Quote# 116779

On the Thursday edition of The 700 Club, Robertson asked co-host Wendy Griffith why women would want to serve in combat roles even after the military announced plans to remove gender restrictions.

“The feminists have gotten to a point where women are going to be drafted and put into combat units,” Robertson remarked. “Why would any woman in her right mind want that?”

Griffith pointed out that “there are women warriors.”

“The Amazons!” Robertson snarked. “You’re living in trenches and eating K-rations and there’s mud and all the rest. Why would anybody want that?”

“I would go if I could take my makeup,” Griffith explained. “I’m not a good candidate, but I think there are some women that feel that call.”

“Maybe there’s a masochistic thing they want,” the TV preacher opined. “That’s bondage, that’s ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’ squared.”

“You’re looking at somebody that’s been there, done that,” he concluded. “It ain’t something for a woman.”

Pat Robertson, Raw Story 29 Comments [2/14/2016 1:18:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 116778

Evolution VS High School Biology. Evolution Loses. Check My Math

The law of biogenesis. Have you heard of it? Louis Pasteur proved that living organisms come from other living organisms and do not spontaneously come to life from non-living material. 150 years later there are some that believe that all life arose from a cell or cells that spontaneously generated from non -living material. Perhaps the law of biogenesis is more of a guideline rather than a law. Or perhaps everything that has ever been observed in nature by scientists over the last 150 years affirms the validity of this law. So the spontaneous generation of a theoretical original cell is a violation of this law and is contradictory to scientific observation.
The End.

No, not really. Let’s look at several of the insurmountable problems associated with the theory of spontaneous generation (evolution)

Problem 1. Amino acids.

Amino acids would be needed to form the protein molecules contained in the first theoretical non-living cell. These amino acids would have been formed by natural processes. Dr. Stanley Miller performed a series of experiments to show how amino acids could be produced by generating electric arcs in a gaseous mixture of hydrogen, methane and ammonia along with water. The main problem with producing Amino acids by natural processes, apart from formation within a living organism is that a mixture of left-handed and right-handed amino acids will be formed. These two forms of amino acids are chemically the same but the component atoms of each are put together differently. In fact, mirror images of each other. In living organisms, virtually all amino acids are left handed. The Miller experiment produced a 50/50 mixture of both. Half left-handed and half right-handed. Typically one right-handed amino acid in in protein molecule will render the protein useless or inactive. In other words, if you have an enzyme molecule that performs a particular function in a cell or organism that contains only one right-handed amino acid, that enzyme will not work.

Problem 2. Specific sequence of amino acids in proteins:

Proteins are made of 20 different amino acids. The amino acids are chemically bonded together like links in a chain. The specific arrangement or sequence of amino acids determines the characteristics and function of each protein molecule. To calculate the probability of the correct amino acid sequence in a given molecule in the first theoretical non-living cell, you only need to know two things:
The probability of a particular amino acid in the sequence being the correct amino acid out of a possible 20 amino acid is one chance in 20.

Multiply all the probabilities together.
In other words, if one of the theoretical protein molecules in the theoretical cell had 50 amino acid links, multiply 20 x 20 x 20 etc. 50 times. So the probability of the first two links being in the correct sequence is 20 x 20 = 400 or one chance in 400. The probability of the first 3 links being in the correct sequence is 20 x 20 x 20 = 8000 or one chance in 8000. As a mathematical shortcut to visualize how big of a number you get when multiplying 20 x 20 fifty times, do this:

Multiply 2 x 2 fifty times (2 x 2 x 2 ……) and tack on 50 zeros to the end of that number.
To calculate the chance of getting all 50 sequences correct AND all left handed, consider that each link could be a right-handed version of any of the 20 amino acids or a left-handed version of any of the 20 amino acids but only one of the 40 possible amino acids is correct for each link. The probability of the first amino acid being correct and left-handed is one chance in 40. The probability of the first two amino acids being correct is 40 x 40 = 1600 or one chance in 1600. The probability of the first three links being in the correct sequence is 40 x 40 x 40 = 64000 or one chance in 64000. The probability of the first 4 links being in the correct sequence in one chance in 2,560,000 or about one chance in 2 and a half million. To get a handle on the probability of getting all 50 links in the correct sequence multiply 4 x 4 fifty times and tack on 50 zeros to the end of that number. That is a really big number. Please enter your answer in the comments section below.

A protein with only 50 links is relatively small in nature. Some enzymes are made up of thousands of amino acids. The first theoretical non-living cell must have had many protein molecules perhaps 100 or more. To give an unfair advantage to those who reject the law of biogenesis lets suppose the first cell or proto cell had only 50 protein molecules that contained 50 amino acids each. To get an idea of the size of the number that represents the probability of all the amino acids being in the correct sequence and all left handed in in all the protein molecules:

multiply 4 x 4 2500 times and tack on 2500 zeros on to the end of that number. I am no math whiz but I believe that would be a really big number. It is bigger than the estimated total number of fundamental particles in the observable universe”

So, if every particle in the universe represented a trial and error formation by natural processes of just two of the theoretical proteins, you could possibly get two molecules that were correct at the same time somewhere in there. The odds would still be against it. By the way, proteins have not been observed to form by natural processes apart from living organisms and isn’t that what scientific theory is all about? The observable and reproducible? How many universes of chances do we need to get the first cell right?
By the way. All of the above math is overkill. Just the left-hand, right-hand problem destroys any hope of spontaneous generation. The chance of all the links in all 50 protein molecules being correct can be calculated by multiplying 2 x 2 2500 times. Every time you multiply by two you cut the probability in half. Please write your answer in the comments section below. One more thing while we are on the subject of multiplying by two. How many times you would need to fold a piece of paper in half to make it thick enough to reach to the moon? The number of folds is as ridiculously small as the piece of paper needed is large.

Problem 3. Specific sequence of the genetic material.

DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) is the molecule inside a cell that among other things contains the code for making protein molecules. As a cell grows it takes in nutrients and produces protein molecules. When the cell is large enough it splits into two cells. The ability for the cell to produce the correct amino acid sequences in the various protein molecules is dependent on the specific sequence of molecules in DNA called nucleotides. If the sequence of nucleotides is incorrect the cell will produce proteins with the wrong amino acid sequence. The DNA molecule contains the code for every type of protein in the cell as well as the code for the specific structure of the cell. The probability that the DNA in the first non-living theoretical cell contained the correct code for all the types of protein molecules in that cell is the combined improbabilities of at least one of each type of protein molecule in that cell having the correct amino acid sequences at the point in time the cell spontaneously transitioned from being dead to being alive. You may want to re-read that last sentence a few times so the implications become apparent.

Problem 4. All the component parts in the same place at the same time.

