Quote# 118056

I think abortions should be legal and accessible, with some restrictions. I think that we should work at the same time to reduce the number of women having abortions through public health programs, safe sex education, increasing access to contraceptives, decreasing social stigmas, etc. That's it in a nutshell.

"I think abortions should be legal and accessible, with some restrictions."
What restrictions, and how do you defend this position from a scientific and moral view? If I wrote the following statement, surely held by many in the 1800's, how would you compare it with yours?
"I think slavery should be legal and accessible, with some restrictions. I think that we should work at the same time to reduce the number of slaves held by owners through public awareness programs, safety standards for slaves and education, decreasing the slave trade, decreasing social stigmas, etc."

First off - equating me to a slave owner is about as intellectually honest as comparing me to Hitler. I don't think it adds anything to the conversation, all you're doing is making a transparent attempt to make me the villain. Clearly on this website I was the villain the moment I got here, so you don't need to do that. Now that I've gotten that out of the way...
I'm happy to explain my position further. I think with programs like the ones I described we can drastically bring the number of abortions in this country down. The vast majority of people do not take the decision to have an abortion lightly, as much as some people here think that is the case. The fact that abortion is the termination of a potential person does not escape most people who have them. So let's imagine that through these programs we have been able to get the number of abortions per year down to 15% of what they are today...
We still need to have access to safe methods of abortion for them. There are obvious cases of rape, incest, health of the mother, severe deformity, etc that would make up some fraction of the remaining cases - and I think the ethical justification for abortion in these cases is pretty easy to meet. How about the rest? I think that there are justifiable reasons to have an abortion even with a healthy baby and a healthy mother. For them there should be a cutoff in fetal development, somewhere in the late second to early third trimester when the fetus becomes viable on its own outside the womb. ETHICALLY this makes sense to me because if a fetus has the ability to survive on it's own, it has the right to self-determination, and so it should be awarded the status of "personhood" and all the legal protections that come along with it. Prior to that cutoff it's life is intrinsically linked to the life of the mother and so I don't consider it an individual or a "person" yet. BIOLOGICALLY I think this cutoff also makes sense because at this time the fetus starts to develop higher order brain and sensory functions, possibly allowing for some sort of consciousness and perception. PRACTICALLY I think this makes sense because the vast majority of people think that abortion should be legal with some exceptions, and it addresses the major concerns of all the camps.

"equating me to a slave owner is about as intellectually honest as comparing me to Hitler"
I will be doing that comparison later. :-) But, it is not I who am doing the comparison to slavery and the holocaust, but YOU - your very own words convict you.
"The vast majority of people do not take the decision to have an abortion lightly"
Please stand out in front of your local abortion mill, and that assertion will be roundly defeated. Even if it WERE true, the vast majority of murderers do not take their killing lightly either.
"The fact that abortion is the termination of a potential person"
False. It is the killing of an actual human in a stage in which you yourself, by your own admission, once passed. If you have evidence to support "potential person," please supply it. But, you have already refuted yourself when you admitted that you were once a ZEF.
"There are obvious cases of rape, incest, health of the mother, severe deformity, etc that would make up some fraction of the remaining cases"
None of those cases are valid - the only one that is valid is life, not health, of the mother. And doctors agree that when a woman's life is in danger due to a pregnancy, there is no time for an abortion - it is C-section and save them both (or go Kermit Gosnell on the baby).
"I think that there are justifiable reasons to have an abortion even with a healthy baby and a healthy mother. "
Of course you do! Nice to see you use the word "baby" there! At least you admit it - get that villain costume right back on. :-)
"Prior to that cutoff it's life is intrinsically linked to the life of the mother and so I don't consider it an individual or a "person" yet."
It does not matter "what you consider" but what is true. You have provided no evidence to support your assertion, and isn't the denial of personhood something the slavers did too? Do you see how your words convict you?
"the vast majority of people think that abortion should be legal with some exceptions"
The vast majority of people once thought that slavery should be legal too. Once again, your words convict you, Massah Microbio! :-)
So, don't come back to me and say I am playing the slaver card when it is you yourself who is playing the part so magnificently. Bravo - encore!

