1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 | bottom
Quote# 120530

UK shouldn't. UK is not out-numbered by the enemy, unlike Israel and the Kurds who are horribly out-numbered by the enemy. And the use of female combatants only weakens the military and corrupts the manhood among men. Why are they making robots if they are letting women become combatants? Mothers should stay with the children, and men should protect women and children and stay gallant - that really strengthens the nation. What's the use of protecting a civilization that puts women in the frontlines?? What are the men doing? It's like just protecting a sexual confusion instead of a homeland. UK needs good godly mothers as all nations do. UK was great when it had the Christian gentleman-ship.

Grace Kim Kwon, Christian News Network 10 Comments [7/15/2016 6:45:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 120528

On his radio program yesterday, Bryan Fischer recounted a debate he had last week on Twitter with Christian Today writer Andrew Walton over Walton's piece criticizing the newly opened Ark Encounter theme park in Kentucky, which was built by the Creationist group Answers in Genesis for the purpose of promoting the organization's fundamentalist view of the Bible.

During his discussion, Fischer took exception to Walton's assertion in his article that Christians "may have diverse opinions on sexual ethics, on life issues, on evolution, on hell, on what role government should play in society, on healthcare, and indeed on science," insisting that, in fact, Christians cannot have opinions on those issues if they differ from Fischer's interpretation of the Bible.

"No, it is not okay for Christians to be all over the map, to have diverse opinions," Fischer insisted. "No, it's not okay. The Bible is abundantly clear about sexual ethics, sex is reserved for marriage, marriage is a union of one man and one woman, homosexuality is a sin, sexual immorality is a sin, et cetera. These things are not ambiguous in the scripture so, no, it's not okay to have diverse opinions on those issues."

"It's not okay to have diverse opinions on life issues," Fischer continued. "It's not okay for Christians to have diverse opinions about evolution."

Bryan Fischer, Right Wing Watch 18 Comments [7/15/2016 6:43:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 120525

Don't believe what I said about Secular Humanism being a religion? Read the 1960 SCOTUS decision, Torcaso v. Watkins. This ruling declared Secular Humanism a religion. To sidestep Secular Humanism's religious status, it's referred to as Multiculturalism, Social Justice, Globalism and a host of other terms too numerous to mention. As for Islamic and Hindu prayers, those shouldn't be allowed if Christian prayers aren't allowed. Like I said before, keep all religion out of public schools and focus on the Three "R's". Just as there are Jewish and Christian schools, Hindus and Muslims are free to open their own schools. Like it or not, public schools are parochial schools for the implementation of the Secular Humanism religion. I went to Detroit public schools, but I'm not dumb. You see, the attempt to dumb me down, FAILED.

[There is no such thing as atheist religion. We don't belong to an organized group that has shared beliefs. We simply don't believe in supernatural deities. As for the court case you refer to.. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torcaso_v._Watkins You may be misinformed.]

I suggest you go to www.conservapedia.com, click on the link, "Atheism Is a Religion". Secularists are so quick to point out treachery done by "Christians", but at Conservapedia, there's extensive documentation of treachery done by non-theists to be found there. I'm not saying that you're among them, but like it or not it's reality. Numbers 32:23.

urbanvrwcmom, WorldNetDaily 23 Comments [7/15/2016 6:42:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 120524

Facebook is one of the biggest scourges on the internet. It started out as a college communication tool (with evil reasons) and is today one of the superpowers of the computer world. In so doing, it has been responsible for more family breakups, divorces, children being abused and killed and other evils.

You might say, hold on. Those people didn’t mean for their lives to be shattered. They thought it was harmless fun, or they were looking for a “significant other” (in other words, they went whoring around via the internet). Well, that may be what they think, but you can’t deny the consequences of evil. Sin always has a high price tag. Sin will take you farther than you want to go, make you stay longer than you wanted to stay, and make you pay that which you cannot pay. The Bible says, be sure your sin will find you out (Numbers 32:23).

These people are so enamored with their fantasy world they even came up with not only a dislike button, but a few more little emoticons to show what the poster is thinking. I’m sure you’ve already seen them. There’s Like, Love, Haha, Yay, Wow, Sad and Angry buttons. This is mind control! People will now flock even more to Facebook to try these emoticons out! Are they serious?? Get a life! Or just keep on worshipping the god of SELF and then attack me for speaking the truth. Some things never change.

