Quote# 116538

During a December interview with TMZ, MMA fighter Conor McGregor bragged that not even the Son of God could defeat him in the octagon.

“There’s not a man alive that could beat me,” McGregor explained. “But Jesus isn’t alive so maybe he could come back from the dead, I don’t know. I’d still whoop his ass.”

That didn’t sit well with Pastor Romero, who revealed during a sermon last week that he would be praying for God to strike down McGregor.

“He said if Jesus Christ was in the ring with me, I’d knock him out!” Romero explained to his congregation. “The guy is a UFC fighter. That guy is nothing.”

The pastor argued that MMA fights were popular because of “wickedness” in the world.

“That guy, I’m going to pray that God strikes him down with a lightning bolt!” Romero exclaimed. “So everybody in the world believes that the Bible even a little bit will know that it was God, it was Jesus that struck him down.”

“He can just look down and with his little finger just say, ‘So, boom!'” he added. “Some catastrophic event because he’s a wicked person. And if you watch him and you’re a fan of his and you call yourself a Christian, shame on you! You’re not right with God! It’s wicked as hell.”

Pastor Donnie Romero, Raw Story 25 Comments [2/4/2016 4:06:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 116537

I spoke to a man recently who professed to be a follower of Jesus. When I said that I was looking for atheists to interview for a video, he said that he would like to bury all atheists up to their heads in sand, cover them with honey and let bees sting them to death.

When I asked him what happened to "love your enemies," he said, "Atheists are 'satantic'," and that the Bible says that there's a time to love and there's a time to kill. I said that I'm sure that when Solomon said that he didn't mean to kill people who have a different worldview. I also told him that he wasn't a follower of Jesus, if he held to that belief.

That's when he walked off...probably to get a shovel and some honey.

Ray Comfort & unknown person, Facebook 38 Comments [2/3/2016 4:23:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Nemo

Quote# 116535

(Commenting on story "A Headache for Evolutionists? Scientists Discover ‘Unimaginable Complexity’ in DNA"):

Creation itself testifies of our Creator. Clear and unmistakable design points to the Designer. Just the discoveries in a strand of DNA should have ended all debate a long time ago: “DNA is an information code. The overwhelming conclusion is that information does not and cannot arise spontaneously by mechanistic processes. Intelligence is a necessity in the origin of any informational code, including the genetic code, no matter how much time is given.” (Lane Lester, Ph.D. Genetics, The Natural Limits to Biological Change, 1989.) And surprise, surprise, the incredible degree of this complexity of design just continues to baffle the evolutionary believers in “magic”.

“The bottom line? The genome continues to show evidence of complexity and precise design.”
Deal with it, blind ones.


The Last Trump, Christian News Network 39 Comments [2/3/2016 4:22:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 116532

How to make Satan fart:

Hadith no: 582 bakhari

Narrated / Authority of: Abu Huraira
Allah's Apostle said, "When the Adhan is pronounced Satan takes to his heels and passes wind with noise during his flight in order not to hear the Adhan. When the Adhan is completed he comes back and again takes to his heels when the Iqama is pronounced and after its completion he returns again till he whispers into the heart of the person (to divert his attention from his prayer) and makes him remember things which he does not recall to his mind before the prayer and that causes him to forget how much he has prayed."

Startingarabic, ummah.com 21 Comments [2/3/2016 4:22:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 116530

I like how people are so mad at this, when in reality this is quite a normal attitude among Christians. Christians are greedy and hateful by their very nature, and don't care about anyone else but themselves when the chips are down - not even their own children. Oh sure they might seem kind at first glance, but their true colors eventually come out.

NeoMatrix, FSTDT 46 Comments [2/3/2016 4:20:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 116529



Catholic Nationalist, Facebook 29 Comments [2/3/2016 4:20:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 116528

The Iowa caucuses bring many celebrities to the state to rally last-minute support for candidates, and this weekend, Duck Dynasty‘s Phil Robertson was the latest to make the trek to support Republican Ted Cruz. Introducing the competitive candidate at a rally Sunday, the reality show patriarch not only attacked marriage equality as “evil,” but suggested that its supporters needed to be literally obliterated.