WorldGoneCrazy, Live Action News 13 Comments [4/10/2016 7:25:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Jocasta McFucken

Quote# 118055

Satanic Cults Which Control Society Are Steeped In Sexual Lust

Our nation's dilemmas go way back to the very beginnings of our nation, when the Christian people tolerated Freemasons establishing our government. We ought to run those satanists out of town! Freemasonry is of the Devil, an organization within an organization, intended to deceive their members. At the highest degrees of enlightenment within their esoteric group, they worship Baphomet (Lucifer, the Beast). Our nation was doomed from the very beginning, because God will not bless Freemasonry, a false religion that worships "The Great Architect" instead of Jesus Christ. Freemasons claim that the issue of God is so delicate that they prefer to refer to the multiple member's individual faith's collectively as "The Great Architect" (which includes unbelieving Muslims, demonic Mormons and Christ-rejecting Judaizers). The Bible warns that there is no agreement between light and dark, good and evil, God and Satan (2nd Corinthians 6:16).

Research and you will find quickly that Freemasons are behind America's evils. Freemasons are synonymous with Jewish Zionism. They control Washington D.C., the schools, the courts, the military, the newsmedia and our economy. Hollywood is the Jewish propaganda Mecca of the world, distributing sexual immorality, violence, homosexual perversion, Homeland Security brainwashing and blasphemy against the Lord Jesus Christ. There is no greater an evil perpetrator of lust, perversion, sexual lasciviousness than Hollywood and the television networks!!! SEX SELLS! Woe unto the wicked!

Freemasonry's official logo of a carpenter's square and compass are sexual symbols, evidenced by the way they are positioned upon each other. The Washington Monument, which stands 555.5 feet (6666 inches) tall and 55.5 feet (666 inches) wide is a sexual symbol of the male phallus. America's leaders are steeped in sexually depraved satanic cults. Bohemian Grove is infamous for homosexual male prostitutes, as evidenced by U.S. President Richard Nixon while visiting. Both George Bush Sr. and Jr. are infamous homosexuals, as was Ronald Reagan (aka, "Rainbow Ronnie"). God deliver our nation from gigolo presidents, homosexuals and child molesters at the helm of our country's White House. Criminals have hi-jacked our nation. Truthfully, God has given to America the incompetent, criminal and shameful presidents THAT WE DESERVE. Our leaders rise from the base of our society, whose most basic structural unit is THE FAMILY. That cursed television in nearly everyone's home is a propaganda device used to indoctrinate and brainwash society, and it is far more effective for Satan than America's church pulpits at influencing people's lives. Mankind always gravitates toward evil, because that's our human nature.

David J. Stewart, Divided by Truth 30 Comments [4/10/2016 7:24:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 118052

Point about special pleading taken, and ok, sex isn't just about reproduction. But I haven't actually said that same sex couples shouldn't have sex - they can't. What they do is in no shape or form sexual intercourse. What I said was that they shouldn't engage in homosexual acts, which cannot to be compared with it, as ht did.
If I'm not mistaken, the English word 'couple' (meaning a man and woman in a relationship) was coined before homosexuality became accepted, Shaker.

Spud, Religion and Ethics 23 Comments [4/10/2016 7:24:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: n

Quote# 118049

Now God says that it is wrong for a man to marry a man. Why? Because it is a violation of His moral code and a celebration of sexual activities which He says are wrong. Once God has educated us on His standards in this area, we can hardly agree to marry gay couples without being guilty of spiritual rebellion. God has told us not to do something, and we’re doing it anyway–that’s what rebellion is. And we’re not just doing it in our own homes, we’re doing it out in public and modeling for the flock that this is the right way to treat God. That’s called bad leadership, and Christian leaders who are intentionally encouraging their flocks to disrespect God are going to have to deal with some very unpleasant discipline.

