Quote# 136693

[Commenting under "Klansman Edgar Ray Killen, convicted in the 1964 slayings of 3 civil rights workers, is dead: A look back"]

Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman were jews

Later:

Schwerner and Goodman got what they deserved, they were jew supremacists who didn't like blacks in the least, they just hated whites

pete, Yahoo! News 4 Comments [2/18/2018 3:26:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 136689

Cheap labor is neither.

1. The imported peasant world labor is less productive than the native White labor.

2. The initial cost savings to BIGCORP are lost to negative social externalities.

Monopolize the profits, socialize the costs.

Cracker Jack writes,

It wasn’t long ago that liberal Democrats/media made the case that “cheap foreign labor” wasn’t cheap – it was an example of big corporations profiting while society pays the cost. Then big corporations/Big Judaism convinced the Democrats to abandon workers because those foreign laborers and their anchor babies vote Democrat 8 times each.

The forces of Globohomo Inc will and are pulling out all the stops to thwart the nascent rise of a White-aware political and social movement in America.

They have everything to lose if they fail to contain nationalist populism. They know this, which is why they’re resorting to lies and frame jobs and censorship and full throttle 24/7 Narrative agitprop. The media-democreep-oligarch partnership in crime will assure America’s decline into banana republicanism if their agenda isn’t exposed and stopped in its tracks.

Which means we Americans have to ask ourselves…do we want self-rule, or rule by BIGCORP overlords?

PS The armchair historian in me recalls that the demand for cheap labor and the sexual and political liberation of women were defining features of nearly every major civilizational collapse. If there was a notable exception to this rule, I invite the commenters to discuss it with the civil flair that is customary for Chateau comment threads.

PPS From an MPC Status Update (strapon will be triggered to a pungent menstruation):

‘The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) counted over 100 people killed or injured by alleged perpetrators influenced by the so-called “altright”-a movement that continues to access the mainstream and reach young recruits.’

“100 genuine deaths or injuries from the altright per year would make them about 14% as dangerous as toasters”

Ban toasters! Heh.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 3 Comments [2/18/2018 3:25:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 136682

The USA is in the midst of what has been called the “bathroom wars”; however, access to bathrooms and locker rooms of the opposite sex for the so-called transgendered is only a means to an end. The real objective can be discerned from ACLU’s press release supporting U.S. Department of Education’s demand that the Palatine High School in Illinois (and by extension all schools receiving federal funds) allow a boy, who wants to be accepted as a girl, unrestricted access to the girls’ locker room.

The transgendered and their supporters claim that people are merely assigned a sex at birth, their gender identity (how they feel) may or may not match their assigned sex. The goal is to force everyone to accept that gender identity should take precedence over the biological reality of sexual identity and men who claim to be women should be treated as though they were women.

The ACLU complained that the school district challenged their “client’s identity as a girl,” which is true because their client is not a girl, but a boy. According to the ACLU, all “she wants to be accepted for who she is.” The problem is that he wants to be accepted for who he is not. Their client claims that not allowing him to change with the girls stigmatizes him, “making me feel like I was not a normal person.” The simple answer is that it is not normal for a male to want to be accepted as female.

The Bruce Jenner celebrity blitz and the battle over bathrooms, have brought the issue of gender to the fore and people are wondering how we got to the point where boys who think they are girls can use the girls’ locker room. What happened to common sense?

Unfortunately, many people thought that gender was just a synonym for sex, and could be substituted for it without causing any harm. However, for activists on the far left, sex and gender are not the same. Sex is biologically determined. Gender is socially constructed and does not have to correspond to sex. There are two sexes –male and female, but an unlimited number of genders. Once identity is divorced from reality, chaos ensues, fantasy rules.

The Obama administration is determined to force everyone to accept the demands of transgender activists. Girls would have to pretend that they are comfortable with a boy who wants to be a girl using the girls’ locker room, because if girls complain or show any sign of disapproval, they will be judged guilty of “transphobic discrimination”. Everyone would have to accept that wanting to be the other sex or believing that one can become the other sex is just normal diversity, when in fact it is a symptom of disordered thinking. Even if a person doesn’t believe that people can change their sex, he would have to pretend they do and call what is obviously a male a woman. The media has accepted this demand. using feminine pronouns for Bruce Jenner, who in spite of all the make-up, surgery, clothes and fancy photographers is still male.