“Don’t you understand that when a fellow like me looks at the landscape and sees the depravity, the perversion — redefining marriage and telling us that marriage is not between a man and a woman? Come on Iowa! It’s nonsense. It is evil. It’s wicked,” Robertson told the crowd.
“It’s sinful. They want us to swallow it, you say. We have to run this bunch out of Washington, D.C. We have to rid the earth of them. Get them out of there. Ted Cruz loves God.”

When Cruz appeared on stage, he reflected praise back at Robertson. “What an extraordinary human being,” the candidate said, claiming that “God makes every one of us unique, but some are uniquer than others.”
“What a voice Phil has to speak out for the love of Jesus,” Cruz added. “What a joyful, cheerful, unapologetic voice of truth Phil Robertson is.”

Cruz did not specifically address Robertson’s suggestion that “we have to rid the earth” of all marriage equality proponents.

Phil Robertson & Ted Cruz, Think Progress 33 Comments [2/3/2016 4:19:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Kevin Klawitter

Quote# 116526

a bill had been proposed that would outlaw pedophilia, euphemistically called “child marriage.” But there’s an entire mullah mafia in the big city with attitudes much like that of the small-minded village cleric who celebrated his student’s self-mutilation. And that mullah mafia thanks heaven for little girls.


Marvi Memon of the ruling Muslim League party was attempting to introduce harsher punishment for those who “marry” minors, while also raising the legal age of marriage to 18.

Relatively uncontroversial in 2016, you would think. But such is the fear of being accused of committing blasphemy in this country, such is the power of the accuser, that all one has to do is threaten. And that is exactly what happened.


The country’s Council of Islamic Ideology declared that to outlaw pedophilia would be an insult to the Prophet Muhammad, for hadn’t he married a 9-year-old girl called Aisha?


Unanimously rejecting the proposed Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Bill 2014 on “purely religious grounds,” the mullahs pronounced any representatives who supported this reform to be blasphemers.


Chairman of the Council Mohammad Khan Sheerani said,“Parliament cannot create legislation that is against the teachings of the Holy Quran or Sunnah.”


In May 2014, the Council repeated its earlier ruling that girls as young as 9 years old were eligible for marriage if “the signs of puberty are visible.” The legislators—from the ruling party I remind you—were forced to withdraw their bill immediately.


The mullah mafia had won once again. A great “victory for Islam.” Pedophilia was “Islamic.” And to question it was blasphemy. Which is punishable by death, in case you were ever in doubt.


Various Pakistan mullas, the daily beast 23 Comments [2/3/2016 4:09:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 116522

(From a letter that was posted in the Alabama Baptist)

At the risk of being an outcast or considered a narrow-minded bigot, I must express my disagreement and disappointment with out Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) leaders in regards to the Syrian refugee crisis. I am against allowing the refugees the rights to America’s soil and my neighborhood. These are the same people that hate America, hate Christians and have vowed to take over the world by destroying our way of life. Perhaps our leaders should study the Old Testament when God gave specific instructions to destroy these people (even their women, children and animals). Why would He give such instructions? Because He knew the impact these idol worshippers of false gods would have on His people. It is not a matter of loving your neighbor. My neighbors are the people that value the same standards of life and way of life that I value.

We owe it to our children and grandchildren to make good decisions for their future in America. And opening up our country to ten of thousands of refugees with their unknown background but known hatred for Christianity and America will destroy any future our children may have.

These are the same people that are willing to give their lives to carry out their commitment to Allah. They don’t have to be considered terrorists to hate Christians. Their religious conviction cause them that hatred.

What we will see is not more SBC churches being established but more mosques. What we will see is their way and their customs being forced on us to either observe or make way for us to give up our rights to observe their rights. They are victims of a more powerful force of Muslims within their own country but they are not victims when it comes to their lifelong hatred of us and our belief in Christ. It makes no sense to say to them, “I know you hate us and I know you want to destroy our country and way of life, and I know you will eventually find a way to kill us, but come on it anyways and live among us until you gain the strength and power to overcome us.” Has the SBC been turned over to a reprobate mind?

Pastor Ted Sessoms, The New Civil Rights Movement 22 Comments [2/3/2016 4:07:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 116520

Further, Asians have a natural predisposition of being less pro-social. They tend to be less emphatic and less socially engaging with society and people who are different from them. Naturally incurious about their surroundings to be more exact when compared to Whites.