Why is the gay issue so hot right now? Because it’s one of the better known moral stands that God has. By pressuring Christians to publicly disrespect God by celebrating something which they know He hates, spiritual rebels try to get us to turn away from God in our own lives. We need to remember that life is about God, and everything that happens to us in this world has some spiritual agenda behind it. It’s hardly an accident that of all the religions in the world, America is fixated on stomping out Christianity. By the time people get furious about God being honored, they usually have a pretty good idea of who the real Gods are, thus we find them spending more time attacking Christianity than other religions. In America, it’s perfectly acceptable to park your statue of Buddha in the workplace, but if you hang up a cross, everyone goes spastic. If we post pictures of Hindu gods, that’s good art, but if we post pictures of Jesus, that’s an infringement on everyone’s rights. Of course it’s totally acceptable to mock Jesus in public by displaying irreverent artwork in a museum or putting on Broadway productions which utterly slander His Person. But if we put out a Nativity scene that honors Him, or if we say “Merry Christmas” instead of “Happy Holidays,” well, that’s enough for a lawsuit. So we all know what the game is: the world hates God and she wants us to publicly side with her against Him. It’s been like this from the beginning, which is why Jesus was so clear that we’d have to choose between pleasing Him and pleasing people.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 11 Comments [4/10/2016 7:22:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 118047

A fundie asks:
Why are some non-Muslims are smart?
For example, Albert Einstein, who never did sujood in his life. Also, Mozart, Da Vinci, and so on. What do these people rely on to make their brains smart?

SOme of the answers are reasonable, but then we get this:

Salaam brother, saw ur other post about asking a non muslim to make dua,

Are you a muslim ? I hope u really trying to learn and not make fun of the seen.

Anyway, these ppl u mention had intelligence but were not intelligent ( if they died on kufr


Wassalam

And then, their smartness will be of no avail without Imaan. (meaning high IQ doesn't help infidels)

Islam is what turns fools into wisemen

lol use your brain, you don't need to be a Muslim to be "smart" in matters of Dunya. The fact that they may not believe in one God means there lacking intelligence somewhere



muz1234, ummah.com 19 Comments [4/10/2016 7:21:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 118046

Members of a California school board who heavily used prayer during public meetings are being ordered to pay more than $200,000 in lawyers fees, the San Bernardino Sun reports.

On February 18, U.S. District Judge Jesus Bernal ordered the Chino Valley Unified School Board to stop a years-long practice of “reciting prayers, Bible readings and proselytizing at board meetings,” the Sun reports.

On Thursday, the judge ordered board president Andrew Cruz, along with board members James Na and Sylvio Orzco to pay out $202,971.70 to the Freedom From Religion Foundation in association with their November 2014 lawsuit.

In the suit, the FFRF claimed that Na “often injects religion into his comments” at meeting conclusions while Cruz regularly concluded with a Bible reading. Prayers were also used to open the public meetings. But it didn’t stop there. Regular attendees complained the board members often stopped business to make long professions of their faith, according to the Sun.

Na at one meeting either mentioned or discussed Jesus 10 times.

“Our plaintiffs told us the board proceedings were more like a church service than a school board meeting,” FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor said in February, according to American School and University. “So my reaction to the ruling is, ‘Hallelujah!'”

Chino Valley Unified School Board, Raw Story 10 Comments [4/10/2016 7:21:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 118045

Absolutely. There is no problem with gay people having good relationships with people of the same sex whom they love, as long as they don't engage in sexual acts. God created male and female and it was good. Homosexuality is one result of man's rebellion against God. It is not good. Yes as you say we should be compassionate; the problem comes when you have a communion service, and the priest knows that a member coming for communion is a practicing homosexual. If someone is living in defiance of God's moral law (eg having an affair), the priest may refuse them communion. This is why it is important to be clear about what the Bible says. The priest is actually doing a more loving thing by not giving them communion because if he did he would be encouraging them to continue to sin, so their soul would not be saved.

Spud, Religion and Ethics 17 Comments [4/10/2016 7:21:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 118044

Indiana State Police Trooper Brian Hamilton was warned before: Stop proselytizing to people during traffic stops.

But a new lawsuit claims the trooper — who was sued once before for preaching on the job — didn’t learn his lesson the first time.

