I did so by applying modern Science to THE WORD OF GOD BY HIS REVELATION CONCERNING HIS WORD THE BIBLE!!!
JESUS BLESS YOU


David, yahoo answers 29 Comments [3/28/2014 3:04:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 29
Submitted By: Towey

Quote# 100219

No, I highly doubt you know how I think because we've never met or spoken on a personal level. I use common sense to understand the fact that homosexuality is wrong no matter how you look at it. Even if you look at it from a religious or atheist point of view, homosexuality is unnatural regardless of your stance. At least with heterosexuality, there is an outcome that results from opposite sex relationships that benefit society. There is no such benefit with homosexuality. So I don't an excuse to speak about homosexuality. No excuse is needed. If I see something is wrong, I'm going to speak up about it. The only defense you have is that there is a large, vocal minority people with a lot of money and thus a lot of political power, pushing the issue in society, and push people to accept something that most of the world believes is wrong.

Vashta Nerada, Nationstates 29 Comments [3/28/2014 3:01:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 100218

[Justice Anthony Kennedy] began his vicious attack in 2003 with Lawrence and will finish it with the effective outlawing of Christianity in this country, because that is essentially what the sodomite agenda is about.

I consider Kennedy our mortal enemy, every bit as dangerous and worthy of the same evasive action that the 9-11 terrorists deserved. I do not say that lightly. He should be hanging from a tree as the traitor that he is. He gave the societal terrorists a sledge hammer.

fwdude, Free Republic 16 Comments [3/28/2014 3:01:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 100217

Judge Kennedy destroyed this country [with same-sex marriage]. May he die of some bone marrow disease.

In other news, Uganda absolutely rejected sodomy today, when the president reversed course and assented to the law preventing homosexual predation of children.

Viennacon, Free Republic 19 Comments [3/28/2014 3:00:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 100215

He who is without sin, cast the first stone. He who is without sin, is Jesus. Jesus gets first dibs on the stoning of fudgedippers. When he starts, I will join in. With that said, same sex is a sin. We all sin. Those who sin must repent to be like Christ. To repent, means to be sorry, and make an effort to not sin again. Therefore, those that are homosexual are just like all of us, we need to quit our sinning as best we can, and they must quit having sex. They are truly LIVING IN SIN.

jeremiad, The Blaze 35 Comments [3/28/2014 3:00:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 100213

evolution says , there's been life on Earth for - what ~4.5 mill yrs ?? Where are all the dead bodies ? They didnt hide them in outer space , So where were they buried ( interesting thought ? which came 1st ?? - cemetaries or civilisation ?) anyway Chris , you were saying that for every fossil the burden is now doubled , but with carcasses from over 4.5 million years , there should be Mountains of them ... abit short on ( under the ground) eh ??? Why cant the cemetaries of Millions of years give up the transitional fossils in huge over whelming amounts , At least thats the wishful thinking , but no ,....

Free Thinker, Y! answers 60 Comments [3/27/2014 3:27:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 45

Quote# 100210

I think I’ve mentioned it before but you all need to realize that the Asian American IR disparity problem is really a subset of a much more broader issue in American society. Feelings of emasculation is not unique to Asian American males but also white and black guys also. Also there is something about American culture, or perhaps Western culture, that transforms women into entitled bitches and men into emasculated, disempowered beta chumps. “Gender Wars” are hardly unique or limited to any one race. Ours just happens to be a special case.

American society is a fucked up place when it comes to social relations. This is the home of feminazis, fake diversity, political correctness, and the obesity epidemic. Race relations was never really resolved, no matter how much liberal propaganda horseshit would have you think otherwise. This is a land of the supposedly brave and free that manages to stigmatize and ridicule every different group of people who come to its shores. America is a lazy and fat consumerist society that worships the rat race, is highly anti-intellectual, low on independent critical thinking, high on brainwashing and mesmerization by the corporatized mass media hologram. It was in this toxic cesspool that the IR disparity thing became spawned. Don’t feel too bad.