I’m sure the progenitors of Facebook (Pastor Danny Castle calls it “Nosebook”) had no idea this invention of theirs would reach such skyrocketing success. The Devil made a deal with them and they have become filthy rich. Satan is the bringer of all the destruction and failed lives. He is the one responsible for Facebook’s fame and fortune. But it will all burn away one day when the Lord Jesus Christ wipes it out with the Sword of His mouth and casts the Devil into the bottomless pit where he belongs.

Many people have a Facebook account, including myself; I’ve had mine since 2010. I don’t stay on long. I communicate with friends from my church and their out of state families as well as some others whom I’ve met on Facebook. They are good folks, true believers on fire for God. I believe I will see them in Heaven one glad day. I don’t waste time on games, pokes, debates, groups or whatever else. I just check in and check out.

kingjameswriter1965, I Hate The Internet But I Love Jesus 18 Comments [7/15/2016 6:42:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 120520

According to Romans 4:2-6, Abraham was saved by faith without works! According to Acts 12:43, Old Testament saints were saved by faith in the coming Messiah. According to Hebrews 4:2, Moses preached the Gospel. Hebrews 4:10-11 teaches us that New and Old Testament saints alike are saved by resting completely in Jesus Christ, Who is our Sabbath. Hebrews 4:10-11, “For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his. Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.” Obviously, resting is the opposite of works. We simply rest our faith in Jesus to be saved. JESUS PAID IT ALL!

One of the Devil's greatest methods of deception is to hide truth amongst lies. We saw this psyops tactic used by the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) to cover-up the 9/11 attacks. The CIA are the secret police of the international banking cabal. The CIA started Homeland Security after the 9/11 attacks. The CIA murdered President John F. Kennedy. Dark Legacy: CIA Kingpin George H. Bush And The Murder Of President John F. Kennedy. It is true that two planes flew into two WTC buildings. That's what the Luciferians behind the New World Order wanted you to see. What they didn't want you to see were the thermite charges (bombs) placed months in advance by a professional demolition team. This was accomplished by a private electronic security company called Securacom, managed by the U.S. president's younger brother, Marvin Bush. The same electronics security company was overseeing airport security in Dulles International Airport on 9/11. You couldn't make this bizarre stuff up! I am always amazed at the bold ignorance of people, who haven't done the least bit of research but refuse to believe anything they aren't spoon-fed by the newsmedia.

David J. Stewart, Love the Truth 12 Comments [7/15/2016 6:40:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 120519

I grew up in Chicago (Logan Square) in the heart of the big city. I used to hunt Super Rats (as big as a cat) in the alley with my Daisy BB gun rifle, and I thought that was fun. In Heaven I want to go bear hunting! That sounds so cool! In July of 2016 an armed 38-year-old career law enforcement officer was knocked off his bicycle and mauled to death by a hungry grizzly bear in Montana! Neo-evangelical preachers go deer hunting, but fundamentalists go bear hunting! Amen! I'm just kidding about that last statement. I love a Baptist preacher who hunts bears! That's my kind of man's man preacher! I remember seeing the 1976 movie “Grizzly” as a kid, and I've had a healthy fear of bears ever since! That reminds me of a joke that I heard years ago. On the way home from church, two teenage boys see a big roaring grizzly bear and one boy starts changing footwear to put on his running shoes. The other boy says, “Do you really think you can outrun that bear?” His friend replies, “I don't have to outrun the bear, I just have to outrun you!” Amen! So always wear good running shoes if you're in bear country!

David J. Stewart, Love the Truth 28 Comments [7/15/2016 6:40:29 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 120518

Why the fuck do the pillowbiters still need a parade for? They got their fag marriage unconstitutionally put into law by the SCOTUS.

God already gave them a chance to repent of their choosing a hedonistic lifestyle, last week, but they continue to turn their back on God, and didn't learn a fucking thing, so they're gonna pay the price.

Jackie Puppet, True News USA 24 Comments [7/15/2016 6:40:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: TimeToTurn

Quote# 120517

The Democratic Party has become even more extremist on abortion than before.

Who would have thought it possible? There certainly was not much room for them to become more pro-abortion.

Now they are worshipping a corporation in their platform?

Planned Murder in Da Hood.

Perhaps they will perform a live abortion at this year's convention to celebrate their new "I <heart> Baby Killing" platform?

Clearly, it is impossible, on orthodoxy and orthopraxy, for an authentic Christian to simultaneously follow the Lord of Life and Light while voting for a Democrat who clearly serves the devil of death and darkness.