A complaint filed in federal court Wednesday by the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, on behalf of Wendy Pyle, accuses Hamilton of asking her whether “she had been saved” after pulling her over in Fayette County in January. Court documents claim Hamilton then told the woman about his church and gave her directions to it.

“Ms. Pyle was extremely uncomfortable with these questions,” the lawsuit says. “In order to hopefully end these inquiries Ms. Pyle indicated that she did attend a church and that she was saved.”

If this story sounds familiar, that’s because Hamilton has been sued before. The ACLU filed a similar lawsuit in 2014 when a woman named Ellen Bogan claimed Hamilton stopped her that August for an alleged traffic violation in Union County. After he handed her a warning ticket, she said, he asked her if she had a home church and whether she accepted Jesus Christ as her savior.

“I’m not affiliated with any church. I don’t go to church,” Bogan told IndyStar at the time. “I felt compelled to say I did, just because I had a state trooper standing at the passenger-side window. It was just weird.”

Brian Hamilton, USA Today 14 Comments [4/10/2016 7:21:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 118042

Perhaps not all women are fascists at heart, but without their votes, few fascists would ever be elected.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 34 Comments [4/9/2016 5:27:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: David

Quote# 118039

Black holes are lurking only in mind of modern shamans. Nowhere else.

There is no way to exist something in the physical structure of vacuum of space, that violate the physical laws of the Creator tha support the originaly established prderr in the universe in interest of life.
This mantras are reflection of the humanistic cult to lawlessness due to the pride and vanity. Simpel and predictable as usual.



viko_mx, Phys.org 41 Comments [4/9/2016 5:23:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 118037

If Hastert was a homosexual, then he should rot in prison.

Flavious_Maximus, free republic 23 Comments [4/9/2016 5:17:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 118035

Moderate atheists like Richard Dawkins notoriously try to deflect responsibility for the brutality of their brothers in unbelief, saying that militant atheists are not representative of so-called secularism. I beg to differ. Atheism itself is the anathema we must face up to and face down or Europe will soon succumb to the secularist swarm.

Believe it or not, atheist apologists go so far even as to claim that Hitler was a Christian on the strength of Hitler’s own words! Do they also seriously believe that Hitler never intended to invade Poland, but unexpectedly changed his mind after promising Chamberlain “peace for our time”?

Check out this example of brazen blame-shifting from atheist apologist Michael Sherlock.

“Besides that, I believe one thing: there is a Lord God! And this Lord God creates the peoples.” ~Adolf Hitler

“We were convinced that the people need and require this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations; we have stamped it out” ~Adolf Hitler

Hitler was a Christian. This undeniable fact couldn’t be made any clearer than by his own confessions.

Sherlock’s claim, that Hitler was a Christian, simply beggars belief. But it’s easily and swiftly dealt with. Hitler himself refutes the claim in his mendacious Mein Kampf manifesto. He writes that “faith is the sole foundation of a moral attitude.” Hitler had no moral attitude—as the murder of 17 million people by his Nazi regime amply attests—and therefore no faith. Also, Jesus was a Jew. (Hitler was an anti-Semite.)

Richard, Eternal Vigilance 34 Comments [4/9/2016 5:16:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 118034

Beware of False Prophet, David Icke



The Bible teaches in 2nd Corinthians 4:4 that Satan is the god of this evil world. If you don't understand this, then you will never grasp the truth behind the workings of the New World Order. There are many scholars and researchers today who are being misled into UFO's, aliens, Reptilians and shape-shifting, and all sorts of weird and bizarre claims.

As with the Freemasons, all false religions, and other deceivers, David Icke presents strikingly accurate information about the inside workings of the Illuminati; while simultaneously discrediting his work with bizarre teachings of reptilians that shape-shift into human form and control the world. It is such rhetoric that leads me to firmly believe that David Icke is an Illuminati plant, without a doubt, intended to generate mass confusion, uncertainty and to discredit other honest researchers who are trying to expose the occult for the evil it is.