Kobukson, bigWOWO 34 Comments [3/26/2014 3:18:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 100207

He wants to create, or he has knowingly now, created a putsche or movement, across society, to ban babies from public. People live in public, and people have to have babies, which you think is so unfortunate, Grant and Baby Ban Disciples, that later become adult humans able to afford your high priced meals.

Society is beginning to implode, across America, at an accelerating rate. Everywhere society is bored and so illogical people embrace these super fallacies, like starting by banning babies, of all things, which are essential to continue human society on Earth, from the best restaurants, then the hate you've festered and conflagrated, Grant, spreads, and multiplies, and then becomes exponentially vast for the baby ban.

Then babies aren't allowed, ultimately, into any restaurants, and then babies aren't allowed anywhere in public, just like the Jews eventually weren't across Adolf Hitler's Nazis Germany. And then the Randists and Yuppie Nazis go one step farther and say that babies, toddlers, kids, and teens should really just be relegated to 'youth clusters,' and that the schools and universities should be banned and shut down, as well, because children, and teens, habituated them.

Mike Stembridge, Facebook 42 Comments [3/26/2014 3:18:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 40

Quote# 100193

ONLY CHRISTIANITY CAN BREAK THE JEWS

JEWS FEAR CHRISTIANITY more than any other thing. This is because Christianity puts Christians on top and Jews on the bottom. Jews fear this.

Americans must tell the Jews that Christ's teachings are all about a "kingdom to come." This is why the Jews lobbied to take prayer out of public schools. For as American children we once prayed, "Thy kingdom come." (The Lord's Prayer) But the Jews ended all of this.

Yet we Americans can live for Christ's "kingdom to come" once again.

We Just Have To Stop The Jews
& Their Master "Satan" From Ruling Our Nation!
NOW!


Brother Nathanael, Real Jew News 31 Comments [3/26/2014 3:07:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 34
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 100192

This is just another example of the old "we just want to ban smoking on airlines and no where else" argument.

Once you start "redefining" something that has been an old institution as marriage has been and worse, letting the Left do the "redefining", the possibilities are endless for twisting what the "definition" is.

Ultimately, they want [same-sex marriage] to be the stepping stone to legitimizing Islamic-like child marriage, pedophilia and beasteality. As well, of course, of destroying the traditional nuclear family.

It is the way the Left has always worked. Bastardize the language, demonize opponents and invent victims. And let the chips fall where they may.

Penguin, Where Liberty Dwells 38 Comments [3/26/2014 3:07:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 100190

[A fundie's response to a recent theory on the Big Bang.]

I actually like this theory, and I’m a young earth creationist!

One reason is that it weakens string theory, which I hate because it can never be test and requires multiple universes.

Another reason is that during the inflation period this theory requires/predicts the early universe is fluid. Just as described in Genesis chapter one. “…and darkness was upon the face of the deep / abyss.”

The third reason is the Zero-energy universe, where the universe is eternal and created out of nothing. Just as the scriptures state.
• A generic property of inflation is the balancing of the negative gravitational energy, within the inflating region, with the positive energy of the inflation field to yield a post-inflationary universe with negligible or zero energy density.
• Due to quantum uncertainty energy fluctuations such as electron and its anti-particle a positron can arise spontaneously out of vacuum space but must disappear rapidly. The lower the energy of the bubble, the longer it can exist. A gravitational field has negative energy. Matter has positive energy. The two values cancel out provided the universe is completely flat [inflation produces a flat universe].In that case the universe has zero energy and can theoretically last forever.
• Stephen Hawking notes in his 2010 book The Grand Design: "If the total energy of the universe must always remain zero, and it costs energy to create a body, how can a whole universe be created from nothing? That is why there is a law like gravity. …Bodies such as stars or black holes cannot just appear out of nothing. But a whole universe can.