Cells contain structures called organelles. They are like small organs within the cell that have specific functions. Some of the organelles and other structures one might expect to find in this theoretical cell are endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, mitochondria, nucleus, DNA, RNA, and cell membrane. At the very least, the theoretical minimum set of component parts to sustain cellular life needed to be present at the same time and place. The component parts needed to be structurally correct and needed to, by chance and unknown natural processes not associated with living organisms, be in a state of correct assemblage. That is a strange concept. The complete simplest theoretical cell needed to be produced by a set of natural processes, then transition from a dead state to a living state, and then grow and reproduce by an entirely different set of natural processes other than the ones that originally generated it. Highly improbable? No. Totally impossible.

Cornucopia of other problems:

Due to the fact that there is massive amounts of calcium on land and in the oceans, there would be no free phosphorus to form DNA. All the theoretically free phosphorus would end up in the form of calcium phosphate in no time.
The theoretical primordial earth atmosphere contained no oxygen. As useful molecules were theoretically being produced by bolts of lightning they would be destroyed by ultraviolet light since there would be no ozone layer. Some molecules would end up in the ocean and if submerged deep enough to be unaffected by UV radiation would be in the ocean along with other lucky molecules in a state of near infinite dilution. At some later time some of these molecules might end up on land in a muddy little evaporating puddle or pond with less dilution. Then they would be destroyed by ultraviolet light. If the atmosphere contained oxygen, these same molecules would be oxidized and useless.

The same lightning that could produce organic molecules could and would far more easily destroy previously generated molecules. That is just how the physics works. Some fortunate few would make it to the depths of the ocean.

Some might theorize that the first living cell might be of the type that would exist near a submerged volcanic vent far from the perils of the earths surface. This cell would reproduce and future generations of cells would produce oxygen by some method other than photosynthesis. As impossible as this is, you still have to get to that first cell. So all the afore mentioned problems still apply.

Misc. notes:

The math in regard to the left and right-handed amino acids is a little flawed. One of the amino acids, glycine, is left handed only. With that in mind the odds are slightly better so spontaneous generation is totally possible. Not. In all fairness, the Miller experiment produces several amino acids with left-hand and right-hand versions that do not occur in living organisms. In other words the Miller experiment produced all the right amino acids as well as some wrong ones. These could just as well be factored in.

Some researchers have concluded that under certain conditions amino acids could be generated with about 90 percent being left-handed. This does not help much. So instead of half of 2500 amino acids statistically being right handed in the theoretical cell, only 250 will statistically be wrong. Then we multiply the results with the probability of all 2500 amino acids being in the correct sequence.

A chemist once came up with this great party game to help illustrate math probabilities like those in this article. He suggested that you get 17 people to line up in a row. Then line up in a different order. Keep lining up in a different order until all the possible combinations have been used. How many unique arrangement of 17 people in a row are there? More than 355 trillion combination. This can be calculated by multiplying 17 x 16 x 15 x 14 x 13 x 12 x 11 x 10 x 9 x 8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2. Since guinea pigs are so well suited for scientific experimentation, guinea pigs can be used instead of people in this experiment. The results are the same.

One last thought. Someone once wrote something like this:

If you had an infinite number of monkeys typing on an infinite number of typewriters all the books that have ever been written and would ever be written would be written.

The problem is there is no such thing as an infinite number of monkeys and typewriters. Ok. Let’s deal with the finite. Start with a meaningful paragraph 2500 characters in length. Forget case and punctuation let’s just get the spelling correct. There is 1 chance in 26 of getting the first letter correct. What is the probability of getting the first two letters correct?.......

jiaogulan, Godlike Productions 14 Comments [2/14/2016 1:18:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 116777

JESUS CHRIST SAVES FROM SATANIC CURSES THROUGH MASONRY ETC.

DEAR GOD, LORD JESUS CHRIST,

Please let this prayer be understood by 'Truthseekers' globally in Your will. We know satan and his demons are working through the MASONIC JESUIT VATICAN CONSPIRACY. Freemason Albert Pike wrote in the letters about Three World Wars that 'Christianity must be destroyed'.

On page 184 of Ronayne's 'Masonic Handbook' we read:
"Whether you swear or take God's name in vain don't matter so much. Of course the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, as you know, don't amount to anything, but Mah-hah-bone--O, horror! You must never, on any account, speak that awful name aloud. That would be a most heinous crime--unmasonic--unpardonable."

May 'truthseekers' and others understand that the name LORD JESUS CHRIST is not allowed to be spoken out loud by satanists, such as masons, because it creates terror for them as YOUR HOLY NAME INVOKES YOU, ALMIGHTY GOD, AND YOU BREAKS ALL CURSES OF DARKNESS AND DELIVER FROM EVIL.

The True light of Lord Jesus Christ has already conquered the darkness and false light of Lucifer. Demons run and flee for His name. Truthseekers, new agers, illuminati-fighters and others pure of heart, but still dwelling in darkness and deception, may they know that demons are real and they are allowed to call out to You to be saved, when 'the energy is crazy again' and they are in despair. Let it be known amongst them, that you, LORD JESUS CHRIST, are the MASTER who makes demons shiver and shake and that your are the ONLY way to come to the Father.

JOHN 14:6 "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."

LORD JESUS CHRIST SAVES!

You already paid with your blood for our sins. Thank you Jesus! Thank you. May the online dwellers pure of heart REPENT IN YOUR NAME, BE BAPTISED AND RECEIVE THE HOLY SPIRIT.

Your True Light casts out darkness and those calling out Your name from deep within their hearts will be saved. May the unbelievers of this prayer who don't believe your Word, Oh mighty LORD, be intrigued to challenge You with a spoken prayer, by praying to you GOD ALMIGHTY, and finishing their prayer with your name LORD JESUS CHRIST.

May conspiracy sites around the world, such as these, be filled with your name, LORD JESUS CHRIST, and testimonies of great wonders and deliverance shatter darkness and destroy demons! In these times of great despair, You need soldiers who will fight darkness with prayers of FIRE in Your name, LORD JESUS CHRIST.

EPHESIANS 6:12
"For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms."

Let this prayer be heared in your name, LORD JESUS CHRIST.

In the name of THE FATHER,
your only SON JESUS CHRIST
and the HOLY SPIRIT we pray.

Amen.

ISIAH 54:17
"No weapon that is formed against me will prosper".

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 18 Comments [2/14/2016 8:54:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 116772

Every National Day of Prayer, it’s the same old dribble: “God, bless America–You know, that same country that is banning prayers to You and spitting in Your face 24/7. Heal our land because we’re suddenly so repentant and concerned about treating You with respect–can’t You tell by the way we’re all droning the same words at You and treating You like You’re some kind of blind idiot?” Who are we kidding? The Church has turned the National Day of Prayer into a national day of treating God like He’s a moron. It’s time to wake up and realize that you can’t do someone else’s repenting for them. Stop insulting God by trying to tell Him about what is going on in other people’s hearts because the truth is that you don’t know what you’re talking about. God knows how America feels about Him, and our constant lying and whitewashing isn’t going to blind Him to the reality that most Americans are steeped in spiritual rebellion with no interest in repenting. No, we’re really not sorry. We’re too busy legalizing sin and celebrating irreverence to be sorry. Even God’s own people are insulting Him 24/7 by constantly bossing Him around and never shutting up long enough to listen to what He has to say. No, He’s really not going to bless America. He is going to spank America, along with the Christians who live in it. The Church desperately needs a refresher course on what it means to revere God. The next major wave of spiritual activity we’re going to see in this country is not going to be some happy Jesus movement. It’s going to be a violent storm of Divine discipline which is going to remind us all that we are not God’s supervisors.

