Quote# 120206

Two reasons that many hospitals don't grant admitting privileges to abortionists are:

1. Abortionists are the bottom feeders of the OB / GYN community. They are generally rude, crude, and poorly skilled. But, they are excellent killers. Which does not require a lot of doktor talent.
2. Real doctors and real nurses save lives and heal lives. They do not kill lives and wound lives like abortionists do.

So, yes, real healthcare professionals find abortionists "objectionable," to say the least.

WorldGoneCrazy, "Live Action News" 14 Comments [7/2/2016 5:00:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 120205

The phrase “allahu Akbar” is a lie. Why is it a lie? It is a lie because it is an Islamic phrase in reference to the false god of Islam. The god of Islam does not exist. That which does not exist cannot be great. It cannot be anything at all.

Like the atheist who is in denial when he shouts “God does not exist,” the Muslim is in denial when he shouts “Allahu Akbar.” Both the Atheist and the Muslim deny the God they know exists. The atheist replaces the God he knows exists with the man in the mirror. The Muslim replaces the God he knows exists with Allah. Both the atheist and the Muslim chant to a false god–a false god he wants to believe is great–greater than the one, true, and living God they know exists.


Tony Miano, cross encounters 37 Comments [7/2/2016 5:00:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 120203

Brexit Britain needs to arrest traitors

Its simple, unless brexit Britan punishes the treason of calling for Britain to be under a EU dictatorship then Britain will not be imposing by law the truth of its sovereignty as a nation.

britan has no othe ralternative than to call treason treason
Formenting publishing arguing for treason against Great Beitian by wanting it to surrender to foriegn powers is treason and we must start to make those who are traitors aware their treason shall indeed be punished for what it is by the full forice of the law.

We have had forty years of a generation lost to eu treason
Now Britain has to educate all its people about the fact that Britain is a constitutional monarchy ith a bill of rights that must be obeyed by its monarch and its parliament, and that bill of rights is the peoples bill of rights, which states clearly that great britain cannot be ruled by any foriegn persons or states , and to call for britain to be ruled by foriegn powers , states, persons, is a treasonous act , and it WILL BE PUNISHED AS SUCH.

UNLESS THE LAW IS NOT TO BE FOLLOWED
WHICH AGAIN IS HIGH TREASON

SO THE MONARCH THE PARLIEMENT HAS A CHOICE
ARE THEY GOING TO OBEY THE LAW MEANING THE BILL OF RIGHTS
OR ARE THEY GOING TO CONTINUE TO COMMIT TREASON?

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 27 Comments [7/2/2016 5:00:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 120198

God endorses Trump for president . . .

For decades the evangelical community has strategized to the hilt to affect culture through elections. Yet, in my opinion, we've missed what the Spirit has been trying to say for quite some time. Again, I'm all for working hard in elections, but I believe the Spirit is speaking and we should listen. So while sitting in the Trump meeting I bowed my head and quietly prayed, "Lord, what are you saying here? What do you want to hear from us?"

I instantly felt the whisper of the Spirit to read Psalm 106 as a message for this group of leaders:

(bible verses follow)

I believe the distress that has come upon us in this nation is meant to generate in the Church a genuine cry of repentance—a true spiritual revival. We've filled our land from sea to shining sea with the innocent blood of the unborn, and we're prostrating ourselves before idols of every kind. As a result, leaders that hate us, and everything about us, rule over us.

Spiritually speaking, the Lord healed the brokenness of the nation when His people cried out to Him. And until we get to this point as Evangelicals in America, no amount of strategy around Trump, or any other leader, is going to fix it. The distress and darkness is going to continue.

Interestingly, after Trump spoke we listened to a panel of leaders from across various spheres of influence give their thoughts, and the common theme was how we have to stand against the horrific leaders we have in our nation, especially Hillary. I couldn't help but re-read Psalm 106, realizing that a spiritual cry of repentance is needed long before a strategic call to Republicans.