David Icke teaches some very bizarre things. Mr. Icke is a Bible-hating, Christ-denying, unbeliever who has extensive knowledge about the workings of the occult and the New World Order; but he is blinded by Satan to the truth of God's Word. As with most intellects, Icke is educating himself into Hell, “Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth” (2nd Timothy 3:7).

Remember, the Bible teaches in 2nd Corinthians 4:4 that Satan is the god of this world; but the Bible also goes on to teach that Satan's purpose is to BLIND THE MINDS of them which believe not, to hinder them from coming to Jesus Christ for salvation. Romans 1:16 proclaims that it is THE GOSPEL that is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth. False prophets deny this power (2nd Timothy 3:5) and teach some other way. David Icke, as seen in the above photo, is quoted as saying that infinite love is the only truth. No, the Word of God is truth, every single Word from Genesis to Revelation! John 17:17 proclaims that God's Word is THE TRUTH! In John 6:63, Jesus said that His Words are Truth. In John 14:6, Jesus professed to be THE TRUTH! Amen and amen! David Icke is a false prophet!

David Icke is being used by Satan to blind the minds of unbelievers even further. 2nd Corinthians 4:4, “In whom the god of this world hath BLINDED THE MINDS of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.” David Icke attacks Biblical Christianity as being fraudulent, demonizing Christian fundamentalists.

My honest opinion is that David Icke is exploiting information for his own personal gain. I think he's a part of the New World Order myself. No one could believe the bizarre things that Icke prorogates, having no evidence to support his ludicrous claims. Reptilians? Lizards? Aliens among us? From the constellation Draco? It's all a mockery of the truth of God's Word, intended to mislead and deceive the naive and gullible. Icke has traveled the world, mentoring his worldwide followers from all walks of life (no pun intended), who take his teachings VERY seriously, buying his books and having made him a very wealthy person. But, as human psychology proves, people by nature must believe something, and those who reject the Scriptures are vulnerable to end up believing anything.

As Christians, we believe that the Bible is God's Word. We believe that Jesus is the Christ, the only begotten Son of God. We do not believe in reptilians, nor shape-shifting aliens having taken over our planet. Do you see what Icke is doing? He is confusing people. I've heard him in interviews weave in and out of truth, tossing in Biblical terms, such as demons; but then he adds utter nonsense and blasphemous teachings, showing that he is a deceiver in these Last Days. David Icke is a dangerous false prophet!

David Icke adheres to a New Age system of beliefs, born in 1952 and from New England. Icke has described himself as “the son of God,” and a “channel for the Christ spirit.” These are New Age ideas. Although every born-again believer has the Spirit of Christ (Romans 8:9); Christians don't deny the Bible as being God's Word as David Icke does.

In The Biggest Secret (1999), pages 19-25, David Icke introduced the idea of the “Reptoid Hypothesis.” He identifies the Brotherhood as originating from reptilians from the constellation Draco, who walk on two legs and appear human, and who live in tunnels and caverns inside the earth. Icke claims they are the same race of gods known as the Anunnaki in the Babylonian creation myth, Enûma Eliš.

A LOT of naive people are listening to Mr. Icke, and are being led farther away from the God of the Bible. The only reptilian lizards are in Icke's mind. I have heard David Icke applying Biblical demons to his theories; but it is NOT Biblical Christianity that Icke believes, he is simply trying to adjust the Bible to fit his false beliefs. I pray to God that David Icke would become a born-again Christian and truly expose Satan's New World

david j. stewart, jesus-is-savior 21 Comments [4/9/2016 5:15:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 118033

The miracle of life begins the very second that a sperm enters an egg. At that moment, drastic changes happen to the egg, other sperm are blocked from entering it, and the great mystery of human life begins. To try and deny that this is the beginning of a human being simply because it doesn’t look like a human being is wrong. A tadpole doesn’t look like a frog, yet it is still a frog in the making. To kill a tadpole, is to kill a frog, and to kill a fertilized human egg, is to kill a human being.

