1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 17 22 | bottom
Quote# 112117

What hope is there for the committed Christian? Isn’t there some sense in which we can look forward to greater blessings on this earth than those who are rebelling against God? Indeed we can. Intimacy with God is so glorious that everything else in this world becomes meaningless by comparison. Even the best that this world has to offer fades into the background as trivial details compared to knowing God and knowing that He is pleased with us. This is why we find Christians in very miserable looking circumstances walking about with strange grins on their faces. When our souls are flooded with God, we simply aren’t so concerned with what is happening to our bodies or our bank accounts. It’s not that we stop feeling the reality of our circumstances, but our view of those circumstances drastically changes.

Suppose I were to tell you that I fixed the flat tire on your car for you. Naturally, you would be pleased not to have to deal with that chore. But then suppose you got a call and found out that you just got a huge promotion at work. You’re still glad about the car, but you’re way more excited about the promotion. The fixed tire goes from being great to being a convenient detail. Now suppose I hadn’t fixed your tire and your car was still sitting lopsided in your driveway. You’re tired and you just don’t want to deal with it. Then you get the call about the promotion. What happens to your energy level? It suddenly spikes, your mood instantly soars and pretty soon you’re out there whistling happily as you get out your spare. The tire problem never went anywhere, but your perspective of it drastically changed. It went from feeling like a major trial to a simple little chore that you could quickly take care of. God has the same kind of effect on us. The closer we get to Him, the more ALL of our trials seem like minor inconveniences in the light of the glorious soul promotion we’re experiencing with Him. We get so focused on spiritual priorities that we just aren’t very affected when earthly details go wrong.

When we align with God’s priorities for us, when we agree that drawing closer to Him is the most important thing in life, then we find ourselves in the best possible situation. Every trial we go through ends up spiritually strengthening us and over time the suffering we experience on this earth becomes less and less important to us as our joy with the Lord increases exponentially. No one has it better than sold out Christians. We are the wealthiest souls on earth. We are the ones that everyone would envy if they could see what we truly have. But they can’t, for God keeps the joy of intimacy with Him hidden away in the secret rooms of our soul. Those around us only catch a glimpse now and then—a smile on our faces, a light in our eyes, or a strange aura of peace about us that makes them wonder what it is that is so different about us. And of course we can’t totally explain, for our spiritual treasures defy description. We can only advise them to do what we did: to pursue God with all that they are and ask Him to have His total way in their lives. Then perhaps one day they’ll be as indescribably happy as we are.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 11 Comments [8/23/2015 3:15:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 112116

All the new Bible versions attack Christ's deity, remove the word “Godhead” and diminish Jesus' preeminence. What better way to destroy the churches than to change the truth of the Word of God into a lie. Romans 1:25, “Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.” Please use only the King James Bible—love it, cherish it, read it, hear it, memorize it, hold it against your chest at night when your heart aches, proclaim it, study it and share it!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 40 Comments [8/22/2015 6:42:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 112115

Pursuing God’s favor is the wrong focus in life. You need to pursue His APPROVAL and PLEASURE instead. You want to be the kind of soul who puts a delighted smile on God’s face. Blessing the heart of your glorious King—THAT is worth something. Simply getting His favor—that is meaningless. God favors both His friends and His enemies for different reasons. Even though Yahweh despised one of the kings of ancient Babylon, He poured out great favor on the little jerk and enabled him to stomp on Israel as a form of Divine discipline. Then He talked about how much He was looking forward to tormenting the man in eternity (see Isaiah 14). Adolf Hitler is another example of a man who experienced great favor from God on earth. An unknown foreigner doesn’t succeed in brainwashing an entire country into worshiping him without a whole lot of Divine assistance. We don’t like to associate God’s favor with the Nazi concentration camps, but from the perspective of the Nazis, they were being majorly blessed as they rapidly exterminated millions of people. Did the fact that God gave Hitler such raging success mean that He was pleased with the man? Not hardly. Do you see how problematic it is when we assume that God’s favor is evidence of His approval? The two things often have NOTHING to do with each other.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 18 Comments [8/22/2015 6:42:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 112112

God's commands against divorce in His Word are not unconditional, though He did say He hates divorce. He knows human suffering in relation to disasterous marriage because humans are naturally sinful and unloving. The commandments are overwhelmingly on purity and chastity. Divorce is really a case by case; the problem happens if the divorcee or divorced look for sex like animals on the expense of God's honor and the protection of children. Christians must protect marriage as if it's life itself, but there is a way to live out God's will even if divorce is committed.