Some initial conditions of the inflation theory.
• During the initial “creation phase, matter and energy were inseparable. The four primary forces of the universe were also a united force. As tiny fractions of a second passed, the universe expanded rapidly. Cosmologists refer to the universe's expansion as inflation. The universe doubled in size several times in less than a second. As the universe expanded, it cooled and matter and energy decoupled. Cosmologists call this baryogenesis. Baryonic matter starts to form. It is the kind of matter we can observe. The most familiar baryons are the protons and neutrons that make up most of the mass of the visible matter in the universe.
• A period of particle cosmology followed the quantum age (inflation phase). The unified force broke down into components. The forces of electromagnetism and weak nuclear force split off. Photons outnumbered matter particles, but the universe was too dense for light to shine within it.

Then God said “Let there be light”.

mcowart, Rapture Ready 35 Comments [3/26/2014 3:07:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 100189

Is it any wonder that the Catholic Church doesn’t want to sully their Saint with the raunchy displays that are typically seen in the annual “gay pride” parades held across America? Why would the organizers want to see homosexuals prancing around in drag, genitalia-revealing clothing, or nearly naked?

And what’s the likelihood that “gay pride” organizers would ever allow Christians to march in their parades and pass out biblical literature about the sinfulness of homosexuality? Or what’s the chance that they would welcome groups such as NOM (National Organization for Marriage), NARTH (National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality) or JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality) to march right alongside the transvestites? Or what about an ex-gay marching band or Mark Regnerus as the grand marshal? Not on your life! The simple fact is that homosexual events are not “open” to everyone. Certain individuals and organizations, that don’t conform to their ideology, are absolutely barred from participating in their parades. Of course, they wouldn’t want any religious or moral principles “raining on their parade.” Homosexual extremists march along a one-way street when it comes to so-called “tolerance.”

At “gay pride” events and parades in places such as San Francisco, Atlanta, Charlotte, and New Orleans, it is not uncommon to see drag queens, phalluses, public nudity, actual and simulated sex acts, offensive signs/music, pornographic images, NAMBLA (pedophilia) representatives, S&M paraphernalia, and public spankings to raise money for AIDS efforts. So, why would the Catholic Church – and any morally sane individual – want to associate St. Patrick with those kinds of debauched displays?

In some places, the homosexual hijackers’ reign of terror is basically complete. For instance, in San Francisco, public decency ordinances are consistently and systematically overlooked during their homosexual, perversity-promoting events. Nudity and public sex acts are the norm during the annual Folsom Street Fair and other “gay pride” parades and festivals held in the city. Police officers, on foot and bicycle, congregate nearby and observe, making no attempt to enforce the law for fear of being labeled homophobic or worse.

And where is the mainstream media while all of this crude and vulgar behavior is so blatantly on display? They’re engaged in a homosexual-friendly, collaborative cover-up via a media blackout because they know that these sex-crazed, pornified sin-fests don’t fit the nice, neat little narrative of the happy, “normal gay family” that’s just minding their own business in relative suburban obscurity. Although not all homosexuals are militantly involved in the hostile takeover of the American culture, we can’t ignore the intimidating and morally corrosive efforts of the aggressive “gay” activists.

[...]

If they “can’t be themselves” without being mostly naked, raunchy, and highly sexualized, doesn’t that contradict the whole “It’s not about sex, it’s about love” mantra? It sounds much more to me like a crotch-centric fixation than anything to do with love.

If they’re so adamantly against “heteronormative” behavior, then why are homosexual activists also fighting so hard to get “married?” Marriage, after all, is the most heteronormative institution there is! There is obviously no method to their madness.

And homosexuals claim that they want equal treatment under the law, but as soon as they are told that they will be treated like any other citizen who breaks public decency laws, they throw a hissy fit. Apparently, they don’t really want equal treatment; what they demand is special treatment. They think that they are entitled to some sort of “protected class,” above-the-law status that allows them to brazenly break the law with impunity, and sadly, in most places and in many ways, that’s exactly what were witnessing as public officials cower in fear and cave to their every terrorist-like tactic!

Therefore, the “coexist” meme is a falsehood of epic proportions; it’s really “Leftist code” for the legal authorization of the anti-Christian forces – of which the virulent homosexual hijackers have become the worst offenders – to run roughshod over anyone with whom they disagree. In their twisted idea of coexistence, Christians and conservatives must live under the heel of the homofascists.