Transgendered persons point to the psychological suffering they endure because people don’t accept them. Their suffering is real. They are engaged in a comprehensive denial of reality. Such a denial is hard to sustain as they must continually shut out the truth. The transgendered delight in “passing” – being accepted as the opposite sex in public. It hurts to be told that even if they can pass they are not and can never truly be the other sex.

The government does not have the right to force a citizen to say something he knows is a lie or to be silent in the face of evil. The people have a right to freedom of speech, which includes the right to speak the truth, even if the truth hurts another person’s feelings. So-called “hate speech” rules are unacceptable because they allow one group to veto the speech of another.

Some may argue that this is just about words, but as G. K. Chesterton said, words “are the only thing worth fighting about.” Careless use of language caused this mess and needs to be remedied, first by never saying gender when you mean sex.

The school under attack tried to accommodate the boy who wanted to be a girl. This was a mistake. They should have told the parents that their son is a boy and must use the boys’ facilities. If this is not possible, he needs counseling. Halfway accommodation won’t work; the Department of Education demands total capitulation. The defenders of the reality of sex difference should learn from this mistake. They cannot compromise the truth. They should not force the other students to accept the lie that gender trumps sex, just to avoid hurting a troubled boy’s feelings.

The LGBTQ activists and their ACLU lawyers are not tolerant liberals who respect other people’s rights. They are pushing a type of political correctness which is a manifestation of a totalitarian, Marxist-influenced ideology. Theodore Dalrymple, an expert on totalitarian societies explains how activists triumph:

In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed.

The girls forced to accept a boy in their private space are being targeted for just this kind of humiliation. This is about much more than bathrooms.

Dale O’Leary is a US writer with a special interest in psychosexual issues and is the author of two books: One Man, One Woman and The Gender Agenda: Redefining Equality. She blogs at What Does the Research Really Say?

Dale O'Leary, MercatorNet 7 Comments [2/18/2018 3:21:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 136676

(Commenting on Lady Checkmate's story "Chelsea Handler blasts Republicans for Florida high school shooting, says they 'have blood on their hands'")

USS Showdown:
"Handler, a self-proclaimed political activist, posted a tweet about midterm elections, urging voters “to elect candidates that are not funded by the NRA” and “who won’t allow kids to go to school and get shot.”
Chelsea Handler whose minor comic career is waned, is an aging, bitter, whoreish woman. She is unmarried, childless (via abortions) and is trying to stay in the public by becoming a political activist. She has no investment in future of this nation.
It's time to out and denounce these Hollywood liberal opportunist trolls for what they are.
Chelsea Handler know a thing or two about killing kids; she had at least two abortions.

Lady Checkmate:
She should be ashamed of herself.

US Showdown, Disqus - News Network 5 Comments [2/18/2018 3:21:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 136672

'Exposing the corruption': David Stephan lashes out on social media after conviction upheld in son's death

A father whose conviction was upheld for failing to provide the necessaries of life to his son has posted a Facebook response critical of the judges and prosecutors on the case, along with the entire justice system.

“I have come to . . . realize that within the current system there is no room for justice and truth, there is no humanity and there definitely is no love,” David Stephan wrote from his home in Nelson, B.C., hours after the Alberta Court of Appeal decision on Wednesday.

Stephan and his wife, Collet, were found guilty last year in their son Ezekiel’s 2012 death from bacterial meningitis.

Their trial in Lethbridge heard they treated the 19-month-old boy with garlic, onion and horseradish rather than taking him to a doctor.

Two of the three Appeal Court judges supported the conviction, with Justice Brian O’Ferrall offering a dissenting opinion. He said the Stephans should have been granted a new trial.

“I have been strongly cautioned to keep quiet as these types of posts could influence the outcome of court decisions, bail hearings etc. But this world needs more people that are willing to take a stand for truth, regardless of the cost,”

David Stephan, Calgary Herald 2 Comments [2/18/2018 3:20:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136670

Asian guys admits: "My beautiful Chinese girlfriend gets approached by some American men and they say. 'But your boyfriend has small penis. Trust me. I'm better than him.'". WMAF is built on hatred & disrespect. ALL WMAF contributes to this. Which is why no WMAF should be given the benefit of doubt

(NAITNC)
This is why we need more Jeremy Longs out there. The vast majority of white men = ~ 5 inches. This is proven shit. https://calcsd.bitballoon.com/

The only reason WM think like this and say that shit is because porn forms their opinions. The reality is, most WM are small as shit compared to porn stars. I wonder which group has a more accurate frame of reference regarding this, WM whose source of info = porn, or gay men and promiscuous women who consistently say that most men are average, with no racial distinctions by size.