The next time some idiot leader in the Church invites you to join them in reading some irreverent pile of hypocritical guff at God, you’d better pass. And if you need some national holiday to remind you to talk to your Makers, then there’s a serious crisis that needs to be addressed. Ask the Holy Spirit to teach you how to be a better listener so that you won’t keep missing the things that God is sharing with you. Ask Him to teach you how to improve the way you talk to your Gods. It starts with getting the focus off of yourself and asking Yahweh, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit to make Their goals, Their feelings, and Their desires far more important to you than your own.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 11 Comments [2/14/2016 8:53:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 116771

We love working with sexual perverts—especially those who have a bunch of sex crimes on their record. Why? Because there’s just so much good news that we can tell you which no one else wants to talk about. We know that you’re getting seriously desperate by the time you become an active sex offender, and the higher the shame piles up on you, the closer you’re getting to your breaking point, and that’s when you will finally become receptive to some critical truths that can radically improve your quality of life. One of those truths is that you simply had no say in defining the basic appetites of your sex drive. Sure you can do things to warp it further once it’s already in motion, but when it comes to defining the kinds of targets that it initially wants, that’s just not in your control. Just as God didn’t ask you which flavors of food you’d like your tongue to enjoy most in life, He didn’t give you a say in what kinds of targets your sex drive would fixate on. And where God gives you no choice, He doesn’t sit around blaming you for being who you are.

While it’s commonly believed that God hates gays and pedophiles, this is simply not true. God loves all souls, and He doesn’t confuse your soul with your sex drive. Every human is packed with depravity, and every human is filled with perverse sexual desires. While your society uses a very narrow definition of the term sexual pervert, God’s definition of the term is so staggeringly broad that we all qualify. This means that if God isn’t willing to seriously love on sexual perverts, then no one can get saved, and we’re all on our way to Hell.

God has a glorious of way of leveling the playing field so that no one can pull rank on anyone else. While the straights look down on the pedophiles, they’re no better in God’s eyes. By the time we’ve got men jumping in the sack with every sexy babe that they meet and women fantasizing about fictitious dream lovers, no one is anywhere close to meeting God’s definition of sexual purity. We’re all in the cesspool of perversion together, and God is right in it with us, calling us to stop using our sexual issues as an excuse to keep our distance from Him.

Is it a drag to be stuck with a sex drive that is lusting after the wrong targets? Yes, it is. And does being stuck with depraved desires mean we have some pity pass from God to go ravage whoever we want whenever we want? Certainly not. God calls us to come to Him and surrender ourselves into His hands—perversity and all. He tells us that if we do not hold back in the submission department, He will use our perverse desires as a catalyst for positive transformation. Show us a mind that is plagued with sick fantasies, and we’ll show you a breeding ground for fabulous compassion, mercy and love. It’s by getting continuously pummeled with defeat that we acquire true humility and a strong grip on our dependency on God. Nothing shatters the illusion that we are intrinsically good like a perverse sex drive. Nothing crushes the delusion that you can rise above sin like having those disgusting fantasies running in a continuous loop through your brain. Sexual perverts are like diamonds that are buried in a swamp of sludge: they’re just waiting to be fished out and washed off so that their beautiful sparkle can be seen by all. So if you’ve come to realize that something is seriously warped way down deep in the core of your being where you just can’t get at it, don’t despair. A perverse sex drive isn’t cause for despair. It’s evidence of thrilling potential.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 19 Comments [2/14/2016 6:09:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 116770

The Thomas Carlyle Club for Young Reactionaries aspires to nothing less than maximum controversiality, and I for one believe we’re succeeding admirably. Huzzah! Jolly good. We’ve done slavery (Issue 3), we’ve done lynching (Issue 11) — well, we haven’t done them, but you know what I mean. Anyway, it seems only natural that we should stay the course and bring our gun turrets to bear on colonialism, completing a sort of reactionary racialist trifecta.

[...]

Ah, the Congo Free State. No one knows anything, but everyone has an opinion. Thus necessitating this appendix.

[...]

The lies and stupidity are endless, reader, and I have neither the time nor the patience to go through them one by one and refute them; instead, I simply present a selection from The Latest Phase of the Congo Question (1906). After that, you’ll be in a suitably skeptical mindset to do your own research and make up your own mind.

[...]

You may be wondering how modern-day critics of the Congo Free State have responded to primary sources such as these. The answer, of course, is that they have simply ignored them, and screamed a lot about racism. This is a classic Progressive debating strategy with an extraordinarily high success rate.

Anyway, the commission ultimately reaches this conclusion (my emphasis):

From the mass of statements, testimony and information gathered by the Commission it appears that the mutilation of dead bodies is an ancient custom which does not have in the eyes of the native the horrible character which it does in ours. The cutting off of certain parts of a dead body fulfils the natives desire to procure a trophy or simply a piece of evidence. The mutilation of fallen enemies frequently occurred in the wars between natives in certain regions. […]

One point is beyond doubt: a white man has never inflicted such mutilations, nor caused such mutilations to be inflicted, upon living natives as a punishment for failure to bring in taxes nor for any other cause. Deeds of such a kind have never been stated to us by a single witness, and in spite of all our investigations, we have never been able to discover such a case.

But do read the whole thing (and whatever other primary sources you like) and decide for yourself — for this has gone on long enough, I think! Adieu!

The Thomas Carlyle Club for Young Reactionaries (Students Against a Democratic Society), Radish 19 Comments [2/14/2016 6:09:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 116769

A Gilmer County deputy county clerk had a lesbian couple in tears after calling their union an “abomination” on what was supposed to be a happy day.

Samantha Brookover and Amanda Abramovich went last week to get married, according to the Charleston Gazette-Mail. The couple had loved ones and cameras in tow.

The West Virginia couple said Debbie Allen, the deputy clerk who processed their marriage license, gave them a biblical earful. They say Allen huffed and puffed, slammed things around then yelled at them for two or three minutes about her views that what they were doing was wrong in her eyes and God’s.

Brookover told the Gazette-Mail they were “flabbergasted and hurt and angry like you wouldn’t believe.”

It wasn’t the first time the women have been attacked for their sexual orientation, “But to have a complete stranger — someone that doesn’t know me — scream like that, it really cut down to the bone,” Abramovich said.

Allen doesn’t deny she told the couple that God would judge them but says she “talked nicely to them.”