Jeff Allen, BarbWire 35 Comments [3/26/2014 3:07:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 100188

[On a YouTube video by Carey Wedler about why she doesn't like Obama any more]

Carey Wedler is exhibit A as to why women shouldn't be allowed to vote until they can demonstrate a mature sense of reasoning. "Oh, he's a black man. Oh, we can put racism behind us and I can show all my friends and family how open-minded I am. Oh, I was so totally into you that I waited in the rain to hear Oprah, Michelle and other racists spout their support for you." Give me a break. Emotions like these have no place in the running of a representative republic. How many other women with "jungle fever" helped to cause the destruction we're now seing. I suppose I should give her just a little credit for finally realizing what should have been discerned long ago. And notice how she is a typical female: She's absolutely ticked off that he lied to her. Yeah, sweety pie, men lie to women all the time to get what they want. You're so gullible as to hear only what you wanted to hear but had no sense to learn a few facts about the guy.

Sensible women should be embarrassed for their gender.

Dawg_em, WND 26 Comments [3/26/2014 3:06:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 100180



An anti-gay church in New York City’s Harlem neighborhood greeted passersby with a horrifying, homophobic message: “Jesus would stone homos.”

ATLAH Worldwide Missionary, led by Pastor James David Manning, posted the message on a sign outside its 123rd Street location. “Jesus would stone homos,” the message read, along with “Stoning is still the law” and Bible verses Matthew 5:17-19, Deuteronomy 17:5-7, Leviticus 20:13 and John 8:1-11.

The Leviticus passage, which is often cited in anti-gay rhetoric, says: “If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.”

Pastor James David Manning, Huffington Post 40 Comments [3/26/2014 3:05:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 32
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 100179

Many Bible scholars believe this very type situation will repeat itself in the last days – the day before Christ's return. A strong man will rise up, commonly believed to be the anti-Christ. He will unite the world in a cultural, political, and religious federation. As in Babel, the end will reflect a world determined to be rid of God.

Nevertheless, no matter what an individual's eschatological persuasion, the fact is, nations have seen this state of affairs occur throughout history over and again. And, it never ends well.

We're seeing it in America. A popular leader rises who is given almost god-like, messianic qualities by the media and others – one who single-handedly seeks to concentrate power – one the Christian Left and proponents of the erroneous doctrine of social justice treat as an anointed one. Our culture has largely abandoned trust in God for the opiate of government provision and hope, while endorsing via legalization abominable acts that God condemns.

Fair warning, America! Look to Babel. This can't end well.

Rev. Mark Creech, Christian Post 26 Comments [3/26/2014 3:05:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 100178

I agree wholeheartedly with Mrs. John R. Rice (wife of the great evangelist Dr. John R. Rice), who said that 90% of all divorces is the wife's fault, because God created the wife to be a HELP MEET for her husband (Genesis 2:18). The wife's ministry IS her husband! Many women pluck their marriages down to the ground (Proverb 14:1). A husband has a Biblical God-given RIGHT to RULE OVER his wife (Genesis 3:16).

David J. Stewart, Jesus-is-Savior.com 50 Comments [3/25/2014 3:42:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 49
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 100175

Why are liberal women always so fugly?

I’ve explained this many times.

Ugly people, deep down, and sometimes not so deep down, are angry at the world/God/nature, whatever, for making them ugly. It’s easier to place others in misery than it is to figure out how to fix themselves.

There are no ugly women, only lazy ones. It’s far easier to be a girly-boy and hang with a crowd than be a man and step out on your own.

That said, all democrats are ugly humans but not all ugly humans are democrats.

You show me an attractive democrat and I’ll show you someone who doesn’t quite swallow liberalism. Kirsten Powers, for one.

Lanceman, hotair 51 Comments [3/25/2014 3:42:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 40
Submitted By: michael3ov
1 2 3 4 5 9 | top