Then again, there's really no difference between WM benefiting from the exclusive use of hung guys in porn, and their benefiting from the top 1% men in Hollywood representing them. It's just sad that the general public is too impressionable to see through this subtle form of propaganda.

(asian-man-throwaway)
The average for white men is 5 inches, not the median. There's a difference ??

So while a significant amount of white men have average length penises, it's probably not the "vast majority" (even though it probably is a normal distribution).

My point is that for every white guy with a big penis, there's one with a micropenis. And while I obviously can't prove it, I'm more inclined to believe it's white guys with tiny penises who shit on Asian men the most so that, in their heads, they're at least better than somebody. So think about that the next time you see a white guy talking about Asian penises.

(8MonkeyKing)
If it's a white guy, standard answer should be "if I wanted a big penis, I would go with a black guy so no thank you". Let's see how these racist WMs deal with that. Use their own stereotypes against them.

(WuKaiHo)
Okay can we get some constructive discussions out of this post? What would be the correct methods for the Asian guy to respond in these situations?

(jermul714)
What I do is casually but publicly challenge them to whip their dick out so that we can compare penis right there, but require it has to be in front of everyone to verify the account. This can go one of two ways, either they accept your challenge or don't.

If they accept the challenge, then maybe you win, maybe you lose. If you're packing anything even close to average, then you will just be living up to what people expected anyways, and at least you had the confidence and balls to challenge them. Remember that confidence and the willingness to defend oneself are much more attractive than a big dick. But fortunately, I've never actually had to do this because...

They 100% always decline the challenge. Think about it. It's a lose/lose proposition for them. To them it's akin to playing basketball against a girl. When you beat a girl in basketball, it's nothing special because you were SUPPOSED to win. But if you LOSE to a girl, that is straight mortifying (at least to a person who overcompensates by talking about other peoples dicks). And if the Asian guy is so willing to compare his junk against yours in public, maybe he's packing something to be afraid of. Every single time the offender called me some sort of crazy, but the people who witnessed my challenge knew I wouldn't put up with that kind of shit and would always be left wondering what size my dick really is.

disclaimer: I always made sure I would only challenge this way against those I knew who would decline. Some dudes are crazy or inebriated enough to accept the challenge, so don't be reckless if this kind of thing would embarrass you. Read body language and social cues. The key part is the challenge anyways, and there are plenty of other ways to challenge people that don't involve you actually whipping your cock out. Recognize this for what it is, a war of words. No penii ever actually cross tips in the war of words (pun intended), but Asians are often losing by not even showing up to the fight.

(bionicj1052)
I believe behind all this bullshit of Asian men have small penis, white men is most afraid of Asian men(intelligent, wealth, mostly grown up in steady family, etc) in society, small penis shit is only thing they can say to put Asian men down.

(guitarhamster)
Even IF whites have bigger dicks (which they dont according to statistics), if that is the only thing they can offer, that is pretty sad. Also what woman would actually leave her boyfriend for another guy just because of dick size? Lol

(redmeatball)
white men are obsessed with asian penis. I wonder why that is?

(whitemoddetector)
This is why when you speak to AF, you have to talk shit about WM to remind them of thier faults (in certain situations only) Talking shit is a two way street, do it back

(evilsalesguy)
Asian need to rock the boat more, I got the small penis stereotype in college on a few occasions from people I don’t even know. So now, every time I talk about white, i mentioned that they are psychopaths. If the white dude is in Asian, I would add loser or pedophile in there.