“I just told them my opinion,” she told the paper. “I just felt led to do that. I believe God was standing with me and that’s just my religious belief.”

She added she “didn’t care to make eye contact with them.”

Brookover’s mother, Jill Goff, said she was sad when her daughter came out because she knew she would be treated differently.

“I love her with all my heart no matter what she does,” she told the paper. “What I said to her was I hate the way people are going to treat you. That makes me sad because for the rest of your life, you’re going to have to pay a price for this.”

The newlyweds believe that Allen didn’t properly do her job.

“Someone at McDonald’s can’t refuse to give someone a cheeseburger because they’re a heart attack risk,” Abramovich told the Gazette-Mail. “You’ve got to do your job. You can’t just scream at people.”

Debbie Allen, Raw Story 34 Comments [2/14/2016 6:08:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 116766

9 Secrets About Female Nature Told By A Hot Girl Dying Of Cancer

Many years ago, I became friends with a very hot blonde in her early 30’s who was dying of cancer. Due to her impending death, she decided that it was okay to relay a vast amount of inside information to me, regarding what women were really all about. She volunteered this information. I have never forgotten what she told me, and it has served me quite well over the years.

Here is a summary of the ten things she told me about the true nature of women, which were related to me over the span of a couple of weeks, shortly before her passing:

1. Women are exactly like little children

We are constantly poking, prodding and testing a man, in order to find out what his boundaries are. If he has no boundaries, we will destroy him, especially if he loves us. A man has to have boundaries, and he has to outline them precisely, and he has to force us to adhere to them with the power of his conviction and the power of his action. If he doesn’t do that, we will beat him over the head with his weaknesses (his lack of boundaries) until he breaks.

2. Women put up a false front about virtually everything

Our faces are fake (makeup), our hair is fake (dyed), our boobs are fake (some of us), everything about us is fake. Most especially when it comes to what is inside of us. We lie constantly, because we are far worse, character-wise, than even our closest friends or lovers will ever know, and we desperately fight to keep all of that hidden.

We are looking for our true daddies, basically – the idealized daddies that we never had – somebody who can see through all of our false fronts and call us out on our bullshit and put us in our place. The problem is, those type of men are very few and far between.

3. If a woman ever tells you, “If we don’t have trust, we don’t have anything,” she is either cheating on you or planning to cheat on you

There are no exceptions to this rule. We use that as cover, to try and make the man feel guilty for questioning our fidelity. What we are really saying here, is, “I will fuck whomever I want and you’d better keep your nose out of it or I’ll cut you off from my pussy and I’ll ruin your freaking life if you keep pressing the issue.” If we really cared about you, and if we really weren’t cheating on you or planning to cheat on you, we would tell you something like, “I am not cheating on you, I love you, and I would never do that. I don’t care if we have to stay up all night, for the next week, and go over every single shred of doubt that’s currently troubling you about this. I have nothing to hide, I would never cheat on you, and I don’t want you thinking these things about me. Please tell me exactly why you think I am cheating, point by point, and I will do anything and everything that I have to do to prove to you that I’m not cheating, in order to ease your worried mind.”

4. Women are much hornier than men

Vastly, exponentially, hornier than men. A woman will do just about anything, sexually speaking, so long as she is fairly certain she won’t get caught. For example, we will occasionally go out of town in order to rendezvous with a man we’ve been longing to fuck, and/or to have multiple sex partners in the same evening, and/or at the same time.

This is something that hot women do, most especially. In our minds, it is a natural desire, and a natural thing, and so long as nobody else finds out, it’s “game on”. Women are receptacles for cock, that’s how we have been biologically designed. Nothing feels better to us than being completely filled up with multiple penises, than being the center of sexual attention, than being the object of unbridled group lust. Since it’s something we can’t risk doing on our home turf (don’t shit where you eat), we have to think outside the box, in order to get our boxes completely satisfied. And you might find this shocking, but many women – many, many women – have sex with dogs on a routine basis. This is just one example of how insatiable we truly are.

I can see why you might not believe it, to which I say, look really hard at all of the women you know who have dogs. Look at women who have dogs whenever you see them out on the street, in the act of walking those dogs. Or at the park. You will notice that most of them have male dogs – the vast majority, in fact. This isn’t a coincidence. And look at all the female teachers who are exposed in the media for having sex with underage students. We have no self-control when it comes to sex – or anything else, for that matter. To our way of thinking, losing control is what makes sex great. Doing anything that is taboo is what makes sex great.

5. Women do not have female friends—they have female competition

We lie to our so-called female friends and pretend we are loyal and faithful to them, just like we do with the men in our lives. Secretly, we are jealous of each other, and we want all of the desirable things that other women have—most especially when it comes to our female friends’ things.

And we consider men to be things. If one of our friends has a hot man, we want him to want us. We will do everything we can to seduce him. Not because we really want him—we don’t really want anybody. We do it because we are rarely happy, and we don’t want our girlfriends to be happy, either, and we want to boost our own egos more than anything else.

And after we get him to fuck us, when our girlfriends find out that he has had sex with us, that’s when we finally get what we wanted in the first place. If we break up the previously happy couple, that’s fine, too. It’s all about our pussy, not hers. It’s about winning.

6. Women always lie about the number of sexual partners they’ve had

They also lie about not wanting men with large penises. If we told the actual truth about the number of different men and women we’ve slept with, and if we told the actual truth about our fervent desire for big dicks, our pool of potential suitors would shrink drastically, to the point where it would completely dry up. So we lie. Most often, we will claim that we’ve had between three and eight sexual partners in our lifetime. And, to our way of thinking, it isn’t a lie, because if we had five sexual partners last Saturday evening, and our man asks us how many sexual partners we have had, and we answer, “Five”, well, technically, we aren’t lying.

7. All women dislike themselves

And because we dislike ourselves, we fervently hate any man who doesn’t see through our bullshit. The more a man loves us, the more we hate him. The more he overlooks our sins, and the more he fails to see how corrupt we are, and the more he gives us the benefit of every single doubt – the more we despise him. We will escalate our bad behavior until we finally break him and he wakes up and realizes how worthless we are and what a fool he has been for believing in us.

8. Women want what they can’t have

We want a man whom we can’t have. We want a man who honestly doesn’t give a fuck about us, who doesn’t care if we come or go. That’s the kind of man we will pursue. Call them bad boys or call them whatever you want, that’s the kind of man we want – period. The kind of guy who will make us orgasm, crudely, and give us a huge sexual thrill in the bedroom, and then discard us like used toilet paper, and fuck our female friends afterwards, just because he can. (Just like we would do with his male friends.)

9. All women are masochists

And all hot women are narcissistic masochists. We hate it when things are going well, especially if they continue to go well for long periods of time. We know down deep that we are fucked-up and not worthy of anything that is truly good. So when things are going well in a relationship, we eventually sabotage it. We just can’t help ourselves in this regard.