Grace Kim Kwon, The Christian Post 20 Comments [8/22/2015 4:39:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 112111

Pope Has a Plan to Fix the World

The pope has stepped into the push for global sustainability —the world-wide effort to "save the planet" from the destructive efforts of its human inhabitants. Blaming wasteful consumerism and selfish profiteering, he declares that the world is in a mess and he knows how to fix it.

His recent 44,000-word encyclical on the environment pushes the plan for a happy world where everyone loves everyone and mother earth. No one is allowed to have too much so that everyone can have enough. His underlying assumption is that there will be some kind of global authority with the power to enforce harmony and peace, and see that all injustice and intolerance is eliminated.

The pope has chosen the issue of global warming as the supreme danger to mother earth. Ignoring the ongoing debate about the cause, he declares it to be settled science that man's industrial and technological progress is primarily to blame.

So how does this play out in our neighborhood? California's Jesuit-trained governor, Jerry Brown, recently attended a Vatican conference of mayors hosted by the pope. While there he was welcomed also by the black pope, Jesuit General Adolfo Nicolás, and afterward spoke to the conference. The topic of discussion centered around Pope Francis's campaign to stop global warming.

Francis told the mayors that the United Nations needed to speed up its efforts against climate change and expressed hope that an upcoming world summit on the subject in Paris in December would produce an agreement on this. “The U.N. needs to take a strong position on this,” he added.

Several other speakers at the conference included Brown and New York Mayor Bill De Blasio. Brown touted California's efforts in reducing greenhouse gases as an example for other cities and states to follow. Pointing to his state's current record of 25% renewable energy and 40 percent of the nation's electric cars, he pledged to be at the front of the campaign for “sustainability.”

Brown had harsh words for climate change skeptics: “We have very powerful opposition that, in at least my country, spends billions on trying to keep from office people such as yourselves and elect troglodytes and other deniers of the obvious science,” Brown said.

In the process, Brown and other attendees signed a declaration stating that, “human induced climate change is a scientific reality, and its effective control is a moral imperative for humanity."

A significant dissenting voice is Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott who has consistently resisted getting involved in “global climate change politics.” Abbott's economic advisor, Maurice Newman, states flatly that the UN was using false models showing sustained temperature increases to end democracy and impose authoritarian rule.

“The real agenda is concentrated political authority,” Newman wrote. “Global warming is the hook…. It's about a new world order under the control of the UN,” he added. “It is opposed to capitalism and freedom and has made environmental catastrophism a household topic to achieve its objective.”

Besides UN control of the economy, the pope's “Christian” solution in his encyclical is for everyone to worship Rome's wafer god and Virgin Mary goddess. This further proves that the pope is not Christian, but, since idol worship and goddesses are common in all major religions, they will be another common denominator for the coming one-world religion.

Instead of seeing the bad weather as God's judgment and repenting, the world is believing the lie that man is to blame and falling for Satan's trap of world government. The Bible shows that a false Christ will rise up to solve the problems that sin has caused. And he will do it by controlling the economy with everyone having a mark before they can buy or sell.

So, it is not surprising that the false Christ in the Vatican wants to put the UN in control of the economy. And the manufactured threat of climate change is his tool to get everyone to agree with his plan.

But Jesus promised that all nations would hear the gospel before the end (Matt. 24:14). Modern printing, TV, and the internet has largely fulfilled that prophecy. Now we are seeing the beginning of the end. In the chaos, many hearts will be open to the gospel. We need to use what freedom we have left to diligently saturate our neighborhoods and communities with no-nonsense gospel tracts.

We may soon be unable to preach openly, but the little paper missionaries will be hard to stop. Anyone who has, or remembers reading a tract, will know how to turn to God when their time comes.

Now, through August 31st, you can get a 50% discount on 1,000 copies or more of the tract "Global Warming"

Use promo code "GLOBE" at checkout to receive the discount.