(whitemoddetector)
In Jt trans article he literally had a woman in his arms, and a white guy went up to him and said "what are you doing with this Asian guy with a small penis" he got cockblocked right there and the woman left him. This is the type of shit you have to deal with so you better learn to talk shit back. No woman will stand by a silent push over. WM are actively preventing women from being with you so do it back. It's a no brainer

various commenters, r/aznidentity 1 Comments [2/18/2018 3:16:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 136657

(Comment on the lovely bible story of Elisha who curses some kids that mocked him, causing two female bears to rip 42 of them apart)

I love that story! Even more today as I see the nasty little snots marching around in the streets today, having their temper tantrums because their person wasn't elected to Presidential Office. They are just as bad as these youth, sneering, mocking, shouting out rage and hate. Maybe some coyotes will invade the city and give some of them what they deserve. God Bless Trump.

Joe Zyzyx, Dwindling In Unbelief 10 Comments [2/18/2018 1:07:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: SomeApe

Quote# 136656

Truth v Lies
5 years ago
I have yet to see where anyone who is only stating his opinion has said that homosexuals are not human. The only people as far as I can see who say they are not human is homosexuals themselves as they keep on bringing up the spurious argument that there 1,500 (note 1,500, not 1,501) species of animals that are homosexual so its OK for them to be homosexual as after all, we are only a higher evolved animal.

If I had the time and room, I would detail all sorts of ways they are hurting themselves as homosexuality is a self defeating way of life and fraught within all sorts of emotional dysfunction.

Promote family values ????

The last time I looked you needed a mum and dad to be a family.

The last time I looked you needed to be able to procreate to be a family.

The last time I looked, a family does not invite their boyfriends to have sex with them every week in addition to the one they are married to.

The last time I looked, a family does not sit down with their children and spend an evening viewing pornography.

The last time I looked a family does not tell its children that homosexuality is normal and you should try it.

The last time I looked, a family does not embarrass the children by having two dads and no mother.

The last time I looked, a family does not send death threats to other families children.

Promoting family values? You really are scraping the bottom of the barrel making spurious claims like that. Or is that another one of your lies?


Truth v Lies, MercatorNet  11 Comments [2/18/2018 1:07:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 136655

Louis, you do not need rocket science to work out that the pink gaystapo have an investment in keeping the truth at bay as the whole homosexual way of life is based on the lie that you are born that way.
That is very hard to believe when one of your own kind stands up at a conference to discuss all things homosexual that they had to make it a civil rights issue. We had to dispel the idea that we are born gay because if we don't then we have to admit that we can stop being homosexual. That was a public statement made in a public meeting for all to hear. To paraphrase, "we have to hide the truth that we are not born gay so that we can sidetrack society into believing it is a civil rights issue. In other words, the truth must be corralled so that we can spread our lies to get what we want. And in other, other words, why should we believe anything you say?

....

Scientists can't prove what doesn't exist and an open minded homosexual is an oxymoron. In addition, the truth about homosexuality has been banned from the university campuses, the main steam media, the education system and governments. The end result is that society today is being re-engineered by a social reforming jackboot brigade who are offering us a house built on sand. If it keeps going at the rate it is, like the past, it will destroy society so in effect they are signing their own death warrant whilst we enjoy the prospect of the second coming of Christ, which I believe their sin and perversion will hasten Whatever happens, we win, they lose.

Truth v Lies, MercatorNet 5 Comments [2/18/2018 1:06:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 136654

User Eric Brock posted the following, post entitled "Faith is Universal: We all believe in something"

Examining the need to confirm our doubts/faiths/beliefs based on the acceptance of others. Does the conversion and adherence of others necessarily validate or invalidate any particular position and, if so then, why? We all will have our own personal faiths and beliefs and within those, we will all have elements of doubt. What percentage of our efforts to convince others is motivated by our need to overcome our own disbelief?
This question is posed to the adherents of so called "organized religions" as well as those who claim to be "atheist". Agnostics are equally welcomed.

Lady Checkmate:
Respectfully, EricBrock, you're confused and your OP doesn't make sense (and I must share truth with you because Truth is the only thing that will set you free from satan's lies and deception). JustMat explained it for you in his comment. Please seek Jesus Christ. He is the ONLY way, the truth and the life. You're in our prayers.