WorldGoneCrazy, Christian News Network 11 Comments [7/15/2016 6:40:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 120515

Last week, extremist anti-gay activist Theodore Shoebat posted a video in which he gloated that when Jesus Christ returns, he'll slaughter every single gay person in the world.

Shoebat, who last year was featured alongside several Republican members of Congress and GOP presidential candidates in an anti-gay "documentary," was using an incident in Australia where two men were arrested for sexually abusing a 10-month-old girl to yet again make his case that all gay people should be put to death.

"In a biblical society," Shoebat stated, "every fag would be rounded up and killed. But that's not going to happen, but believe me, when Jesus comes back, Jesus is going to kill all these sodomites. You're going to be praying to be living under a Catholic society from the Middle Ages because when Jesus comes back, it's going to be a lot more brutal."

"He's going to find all you bastards and he's going to slaughter every single one of you," said Shoebat with a smile on his face. "I can't wait for that day to come. It's going to be a beautiful, beautiful, beautiful world."

Theodore Shoebat, Right Wing Watch 20 Comments [7/15/2016 6:30:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 120514

Last week, talk radio host Michael Savage continued his attacks on former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson for filing a sexual harassment lawsuit against Roger Ailes, the network’s CEO.

He compared defendants in sexual harassment lawsuits to the dissidents who have been persecuted in communist countries like North Korea and mocked “the myth” of “the poor, downtrodden woman” in America.

“What’s this nonsense about ‘oppressed this, oppressed that’?” Savage said on his program on Wednesday. “The most oppressed member of society, as I’ve said before and I’m willing to stand by this again: The most ridiculed, the most oppressed member of society today is the straight, heterosexual, white, male Christian. Period.”

Michael Savage, Right Wing Watch 29 Comments [7/14/2016 3:51:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 30
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 120513

AUGUSTA (WGME) -- Mike Heath and other former heads of the Christian Civic League of Maine have formed a new group, "Equal Rights, not Special Rights."

They say they're tired of being forced to accept the homosexual lifestyle.

Paul Madore and this small group of people say they want to restore America to its former greatness by repealing same sex marriage laws and making homosexuality a crime.

"There is conduct that ought to be punished," Heath said. "And Christianity teaches, has always taught and still does teach, that sodomy is such a behavior."

In fact, they're against any public displays of affection by members of the LGBT community.

"These are two military men, at least one, and there's an open expression of homosexuality and sexual expression that is totally out of line for a country as great as the United States of America," Madore said.

But the first battleground for the group "Equal Rights, not Special Rights" is to push for a citizen's initiative to remove the phrase "sexual orientation" from the Maine Human Rights Act, even though Maine voters passed the measure 11 years ago.

"If it's removed, what does it do?" Heath said. "It very simply moves something, a behavior that belongs in the closet back into the closet."

Matt Moonen of Equality Maine called the referendum this group is pushing a waste of time.

"They think they can force people to accept their world view," Moonen said. "That's just not what America is, not what the State of Maine is. And it's not going to work."

Mike Heath & "Equal Rights, not Special Rights", WGME 32 Comments [7/14/2016 3:51:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 120512

What If I could present this idea that, atheistically, evolution was not the only alternative to spirituality/religious beliefs? – Regardless of the fact, religion means, “self-immersion in holisticism.” - 
Indeed, I am quite interested in evaluating the alternative routes to an atheistic reality. So perceive this:
 
If opals can be found all around the globe, and topaz too, diamonds, oils, reoccurring minerals, gems of various varieties, as well as common chemical compounds.

Then what, is to suggest that DNA also, cannot have multiple simultaneous or divided origins?

DNA is limited to the molecular composure of our reality, and must be stable and efficient in order to be sustainable or present in current day observation. DNA must also be compatible with a cell, which is also limited to our molecular composure, and must be sustainable or optimal to exist.

Thus, since cells and DNA have a limited amount of forms they can exist in, it is no coincidence that they are similar. There was simply no option for variation. THUS, it IS possible, that there is no common ancestry between monkeys of each variety, felines of different kinds, humans and apes, elephants and rhinos, and the predominant population of species on the planet.

Justly, because these are all assertions which use all the observed sciences applied to the theory of evolution. It is equally as plausible.

Each lineage can have uniquely originated in isolated situations.
Limbs, organs and parts of the body are nothing but reoccurring patterns on a molecular scale. Thus, it is not hard to understand the similarities between living species.
 
AH HA. And what I have done is presented skepticism to Evolution, by evaluating an alternative theory. I did not use skepticism as a debate tactic, but instead created it analytically.