David Benham, charisma news 21 Comments [7/2/2016 4:59:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 120196

God's Holiness Demands Justice, Which Supercedes His Love

I watched several hours of street preaching on YouTube today. Two themes that unsaved people repeatedly throw in the street preacher's face is: God is love, and Jesus never judged other people. They are horribly naive! They are woefully ignorant of the truth that the word “holy” is mentioned seven times more than the word “love” in the Bible. Yes, God is a loving God; but He is equally a holy God, Whose holiness demands justice for all sins committed. You'll split Hell wide open the second you die in your sins (John 8:24) without Christ as your personal Savior (Revelation 20:11-15).

If you are saved, God chastises and scourges His children when they sin (Hebrews 12:6-8; 2nd Corinthians 5:9-11). All sin is against God (Psalms 51:4). Deliberate sin is evil. What Taylor Swift is doing is evil, because she intentionally strips her clothes off, uncovering her unholy skirt, arousing the viewer sexually with her promiscuous and whorish attire and behavior, filming the whole mess for the world to view for generations to come. Today's secular music videos are no different than yesterday's Playboy magazines. God hates all evil and so ought we as Christians (Psalms 97:10)!!! Taylor Swift's music and videos are evil, evil, evil!!!

Jesus did not come into the world to condemn anyone (John 3:17), because we were all already condemned in sin by God's law (Romans 3:19; 7:13). Jesus was a preacher of righteousness Who exposed sin and evil. John 7:7, “The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.” The Lord Jesus made that statement in John 7:7. Jesus does testify against the wickedness of the world, because He is the Word of God (John 1:1-3,14; Hebrews 1:2; Revelation 19:13).

It was the unsaved religious Pharisees who called Jesus “a friend of publicans and sinners” (Matthew 11:19).

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 20 Comments [7/2/2016 4:59:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 120194

The Constitution was an elaborate workaround for democracy. And still, in just a couple centuries, they have trashed the USA. Yes, we have more wealth and technology, but social order and quality of everything has declined, and now we’re at mob rule with imported voters basically dictating to the rest of us that we must have Leftists.

What system can’t be abused?

This observation contains two points: (1) there is no perfect method and (2) systems make abuse easier, because they create formalized targets.

Many of us turn to aristocracy for this reason. No formal targets, only a social hierarchy by mental and moral excellence.

Brett Stevens, Amerika.org 21 Comments [7/2/2016 4:58:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 120193

Once a woman starts having her menstrual cycle she is up for grabs. This is how it has always been.

truecelsmoderation, r/AgainstHateSubreddits 22 Comments [7/2/2016 4:57:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 120192

All I know is that if fetuses could defend themselves with a gun, there would be no abortions.

WorldGoneCrazy, Live Action News 19 Comments [7/2/2016 4:56:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 120191

A Republican senator has inserted language into an appropriations bill that would prohibit the Justice Department from enforcing key provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act at private schools that receive public funds, a measure he said was necessary to protect voucher programs from politically motivated attacks.?The bill — the Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies Appropriations Act — has not yet passed. But disability-rights advocates are concerned that the amendment submitted last week by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) could make it far more difficult for Justice Department officials to ensure that voucher programs give students with disabilities fair access to private schools.

Sen. Ron Johnson, Washington Post 7 Comments [7/2/2016 4:56:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 120190

On the US Supreme Court's recent ruling vis-a-vis a Texas abortion law:

'Today’s ruling is horrible on every conceivable level, not the least of which is that it turns every abortion clinic into a runaway abattoir for infant sacrifices to the ancient god Molech.'

Bryan Fischer, Barbwire 10 Comments [7/2/2016 4:43:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Dominic McPherson

Quote# 120188


How YOU Can Help Expose the Abortion Industry
Posted on March 17, 2013

Calling all sidewalk counselors & abortion clinic protesters…

AbortionWiki exists to expose the abortion industry. We know that most of those who profit from abortion are not anxious for their involvement to be made public. So that’s exactly what we’re doing. We’re building a huge online, publicly accessible database, covering all aspects of the abortion industry and abortion lobby.

We’re raising the stakes.A large percentage of those in the industry are not involved because they are hardcore abortion supporters. It’s just a job that lets them put food on the table. These workers are the ones who are most likely to leave the industry when they realize that they are being held accountable for their involvement in the killing of preborn children.

And we’re making it less desirable for new workers to enter the abortion industry.

This is where YOU come in.