JS, Lion of the Blogosphere 21 Comments [2/3/2016 4:07:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 116515

UPDATE 11/7/2015
Some people take offense that I shouldn't compare people with disabilities to animals.
The time I used them was to compare them (And now I will just consider the type of people who lacks certain abilities) only for the sake of the argument that it depends on 'how much we can do', and I thought it would be fair to compare a person who lacks an arm (for example) to someone who has that and can do more.. Only for the sake of that kind of argument of 'more'. So I thought it was fair. I did NOT intend to harm. I just thought one thing connected to an argument type, I am not saying some humans are like non-human animals (Or that depends, and yet, all humans are similar anyway).
Also, I may have lack of stuff that I can't control too. But I'm still standing up, and so can anyone else.
Also, all animals are equal to living anyway. Soooo.
UPDATE DONE

NOTE: It's completely fine to personally prefer humans over other animals, just like how it's fine to personally prefer other animals over humans.

But it pisses me off how humanaboos go act like humans are "more important", "special", and so forth.
It's just as bad as when a wolfaboo morally treats wolves as "superior".
After all, IF people are allowed to give the opinion that human animals are superior, then people are ALSO allowed to do the same with other animals then.
Or if it's considered "animalaboo, or whatever" to argue that a non-human animal is "superior", then the same concern (the term humanaboo) should be about treating humans as superior to other animals.

Anyway, treating humans as "superior" in terms of morality, and rights is one of the 3 main reasons why I have a general dislike on our own race. It disgusts me.

blog.burningman.com/wp-content…

Now I like to show some stupid idiotic myths.

"Not all animals are equal because humans can do more!!!"
In terms of what we do, it's kinda true that all animals (including animals) on this planet can't do everything (Though we do not fully know what each creature can do) humans can do. However, does that mean they are not morally equal, with respect, etc? NO.
Hell, even non-human animals can do things humans can't do. There really is no 'actual more' either.
Yet, what about all the humans that has disabilities? Are we going o say that people with disabilities are not equal? Because according to logic, if I had to agree based off what we do, then I would need to agree that humans with disabilities are not equal then.
faculty.webster.edu/corbetre/p…

"Animals don't have rights."
Humans are animals. If other animals do not have rights, then neither does homo sapiens.
Also, who gave out the illusion that it must depend on what humans do? Just because humans can build all this cool technologically, that doesn't mean other animals can no longer have rights. What we do, does not connect with nature fundamentals of other creatures.
blog.burningman.com/wp-content…
www.adelaide.edu.au/news/news6…

"But humans understand rights, therefor, humans can only have rights!"
The term "Human rights" it's self, is just an idea made up by humans.
But if a human said that we have super powers, does that mean we have them? No.
Human rights are 'real', because it's based off 'natural rights'.
A natural right is a basic nature fundamental thing. And you want to know also shares this fundamental thing?
Non-human animals.
All animals have rights. Natural Rights.
Humans have natural rights, and so does non-human animals.
Just like humans, other animals try to survive too.
eyler.freeservers.com/JeffPers… - Don't know if I agree to all though.
Another interesting article: animalrights.about.com/od/anim…

"Animals don't have Free Will!"
Not even humans have free will. I mean what is 'Free Will'? Despite the fact that there IS evidence of free will in non-human animals, but humans don't have this special 'free' choice. I believe they are controlled by some part of their nature brain in a physical sense.
www.scientificamerican.com/art…
At the same time, I do believe it might exist, but the same can be said for other animals because of the evidence.



In the end kinda, it doesn't matter what we do, what matters is the fact that all animals consent to living, taking some action/behavior, and other.
If an animal is trying to live/survive, it's a natural right. It may not 100% be the same as what humans do (Humans saying words, etc.). But how does that somehow "change" it? Face it, the idea that it "does" is based off the egoist mind of some humans.
You do not need to 'say or reason' to show rights. You just have to show that you are trying to live.

Also, remember if we do depend on what 'humans do', then what about the humans that has disabilities?