Liberate yourself.
And eat up dat pudding.
Zero-common ancestry Atheism.


This, is superior to eating up the heavily invested in theory of evolution used to manipulate the populations into indulgence, selfishness, isolation and bigotry. Which is the theory the cartels fund heavily to promote prostitution.

Complidudaaldo, AtheistForums.org 24 Comments [7/14/2016 3:33:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Stimbo

Quote# 120510

The historical fact of the matter is that evolution by natural selection is a failed science. It has a long and inglorious record of failed predictions that puts even Keynesian economics to shame. Evolutionists know this, which is why they prefer polemic to predictions and why the foremost evolutionary propagandist has adopted rhetorical tactics that are utilized by the devotees of another pseudoscience, anthropogenic climate change/global warming.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 28 Comments [7/14/2016 3:31:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: David

Quote# 120509

[Discussing a video of Eric Hovind answering questions from a sixth grader:]

For the record, Elijah dealt quiet well with some children that decided to start some stuff with a Servant of the Most High. Didn't have to lift a finger.....

I agree with both Vox and another commenter. First I would demand that the adult feeding that child questions stand up and take his place, if the coward refuses I would give that child a verbal beating like never before. Of course, not if Elizabeth Hasselbeck was around.

Kickass, Vox Popoli 21 Comments [7/14/2016 3:31:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: David

Quote# 120508

[Discussing a video of Eric Hovind answering questions from a sixth grader:]

Most modern Christian apologists are incompetent because they approach the discourse as a chance to explicate theology rather than understanding that it is a form of intellectual combat where the goal is to discredit the interlocutor. So, like Hovind, they explicate a little theology that looks like an irrelevant evasion while simultaneously managing to get intellectually discredited by young boys. Frankly, I'd be surprised and a little disappointed if I didn't have the kid in tears and questioning his faith in science within minutes after asking such a pair of stupid questions.

First things first. Destroy the interlocutor. Answer every question directly, on his terms, and then go after the vulnerabilities they reveal with a flamethrower. Only then, when you are standing upon whatever quivering ashes remain, can you explicate further if you wish.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 26 Comments [7/14/2016 3:30:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: David

Quote# 120505

By and large, I tend to focus on power at the bottom – that women interrupt their boss tells me that they are hired for reasons other than their contribution to profit, that businesses are forced or morally pressured to hire women, and then stuff them into parts of the business where they cannot do too much immediate damage. Blacks walk down the street like aristocrats, taking up lots of space, while white males walk like serfs.

I also write a lot about female sexual preferences. Sexual selection, female choice, results in a positive feedback cycle, hence the peacock’s tail. I expect my readers, unlike Harvard alumni and Word Bank economists, to know the difference between positive feedback and negative feedback, to, unlike the typical Harvard alumunus, understand why the peacock’s tail is a really bad thing for peacocks, and to know that positive feedback is apt to have extremely bad consequences, and almost always needs to be broken and disconnected in the most direct way possible.

But this post is about power at the top. It is, however, also about my favorite topic: Positive feedback loops. And if you did not get that the peacocks tail is a manifestation of a positive feedback loop and that the peacock’s tail shows that women should never have been emancipated, do some homework before commenting. Seems that these days all they teach in university is how to hate white males, even if your degree is nominally in computer science. If your degree is in computer science, you damn well should know what a positive feedback loop is and why it is a bad thing.

Jim, Jim's Blog 24 Comments [7/14/2016 3:29:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 120504

Wanting to remain celibate is a legitimate reason for not being a partner to someone of the opposite sex. But wanting to use sex for someone of the same sex when its biological purpose is for the opposite sex, even if one is inclined that way, seems like an offense against that biological purpose and against the opposite sex.

Spud, Religion and Ethics 23 Comments [7/13/2016 3:41:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 120502


(Further comment on having been turned down by a lesbian)

I'll throw this in as a follow up to my previous post: The reason I think I felt it was unjust for a woman I liked to prefer another woman is that she was committing an offence against the principle of a woman giving a man not only the necessary help he needs, and being given back the help she needs in life, but also the gift of procreation, which she withheld from not just me but the whole of society.

Spud, Religion and Ethics 34 Comments [7/13/2016 3:41:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 36
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 120500

Feminism is the process by which birth rates are forcibly moved below replacement level. That is, by definition, genocide.