We could have the greatest, most handsome, most well-hung husband in the world—a one-of-a-kind man who makes all of our girlfriends jealous; we could have the greatest children in the world, who are beautiful, well-behaved and ambitious; we could have the most enviable career imaginable; we could have all of the money and prestige and the truly good things in life, and we could repeatedly tell ourselves over and over, and believe, on the surface, that we would never cheat on our husbands. But down deep we know that it’s a lie. Because one day, we could walk into a grocery store, and some bad boy could whisper just the right combination of words in our ear, and the next thing you know, we’re at the Motel 6 getting it in the ass. That’s just how we are, and any woman—especially a hot woman—who says otherwise, is a liar.

Over the years, my deceased friend’s words have proven to be spot-on, in the vast majority of cases. And if they ring true from your own personal experience as well, then I am more than happy that I shared them with you here today. I know that my deceased friend would be thrilled to know that I have shared this information with the manosphere. After all, she used to be a hottie, and she’s now dead, and by giving me the inside scoop on her female competition, she continues to beat them—she continues to “win”—even from beyond the grave.

Bob Smith, Return of Kings 43 Comments [2/14/2016 6:05:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 116765

It’s no longer necessary to just ridicule sincerely held beliefs of others, including secular/atheist ones, when you can bring them all crashing down! For they may all be in for a serious bashing if material on the web proves itself and there appears to be a concerted effort to authenticate and confirm the efficacy of what may be the most important, new moral teaching ever revealed. This is what I’m TESTING out at this very moment.
The first wholly new interpretation for two thousand years of the moral teachings of Christ has been published. Radically different from anything else we know of from theology or history, this new teaching is predicated upon the ‘promise’ of a precise, predefined, predictable and repeatable experience of transcendent omnipotence and called ‘the first Resurrection’ in the sense that the Resurrection of Jesus was intended to demonstrate ods’ willingness to reveal Himself and intervene directly into the natural world for those obedient to His Command, paving the way for access to the power of divine Will and ultimate proof as the justification of faith.
Thus ‘faith’ becomes an act of trust in action, the search along a defined path of strict self discipline, [a test of the human heart] to discover His ‘Word’ of a direct individual intervention into the natural world by omnipotent power that confirms divine will, law, command and covenant, which at the same time, realigns our mortal moral compass with the Divine, “correcting human nature by a change in natural law, altering biology, consciousness and human ethical perception beyond all natural evolutionary boundaries.”
So like it or no, and many won’t, a new religious teaching, a wisdom not of human intellectual origin, empirical, transcendent, testable by faith, meeting all Enlightenment criteria of evidence based causation and definitive proof now exists. Nothing short of an intellectual, moral and religious/spiritual revolution is getting under way. To test or not to test, that is the question? More info at http://www.energon.org.uk

RA Landbeck, Jesus and Mo 13 Comments [2/14/2016 5:50:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Frogflayer

Quote# 116762


The OT was the covenant with the Jews not Christians.
It was for people in a different country at a different time. And no matter what you call this thread you cannot use it to poke at subjects that are nothing to do with the Lords Prayer.

There is no mind set to condemn or defend. That was that covenant. But today for Christians they cannot be homosexual in practice because the body is to be used for Gods Glory not mans lusts or to sin in any way.
Christ is for Christians and homosexuality is for homosexuals.  Christians are not allowed to take part in any sexual behaviour considered sin. They cannot sleep with prostitutes and they have to remain in unity with God.

So not really anything to do with Christianity is it?

Sassy, Religion and Ethics 28 Comments [2/13/2016 5:41:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 116761

You mean they "made love"? A husband and wife can't have s_x.

AV1611VET, Christian Forums 35 Comments [2/13/2016 4:56:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 116757

Satan (Lucifer) is a Woman, The Queen of Heaven (Formerly)

SATAN (LUCIFER)(DEVIL) IS A WOMAN/FEMALE, THE QUEEN OF HEAVEN, THE WOMAN WHO SITS ON MANY WATERS… LUCIFER IS NOT A MAN/MALE.

SATAN IS A WOMAN, NOT A MAN! THIS IS PROVEN THRU SCRIPTURES! YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THE WORDS THE LORD USES TO DESCRIBE SATAN! IN EZE 28 – HE CALLS HER “PERFECT IN BEAUTY”, “EVERY PRECIOUS STONE WAS THY COVERING IN THE DAY THOU WAST CREATED”, “THOU ART THE ANOINTED CHERUB”, “THOU HAST BEEN IN EDEN THE GARDEN OF GOD”, “THOU WAST ON THE MOUNTAIN OF GOD”, “THOU HAST WALKED UP AND DOWN IN THE MIDST OF THE STONES OF FIRE”, “THOU WAST PERFECT IN THY WAYS”, “TILL INIQUITY WAS FOUND IN THEE”, “THINE HEART WAS LIFTED UP BECAUSE OF THY BEAUTY”, “THOU HAST CORRUPTED THY WISDOM BY REASON OF THY BRIGHTNESS!”

NOW THESE ARE WORDS BEING SPOKEN TO SATAN (LUCIFER) BY THE LORD HIMSELF! YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE HOW CLOSE LUCIFER WAS TO HIM BEFORE SHE SINNED (“THOU HAST BEEN IN EDEN THE GARDEN OF GOD”, “THOU WAST ON THE MOUNTAIN OF GOD”, “THOU HAST WALKED UP AND DOWN IN THE MIDST OF THE STONES OF FIRE”)! SHE WAS THE QUEEN OF HEAVEN AND WALKED IN THE GARDEN OF GOD (EDEN OR HIS PHYSICAL PRESENCE), SHE WAS ON THE MOUNTAIN OF GOD (HIS THRONE ROOM), AND SHE WALKED UP AND DOWN IN THE VERY MIDST (MIDDLE) OF THE STONES OF FIRE (THE LORDS HEART, HIS VERY BEING/PRESENCE, IN THE MIDDLE OF HIS LIVING THRONE, THERE WAS NONE CLOSER TO HIM THAN HIS QUEEN) THIS IS WHY THE LORD DESPISES ADULTRY SO MUCH… AND THIS IS WHERE THE LORD MOLDED WOMAN FOR ADAM (MAN) OUT OF HER IMAGE AND LIKENESS BEFORE SHE SINNED (READ AGAIN EZE 28 TO UNDERSTAND HER LIKENESS BEFORE SHE SINNED)