Chick Publications, Chick.com 24 Comments [8/22/2015 4:39:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 112110

What were the beliefs of people during Biblical times? Before that? As we travel backward in history, does man come closer to belief in God or further from it? More religious or more scientific?

With that in mind, historically, do we get closer or further from the truth of a global event as time passes? We get further from the truth. First hand accounts become second hand accounts which fade into fables. It’s the natural law of entropy we find with the telephone game.

What we do know is that by 100 AD, something so cataclysmic-ally huge had occurred that 90% of the known world had converted to Christianity. We know that Jesus appeared to over 500 people, making a sealed case for Christ. (It only takes a few witnesses for capital punishment…)

Can you imagine an event so huge that the entire globe believed in it? We don’t even have that kind of consensus with the moon landing, which we know to be fact.

When talking about the origins of the earth, I have a document which dates back over 3,500 years which provides a snap shot of what life was like at that time.

When evolutionists talk about the origins of life, they have to infer based on circumstantial evidence and rely on other sciences. There is no document that speaks of evolution as the origin of mankind from thousands of years ago. They all speak of a Creator.

If the science of today were true, and evolution is the origin of life, then why did people bother worshipping God as Creator as opposed to evolutionary science? Is it we who have a greater truth of a theory which is only 200 years old, or is it the truth that prevailed for over 5,000 years beforehand which is true?

If evolution is true, why do we circumcise on the eighth day? My God says to do it on the eighth day. Science only discovered bilirubin in the past two hundred years, which explains why newborns can bleed to death if circumcised earlier.

If evolution is true and my Bible is not, then why were trade winds only discovered five hundred years ago? My historically accurate document tells me of the paths that winds travel, and it is thousands of years old.

If evolution is true, why do we wear clothes?

Why do we have an innate understanding of good versus evil?

Why do we believe in monogamy?

Why are we against murder?

All of these things are explained to me in my Bible, and they all have an origin and an end. There is hope of everlasting life, and an eternal Heaven. There is knowledge of a new Heaven and a new earth.

My Bible doesn’t disagree with science; it proves it. I can find all about astrology, astronomy, and the Heavens and the earth…all in one neat and tidy, eternal manuscript written by the finger of God Himself.

awomaninspired, Authonomy 31 Comments [8/22/2015 4:39:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 112109

Is Christianity really sexually repressive? Let's consider the facts, shall we.

Take for instance the Puritans. They are held up as the model of sexual repressiveness, right? But most people tend to ignore the fact that Puritans had large families of 8 plus children. That sounds like they are sexually liberated to me. A good example is the Duggar family of Arkansas . [...] That is a couple that had sex at least 19 times. Who were the critics of this sexually free family? None other than single, free thinking secular progressives who basically want to have their cake and eat it too. Columnist Mark Morford wrote a bigoted piece decrying the Duggars as freakish dullards with too many babies to feed.

But Morford is a classic example of the so-called liberated free thinker. [...] But remember, "free thinker" is really just a code word for sexual deviant: a pervert. When secular atheists boast that they are "free thinkers" they want you to believe they have opened minds and consider many areas of intellectual pursuits. This is a dishonest picture. In truth, the idea with the term "free thinker" is of a person longing to be free to have as much sex with whomever (or whatever) he or she desires with reckless abandon and impunity, and without fear of judgment from societal norms.

Those fuddy dudes, like Christian moralists, who tell individuals to control their sexual impulses; teaches faithful, sexual commitment to one person of the opposite sex; and maintains a since of propriety with those restrictive age of consent laws, are frowned upon by "free thinkers" as being "dinosaurish" and unenlightened.

Fred Butler, FredsBibleTalk.com 33 Comments [8/22/2015 4:38:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 112108

There never was and never will be any sort of, "kinder and more reasonable" homosexual. From the beginning of time they have always been aggressive and militant. This is not just true for homosexuality however. All sin corrupts completely, and those who worship it as normal become twisted and evil. Look at all the militant defenders of Planned Parenthood. A literal holocaust, on a scale vastly greater than anything Hitler ever imagined, is going on. Yet PP supporters will defend abortion with the hatred of hell itself.