Stopnoanddont, Reddit 24 Comments [7/13/2016 3:40:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 120499

Study: Homosexuals And Bisexuals Are More Likely To Be Mentally Ill, Drug Abusers

It’s summer now, and in Sweden that means it’s pride parade season. One thing that’s different this year is that the very gay Milo Yiannopoulos is coming here to lead a parade on July 27th. The reason is that this particular parade will go through Tensta, a suburb comprised of mostly immigrants, a lot of them Muslim. We’ll see how that goes.

In other gay news: a new survey has found excess health problems in gays, lesbians and bisexuals. These groups reported more health problems than straight men and women.

More prone to smoking and heavy drinking

The study was done in the US, with nearly 69,000 participants. The National Health Interview Survey has been around for many years, but in 2013 and 2014 it included a question about sexual orientation for the first time.

The researchers conclude that gay, lesbian and bisexual adults “were more likely to report impaired physical and mental health, heavy alcohol consumption, and heavy cigarette use, potentially due to the stressors that (they) experience as a result of interpersonal and structural discrimination.”

The results show that lesbians, compared to heterosexual women, are 91 percent more likely to report poor or fair health. Lesbians are also 51 percent more likely, and bisexual women more than twice as likely, to report multiple chronic conditions, compared to straight women.

Gays, lesbians and bisexuals are more likely to indulge in heavy drinking and smoking. 26 percent of gay men and about 40 percent of bisexual men reported at least moderate psychological distress, compared to about 17 percent of heterosexual men.

In the case of women, about 22 percent of heterosexuals had at least moderate psychological distress, compared to about 28 percent of lesbians and about 46 percent of bisexuals.

Gilbert Gonzales of the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, who worked with this study, thinks so-called “minority stress” may account for health differences between heterosexuals and gay, lesbian and bisexual people. He thinks bisexuals have it worse than the rest because they may not always be accepted by gay, lesbian and transgender communities.

Right off the bat, you know the researchers aren’t exactly unbiased in this matter, since they talk about “structural discrimination” of these minority groups in America, a country where they are constantly praised in the media and by the elites. But leaving that aside, their study does show some interesting results.

I can’t say that I’m surprised. There are many possible reasons why the LGB (and likely also T) community is having more psychological problems than heterosexuals. One reason could be that some people do treat them badly on account of them being so strange (there’s a reason why they’re called queers). If they insist on acting act out their weird sexual desires in public, it’s understandable that some will take offense to that.

Some might even go so far as to discriminate against them. A business owner with more traditional values might deny them service—for instance, refuse to be the host of a gay wedding. That could well cause the gay couple to feel distress. (Although I would say that that’s the business owner’s right in a free country.)

But I would argue that there are other factors that affect LGBT people’s mental health more than real life discrimination, which can’t be that common in Western countries. The fact that their situation is often described as a lot more bleak than it is, is something that surely must affect them in a negative way. If they’re constantly being told about how oppressed they are by white, cisgender men, and “the religious right” (but not Muslims, we can’t say that), then of course they’re gonna be worried about their safety and future.

In the same way, if you tell a black person enough times that the police are after him and want to shoot him to death, for nothing more than walking down the street, eventually he’s going to believe it and start resenting cops and society in general.

Why celebrate sexual deviance?

But there’s one other factor that I want to bring to this discussion. I’m not a scientist like Gilbert Gonzales, and I’m definitely going to sound like a prejudiced asshole saying this (although it wouldn’t be the first time), but I think there’s something fundamentally wrong with gays, lesbians and bisexuals. Wrong in the sense that they weren’t created as they were supposed to be.

People are, like all animals, supposed to mate with each other, otherwise we wouldn’t still be here. Hence, we’re meant to be heterosexuals. Ergo, gays, lesbians and bisexuals were born with a faulty constitution. And since they’re faulty, it’s no wonder if that reflects on their mental condition.

I’m not saying that there’s necessarily something morally wrong with being gay, just that they’re a small minority of the populace for a reason. It’s not something we should encourage people to be—the results of the study presented above support that case.

Should someone feel pride over being born faulty? Should it be paraded around in the street like it’s something we should celebrate? Should we embrace a condition that impedes our species’ ability to survive? I’m not sure I can agree with that.