MAN WAS CREATED TO TAKE DOMINION OVER THE EARTH/LAND AND TO BE A KING UNTO THE EARTH. THE WOMAN (EVE) WAS CREATED TO BE A QUEEN UNTO THE MAN (ADAM) FOR IT WAS NOT GOOD FOR MAN TO BE ALONE, AND WOMAN WAS PUT IN THE GARDEN (EAST OF EDEN) WITH MAN NEXT TO HIS PHYSICAL PRESENCE, THE WOMAN WALKED IN THE GARDEN OF MAN AND IN THE MIDST OF MANS HEART, AND THERE WAS NONE CLOSER TO MAN THAN WOMAN EXCEPT THE LORD, UNTIL MAN PUT WOMAN ABOVE THE LORD AND LISTENED TO HER WORDS AND OBEYED THEM KNOWING THE LORD AND THAT IT WAS WRONG WHAT WOMAN WAS TELLING MAN TO DO WAS DISOBEDIENCE TO THE LORD. THE INSTITUTE OF MARRIAGE WAS GIVEN TO MAN AND WOMAN FOR THE LIKENESS OF THE LORD AND HIS QUEEN FOR MAN TO KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THE LORD AND WAS GIVEN PERMISSION OF MARRAIGE AND TO PROCREATE.

unknown, It time now for you 33 Comments [2/13/2016 4:55:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: undie not fundie

Quote# 116756

David Daleiden was smiling on the morning he turned himself in at the Harris County criminal courthouse in Houston, Texas. Sporting a skinny tie, his hair slicked back in a faux-hawk, the 27-year-old thanked his supporters in the anti-abortion movement. He vowed to continue his three-year secret-video crusade against Planned Parenthood, which Daleiden maintains is illegally trafficking in fetal tissue.

But it has been a stunning reversal of fortune for Daleiden, the toast of the Republican presidential candidates and the bane of abortion providers’ existences, and that sea change goes beyond the Texas courthouse. A grand jury that was supposed to be investigating Planned Parenthood over the content of Daleiden’s videos – at the request of Texas’s fervently anti-abortion lieutenant governor – instead indicted Daleiden and an associate on felony charges. Having turned down a plea deal that would keep him out of prison, Daleiden could serve up to 20 years. He faces a raft of civil suits, including accusations of racketeering by Planned Parenthood. Twelve states that have investigated Planned Parenthood have cleared the organization of wrongdoing. And he didn’t know it yet, but another setback for Daleiden was about to come.

“They are sending a message that the state of Texas right now is open for business in baby body parts,” Daleiden said last Thursday morning. He was referring to a state that has gone further than any other to restrict abortion and shut down Planned Parenthood.

Daleiden calls himself a citizen journalist, and his attorneys have claimed that creating a fake tissue procurement company and misrepresenting himself to secretly record abortion providers falls within the bounds of journalistic techniques.

David Daleiden, MSNBC 27 Comments [2/13/2016 4:54:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 116740


'on being asked what the proof/valudation of Helena finding the 'True Cross ' was'

You can't say that. That would be like asking you to prove that 2+2=4 without using mathematics. It would make no sense. The miracle was the proof, a corpse rose when the cross was held over it.

ad_orientem, Religion and Ethics 15 Comments [2/12/2016 4:07:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 116739

"Not hard to google "Disqus Oboehner". Hatred of gay people, hatred of Catholics, hatred of transgendered people, hatred of science, hatred of evolution, belief in a young earth - I guess you missed that part where Jesus preached love. And made up the part where he said to fight hard against science."

Not hard to embellish either I see, gay people are not born that way, catholics contradict the Bible they claim to believe, science is great - it's people claiming their religion is science is what I disagree with, evolutionism is a religion that is being taught in government schools (so I take it that religion being taught in school is ok with you).
I never said hate, you did. I never fought real science, attempting to lump your religion in with real science is fraudulent, but you apparently like fraud.
Being that you haven't a clue about what Jesus taught, I'll ignore that part of your rant.

Oboehner, Christian News Network 13 Comments [2/12/2016 4:06:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 116736

No matter how many people you’ve killed or how vicious your methods were, you can choose the path of redemption and seize hold of the invitation your Creators are extending to you. Theirs is an invitation to a far better quality of life and an existence that is filled with purpose and hope. You are not just a screwed up mess in Their eyes. You are Their dearly loved creature who They want to see experience the vast benefits of the pain that They have put you through. Our Gods don’t enjoy inflicting suffering on us in life, but They love us too much to block us from the experiences we need to become able to receive all that They want to give us. Choose the path of redemption and refuse to accept that where you are now has to be the miserable end to your story. This doesn’t have to be the end of anything. Instead, it can be the beginning of a truly beautiful transformation.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 22 Comments [2/12/2016 3:56:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 116735

A more in-depth take on the 911 false flag watch, learn, and share with everyone!
Addicted to the truth and needing no rehab............
Disinformation = BAN no warning no debate so post carefully. Posts should be assessed on their level of truth. Respect each other's opinion's without any personal insults, back up your truth with multiple links or Google search page links. thank you!
BASED ON REAL PROVEN SCIENCE
The flat earth movement is run by the FBI, a co-intel program, "cognitive infiltration of paranoid libertarians" instructed to mock 9/11 truthers and anarchists, to attempt to demonstrate how insane the views of the extremists are. Thus when a meme comes out saying that those who investigate 9/11 come away convinced that the government is lying--then the government agents and their contractors put out flat earth memes saying the same thing about the flat earth. One way to combat this sort of evil unethical behavior is simply block anyone who mentions flat earth as a seriously held belief.


Derek Richards, Truth Seekers for WORLD TRUTH 14 Comments [2/12/2016 3:55:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Count Zapolai

Quote# 116734

The Voyage Begins Again!

There will never be another global Flood. That was God’s promise to us in Genesis 9:15, when He gave us the rainbow as a sign of His covenant with man and all living creatures.

The Bible makes it clear, however, that there will be another global judgment: next time by fire. As God’s Word states, it will be the Final Judgment as: “the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up” (2 Peter 3:12).

Today, we don’t need another Ark to save animals and people from a global Flood. But we do need another kind of Ark, and to take people on what we are calling “a voyage of discovery.”

More than ever, people need to discover the truth of God’s Word beginning in Genesis and the saving gospel of the New Testament. That is especially true today for teens and millennials (including those inside the church). Our culture needs to take a voyage of discovery and discover that:

God’s Word concerning the history of the universe and all life is true.
God’s Word concerning man’s sinful state and his need of salvation in Christ is true.
Just like the angel in the book of Revelation, we need to be preaching the gospel and warning people about the judgment to come:

There will never be another global Flood. That was God’s promise to us in Genesis 9:15, when He gave us the rainbow as a sign of His covenant with man and all living creatures.

The Bible makes it clear, however, that there will be another global judgment: next time by fire. As God’s Word states, it will be the Final Judgment as: “the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up” (2 Peter 3:12).

Today, we don’t need another Ark to save animals and people from a global Flood. But we do need another kind of Ark, and to take people on what we are calling “a voyage of discovery.”