Shane Clark, OneNewsNow 19 Comments [8/22/2015 4:37:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 112107

[On Muslims]

JACIE: Every time I see them in our stores with only their lying eyes peeking out I want to go up to them and say " get the hell out of my country" , but my husband won't let me . He says they'll put me in jail. I wonder can I really go to jail for speaking my mind??????????

Cooky642: My husband has the same fears for me: you're not alone! I have no doubt whatever that either of us could/would be arrested, convicted and imprisoned for such an action. My way of handling that is to take a basket load of stuff I intended to buy at a store and deliver it to the manager, and tell him in a normal (not quiet) voice that I do not do business with Muslims or Muslim supporters, and he'd better hustle to get the merchandise back on the shelves because I'm not buying any of it! And, I will tell all my friends and relatives (I don't have that many, but he doesn't need to know that) why I'm boycotting his store, and that I won't be back until his 'staff' is Muslim-free! So, I go back 6 months or a year later, and guess what? Not a hijab in sight!

JACIE and Cooky642, WND 23 Comments [8/22/2015 4:37:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 112106

What a wonderful scenario! The Fan Belt Inspectors, aka, FBI, warn the avowed Muslim enemies of this Republic about a possible attack on them by 'Militia Extremists.' The mini minds in the Bureau that issued such a warning need to revisit American History 101 and refresh their vacuous brains about the 'Extreme Militia' that is called for in our Constitution, and who defeated British General Cornwallis at Bunker Hill during the American Revolution. These are the same 'Minute Men/Women' who make up the Military Reserve in all 50 states of our Union, and who have given their lives by the hundreds and thousands around the globe to protect our homeland or the homeland of others. Those in the Bureau who issued this warning should hang their heads in disgraceful shame and should be booted from the Bureau with a 'yellow stripe painted down their backside. Any American citizen who identifies themselves as a conservative or moderate need not apply to any Agency, Bureau, Department, Office, or entity of the federal government for assistance while Obozo the Clown remains as Divider-in-chief. If I were a murderer, I would rather have the Fan Belt Inspectors (FBI) on my case, than a crew of extremely competent Homicide Dick's from the LAPD. Some years ago the Bureau was able to throw off the stigma of its cross dressing Director/Founder, J. Edgar Hoover, but alas it has fallen back into its old ways since the advent of the Chicago Charlatan as POTUS, who knows as much about Criminal Justice and law enforcement as he does about brain surgery, and the mating habits of the male Tse Tse fly!
Semper Fi, and keep your powder dry! ({:o|).

Gunny Larry, WND 17 Comments [8/22/2015 4:37:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 112101

"Here's why Amnesty backed the decriminalisation of sex work":

Amnesty international is a feminist institution that believes that sex predators deserve pity, sympathy and most important of all protection and encouragement so long as they are women and their victims are men and young boys.

I'm not sure many people are going to read this comment of mine but I would like to encourage people to stand up to and challenge the authority that is institutionalised feminism.

Prostitution is a profession mostly dominated by women. These women sexually exploit men and young boys for financial gains. They pray on weak vulnerable people who need help desperately. They help spread disease, perversions and often not only abuse their clients but their own children who witness their deviant sexual acts.

I would like the reader of this article, written by a woman, no doubt a feminazi, to notice the difference in the way she deals with the men and the women involved in prostitution. According to her interpretation of prostitution, the prostitutes are victims and most all prostitutes are women whilst the clients, the pimps who are all mostly men are according to her evil victimisers. This is because she looks at life through a feminist keyhole. She is a sexist. In her mind women cannot do wrong and men cannot do right. Women are born victims and men are born victimisers. We have to change our culture to fit this feminist theory.

Say no to prostitution, say no to amnesty international and say no sexism, say to sexual exploitation and say no to feminism.

Themishmisheh, The Independant  18 Comments [8/22/2015 4:34:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 112100

Women stagnate evolutionarily because they have 2x chromosomes, the fact male is xy allows for more genetic variables, which allows for different off spring. Men tend to be smarter than women but also stupider than women because of this genetic trait. By having the variability in the man who must earn their partner it ensures the best traits move forward.