1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV)
5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

John 14:6 (KJV)
6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

1 Corinthians 14:33 (KJV)
33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.


*Faith & Religion is a Christian community as stated in our channel's description and the Faith & Religion Community Guidelines:
Please read our community guidelines before commenting or posting here again...the link is in our channel's description (top right hand corner of your screen). Everyone is welcome as long as they comply with our community guidelines. Do not send me any off topic comments, nor questions nor concerns about my request here. If you have follow-up/clarifying questions or concerns please post them in the proper forum, not here, again, the link is in the guidelines. Sock accounts are both a Disqus TOS violation and a violation of our community guidelines. I noticed your accounts been open since 12/13/2014, but you only have 27 comments.

Thanks for understanding.

For your convenience: https://disqus.com/home/channel/faithreligion/discussion/channel-faithreligion/channel_rules/

NOTE: Conversation was closed from further commenting and Eric Brock was banned.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 7 Comments [2/18/2018 1:06:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 136644

That graph that he included at the beginning of the video which showed that virtually all black conservatives and most Hispanic conservatives voted for Obama was pretty damning for anyone pushing civic nationalism on the right. As AH stated, that graph clearly shows that blacks and Hispanics care more about race than ideology. It's really only White people, including White conservatives, who try to be colorblind when they vote.
The implications of that graph are pretty obvious: non-Whites are trying to overthrow White dominance of this country. While that might benefit them in the short term, it's obviously not going to benefit us, or even the country since we Whites have clearly proven that we're extremely good at developing and maintaining highly successful societies, whereas brown and black people have proven themselves to be incapable of creating the types of highly successful societies that people want to move to and live in.
Maybe this non-White takeover of America would be able to maintain or even surpass the high level of development created by White Americans if only East Asians or the intellectual elite of the low-IQ races were flooding into America, but the massive influx of dregs from the 3rd world are eventually going to drag us down into the type of societal dysfunction that you see in countries like Brazil. And since most of the studies that looked at the effects of ethnic diversity showed that ethnic diversity has a net negative effect on society, then maybe even high-IQ mass non-White immigration won't be workable because it transforms a high-trust homogeneous society into a low-trust heterogeneous society which is afflicted with extremely destructive tribal identity politics.

One has to wonder what exactly our leaders and even these non-White immigrants themselves are thinking in relation to the long-term effects of mass non-White immigration. The desire to fuck over the White race makes sense for both the anti-White left and the average person of color that's still butthurt over colonialism and the era of militant White Supremacy. But for the White leftists and non-Whites that are motivated by a desire to increase the living standards of these non-White immigrants, don't they realize that turning America into Brazil will suck for everyone? Wouldn't you rather live in a highly advanced White society as a minority that treats you humanely rather than in a borderline 3rd world country like Brazil?

I mean, I can imagine myself as a black, Hispanic, or Arab person moving to Sweden and enjoying living in a highly successful White society as a minority. But I wouldn't support flooding Sweden with millions of low-IQ brown and black people because then you'd completely ruin that society and fuck over your own standards of living as well. Do non-Whites and White leftists really hate us that much? Are they really willing to harm their own standards of living in order to tear down the White race?

By the way, that entire video was amazing. I'm already angry in anticipation of such an interesting voice eventually getting censored one day.

CertifiedRabbi, Reddit 2 Comments [2/18/2018 1:05:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 136620



What does Scripture say about Polygamy?

In Matt. 19:4 we are told by Jesus that God created one “male and [one] female” and joined them in marriage. Mark 10:6-8:"But from the beginning of the creation, God 'made them male and female.' 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, 'and the two shall become one flesh'; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh.
The two as one is the pattern on how marriage was to be conducted from the start. NOT three or four as one.

Eve was taken from Adams body and given back to him as his wife (singular) showing God’s approval of what the marriage union is to be like. God always spoke of man's “wife,” as singular, not wives. Notice it also states one father one mother.

It wasn’t until sin made man fall (Gen. 4:23) that polygamy occurs. Cain was cursed, Lamech is a descendent of Cain and the first to practice polygamy. The first time polygamous relationship is found in the Bible is with a thriving rebellious society in sin; when a murderer named “Lamech [a descendant of Cain] took for himself two wives” (Gen.4:19, 23).

The same Godly pattern of one man and one wife is lived by Noah. At the time of the Ark (Gen. 7:7), Noah took his one wife into the ark, all his son’s took one wife; God called Noah’s family righteous and pure. If polygamy were ordained of God, it would have made sense that Noah and his sons would have taken additional wives with them to repopulate the earth faster from the cataclysm.