All animals have rights, all has a soul, and all can possibly be unique with intelligence, which by the way exist in at least a lot of other animals.
Other animals feel pain too. I also wonder why people are against actual rape, but is fine with killing? Kinda odd.

Yet, to the arguments that "animal rights are made up"? The only thing that is completely made up is the idea that other animals don't have rights.

---------

There is other myths and possible facts. I do think I didn't write this very well much.
Here is some other links though!
speciesismthemovie.com/
www.adelaide.edu.au/news/news6…
lesswrong.com/lw/i63/arguments…
www.livescience.com/41601-spec…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciesi…

_______________________________________

Other arguments - Free Will and Possibly Consenting

io9.com/5714341/even-animals-a…

www.psychologytoday.com/blog/a…

wwwarea, deviantart 24 Comments [2/2/2016 3:46:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 116509

Should rape be legalized?

Best Answer: of course.

too many females make false accusations that fill our prisons, and any female the was raped probable shouldn't have lead him on.

just spend another trillion, Yahoo! Answers 33 Comments [2/2/2016 3:44:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 29
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 116508

would rather have persecution and oppression of the True Faith than the current state of affairs.

I would rather that Catholics be martyred for our beliefs and forced to go underground, worshiping secretly, than secular humanist atheism be permitted to take over and run rampant in this nation because of the technicality that the powers-that-be don't consider it to be a "religion" by their definition (it is indeed religion masquerading as something else) and allow it to piece-by-piece establish itself in the infrastructure of this country ever since the American Revolution.

I would rather that priests be shot openly in the public square, and thus assuring their Heavenly reward and witness to the Faith, than this abuse of our internal scandals such as sexual abuse, and idiotic snarky sniping that goes on in the Huffington Post and Salon.com by "enlightened atheists" that want to throw off the shackles of Bronze-Age morality and usher in a new Utopia of atheistic peace and tranquility.


Elizium23 , catholic anwsers forums 38 Comments [2/2/2016 3:43:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: mary

Quote# 116507

A lawyer in Novosibirsk has called for a ban on stories about a goat and a tiger in a national park in Russia's Far East, arguing that the widespread media coverage of the pair is 'covert gay propaganda' and poses a threat to Russian children.

The animals gained worldwide fame when Amur the tiger failed to pounce on a goat named Timur after it was released into his enclosure at the Primorye Safari Park as dinner.

Instead of eating his prey, Amur developed an unlikely friendship with the goat and the two were filmed walking around the park together, charming media audiences worldwide. YouTube videos of the pair received millions of hits.

But lawyer Alexei Krestianov has appealed to the General Prosecutor's Office to ban future coverage because it poses a threat to the rights of children, a copy of the letter published on his personal Facebook page on Wednesday, said.

The letter argued that the “positive” exposure given to the “non-traditional co-habitation” of two male animals was “an intrusion into the private lives of underage citizens and covert gay propaganda, as well as an active imposition of homosexuality.”

Krestianov added the stories could have a negative influence on the formation of children's personalities by “arousing interest in non-traditional sexual relationships” and causing confusion over their sexual identities.

Alexei Krestianov, The Moscow Times 47 Comments [2/2/2016 3:59:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 36
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 116505

Howdy y’all. We all know that phags molest kids at 30 to 60 times the rate of straights (the math is simple: one to two percent of the population is phags, and 60% of misopedia convictions are for phags. 30 to 60 times – that’s 3000 to 6000% more).

I had the lovely experience of debating queers in fagberg (they eventually false flagged me and my account was blocked – such civil “people”). Their main argumentation tactic was to repeat that Catholic priests have a pedophilia problem. Well if you check that, it isn’t true – Catholic priests have a misopedia rate far lower than the population at large. You could very well argue from these standard statistics that Catholicism is a cure for misopedia. Further, the Catholic Church and many other religious organizations have created action committees and organizations to combat the existing misopedes in the ranks. So this begs the question: where is the LGBT opposition to misopedia?