Dangerestdrag, r/TheRedPill/ 22 Comments [8/22/2015 4:34:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 112091

(on a story about a gay couple settling with a clerk who refused to issue them a marriage license due to her Christian faith)

I'm sorry this poor woman was forced to be in contact with such reprobates. In the interests of her own health, I hope the homosexuality choosers didn't touch the clerk when they got their license, and that she disinfected the area after they left... because male homosexual choosers are notoriously diseased. Here's hoping these wayward men stay obsessed with their lust for each other, and leave little kids they like to hunt alone.

SoundMind, Christian News Network 23 Comments [8/21/2015 3:01:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 25

Quote# 112087

Repost from recent days. They are tearing this one apart on Blue Pill too. Male feminists are such fags.

And female feminists…well…I am not sure if they are the enemy so much as that they are just stupid, and like most women nowadays, they just don’t get it.

Feminism is like all the rest of Identity Politics – Gay Identity Politics, antiracism, the trans movement, the Pro-ethnicity movements and all the other various idiocies in that almost every single thing they say is not even true. Apparently feminists live in a fantasy world just like antiracists where all of the things we intuitively know via common sense and a lifetime of simple observational learning are actually somehow not even true.

The motto of the PC crowd should be, “Everything you know is wrong!” So feminists, like the antiracists and the rest of the boneheads, simply believe an endless series of lies, and almost everything they say is wrong. I am not sure whether I should hate people like that or just feel sorry for them like you feel sorry for actual retards.

It’s a known fact that modern women are completely nuts on the subject of men and teenage girls. You can’t even say they’re nice to look at. You can’t even say how you can see some guy wanting to fuck one of them. You can’t say how you think it’s normal to jerk off and fantasize about them. All of this, incredibly enough, is “pedophilia” despite that face that 100% of behavioral scientists say that being turned on by teenage girls or even fucking them isn’t “pedophilia,” and in fact it’s not any sort of mental illness and indeed, beyond that, it’s not even abnormal.

Men screwing teenage girls is normal. Humans have been doing this for as long as there are humans. It is completely normal in many societies such as African tribes to this very day. In cultures where this is normal, not a single teenage girl in the history of man has been psychologically damaged by having sex with a man any more than any grown woman has been damaged by having sex with a man.

There’s absolutely no evidence whatsoever that it harms the girl other than everyone screaming about how damaged she got and running her around to idiot feminist therapist who endlessly drum it into her little head about how damaged she is. Yes, you freak out and tell a human that what just happened to them is awful and damaging and a lot of humans will react by deciding that they event was traumatizing.

The problem with screwing teenage girls is that society has decided that it simply does not approve of such things. Because society has decided it doesn’t like it due to a feminist-led mass hysteria equating normative teenage sexuality with pedophilia, the penalties for messing around with teenage girls have gone berserk.

You would think an 18 year old boy could fuck a 15 year old girl easily, but oh no, feminist shitheads have decided that is “pedophilia.” The laws are so lunatic and evil now that I would advise any grown man over 18 to exercise extreme caution in this area. And once you get to 25 or so, don’t even think about it. 25-30 year old men are going down on “child molestation” charges for fucking girls aged 17 years and 10 months. That’s right. Two months shy of legal, and it’s “pedophilia.”

Your grandma was right after all.

I get the distinct impression from talking to my parents that their generation thought, “Well, yes, men will fuck teenage girls if you give them the opportunity.” I am not sure if they thought it was the greatest thing since Kleenex, but they seemed to think it was simply part of normal human behavior. And I believe my mother pointed out that a lot of teenage girls want to screw men and will even try to seduce them.

Identity Politics says everything you learned from your parents and grandparents, the obvious wisdom of ages which was then born out in life by you via common sense and simple observation, is wrong. Everything you grandma told you is wrong. Bull-shit.

Robert Lindsay, Beyond Highbrow 22 Comments [8/21/2015 2:56:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 112086

“If you are here without our permission, and we have given you two months to leave, and you’re still here, and we find that you’re still here after we we’ve given you the deadline to leave, then you become property of the State of Iowa,” he argued. “And we have a job for you. And we start using compelled labor, the people who are here illegally would therefore be owned by the state and become an asset of the state rather than a liability and we start inventing jobs for them to do.”