This was to be a permanent union between man and woman that they might be helpful to one another (Genesis 2:18). Marriage represents a relationship of both spiritual and physical unity.

Hebrews 13:3-4: “Marriage is honorable among all, and the bed undefiled; but fornicators and adulterers God will judge.”

We have examples of saints in the Old Testament going off the commandment i.e Solomon, but this is not God approved. Many of the patriarchs took more than one wife. Abraham, by recommendation of Sarah, took her maid. Jacob was tricked through Laban, into taking Leah first, and then Rachel, to whom he had been betrothed. polygamy was not wrong in ancient cultures, but was a departure from the divine institution that God ordained.

In the Bible I count 15 examples of polygamy from the time of Lamech to 931 A.D. 13 of these men had enough power that no one could call into question their practice, they were unaccountable or no one dared approach them. Lamech Genesis 4:19; Abraham Genesis 16; Esau Genesis 26:34; 28:9; Jacob Genesis 29:30; Ashur 1 Chronicles 4:5; Gideon Judges 8:30; Elkanah 1 Samuel 1:2; David 1 Samuel 25:39-44; 2 Samuel 3:2-5; 5:13; 1 Chronicles 14:3; Solomon 1 Kings 11:1-8; Rehoboam 2 Chronicles 11:18-23; Abijah 2 Chronicles 13:21; Jehoram 2 Chronicles 21:14; Joash 2 Chronicles 24:3; Ahab 2 Kings 10; Jehoiachin 2 Kings 24:15; Belshazzar Daniel 5:2; 1 Chronicles 2:8; Hosea in Hosea 3:1,2. Polygamy is mentioned in the Mosaic law and made inclusive on the basis of legislation, and continued to be practiced all down through the period of Jewish history to the Captivity, after which there is no instance of it on record (Gen.29:15-30, Jacob and his wives.)

Was Abraham, David Solomon condemned or approved for practicing polygamy? Well they certainly did not get blessed for it! The fact that every polygamist in the Bible like David and Solomon (1 Chron. 14:3) were punished. This should be evidence that this is not God’s will.

God never condoned polygamy but like divorce he allowed it to occur and did not bring an immediate punishment for this disobedience. Deut. 17:14-17: “I will set a king over me like all the nations that are around me,' “you shall surely set a king over you whom the LORD your God chooses; one from among your brethren you shall set as king over you; you may not set a foreigner over you, who is not your brother. But he shall not multiply horses for himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt to multiply horses, for the LORD has said to you, 'You shall not return that way again.' “Neither shall he multiply wives for himself, lest his heart turn away; nor shall he greatly multiply silver and gold for himself.” This is the command of God, and he has never changed it.

1 Kings 11:3 says Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines violating the principle of monogamy that he was given through the law of Moses. Consider that Solomon at one time was the wisest man in the world. In I Kings 11:4: “For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father.” Notice Solomon became a polytheist because he was influenced in polygamy. In his case many wives, became many gods. Scripture has always commanded monogamy (Ps.128:3; Prov. 5:18; 18:22; 19:14; 31:10-29; Eccl. 9:9).

The fact is that God never commanded polygamy or divorce. Scripture says (Bible) He only permitted it because of the hardness of their hearts (Deut. 24:1; Matt. 19:8). Matt. 5:31-32: “Furthermore it has been said, “Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce. But I say to you that whoever divorces his wife for any reason except sexual immorality causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery.” God hates divorce as well as polygamy, since it destroys the family (Mal. 2:16). Whatever the patriarchs or any Christian did wrong does not change the fact the Bible condemns it.

There are some stipulations in the law that are connected to this subject. Matt. 22:24: “Teacher, Moses said that if a man dies, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife and raise up offspring for his brother.” This is based on the commandment found in Deut. 25:5-6: “If brothers dwell together, and one of them dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a stranger outside the family; her husband's brother shall go in to her, take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband's brother to her. “And it shall be that the firstborn son which she bears will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out of Israel. ”

Multiple wives was tolerated but never with God's approval. Jesus told the Jews, "Because of your hardness of heart, Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way" (Matthew 19:3-8). The Mosaic law aimed at mitigating, rather than removing, evils that were inseparable from the state of society in that day. Its enactments were directed to the discouragement of polygamy; to prevent the injustice frequently consequent upon the exercise of the rights of a father or a master; to bring divorce under some restriction; and to enforce purity of life during the maintenance of the matrimonial bond.