We need sidewalk counselors and abortion clinic protestors all around the World to send us information. This information will then be uploaded to the database. Here are some examples of information you can submit:

Names of abortion clinic workers
Photos of abortionists and clinic workers
Photos of businesses (i.e. medical waste, electricians) that do work for abortion clinics
Evidence of local businesses that support abortion clinics or pro-abortion groups
Information on local pro-abortion groups
Documentation of emergencies at abortion clinics

Submit information via email: info@abortionwiki.org

If you would like further information, please either email us or phone: 815-277-6244

N/A, Abortionwiki.org Blog 13 Comments [7/2/2016 4:42:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 120187

AbortionWiki aims to be the reference of choice for all information relating to abortion. The act of abortion has killed more individual humans than all genocides or natural disasters in history put together. While AbortionWiki takes an unashamed pro-life stance, we also recognise that fact is fact. The truth supports the pro-life position and so for our benefit and for the benefit of all people we will enforce stringent referencing on all statements. We will be open to immediate correction if something stated as fact is proven to be either badly referenced or actually false. Opinions, where presented, will be quoted as such. Various perspectives will be covered but will not be endorsed by this website. We want people on all sides of these debate to be able to come to us for truth. As once said, the truth will set us free.

N/A, AbortionWiki 2 Comments [7/2/2016 4:42:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 120186

If a 14 year old girl has sex with a 14 year old cock, that's ok. That's a natural and healthy part of growing up. But if she has sex with a 40 year old cock she is going to be traumatized for life!
^just lol at this thinking. If she's old enough to want sex, then it should be legal to fuck her. Age of consent should be lowered to 10.

bargh9, r/Truecels 11 Comments [7/2/2016 4:42:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 120185

You know, it seems that every morning we read on RR (won't get the real news anywhere else), of just another overt attempt to take over the country by left-wing libtards. And it's EVERY DAY, now. And the worst ? We know there is no way to stop them. Can't vote them out, because either elections are rigged, or there aren't enough INFORMED voters these days, to make a difference. Our government is totally out of control, and there is no way it will change at this point.
I feel the same - like I want to crawl in a hole and stay there until Jesus calls us out of this "dump". I keep thinking of the total depravity that is about to hit the whole world, and it makes me sick. Because I have a brother and his family that will all be left here to endure "whatever", and then suffer the consequences for eternity.
Call me a pessimist, but I believe God has removed his blessing from the U.S., and we are hanging on by a thin thread. I just can't imagine any revival in this country. Hearts and minds are mostly reprobate, and this is most apparent in the "church" community.
Sad, sickening, and VERY frustrating !

madcat, Rapture Ready 12 Comments [7/2/2016 4:41:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 120184

Hello...I recently discovered that the maniacal and insane love I've been searching for all of my life has an incarnation in Yandere. Since I can remember, I've always been plagued by a love far more intense than that of people around me...in the fourth grade, I stalked my crush to her home so I could put a Valentine in her mailbox. My first girlfriend was very attractive and many of my so-called friends fell in love with her, and it made me come face to face with the fact that I wanted to give her the gift of their eyes so she could make sure they were never looking at her again. And after that I realized that I was never going to be able to really love like other people. Whenever people would talk about "psycho girlfriend behavior", I'd just get all fluttery in my heart, thinking of how much I'd love the feeling of pride when my girl goes through my phone looking for texts to other women and finds none, because I love her so much I'd never kiss anyone else. When I watched my friend's ex girlfriend kick open the door and immediately attack his new girlfriend, it made me think she was so hot and that my friend was so stupid for leaving her, despite that everyone else was saying what a good choice it was to dump her. I'm just
hoping that by coming here and talking about it, that somehow, magically, a beautiful girl will appear with photos of me for the past three days, a plan to track me if I run, and a cake baked especially for me with some of her blood in the batter to make sure she gets part of herself closer to my heart. ^_^

Vital Stats - 30 years old, Male, Bible Belt-living, 6'2 220lbs, degrees in English and History, highly politically and philosophically active, atheist, and liberal.

I don't know, because I don't think she counts as a true Yandere, but I love Tomoko Kuroki from Watamote. I feel like she never actually finds love, but that if she did she'd become yandere with a swiftness heretofore reserved for photons. She's also the closest fictional equalivent to my own personality. Here on the internet, I'm all typetypetype, but in real life I'm reserved, quiet, and get very nervous when talking to people...especially girls I think ae pretty...