Mickelson insisted his idea was justified even after a caller said it “sounds an awful lot like slavery.”

“Well, what’s wrong with slavery?” he asked the caller.

“Well we know what’s wrong with slavery,” the caller replied.

“Apparently we don’t because when we allow millions of people to come into the country who aren’t here legally and then people who are here are indentured to those people to pay their bills, their education of their kids, pay for their food, their food stamps, their medical bills, [in] some cases even subsidize their housing,” Mickelson said. “And somehow the people who own the country, who pay the bills, pay the taxes, they get indentured to the new people who are not even supposed to be here. Isn’t that a lot like slavery?”

(...)

“Put up a tent village, we feed and water these new assets, we give them minimal shelter, minimal nutrition, and offer them the opportunity to work for the benefit of the taxpayers of the state of Iowa,” Mickelson argued. “All they have to do to avoid servitude is to leave.”

Jan Mickelson, Raw Story 25 Comments [8/21/2015 2:54:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 112084

[Ya know, I can understand the anti-abortion view completely in most cases. This is not one of them. 11 and raped!!! Geez hasn't the poor girl been through enough without having to carry a baby to term that'll @#%$ her up?]

It's a tough decision. but it isn't the baby's fault, so why would you kill it? Besides, if you were to abort all these types of births, this person wouldn't have been born :
I'm sure there are some pioneering jazzmen who were also born from rape, or Master/Slave mulattoes who went on to great things.
I still think you're losing more from abortion than gaining from it.

micronian, social anxiety support 11 Comments [8/21/2015 2:52:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 112081

Sin is sin, and we’re all guilty. You say you’re better than Mike the molester because at least you’re not hurting kids. Well, whoopee. If we took an inventory of all the sin in your life, we’d find that you’re up to plenty of shenanigans that Mike’s not presently guilty of. No one has room to pull rank on anyone else. For every sin that you’re not doing, there are plenty of others that you are doing, so you’re totally unqualified to judge.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 10 Comments [8/21/2015 2:51:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 112080

If I had a dollar for every time Bill Maher got more cheers from conservatives than liberals, I’d almost have enough for a Little Ceasars Hot-N-Ready. Yet Maher is getting support from several conservative quadrants for his bold and non-compromising stance on the inherently violent nature of Islam.

It’s kind of amusing how host Charlie Rose keeps throwing Maher a lifeline (how many times does he say something like, “But you’re not really saying…”). Maher doesn’t take the hint, though; he doubles down, especially when Rose tries to make Christianity as primed for radicalization as Islam:

Maher: There are illiberal beliefs, that are held by vast numbers of Muslim people…

Rose: Christians too

Maher: No, that’s not true. Vast numbers of Christians do not believe that if you leave the Christian religion, you should be killed for it. Vast numbers of Christians do not treat women as second class citizens. Vast numbers of Christians do not believe if you draw a picture of Jesus Christ, you should get killed…Would most Muslim people condone [ISIS]? No, but most Muslim people in the world do condone violence for what you think.

Atheist Sam Harris agreed with Maher on his show recently, much to the animated dismay of actor Ben Affleck.

Affleck, however, called these characterizations “gross and racist” and argued that Maher and Harris were just conflating the minority views of radical jihadists with the beliefs of the rest of the world’s estimated 1.6 billion Muslims

I’ve seen a lot of posts from fellow Christians and conservatives saying something like, “Never thought I’d agree with Bill Maher,” or, “Maher gets it right for once.” Maher doesn’t like Christians–even in the Rose interview he makes a point of saying that all religions are stupid–but in this instance, he seems to be getting some unrequited support.