Trying to tell God when we think the evolving human becomes advanced enough to meet our approval is utterly obnoxious. He has made the creation of humans a continuous, ongoing process which begins the moment sperm and egg meet. So then, when it comes to murdering our infants, we commit abortion anytime we intentionally destroy a fertilized egg. This means that any form of birth control which does harm to a fertilized egg is a weapon of murder, and must be considered morally unacceptable for Christians. On the other hand, forms of birth control which prevent sperm and egg from ever meeting can be considered morally acceptable, since no life is being destroyed. On their own, a human egg and a human sperm will never create a human being, just as an amputated arm will never grow back the body it was separated from. We are not committing murder when we discard a man’s arm, nor are we committing murder when we destroy eggs or sperm.

Even though it is morally acceptable for a Christian to use certain forms of birth control, God might direct you as an individual down a different course of action. Some Christians feel strongly convicted that it is morally unacceptable to try and interfere with God’s creation process in anyway. If this is how you feel, you need to obey your convictions. If God specifically tells a man not to use condoms, then the man needs to obey those clear instructions. But before you obey any instructions, you need to make sure that they are actually coming from God and not just from people or Satan.

In the Church, Christians have become far too slack about the issue of birth control. Some have talked themselves into believing it is fine to slaughter a human in the making, as long as they do it within a certain window of time. This is a lie from Satan. God has allowed us to invent amazing tools with which we have been able to film the entire conception process live with a camera right inside the female womb. If in doing this, we had observed the exact moment when the soul enters the body, then we could make a sound argument for a human embryo being “not quite human” before it received its soul. But as it is, God does not show us any such moment. It is an utter mystery to us how soul and body come together. What we do know for certain is that the soul of a child is very much present inside his mother’s womb. In the Bible, John the Baptist was still in his mother’s womb when he had a spiritual reaction to being in the Presence of unborn Jesus. Both babies were not yet born, yet they were spiritually communicating somehow. Such a story should make us quite reverent of the whole creation process. Since God is intentionally not telling us how soon the soul gets involved in the creation process, we must play it safe and assume that it could come the very moment an egg becomes fertilized. There is no possible grounds on which we can argue that the soul is not present from the very moment that the formation of a physical body begins. This being the case, we should be most fearful of flushing fertilized eggs from the body as if they are so much garbage. To treat life in such a disrespectful manner is to insult God.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 13 Comments [4/9/2016 5:15:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 118032

The only sperm that God authorizes a woman to voluntarily put into her body is that of her own husband’s. To seek out the sperm of other men from any source is a violation of His moral code. If your husband was disappointed by your infertility, does that mean he should get to go sleep with some sexy stranger to make up for it? Of course not. In the same way, it is totally unacceptable for you to go and try to collect the physical benefits of sleeping with another man simply because you and your husband are unable to have children. If you’re not even married, then you really have no justification for trying to get pregnant. To try and force a child into a fatherless home just because you’re in a hurry to be a mother is utterly selfish.

With the world cooking up so many ways to blow off God’s moral code, it’s easy to think that there could be some room for compromise in this area. But there’s not. The fact that God is blocking you from having children through moral channels does not mean He is authorizing you to start sleeping around—and that is essentially what you are doing, even though you are skipping the physical bonding part and going straight for the end result. Let’s be honest: seeking out sperm donations is about trying to force God to give us children. Our motivations are wrong, our methods are wrong, and the whole package is going to have very negative spiritual ramifications.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 14 Comments [4/9/2016 5:15:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 118031

I have never seen a bull attempting to mount another bull. Homosexuality is a crime against nature and morally repugnant, The very idea of a man with a man or a woman with a woman makes my skin creep. I want NOTHING to do with faggots and I would hope they would stick to their own. But everyday I reed the news and someone else is attempting to force me to accept their perversion. I WILL NOT!

If you are not a faggot then why would you defend them? Either way you are one sick puppy!

ironmansouth, Breitbart 24 Comments [4/9/2016 5:15:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 118029

God said He would not be mocked; but it seems the radical abortionist religion of peace LGBT war mongering drone using gun running Crucifix covering over posing in front of Che Guevara loser in the WH won't be content until he makes an outright and endless joke out of Him and this formerly God fearing nation.