John Hydenius, Return of Kings 27 Comments [7/13/2016 3:40:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 120498

Why do Democrats hate black people?
Abortion. It’s a fact that black babies are killed in higher percentages than any other race.
Is that why democrats insist on government funding for abortions?
It’s a fact that black people especially black men are killed and assaulted by criminals in higher percentages than any other race.
Is that why democrats seek to disarm the people?
Immigration. Black people by far are by percent far poorer than any other race.
Is that why democrats insist on amnesty for illegals and massive immigration?
The above shows that those issues couldn’t possibly be about white people as white people are less affected by any of those issues.
Why are democrats pursuing policies which economically hurt black people the most?
Why do democrats advocate for policies which kill black Americans proportionally more than any other race?
Are limousine liberals quietly and stealthily eliminating black people as a factor in America?

Willfullman, Tumblr 14 Comments [7/13/2016 3:31:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 120497

Mike Mantonya: "The very concept of sin comes from the Bible. Christianity offers to solve a problem of its own making! Would you be thankful to a person who cut you with a knife in order to sell you a bandage?" Dan Barker

Dan Barker faked it in the pulpit for years. His quote shows why he gave up the act. First, he tries to blame God for his own sin (his crimes against God—violation of the Ten Commandments).

That won’t even work in a court of law: “God made me like this, that’s why I robbed the bank.” Second, he thinks God is selling everlasting life, when the Bible makes it clear that it’s a free gift (see Romans 6:23).

Both of these are very basic Christian doctrines that clearly Dan didn’t understand.

Ray Comfort, Atheist Central 24 Comments [7/13/2016 3:31:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 120496

When it comes to authorship of the Bible, of course men were involved. Christians would be the first to point this out. For example, Paul wrote letters to early churches that are included in the Scriptures (2 Peter 3:15–16). David wrote many of the Psalms. Moses wrote the Pentateuch, or the Torah (the first five books of the Bible). In fact, it is estimated that over 40 different human authors were involved.2 So, this is not the issue.

The issue is this: did God have any involvement or not? Did God inspire the authors of the Scriptures?3 When someone claims that the Bible was written by men and not God, this is an absolute statement that reveals something extraordinary.

It reveals that the person saying this is claiming to be transcendent! When one claims that God was not inspiring the human authors of the Bible, that person is claiming to be omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent!

Omniscient: they are claiming to be an all-knowing authority on the subject of God’s inspiration, to refute God’s claim that Scripture was inspired by Him (2 Timothy 3:16).
Omnipresent: they are claiming that they were present, both spiritually and physically, to observe that God had no part in aiding any of the biblical authors.
Omnipotent: they are claiming that if God had tried to help the biblical authors, then they had the power to stop such an action.

So, the person making the claim that the Bible was written by men is claiming to be God; but these three attributes belong solely to God. This is a religious issue of humanism versus Christianity. The person is claiming (perhaps inadvertently) that they are the ultimate authority over God and are trying to convince you that God is subservient to them. This needs to be addressed in responding to them.

Bodie Hodge, Answers in Genesis 15 Comments [7/13/2016 3:31:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 120495

Atheist are all wannabe dictators it seems!!! This is a perfect example of atheist philosophy, the smothering , murderous communist ideology that promotes that humans are basically good. It always results in one thing , genocide, look at all the atheist regimes of the twentieth century, that's the true intention of the human heart at work. The very thing atheist accuse God of, whom they don't even believe in supposedly , they accuse Him of genocide, while its proven that their beliefs always result in genocide when they take a government over. Such tyrannical hypocrites they are, and I pray the Lord wakes them up, and they find mercy and wholeness in Jesus.

Mjdee36, WND 21 Comments [7/13/2016 3:30:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Arceus

Quote# 120494

What the secular humanists (so-called atheists) don't understand is that they are every bit as fundamentalists in their ideology as any of the religious fundamentalists that they so revile.

Their "free thinking" only goes so far as their dogmatism allows. Case in point is when a "free thinker" breaks free from the accepted dogmatism and actually does some free thinking, and writes something critical of evolution, for example. Careers have been ruined over such transgressions from the secular humanism fundamentalism.

Something else to think about. If you asked a "free thinker" to name 50 of the founders of modern science he could probably do that. However, what he won't recognize is that of those 50 probably at least 45 of those would be Bible-believing theists of some kind who would abhor the notion of disregarding God's role in creation.

If you asked him to name any "free thinkers'" contributions to science he'd probably name Darwin at the top of the list, for example. However, the big difference there is that Darwin's contribution, as were others of his persuasion, was an attempt to try to explain science without God ... something that they have failed at miserably, forever running in circles chasing their own tales.

Dave, WND 18 Comments [7/13/2016 3:29:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Arceus
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 | top