More than ever, people need to discover the truth of God’s Word beginning in Genesis and the saving gospel of the New Testament. That is especially true today for teens and millennials (including those inside the church). Our culture needs to take a voyage of discovery and discover that:

God’s Word concerning the history of the universe and all life is true.
God’s Word concerning man’s sinful state and his need of salvation in Christ is true.
Just like the angel in the book of Revelation, we need to be preaching the gospel and warning people about the judgment to come:

Then I saw another angel flying in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach to those who dwell on the earth—to every nation, tribe, tongue, and people— saying with a loud voice, “Fear God and give glory to Him, for the hour of His judgment has come; and worship Him who made heaven and earth, the sea and springs of water” (Revelation 14:6–7).
Creation Wise: Ark of Salvation
In this secularized time, I believe one of the best and most effective ways to reach tens of millions of people with the gospel message is to build another Ark—a gospel-focused life-size Ark—and show the world that science confirms the Bible. God’s Word is true, and we all need to come to repentance.

Other than the Cross, I believe Noah’s Ark is the greatest reminder of the soul-saving gospel. Just as Noah and his family had to go through the one Ark door to be saved, so we need to go through the one door, Jesus Christ, to be saved. Jesus said: “I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture” (John 10:9).

By God’s grace, on July 7, the life-size Ark, one of the greatest Christian outreaches of this era, will open to the public. This huge ship will take visitors on a very special voyage:

to experience the most authentic reconstruction of Noah’s Ark, built according to the dimensions in the Bible
to get an idea of what it was like in Noah’s day
to get answers to questions about the Ark and Flood
to be taught about the truth of God’s Word, beginning with its history in Genesis
to be challenged concerning the need for every person to go through the “door” (Jesus Christ) and be saved from the coming judgment, and live for eternity with their Creator and Savior.
Because of our conviction that we need to reach the masses with an evangelistic message—the most important message in the universe—we have started an unprecedented national media blitz.

You may know that AiG has a decade-long history of utilizing the mass media in a high-profile way, in both Christian and secular outlets, to promote the various initiatives of this Bible-affirming ministry. Because the Ark Encounter is every bit the quality of a major attraction in California (like Universal Studios) or Florida (like Disney World), yet with an unmistakable and bold Christian message, I believe it’s vital we do our best to convince people across America and around the world to visit.

In the spirit of leveraging every available media by which to effectively communicate the Ark’s opening date and help families plan their summer trip to the Ark Encounter, on New Year’s Eve we launched an aggressive national branding campaign to bring awareness of the amazing, huge Ark. It began on the Fox News Channel at Times Square, and then we went on to many other major media outlets, both Christian and secular. (You can read about this large media campaign.)

When the secular media ask me (constantly) about the purpose of Answers in Genesis, the Creation Museum, and now the Ark Encounter, I tell them that our message is simply this:

The history in the Bible is true, and the gospel based in that history is true!

We also share with the media this gospel verse: “If you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9).

So, the voyage begins . . . again . . . on July 7! Help get the word out, plan your trip, and purchase advance tickets when you visit ArkEncounter.com.

Ken Ham, Answers in Genesis 29 Comments [2/12/2016 3:54:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 116731

During Saturday night’s debate in New Hampshire, no candidate who was asked about women being required to register for the draft spoke out against such a proposal. My ears could hardly believe what they were hearing: Republican candidates, the party of so-called “traditional values” insisted upon the nobility of the United States drafting women into the military. Whether one “allows” or “requires” women to sign up for the draft misses the bigger point that needs to be said: Women should not be combatants—under any circumstances.

[...]

There is no valor in requiring a woman to be subjected to the brutalities of a wartime foxhole where unimaginable horrors are played out in real life. But more importantly, let me raise this possibility: If a day were to ever arrive where the U.S. military depended on female combatants in order to win a war, the United States has already lost its most important battles. A nation relying on female combatants is a nation that has been brought to its knees by political correctness. A nation relying on female combatants is a nation that has lost all trappings of male and female differentiation. It is a nation that denies creation and reality in favor of anti-creation and anti-reality. A nation requiring female combatants is a nation that has surrendered any remaining relic of chivalry.

Frankly, it is cowardice of the highest order, and one that any self-respecting man ought to shun. The logic and consequence leads down a path that any man with a view to virtue or duty ought to shutter at when imagining. Think, for example, of the moral equivalency of such arguments that make it the duty of wives to respond to midnight intruders, rather than husbands. That’s what those supporting a military draft of women are asking us to accept. This isn’t just a military proposal; it’s about an entire worldview built on the bankrupt ideology of egalitarianism. This form of egalitarianism tries to level all differences in service to ideology. Ideology is so dangerous because it subjects all realities to its claims, regardless of whether such claims are moral or natural. Putting a woman in a man’s place will only increase her likelihood of harm and bring earned dishonor to the man.

[...]

As the book of Romans tell us, disavowing creation is its own form of judgment, and a nation cannot suppress the natural laws of God and expect to prosper in the long-term, much less win a war.

In biblical tradition, man and woman are made beautifully different for purposeful reasons. The broad shoulders of men aren’t ancillary or accidental features, but evidence of the natural strength that males innately possess. The protective instinct that men can harness at a moment’s notice isn’t an evolutionary instinct passed down from marauding cavemen—it issues from the fact that God made men protectors. Military conscription of women makes the thwarting of nature mandatory. Women are nurturers; not warriors. That women are delicate, and possess, on average, a smaller frame than men indicate their aptness for less rugged activities, not hand to hand combat.

That we’re having this conversation reveals that America is less humane and gentlemanly, and that we’ve surrendered to our progressive zeitgeist. It is unacceptable.

[...]

America, this shouldn’t be hard. Nations ought not send their daughters into battle, but God forbid, if wars arise, it ought to be sons that do the nation’s bidding. Anyone with an iota of commonsense and an eye toward reality knows we shouldn’t sacrifice our daughters to battle—and especially not to the spirit of the age.

Andrew T. Walker, Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission 36 Comments [2/12/2016 3:53:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 116730



Catholic Nationalist, Facebook 27 Comments [2/12/2016 3:52:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 116729

What Is Fascism?

Political radicals often shout, “Fascist!”, “Fascist!” at anyone who doesn’t agree with their views. The term is especially popular among college students. But do such people actually know what Fascism is? Have they studied it?

Unfortunately, Fascism has an undeserved bad reputation. Regardless of this reputation, Fascism is a very sensible economic and social ideology. There are a few different “flavors” of Fascism, but basically they all come down to the following.

First and foremost, Fascism is an economic system in which a nation’s government plays a central role in monitoring all banking, trade, production, and labor activity which takes place within the nation. Such monitoring is done for the sole purpose of safeguarding & advancing the nation and its people. Under Fascism, the government will not approve of any business activity unless that business has a positive impact on the nation as a whole and the people of the nation – this is the axiom which determines everything within the economic aspect of Fascism.

In other words, the government asks, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for our nation and our people?” If yes, it’s approved. If no, it’s not approved. When they ask, “Is it good?”, they mean, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for the workers, do they pay a fair wage, do they produce a product or provide a service which advances our nation & our people technologically, morally, spiritually, health-wise, etc???” For example, a pornography company would not be allowed because pornography corrupts people generally and exploits & degrades women particularly. Also, “free” trade agreements (such as what the U.S. has with China) would never be allowed because such trade agreements result in companies sending jobs overseas (where labor is dirt cheap). Such an activity, of course, would undermine a nation’s labor class. This is entirely unacceptable and thus not allowed under a Fascist economic model.