Robert Roselli, WND 18 Comments [4/9/2016 5:15:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 118028

(On Megyn Kelly possibly leaving Fox News)

Oh, I hope she quits. She already got the butch hairstyle, she will be on MSNBC. She ain't no superstar, totally unprofessional. She is also a NY Liberal working for FOX because the $$$$$$ was right!

luvourtroops, WND 14 Comments [4/9/2016 5:04:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 118024

If I could give parents one bit of advice, it would be to enroll your children into a Christian school. Enough cannot be said about the important of providing a Christian environment for your child to develop spiritually, emotionally and physically. Notice that I placed spiritual first. Most parents are more interested in a good sport's program than they are daily chapel and Bible reading.

Your child would be better off attending school in the converted basement of a Baptist church than in a nice big building with adequate labs and a gymnasium of a public school. Nothing will destroy your child faster (next to a divorce) than placing them into a public school where heathen influences surround them. This is especially true in Junior High and High school.

When a child is sent to a hellhole public school system, they are placed in an environment of temptation and wickedness. The other heathen teens will ruin your child's attitude. You cannot expect to teach your children about God and the Bible at home, and then send them to a worldly school where the teen boys want to have sex with your daughter (and that's what television and society teaches them). Your son will be seduced by worldly whores in a public school.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 27 Comments [4/9/2016 5:03:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 118023

The education system, the Darwinist education, that is found on a philosophy that denies God should be stopped.

Violence against women would not stop so long as Darwinist education continues.

Harun Yahya, Twitter 15 Comments [4/9/2016 5:02:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 118021

Bull garbage, (Trump) won't commit "war crimes" because there is no such thing. War is bad, BUT the purpose of War is to win and there is no fair way of doing that. Like they say, War is HELL, but living under oppression is worse.

Victoria Larsen, NPR 22 Comments [4/9/2016 5:02:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 118020

(responding to story "PayPal Pulls North Carolina Expansion Plan after Transgender Restroom Law"):

Which rights were taken away from gays again?
Oh yeah, that's right. None.
Gettin' old, that play the victim routine of yours. Nobody's buying it anymore pal.

The law in question forbids cities from passing non-discrimination ordinances. If you don't think a right was taken away from gays, you at least have to admit it was taken away from cities.

Are you for real?
We're talking about people USING THE TOILET. In the appropriate bathroom designated for the anatomy that, you know, they actually have, and the gender that they scientifically, biologically and just matter of factually, actually ARE. Period.
Regardless of any nonsensical feelings and opinions.
RIGHTS taken away!!? Rights? Huh? Hello???

No matter how badly you and the liberal left, scientifically confused, and sheer fact denying crowd wish it wasn't so, there are, indeed, only TWO genders. Male and female.
And intelligent folks know, that the two are to forever be, you guessed it, segregated.
And if THAT really needs to be explained to you more fully, than you're in worse shape than I thought.

The fact that you truly believe that transgenderism does not exist is irrelevant. The fact that you believe it to the point of stomping your foot, using multiple punctuation marks, and shouting at me does not render it any more relevant.
What would be relevant is if you were able to overturn the decision of the American Psychological Association that transgenderism exists as a recognized psychological condition, and that its best treatment is to reassign the sufferer's gender.
But, hey, if you think you're better at psychology than the country's most preeminent psychologists, don't let me stand in your way. I look forward to reading your paper.

You just did!
There's TWO genders. It's just science, bud. No need to take it personally.
And it doesn't matter how they "feel". You keep them apart in bathrooms.
Unless you are a complete m0r0n and like to temp fate and victimize people trying to pee in peace. It's ok if you don't get it. Most liberals today don't.

Papers he says! You're the type that requires papers to understand common sense, huh? Yeah, life must be pretty complicated when you're a politically correct liberal today! Funny how we managed toilet training all of these thousands of years just fine with the sexes wisely segregated, huh?
A concept so basic only liberal America could possibly screw it up.
BIG issue today! Yes, your hedonistic, drug addicted and gender confused 'psychologists' today in fiscally, morally, and academically bankrupt Bizarro Amerika surely know better than all of the previous generations of mankind!
Papers! Hee, hee! I think you missed your calling. Clown! :)


The Last Trump, Christian News Network 19 Comments [4/9/2016 5:02:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 118019

If you really, really want to be stalked hard, explain to them with facts and figures (A) why Obama is completely incompetent, (B) why Cruz is going to be the next president, and (C) how he's going to repair all the damage that Obama has done.