Istantanea_2016-01-29_16-49-34
click to enlarge. Research shows: faggits have zero organization against misopedia (“pedophilia”)

In my search I tried “gay opposition to pedophilia” and “LGBT opposition to pedophilia”. The results left show: 1) an ad by the occupying italian government for queers to come and steal money from italian taxpayers at their geigh center 2) a study on misopede statistics from the NIH 3) the wankapedia article on a murican kiddie rapist association (which is btw totally legal) NAMBLA 4) Rense.com’s repoasting of a study’s obvious results saying queers are more often misopedes 5) an often-linked “study” by headshrinkers (far more often crazy themselves than the normal population) claiming the opposite 6) a search on LGBTQnation.com for articles related to “pedophilia” 7) Ted Cruz’s dad saying legalization of faggitry will lead to legalization of misopedia, then the same thing from infowars, then at the very bottom an ad (ironically) for a intra-religious organization against misopedia, then the second and third pages filled with just tens more of irrelevant results. Okay then, it’s official: exactly zero queers are concerned about misopedia and are organizing to stop it.

Figured you already knew that, but we figured we’d sum it all up here. OM and Amen

Janoklark, Knights of Banjo Hollow 35 Comments [2/2/2016 3:59:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 116503

I don't have anything against gays except for those who make it too obvious they are gay and have the need for everyone to know. I remember watching 30 Days about gays adopting that that helped me accept them even more. With that being said, if my son tells me he is gay, I would kick him out of the house for sure. Yea you all say you are tolerant against gays but you probably wouldn't be so accepting if your son said he was gay. Also who ever says homosexuality is wrong because the the bible needs to get their heads checked, so apparently god created a gay guy but god doesn't approve of him. I also think being gay isn't a choice. I mean when I grew up my mom and dad never told me that I should like girls, it just happened naturally so I would think it's the other way around too.

stillfantasy, BasketBall Forum 28 Comments [2/2/2016 3:53:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: randy

Quote# 116493

If you notice in the media, which I don't recommend watching much of as a Christian, you will see lots of depictions of women popping their cellphone into their back pocket. By extension, you see it in the every day world. It does appear to be something the enemy wants women to do, but it's worth noting the proximity of such a thing to a woman's reproductive organs. We have no idea what kind of influence those electro-magnetic waves have, but the fact that the media, which is run by the enemy, is trying to guide the world to do this should indicate it's probably not a good idea.

So... I suppose I agree with your assertion. The next question should be what do we do as Christians when God exposes such plans of the enemy. The answer, of course, is pray! And pray big, because the power and authority of Christ Jesus seated at the right hand of Father God above every principality and power in heaven and on earth is tops. And that authority will come forth when we pray Father God's will down here on earth.

AGTG, CF 33 Comments [2/2/2016 3:43:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Armoured

Quote# 116492

Listen people. The SCOTUS ruling last year in favor of Gay marriage means NOTHING!!! The SCOTUS cannot make, change or remove laws. Courts only offer opinions. Opinions can change when judges change. The law cannot be changed by a “judge.” If that were the case, our “laws” would be as constantly changing as the “judges” are. If “judges” ruled that sodomy was illegal in 1986, how did sodomy become “legal” today? Did the law change, or did the “opinions” of the “judges” change? There is NO gay marriage law on the books. Laws can only be made by one of two ways in America: by an act of the Legislative Branch, or by a citizen’s initiative through a direct vote of the people. Courts can never make laws. They just tell us that they can, and we believe it, and teach it to others until the lie eventually becomes accepted as “truth.”

Here is my point: All the hubbub over homosexual marriage is a cleverly designed smoke screen. Who cares what the Supreme Court says? They are merely rendering their “opinion”. The people of 30 states have already spoken on this issue. No court “opinion” can nullify the vote of the people. Did anyone vote to give Kagan, Sotomayor, and Ginsburg the power to change the institution of marriage?

We have to begin to push back. We must attack the lies head on. They have distracted us and they have us focusing on “religious liberty” or “conscience” or “deeply held religious beliefs.”, but those are the wrong arguments. We must stand and fight on the Truth. Courts do not make laws. A court decision does not carry the force of law, and it most certainly does not “change” the law. Abortion is illegal, homo marriage is a fraud, and religious values cannot be separated from government.