Fascism is based on free enterprise – but with constraints (the primary constraint being, “Is the particular economic activity in question good for our nation/people?”). Also, a businessman can become wealthy in a Fascist country, and the government has no objection to this (this is in stark contrast to Communism). Fascism also encourages private ownership of property (again, in stark contrast to Communism where private property is not allowed).

In a nutshell, Fascism basically tells entrepreneurs, “Go ahead and start a business, earn a lot of money, be successful, but don’t produce any products or services which damage our nation and our nation’s people… and make sure you treat your workers fair and pay them a living wage. If you don’t follow these rules, we’ll shut you down.”

With regard to banking, usury is not allowed under Fascism. The government tightly controls all aspects of monetary policy, including terms of lending. The government issues/prints money and lends it interest free, as needed, to grow the economy and ultimately serve the citizens.

The above is the economic aspect of Fascism. There is also a cultural/social aspect to Fascism as well. Under Fascism, government plays a key role in monitoring: film, theatre, art, literature, music, education, etc in order to maintain a high moral standard, keep things clean and respectable, promote a strong sense of patriotism and honor, and prevent the dissemination of depraved filth which corrupts society.

With regard to political legislation introduced by a Fascist government, the same criteria is applied – “Will this proposed law benefit the nation as a whole and the people of our nation?”

A few other things to mention. Fascism encourages respect for the environment as Fascists understand that nature is the giver of life and thus must be preserved. Contrast this environmental philosophy with that of Capitalism which too often takes the short term view with regard to natural resources and foolishly believes that pollution is a necessary byproduct of profit. Also, and somewhat related to environmental issues, Fascism holds very progressive views with regard to animal rights.

Fuhrerious88, Fuhrerious88blog 20 Comments [2/12/2016 3:51:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 116727



Priya Kishna, Vegan Artbook 26 Comments [2/11/2016 5:22:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 116724



Priya Kishna, Vegan Artbook 30 Comments [2/11/2016 5:22:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 116722

[on a gay kid being shot for being openly day and dressing like a female ]


My god, that's like something from an action movie. The fact that he you know, walked out all calm. Disgusting that he showed little or no remorse, though if he showed remorse he wouldn't have done it in the first place.

Maybe he was drunk or in a odd state of mind =D. When I'm drunk I smash bottles and well... try to hit people with them, and unless my friends stop me, then I would probably hit someone.

I'm not going to lie, by the sounds of it, the way that guy was acting. The fact that he was so openly gay at that age, and coming to school dressed that way is; as someone stated before, basically making himself a bully magnet. Though killing him wasn't necessarily the BEST way to resolve things, if someone had have just bashed him or something he might have come to his senses.

School is no place to freely express your homosexuality. Especially not to the extreme of painting your nails pink. You'd get absolutely smashed where I live for doing that =p.
It could have been worse, He might have made it to Senior School (High School, w.e Americans call it) and got totally smashed he probably would have suffered a long and painful death, like an American guy suffered who was attending University of California.

He got bashed, then strapped to a pole and left for death, he later died.

Not to mention the bad and cruel 'harmless jokes' that the seniors play on the new kids (whatever the lame word they use for that is).

Ok, You may be gay, but with the pressure being put on in American schools. Why would anyone want to. I don't really think people shouldn't openly gay, they just should maybe wait until they're out of school, and the world is more open and you're not forced to go to school. etc.

[Last time i check people had the right to express themselves without being hated upon. I could walk down the street with my piercings in, wearing all black and my hair as emo as i could possibly make it and not be disturbed by anyone. A gangsta could wear his skin tight shirts and nike hats and any other stereotypical piece of clothing and not have anything happen to him.]


This is a world of racism, violence and god only knows what other shit happens in this world. I was never said "Oh my, he should never wear pink nails because im going to pull a gun out of my backpack and shoot him"; I said that he could have avoided the conflict by not having the pink nails. Oh, I'm sure he is going to be absolutely disheartened because he can't wear his pretty pink nails - As said one million times, by doing so he bought it upon himself!

I'm not defending the kid, nor standing up for him, I'm taking the viewpoint of both sides.

This is NOT what I would do to the kid if he wore pink nails in front of me. It's what the citizens of the world would do to him, and as you can see, he was murdered for it! It may not necessarily have been the pink nails.

It doesn't just happen in America; you try walking through Surfers Paradise on a Friday night with pink nails and gay clothes, You would more than likely get bottled, glassed or stabbed. It's happened before.

It's almost a way of life, there's ways to avoid it and this kid didn't do it. Sure he has a right to express himself, though who would express themself when there's a chance you will get bashed, or worse; murdered.


He obviously wasn't afraid to dress like he did, and he paid the ultimate consequence. Yeah he lives in an apparent "Free Nation", yet he still died, by saying such things you're only criticizing your own country.

He doesn't have to stop being gay to avoid the conflict, he simply has to stop dressing the way he was, not painting his nails pink, and saying to people they have a "Nice ass".

snoopy, Silk Road Online Forums 25 Comments [2/11/2016 5:22:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 116721

on a child named Larry who was murdered by a classmate for being openly gay

[At 8:30 a.m., a half hour into class, Brandon quietly stood up. Then, without anyone's noticing, he removed a handgun that he had somehow sneaked to school, aimed it at Larry's head, and fired a single shot. Boldrin, who was across the room looking at another student's work, spun around. "Brandon, what the hell are you doing!" she screamed. Brandon fired at Larry a second time, tossed the gun on the ground and calmly walked through the classroom door. ]


The first time I read that I laughed, hard. Hard and long tbh.

anyway, I'm not going to say 'oh, what a tragedy! This could have been prevented' blah blah, it isn't a tragedy. The kid was an idiot, did he deserve to die? Probably not, but I personally am not going to feel sorry about it.

Who the fuc.k does that, in school of all places. Just as bad as emo **** or goths, if you don't want attention or harm brought to yourself then get a fuc.king grip and dress normally. If you can't say something constructive or interesting, don't say anything at all. Wait til after school is out to do whatever you want if it makes you happy.
In my school they would've kicked him out made him go home until he got a new look, they've sent girls home for having spaghetti straps on ffs, school isn't the place for this shit.

No, I'm not prejudice against gays either. I have two friends, one male and one female who are bisexual, good for them. If the guy went to school like that I'd kick his ass myself before someone else did.
btw, having a bisexual friend whom is female is sooo nice, just thought I'd add that in here ;-).

Guess I'll contradict myself a little here but, I don't know if they were born that way.. don't really care either, if they are born that way.. that would also mean that pedophiles are born that way also wouldn't it?
That's a scary thought imo. I'd like baro to comment on this if he would.


Mousetrap, SilkRoad Forums 22 Comments [2/11/2016 5:21:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 22