Samuel James, Inkligations 17 Comments [8/21/2015 2:51:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: AJ Williams

Quote# 112078

Every time I drive by a construction site, I always see a woman waving the traffic flag. She ought to be at home baking bread, not waving trucks and automobiles past a construction zone. What is wrong with America? We've lost our minds as a nation. Many people see no harm in women pursuing professional careers, but when it comes down to reality, those type of women act and think like men. They are decisive, strong-willed, tough, loud-mouthed, rugged and lack the Biblical character traits that God desires in a Christian woman. The Amish people have a beautiful culture. Their kids aren't programmed to work in factories the rest of their lives. Their daughters are taught to cook, sew and be mothers. Their boys are taught to make furniture, grow crops and be fathers. The rest of America's kids know how to play Super Mario, curse in Spanish and do the moonwalk.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 33 Comments [8/21/2015 2:50:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 112077

here you are. There you are! I knew it, I just knew one of you morally bankrupt Eugenics apologists would swim on by. And proving my point in a spectacular fashion, I might add, being so blind that you deny the very thing you support.

Let me tell you something that will likely go in one ear and out the other: Abortion is not a basic human right. I don’t know where you people pull that out of. Maybe it’s comes out of the asses your heads tend to be shoved inside. A fetus, an unborn human, is not part of the mother’s body. It is a separate human, with a unique set of DNA, a unique fingerprint, and a unique appearance. Yes, she is dependent on her mother for survival, just as any child is dependent on an adult for the same. For what is a womb but a place where the growing child gets food and shelter, just like a born child is dependent on his parents for the same. The only difference, the only difference, is time. Would you justify killing a toddler because he’s dependent on his parents for survival? By following your logic, you would. But then again, logical consistency was never the strong suit of the Pro-Choice movement.

Time does not matter when it comes to life. What right have you to kill a child because it is still developing? What right have you to declare that dependence on another is grounds upon which to kill someone? Unborn fucking birds get more goddamn protection from wanton killing than our own unborn children. Even nature shows us the value of the unborn for fucks sake!

And what twisted logic drives you to the conclusion that protecting an innocent life, even a “potential” one (if you want to be stubborn about the term), somehow gives a woman fewer rights than a corpse? Can you even read what you’re typing? A woman can’t terminate her child, so suddenly she’s worse off than dead people?? What the hell kind of logic is that? I’ll tell you what it is, It’s emotionally-contrived drivel. A false and pretentious non sequitur used to justify the murder of children by the thousands.

And congratulations for not reading my post. I never directly compared Abortion to the Holocaust, though perhaps the parallel isn’t that far fetched. I did, however, compare Eugenics to the Holocaust. You’re here, defending women who have murdered their unborn children for genetic reasons, which is the EXACT definition of Eugenics. Clearly, the fact that you’re here debating this tells me you embrace the logic that leads to it. Abortion for most other reasons is flat out murder, but justifying it on the basis of genetics takes to straight into Eugenics. The Holocaust was justified under the same Eugenic propaganda. Namely: This group or that group is genetically inferior and therefore less than human. Ergo, their legal rights are slim/non-existant.

Your last paragraph is the fucking linchpin. Magically, after 24-weeks, suddenly the “mass of tissue” is a person. Can you pinpoint for me the exact magical thing that one one-hundreth of a second prior to the 24th week disqualified it as a living being? As being alive? As having the basic human right to live? That’s a real basic human right for you. LIFE. And nothing trumps the right to life.

If it contains human DNA, it is a human, and therefore inherits the inalienable right to life from the moment that new set of DNA is formed. Mothers should take role models from nature, as every single species that I’m aware of goes to some lengths to preserve the life of their unborn. Even fucking ants do all they can to secure the safety of their fertilized eggs. What kind of twisted, evil creatures are you that you can’t even match the moral integrity of a fucking insect!?

You. Disgust. Me. You attempt to defend the undefendable twice over in your little post, while simultaneously denying the fact that you’re openly supporting the single most arrogant and destructive chain of logic ever created by mankind; that one group of humans is superior to another by virtue of uncontrollable circumstances.

Fuck you and your fascist, eugenic, murderous bullshit! I’m done with you. Go sit in a corner and contemplate how an ant is a better example of morality than you.

justanotherconservative, tumblr 39 Comments [8/21/2015 3:42:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 112076

[Also, there are thousands of women out there who don't regret getting an abortion at all. Why are you ignoring them and pretending they don't exist? Also, do you know what one of the main factors is in whether or not a woman regrets getting an abortion? Whether or not the people around her are supportive of her decision. So why not be supportive of a woman's choice to get an abortion, so that she doesn't end up feeling bad about what she did?]