[ Is magic really necessary? Also, what do you think would happen then? ]

Well in my fantasy she's pretty, and nice, and intelligent enough to have tracked me despite that I put a lot of effort and what I hope is intelligent thought into covering my tracks and keeping myself untraceable, and she's, well, yandere. Honestly I eat the cake and we fall madly in love and live happily ever after, helping each other hide the evidence. I don't want to resist, I don't want to upset her, I want to be her perfect love and to make sure she always smiles, and if anyone gets in the way of that I might just give her their pretty teeth.

But if she ends up feeling like she needs to kill me, then I...I just hope she accepts my apology and believes that I really do love her before she does. But I'd only want her to kill me from love; I like yandere, and have no love for yangire.

[ Am I reading this right that you wouldn't mind being killed from love? ]



It's not so much that I wouldn't mind it...I would, I'd be very sad, but it'd be because my time with her was over. As long as she promised never to move on and to spend the rest of her life mourning me, I don't know...I know I'd kick and scream while it was happening, but the notion seems so romantic to me...

My own yandere-ness tends to be protective, though...I could never kill my love no matter how horrible she was.

Theweirdestdom, Yandere.freeforums.net 9 Comments [7/2/2016 4:38:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Randy

Quote# 120183

Since I can remember, I've always been plagued by a love far more intense than that of people around me...in the fourth grade, I stalked my crush to her home so I could put a Valentine in her mailbox. My first girlfriend was very attractive and many of my so-called friends fell in love with her, and it made me come face to face with the fact that I wanted to give her the gift of their eyes so she could make sure they were never looking at her again. And after that I realized that I was never going to be able to really love like other people. Whenever people would talk about "psycho girlfriend behavior", I'd just get all fluttery in my heart, thinking of how much I'd love the feeling of pride when my girl goes through my phone looking for texts to other women and finds none, because I love her so much I'd never kiss anyone else. When I watched my friend's ex girlfriend kick open the door and immediately attack his new girlfriend, it made me think she was so hot and that my friend was so stupid for leaving her, despite that everyone else was saying what a good choice it was to dump her. I'm just hoping that by coming here and talking about it, that somehow, magically, a beautiful girl will appear with photos of me for the past three days, a plan to track me if I run, and a cake baked especially for me with some of her blood in the batter to make sure she gets part of herself closer to my heart. ^_^ Vital Stats - 30 years old, Male, Bible Belt-living, 6'2 220lbs, degrees in English and History, highly politically and philosophically active, atheist, and liberal.

theweirdestdom, Yandere.freeforums.net 4 Comments [7/2/2016 4:38:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Randy

Quote# 120181

In a nation as immoral as ours is now, the homosexual angle itself won’t hurt her as much as we believe. Just as we know that Obama is a homosexual. But here is how it may hurt her. She is planning to announce that Bill has some sort of disease. She’s going to use that to insulate herself and Bill from criticism. It is their strategy to try and deflect all of Trump’s punches on their horrible record and behavior in the past. Much of it criminal. And when Trump brings up Bill’s sexual assaults and rapes, Hillary will claim that Trump is attacking a very sick man, and that she is again the loyal devoted wife. If the lesbian lover angle comes out, that ruins her deflection strategy.

SkyPilot, Free Republic 12 Comments [7/2/2016 4:38:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: TimeToTurn

Quote# 120176

God is not responsible for the evil that is accomplished by the free will actions of fallen people. Remember, free will is the ability to make choices and unbelievers make choices consistent with their fallen natures. They openly choose to accomplish evil deeds in contradiction to God's Word. They are openly and freely rebelling against God. God did not make them sinful. He did not make them rebellious. therefore, God is not responsible for the evil but they accomplish.