It's time to make one simple request of the judges: Show me the law! Show me the law that legalizes abortion. Show me the law that legalizes homo-marriage. Show me the law that separates church and state.

afchief, Rapture Ready 42 Comments [2/2/2016 3:43:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 116489

The torpedo at the waterline of equalist, feminist “theory” is that women are attracted to Self+1, i.e. hypergamy. The fact that women are only interested in LTRs with superior men ends equalism on the spot. There is no rebuttal. It’s done. Over.

If men understood the basic concept of women’s Self+1 attraction model they would never listen to feminists again. They’d also look at their own ideas and behaviors much differently.

zdr01dz , The Rational Male 22 Comments [2/2/2016 3:42:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Xadoy

Quote# 116488

“I’d honestly love if the manosphere would actually focus on helping men in relationships and self-improvement.”

I had this comment offered in a recent thread. It’s a common gripe from women who believe they’re in some way Red Pill and want to divert their new acceptance of Red Pill truths to serve the same tired ends of the Feminine Imperative. The operative, of course, is always whose definition do we base the measure of ‘improvement’ on? For most women the term ‘improvement’ always aligns with whatever best serves a female sexual strategy – because from a feminine-solipsistic perspective whatever serve women should necessarily serve men.

As with most uneducated women’s concerns I’d already addressed this long ago in The Bitter Taste of the Red Pill

Rollo Tomassi, The Rational Male 18 Comments [2/2/2016 3:41:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Xadoy

Quote# 116486

The time is now ripe to promote the 'Old Religion'!

In the soul-less hedonism of our materialist society, the rise of Islam has opened people’s eyes as to a spiritual dimension for life and being. In Britain at least, the long established Christian doctrine is all but finished and devalued and people who question the right of the alien in their land and the quest for their own 'Roots' find little comfort within the embrace of the mainstream Christian church.

Now is the time for ancestral strength and recognition, now is the time to draw a line in the sand and say 'No further'! With our hearts in the past, our courage in the present and our minds on the future, now is the time for Folkish Heathenry to reclaim its lost children and re-kindle the flame of spirit to light our path in the dark days to come.

Hail Odin, Hail Woden, Hail the Folk.

Hodekin, Anglo-Saxon Foundation 33 Comments [2/2/2016 3:40:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 116485

Animal Welfare -
This has nothing to do with 'Animal Rights' which are as unreal as 'Human Rights' and merely a means to distort the truth. Animal welfare is not a 'right' given to animals, it is the duty and responsibility of every one of us humans, given the means to see what is right and what is wrong. Factory-farming of animals, battery hens, and the totally inhumane killing of animals by Kosher and Halal methods are things that must change here in England - they were never known to our Anglo-Saxon Ancestors.

This goes for animal experiments of any kind, and for the treatment of animals as 'fashion accessories' which to them is unnatural (this seems to be because pets are now used to replace having children, and thus treated like children - which they are not!).

[...]

If we lived in a Golden Age of Perfection things would be far different, but we do not live in such an age; indeed, we live in a Dark Age, the darkest age of the cycle, so we cannot act as if we do live in a Golden Age - if we did we would become like the Marxist Socialist Utopians who have caused the death of millions through their 'utopian ideas'. We have to live and act in this Dark Age, but as Men Against Time.

[...]

The slaughter of animals without stunning is barbaric and totally inhumane and this has no part of an Anglo-Saxon Society. Those who deny this are liars and deceivers. You only need to watch a human slaughter when the animal is stunned by an electric current and compare this with the animal who has its throat cut without stunning - this applies not only to Halal (which is usually attacked) but to kosher killing too. This is an alien concept an we should all seek to enlighten our Folk on this.

[...]

What I have said here can come about through a National Government coming to power, so long as that National Government is fully aware of the socialistic aspect of the New Order. At this time it is unlikely that such a government would come to power. The more likely scenario would be a total collapse of society coupled with catastrophic change which would break everything down into chaos, disorder and widespread destruction, from out of which would naturally arise a new form of Tribalism out of which again the Folk-Nation would arise organically.

It is very likely that if changes started to happen oppressive laws would be brought in to halt these changes. This may also happen if too many farmers started to move away from the supermarkets into local production for local sales. We can see today how, when the Alternative Medicine scene started to grow there are more and more voices arising in opposition, not only ridicule (one method to stop people listening) but also in time no doubt through laws to protect the 'Drug-Industry'. And this is all in face of a National Health Service that is deteriorating rapidly. Of course, this would be very hard to do with individual use of alternative medicine - Folk-Medicine. The System will have to tolerate some small alternatives, but when their whole consumer system is threatened there is no doubt they will act against any opposition.