Ignoring them? I’m pretty sure I addressed exactly what my position was on women who unrepentantly abort their children. To put it bluntly, I want women who Abort to feel guilty, just as much as I would want any murderer to express a modicum of regret over their actions. I want to comfort them in their guilt, explain to them that there is still forgiveness for the act, and help them to realize they need not ever repeat it. Just because I have compassion for them and understand why they feel it’s necessary does not mean I condone or support the act, especially when alternatives are readily available. I cannot and will never support the decision to needlessly terminate an unborn child. Period. End of story. I will not be supportive of that decision, because it is antithetical to the preservation of human life! I want both the mother and the child to live! I want them all to live! I thought I made that explicitly clear! I hold them both to be of equal value. I implicitly covered all of this in my previous set of answers.

But that’s the difference between you an me, apparently. I want everyone involved to live, you’re perfectly fine with half of them dying.


justanotherconservative, tumblr 18 Comments [8/21/2015 3:42:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 112075

What do we call it when someone is forced to provide labor against his will?

We call it slavery. And homosexual activists are determined to resurrect it in the South and everywhere else.

Case in point: Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis is refusing to issue sodomy-based wedding licenses to gay couples. In so doing, she is honoring the Kentucky state constitution and her own conscience.

But a federal judge, David Bunning, is ordering her to violate her own deeply held religious principles or go to jail. Bunning wrote that her liberty is limited to the freedom “to believe (emphasis mine) that marriage is a union between one man and one woman.”

But the First Amendment does not protect Ms. Davis’ right to “believe” the principles of her Christian faith; it guarantees her right to practice the principles of her Christian faith, to freely exercise her Christian faith.

In truth, it is Judge Bunning who is the transgressor here.

He is violating the First Amendment of the Constitution, which prohibits the federal government from interfering with the free exercise of religion. Whatever else he is doing, he is grossly interfering with Ms. Davis and her freedom to live according to her religious faith in the public square.

Bryan Fischer, American Family Association 35 Comments [8/21/2015 3:41:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: AJ Williams

Quote# 112074

I have to ask any pro-choice readers of this blog, as respectfully and gently as I can: What more would it take for you to see the humanity of the unborn? What exactly would you have to witness to be convinced that bodies in the womb are people? Is your position one of faith and dogma, that cannot be assailed by even the most convincing medical and video evidence? If not, what are you waiting to see?

Let’s be absolutely clear about one thing: The idea that these videos are “hoaxes” or are “deceptively edited” is a laughingstock. The only honest reason to look away, the only honest reason to not see, is to admit that you don’t want to.

Samuel James, Inkligations 20 Comments [8/21/2015 3:41:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: AJ Williams

Quote# 112073

Donald Trump: The 14th Amendment Is Unconstitutional

On Tuesday, when Bill O'Reilly challenged the presidential hopeful's proposal to end birthright citizenship in light of the 14th Amendment, Trump hit back: "Bill, I think you're wrong about the 14th amendment and frankly the whole thing about anchor babies."

"I can quote it, you want me to quote you the amendment?" O'Reilly responded. "If you're born here you're a citizen. Period!"

But Trump insisted he and his lawyers have found some disturbing holes in the amendment, which unequivocally states that anyone born in the United States is in fact an American citizen.

"What happens is, they're in Mexico, they're going to have a baby, they move over here for a couple of days, they have the baby," Trump said, while trying to break down his legal take. "Bill, [lawyers are] saying, 'It’s not going to hold up in court, it’s going to have to be tested.'"

"I don't think they have American citizenship, and if you speak to some very, very good lawyers, some would disagree," Trump added. "But many of them agree with me—you're going to find they do not have American citizenship. We have to start a process where we take back our country. Our country is going to hell. We have to start a process, Bill, where we take back our country."

Donald Trump, Mother Jones 34 Comments [8/21/2015 3:36:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 112072

Other user: I think Jesus was talking about a desire to commit audelry in Mat.5;28

Goodbook: Or the desire to commit yoga.
Yoga is just practice for sex with demons.

Goodbook, Christian Forums 26 Comments [8/21/2015 3:35:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 17 22 | top