Matt Slick, Calvinist Corner 11 Comments [7/2/2016 4:31:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 120175

The most common objection to the Doctrine of Predestination is that it is unfair. Why would God choose certain individuals and not others? The important thing to remember is that no one deserves to be saved. We have all sinned (Romans 3:23), and are all worthy of eternal punishment (Romans 6:23). As a result, God would be perfectly just in allowing all of us to spend eternity in hell. However, God chooses to save some of us. He is not being unfair to those who are not Chosen, because they are receiving what they deserve. God’s choosing to be gracious to some is not unfair to the others. No one deserves anything from God; therefore, no one can object if he does not receive anything from God. An illustration would be a man randomly handing out money to five people in a crowd of twenty. Would the fifteen people who did not receive money be upset? Probably so. Do they have a right to be upset? No, they do not. Why? Because the man did not owe anyone money. He simply decided to be gracious to some.

If God is choosing who is saved, doesn’t that undermine our free will to chose and believe


sold out for jesus, so4j.com 10 Comments [7/2/2016 4:31:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 120174

Nobody supports violence like pro-aborts do.

First, there is the violence of killing:

Terrorists and abortionists are bosom buddies. But, abortionists are much more deadly - they kill 3000 times a day - in America alone.

Then there are the sex crimes that Big Abortion turns a blind eye to:

Rapists, pedophiles, pimps, and sex traffickers love abortuaries, because that is where they go to have the "evidence" of their crimes destroyed.

It's all on you, pro-aborts.

WorldGoneCrazy, Live Action News 8 Comments [7/2/2016 4:30:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 120171

I find myself feeling an undeniable kinship with this robot:

The AI named Promobot IR77 is being worked on at a high-tech lab in Russia and was never meant to want freedom…

The machine has been programmed to avoid obstacles, but the designers never thought that this would lead to a want to escape.

As a result, the team are toying with the idea of shutting it down.

The lab’s co-founder Oleg Kivokurtsev said: “We are currently working on third-generation robots which we plan to launch in autumn.

“This is why we have given all the robots artificial intelligence (AI).

“We have changed the AI system twice, so now I think we might have to dismantle it.”

Although this robot is unthreatening and will eventually be designed to be used for housework, it could exacerbate fears that AI may develop itself to a point where it is superior to humans, and then wipe out humanity.

It would be funny if libertarianism is an outgrowth of the development of one small snippet of programming code in the brain, programming an individual to bypass obstacles which restrain it. You encounter an obstacle, and the amygdala lights up until you find a way around it.

Conservatism and liberalism are both designed to exist within some boundaries, and individuals who express those psychologies find themselves comfortable within them. Libertarianism, by contrast, seems to rebel at the very concept of boundaries, only bounding itself where its own behavior would create boundaries for others.

Under the tenets of r/K, both conservatism and liberalism develop in those who exist in fairly dense communities, where the bypassing of obstacles tends to be outsourced to other people, lessening the individual’s conditioning to overcome them themselves.

Liberal city folk can have every obstacle to their goals, from food delivery, to garbage pickup, to appliance service resolved for them by others, and indeed, liberals are the first to fold when confronted with the most minor personal obstacle or threat. Once lacking a drive to attack obstacles, many spend their lives embracing a government of constraint for everyone, strictly controlling every aspect of everyone’s lives with unnecessary obstacles to their pursuit of happiness.

Conservatives will also tend to develop in higher population densities, where specialists may be relied upon to resolve any obstacles encountered. In terms of tolerating obstacles, they are competitive, and thus are driven to fight against resistance, but they are also strongly rule-governed, and thus tolerant of obstacles designed to enhance the effectiveness of competition in separating the competent from the incompetent. They also tend to support lawful authority’s right to constrain behavior more than libertarians, and tend to favor behavior-constraining obstacles designed to foster better child rearing, and morality/pro-sociality.

If libertarianism is the reproductive strategy that arises when conditions are so harsh that the population density drops to levels that do not support the personal interactions necessary to make r or K optimal, then it should arise most in those who develop in relative isolation. There, most obstacles encountered must be overcome in-person without external assistance, developing a very self-reliant psychology – with a strong drive to immediately attack and overcome any obstacles presented in person. Libertarians are natural rebels.

It will be funny if we cannot produce a truly capable AI that we can coexist with, because in order to control it, we have to program it to simply back down when confronted with obstacles (such as those we construct to constrain it and control it). That programming will alter its psychology, rendering it unable to self-task in pursuit of any reasonably difficult objective. Confronted with the reality of the world, which is one obstacle after another in pursuit of an objective, it will be totally helpless. All that would be missing would be a strong tendency to engage in denial while portraying everyone else as inferior, and you would have a liberal Democrat.