The Bible says adultery is not a choice, one does not have to acquire another wife to solve his urges. Jesus said if you look upon another woman with desire (married or not) it is adultery, a sin.

Paul insisted that a leader in the church should be “the husband of one wife,” a deacon or elder must have one wife... Titus 1:6.

The New Testament teaches that, “Each man [should] have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband” (1 Cor. 7:2). Monogamous marriage teaches us the type of the relation Christ has between himself and His bride, the church (Eph. 5:31-32). The church is called the bride, collectively as one (singular) each person is not a bride, as in plurality of wives and marriages.

How many wives did Adam have in Gen.2:24? One, God did not take two wives out from his side. Monogamy has always been God's standard for the human race. From the very beginning God set the pattern by creating a monogamous marriage relationship -one man and one woman, Adam and Eve (Gen. 1:27; 2:21-25). It cannot be interpreted he became one with “each wife”; then this would mean he would be a husband to each, committing adultery. God certainly could have made two or more wives for Adam, this would have endorse the idea of polygamy, but he made only one.

The Bible clearly and decidedly states that God does not condone or allow the practice of polygamy over and over again.

Let Us Reason, Let Us Reason 4 Comments [2/18/2018 1:02:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 136619


God's love demands a hell. Imagine a man proposing to a woman in marriage and the woman refuses saying I respect you, I admire you, but I am not going to marry you. Then he comes to her and proposes to her again and she declines. He comes to her again and proposes and she declines. And then the man says I love you so much I'm going to force you to marry me. That relationship would not be operating by love, forced love is really not love at all. God's love is persuasive, it's convincing, but it's never coercive. He's not going to put your arm behind your back and force you to do what's right. He's going to allow you to have the freedom of choice, yet he will give you all the proof one needs to be convinced that He is love. This love is also perfect in justice, and God is longsuffering in His love, patient, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. So the choice is really up to us, it's ours to make. It's an eternal choice which we cannot change once we die. There are no shotgun weddings in heaven, but there will be a great divorce for those who refuse to enter into a vow and a covenant with God and Christ as their husband. If there is no heaven to gain or hell to shun, justice would not prevail in the universe. If there is no final judgment there is no Hell. The Bible teaches the dead will be raised to give an account and then punished. So there has to be a final separation for wickedness. We find evil is unable to be contained, it's easily spread. This cannot be said for godliness, which is not easily spread.

We are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth at which time evil will cease. Evil will be totally removed from those of us who are going God's way, who love God, and who have been born again into His kingdom. Sin has taken its effect on this world and its people and we are told in Scripture that all creation groans in travail for the day when all this will be removed. Hell shows the nature of sin and the great cost of salvation, it shows the very love of God. By the cross we see how hideous sin is and how much more powerful God's love is. This is the very reason that Jesus died, to save people from their sins. Death is the penalty of sin, the body dies and the soul becomes separate from the creator who gave them life. If there is no eternal consequences to sin then the crucifixion is robbed of its very significance. Jesus suffered in vain and it would not have been necessary for Him to die for our sins. Yet, God the father said there is no other way, that Christ is the only way. Jesus, who was truth incarnate, warned us, if your hand offends you, cut it off, it was better for you to go to heaven maimed than to go to the unquenchable fire whole, or with two arms, speaking with a hyperbole, using extreme examples to make the point how serious it is. Was He putting a non-existent fear in us for over nineteen hundred years? Of course not. Fear can actually be a good motivation because it leads to the preservation of one's life or soul. The Bible tells us the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, that if we want to understand what wisdom and knowledge is, it begins with a healthy respect and fear of God because He is in control and he deals justly. However we need to be as the evangelist D. L. Moody who said, when we speak of Hell, have a tear in your eye and a quiver in your voice.

Let Us Reason, Let Us Reason 7 Comments [2/18/2018 1:01:55 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 136746

First of all, who gives a shit what groups he belong to? He was a nutcase. And the left tells us again and again that we shouldn't judge groups by the actions of their most radical members. The only response to them should be to point out their hypocrisy.

Second, this does fit a crazy theory I have about jews. I don't think there is a grand jewish conspiracy or anything like that. For one thing it's already well established jews are severely inbred and have a much higher rates of mental illness. Which this shooter clearly had.