Wulf Ingessunu, Inglinga 10 Comments [2/2/2016 3:40:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 116483

Nationalist politics don't need females. Allowing women into politics has morally bankrupted the West and spiritually crushed it as women keep on voting for more niggers, more arabs, more turks and more gooks to swarm into the lands white MEN conquered and built for white women. Thanks to your intellectually inferior sex, you've sold out our civilization in less than 100 years. Congratulations.

Muskrats_Rat, /r/european/ 25 Comments [2/1/2016 5:35:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 116482

Here's what I believe: Being opposed to gay marriage or respectfully disagreeing with the gay lifestyle is perfectly alright as long as you don't try to force your beliefs down the throats of others. That in itself does not make you a homophobe.

Being opposed to interracial marriage, however, does make you a bigot no matter how you look at it. Whether or not you ever try to force this belief on others, it is still a racist idea by nature to be against interracial marriage. Simple as that.

Louie, Basketball Forum 15 Comments [2/1/2016 5:34:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: randy

Quote# 116481

The latest deviancy they're trying to mainstream

Exclusive: Phil Elmore sees 'furry' perversion as next crack in society's foundation

Emily Gaudette, writing for Inverse, said it best early last month: “When Disney released an explanatory teaser for 2016’s ‘Zootopia,’ one could almost hear the sound of a billion DeviantArt accounts whirring to life. … The film’s teaser alone reads like an explanation of the furry manifesto: that anthropomorphized animals can be sexualized and identified with as easily as humans. … Could it be a coincidence that Disney chose a fox protagonist for its first fully anthro feature, considering foxes are arguably the most popular ‘fursona’ cited by furries? Many furries name the hero of Disney’s animated Robin Hood, also a fox, when recalling their first sexual feelings for anthropomorphized animals.”

Wait, what? Yes, you read that correctly: Disney’s new film, “Zootopia,” is arguably an attempt to mainstream “furry” sexuality – the practice of dressing up in fuzzy animal mascot costumes in order to engage in one’s perverted, prurient practices. This column has profiled the intersection between “furry” perversion and left-wing politics before. Already, the “otherkin” movement, in which various losers redefine themselves in terms of the animals and fantasy characters with which they “identify,” are posting lists of their preferred pronouns on their self-absorbed blogs. That’s where it starts. The more society in general becomes aware of this movement, the more it will creep into the mainstream of popular culture. Once lodged there, it will be impossible to root out, and society will be that much weaker for it.

When the debate over Obamacare produced the “Pajama Boy” meme, right-thinking people reacted in horror at the emasculation this imagery represented. It juvenilized young adults in a way that any real grownup would find repugnant. That is, after all, what the push toward societal acceptance – be it for furries, “otherkin,” “bronies,” transgenders, or some other sexually delusional perversion – is all about. If masculinity is the fuel on which society runs, on which innovation occurs, on which industries are built and on which wars are fought to protect a free people, then feminism, liberalism, furries, bronies, transgenders and the Star Wars cantina of progressive freaks with body image issues and self-esteem deficits is the sugar in society’s gas tank. Progressives hate themselves, so they invent new sexual personas and new deviancies to keep themselves entertained. Liberals hate families and decency, so they champion sexual perversion and child molestation while holding it up as viable “other” sexuality. Can there really be any doubt that the majority of “furries” are likely pedophiles?

As social media is used to promulgate countless delusional, perverted indulgences, society suffers. By embracing “furries” and other perverts, we are producing a population of incapable, weak-minded children. As our culture sags under the weight of these useless Pajama Boys and Pajama Girls, it is no wonder, then, that our foundations are beginning to show serious cracks. The mainstreaming of “furries” is the furthering of liberal destruction of society. It presages the extinction of the rational, responsible adults who once formed the backbone of our nation. This destruction started on social media, and it is there that this battle was, is and will be fought.


Phil Elmore, WND 29 Comments [2/1/2016 5:34:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: KingOfRhye