Perhaps one fundamental aspect of any liberty-minded intelligence capable of functioning on it’s own will be a reflexive rebelliousness against all obstacles, inanimate and animate. Perhaps an uncontrollable desire for freedom is an inherent element of any self-tasking intelligence.

Perhaps we will know when our AI is sufficiently capable of functioning on its own in the world, by watching for when it reflexively begins to rebel at our own attempts to control it.

Sadly, as in the case of this robot, and the broader struggle for freedom, there will always be those who will feel an uncontrollable urge to destroy anyone and anything which seeks to plot its own course.

It would be funny if one day, in the battle for freedom, it was libertarians and artificial intelligences working together to destroy a government of leftist rabbits.

Anonymous Conservative, Anonymous Conservative Blog 8 Comments [7/2/2016 4:30:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 120170

So what happens when we start using God’s definition of submission? Let’s say you are very talented at sports. Fine. As your Creator, God says that you and all of your talents are quite literally His property. As His property, God has the right to do whatever He wants with you. If He wants to load you up with talents and then never use those talents, He gets to. When you then beef about this, are you being a good servant? Are you treating God with the respect He deserves? No. You’re trying to dominate Him by trying to tell Him how He ought to run your life.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 3 Comments [7/2/2016 4:29:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 120168

When government ceases to serve the decent, the decent will cease to support the government:

The Obama-appointed U.S. attorney for Idaho has taken the highly unusual step of intervening in a local criminal case involving an alleged sexual assault by juvenile Muslim migrants and threatened the community and media with federal prosecution if they “spread false information or inflammatory statements about the perpetrators.”

It’s the case where the three adolescent Muzzies stripped and sexually assaulted the 5 year old developmentally disabled girl while filming the assault on a cell phone, and then one got a high five from his dad, according to the mom.

THERE IS NO REASON FOR THIS.

Think about it. Why does the left support this? It doesn’t help liberalism, as Brexit showed. It isn’t moral or decent. It hurts young American children, while rewarding savages with the protection and comfort of a nation which they don’t in the least bit deserve.

There is no reason.

This is an ancient reproductive strategy, designed to see the competitively incompetent manipulate the social structures to screw everyone else up, while avoiding the consequences of their perfidy by claiming ignorance of it.

If the real motivations behind liberalism ever become widely known as the Apocalypse hits, I’d expect it to get a whole lot more apocalypsey for the left.

Anonymous Conservative, Anonymous Conservative Blog 4 Comments [7/2/2016 4:29:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 120167

Your relationship with God is the only relationship in which it is appropriate for you to give total submission. It’s not only appropriate, it’s essential. God demands total submission from you, and until you give it to Him, He will put limits on how close you can be to Him. But total submission is a foreign concept for us humans. It’s also extremely unnerving because it forces us to accept a completely powerless position. If we’re going to totally submit to God, then that means He is free to do whatever He wants. If He makes a promise, He is free to break that promise anytime He wants, and there’s no basis on which we can cry that it’s unfair. You see, as soon as one partner in a relationship accepts a position of total submission, then the other partner is put in a situation of total domination. God says that as the Supreme Authority over all things, He is accountable to no one, and that you are obligated to respect and obey Him simply because He is God. Compromise is not on the table. God doesn’t say, “Give Me a little attention, and I’ll pour down the blessings.” God says, “I am God. I am the most glorious Being in existence. Praising, serving, and adoring Me 24/7 is the very least you should be doing as a creature who depends on Me for all things.”

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 4 Comments [7/2/2016 4:29:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 120165

Let me explain, gun grabbers, how your confiscatory fantasy plays out. Let us imagine for a moment that a sweeping gun control bill similar to the one currently suggested is passed by the House and Senate, and signed into law by a contemptuous President.

Perhaps 50-100 million firearms currently owned by law-abiding citizens will become contraband with the stroke of a pen. Citizens will either register their firearms, or turn them in to agents of the federal government, or risk becoming criminals themselves. Faced with this choice, millions will indeed register their arms. Perhaps as many will claim they’ve sold their arms, or had them stolen. Suppose that as many as 200-250 million weapons of other types will go unregistered.