Stick to the facts. It doesn't matter whether you know it's true. You have to be able to prove it to the most hard-headed, obstinate, Fox News-hating left-wing partisan on the Internet. Otherwise, don't say it. The facts are sufficiently humiliating to get them really, really stirred up. Using terms such as "American Taliban" and "Christian Sharia Law" brings new depth and dimension to words like "hysteria," "hyperbole," and "histrionics."

The real Taliban, according to real Sharia Law, executes homosexuals for being homosexual. With Christians you have a difference of opinion about public policy. No executions or other physical harm or criminal penalty has been suggested by anyone, except by the extreme, hate-filled left-wing fringe.

Dean Hinnen, NPR 17 Comments [4/9/2016 5:01:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 118017

I’ve been pleasantly surprised by the primaries so far, but Trump is a few years too early and a few years too old. I’d like to see him win the nomination even if he goes on to lose the general, but maybe the phenomenon is good enough.

Our elites have been engineering their “orange revolutions,” their “springs” and their invasions and all that crap for a generation. Someday soon it will turn around on them. Trump’s success to this point will only embolden people. He’s broken the paradigm. Even if the wealthy republicans can put him in his place, there’s a real wellspring of dissent bubbling up that won’t be easily contained.

Bill P, Unz 5 Comments [4/9/2016 5:00:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 118016

Utterly crazy sex law exposed by Adam Johnson's sentence – indeed, his conviction, and that he was ever charged

Adam Johnson has done absolutely NOTHING wrong. He was vigorously pursued by a female who was several years beyond the age of puberty, who knew perfectly well what she was doing, and was well equipped (as evolution has equipped all girls) to deal with it. In most other countries she would have been over any 'age of consent'. She facilitated and very willingly engaged in not sex but merely a mild sexual fumbling. The girl chalked this up as a sexual feather in her cap that she used to get her a lot of brownie points within her peer group. Enter the police, CPS and judiciary, and suddenly the girl was put in the position of inadvertent anatagonist to a famous footballer. As is so often the case, the queen bee and wannabes of her peer group seem to have decided she needed to be brought down a peg or two, and turned on her to invert her female prestige to 'slut' status, and consequently, with the collusion of the police and the CPS, she backtracked to try to make out that a little sexual fumbling with a A* male she found supremely attractive, somehow was 'damaging' to her and even non-consensual. It was, in no respect whatsoever, either. She suffered zero damage of any kind from Adam Johnson. Any damage -- and clearly there was damage to her -- was from the peer group she'd been so keen to impress and, most particularly, by the police, the CPS and the judiciary.

It is a 100% travesty that there was any charge against this man, let alone a trial, never mind a conviction and criminal injuries compensation paid to not the party who was the victim here. The victim was Adam Johnson. Everyone else involved were the perpetrators in this case.

With the average age of female puberty having fallen since Victorian times from 17 to ten, yet the legal 'age of consent' has remained at 16, then the law is an abomination and will have to be changed. It is scientifically illiterate to claim that a 15-year-old is a child. Not only have her bodily changes complete, but mental changes ensue actually before physical ones, so the claim of sexual immaturity is completely false. And why is the 'age of consent' 16 when the age of criminal responsibility is just ten? The answer: age ten is rationally deemed to be the end of childhood per se, whereas the additional six years beyond age ten represents deep-seated anti-male prejudice and sexual prudery.

We live in not neo-Victorian so much as uber-Victorian lunatic times where all men are considered far game to punish severely simply for having male sexuality. It is an atrocious disgrace, and the extreme hate-mongering ideology behind it is not long for this world

Steve Moxon, Steve Moxon blog 17 Comments [4/9/2016 5:00:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 8