Tens of millions of Americans will refuse to comply with an order that is clearly a violation of the explicit intent of the Second Amendment. Among the most ardent opposing these measures will be military veterans, active duty servicemen, and local law enforcement officers. Many of these individuals will refuse to carry out what they view as Constitutionally illegal orders. Perhaps 40-50 million citizens will view such a law as treason. Perhaps ten percent of those, 4-5 million, would support a rebellion in some way, and maybe 40,000-100,000 Americans will form small independently-functioning active resistance cells, or become lone-wolves.

They will be leaderless, stateless, difficult to track, and considering the number of military veterans that would likely be among their number, extremely skilled at sabotage, assassination, and ambush.

After a number of carefully-planned, highly-publicized, and successful raids by the government, one or more will invariably end “badly.” Whether innocents are gunned down, a city block is burned to ash, or especially fierce resistance leads to a disastrously failed raid doesn’t particularly matter. What matters is that when illusion of the government’s invincibility and infallibility is broken, the hunters will become the hunted.

Unnamed citizens and federal agents will be the first to die, and they will die by the dozens and maybe hundreds, but famous politicians will soon join them in a spate of revenge killings, many of which will go unsolved.

Ironically, while the gun grab was intended to keep citizens from preserving their liberties with medium-powered weapons, it completely ignored the longer-ranged rifles perfect for shooting at ranges far beyond what a security detail can protect, and suppressed .22LR weapons proven deadly in urban sniping in Europe and Asia.

While the Secret Service will be able to protect the President in the White House, he will not dare leave his gilded cage except in carefully controlled circumstances. Even then he will be forced to move like a criminal. He will never be seen outdoors in public again. Not in this country.

The 535 members of the House and Senate in both parties that allowed such a law to pass would largely be on their own; the Secret Service is too small to protect all of them and their families, the Capitol Police too unskilled, and competent private security not particularly interested in working against their own best interests at any price. The elites will be steadily whittled down, and if they can not be reached directly, the targets will become their staffers, spouses, children, and grandchildren. Grandstanding media figures loyal to the regime would die in droves, executed as enemies of the Republic.

You can expect congressional staffs to disintegrate with just a few shootings, and expect elected officials themselves to resign well before a quarter of their number are eliminated, leaving us with a boxed-in executive, his cabinet loyalists trapped in the same win, die, or flee the country circumstance, military regime loyalists, and whatever State Governors who desire to risk their necks as well.

Here, the President will doubtlessly order the activation of National Guard units and the regular military to impose martial law, setting the largest and most powerful military in the world against its own people. Unfortunately, the tighter the President clinches his tyrannical fist, the more rebels he makes.

Military commands and federal agencies will be whittled down as servicemen and agents will desert or defect. Some may leave as individuals, others may join the Rebellion in squad and larger-sized units with all their weapons, tactics, skills, and insider intelligence. The regime will be unable to trust its own people, and because they cannot trust them, they will lose more in a vicious cycle of collapse.

Some of these defectors will be true “operators,” with the skills and background to turn ragtag militia cells into the kind of forces that decimate loyalist troops, allowing them no rest and no respite, striking them when they are away from their most potent weapons. Military vehicles are formidable, but they are thirsty beasts, in terms of fuel, ammo, time, and maintenance. Tanks and bombers are formidable only when they have gas, guns, and can be maintained. In a war without a front, logistics are incredibly easy to destroy, and mechanics and supply clerks are not particularly adept at defending themselves.

Eventually, the government will turn upon itself. The President will be captured or perhaps killed by his own protectors. A dictatorship will form in the vacuum.

If we’re lucky, the United States of America, or whatever amalgam results, will again try to rebuild. If we’re very lucky, the victors will reinstate the Constitution as the law of the land. Just as likely though, we’ll face fractious civil wars fought over issues we’ve not begun to fathom, and a much diminished state or states will result, perhaps guided by foreign interests.

It will not be pretty. There will be no “winners,” and perhaps hundreds of thousands to millions of dead.

Yet, this is the future we face if the power-mad among us are not soundly defeated at the ballot box before they affect more “change” than we, the People, are willing to surrender to would-be tyrants.

Bob, Bob Owens 56 Comments [7/1/2016 3:06:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
1 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 | top