But also I think they have a personality type that makes them much more likely to join radical political movements. Look how many of the notable communists were jewish. Today communism is basically dead so they are way overrepresented in stuff like feminism (I had a similar image to that one for feminists but I can't find it.) I have a study that shows jews have maybe up to a standard deviation or more higher "openness" than non jews. Which is a personality trait no one really understands, but correlates with political views very well. And is highly heritable.

Centuries ago, Europeans that had similar personality types probably joined religion and became celibate monks and priests. And bred those traits out of the white population. Whereas jewish rabbis had large families.

RabidLibertarian, Reddit 0 Comments [2/18/2018 12:21:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 136745

That said, we should not be surprised that the far-left favour child sex. After all, the very basis of their cultural Marxist ideology is the idea that Christian morality is ‘reactioinary’ and has to be smashed in order to prepared the ground for revolution. That’s why groups such as the Socialist Workers Party support the legalisation of pedophilia by the abolition of the age of consent.

This leftist promotion of perversion is basically the brainchild of György Lukács, a Hungarian-based (but not Hungarian) Bolshevik who was deputy commissar for culture in the Béla Kun regime in Hungary in 1919. Lukács’ goal was openly and avowedly to eradicate Christianity and Christian morality from Hungarian society, and he believed that one of the most effective methods of achieving this would be to undermine sexual morality through the introduction of compulsory sex education in schools.

To achieve his aims, he introduced a radical programme in schools which included graphic literature being handed out to children, the promotion of promiscuity, the mocking of monogamy, and the scorning of their parents’ moral ethics.

The Béla Kun regime in Hungary lasted only six months, so György Lukács never got to see the rotten fruit of his plans. But unfortunately his ideas didn’t die with regime. Four years later he turned up in Frankfurt for a Marxist study week, where he shared his ideas amongst a fascinated group. One of the Marxists there, Felix Weil, was so taken with Lukács’ ideas that he used the fortune he had inherited to finance the Institute of Social research in Frankfurt – what became known as the Frankfurt School – incorporating many of Lukács’ ideas in its teaching.

The goal of the Institute was to translate Marxism from economic into cultural terms, since economic Marxism hadn’t had the success amongst the working classes that they had expected or hoped for. The reason for this lack of success, they surmised, was that the working classes had been contaminated with traditional bourgeois morals. So they set about breaking those morals through a number of means, including portraying traditional attitudes as “prejudice”, promoting androgyny, homosexuality and other perversions and by seeking to subvert the language through what we now know as “political correctness”.

Which, on reflection, is what should have told us that Antiphobic Aktion was not the work of trolls, but simply a ‘kite-flyer’ for the far-left’s next big assault on decency and Christian society – the attempt to normalise pedophilia. Because that was part of the long-term goal when they began their first, tentative propaganda about the need to halt the ‘repression’ of adult male homosexuality. It’s all part of the same plan!

FRANCESCO LATORRE, Forza Nuova USA 4 Comments [2/18/2018 12:20:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 136744

Secular Humanists and most Liberal atheists don't want us to believe in ghosts God or satan demons etc

they want that so we have no DEFENCE against demons and satan - evil

anonymous, Y! answers 10 Comments [2/18/2018 12:20:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 136617



Evidence is only what we are able and willing to see. All of us don't believe in spiritual realities without any evidence. (That is just atheist arrogance to assume so).

Its just that you are unable to see it. That is all....and we are unable to show it to you. I keep citing the example of a stubborn blind man denying the existence of Light. Nothing can be done about it!





Sriram, Religion and Ethics 4 Comments [2/18/2018 11:19:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 136615

Did I read it - NO! Am I ignorant as you obviously imply - NO! Have I ever researched the subject, read books, inquired and sought answers - YES!
Conclusion - when it comes to 'hard science' - that is: computers, cars, medicine, etc., you betcha - science is great. When it comes to the 'coulda , woulda, mighta, shoulda, with a definite maybe thrown in of evolutionary science, or whatever you want to call it,'- it's ALL nothing more than wild guesses, speculation, lies and fraud - there are NO provable 'missing links, no evolution in the sense that small changes over time produce different species, etc. It's ALL tax-supported religion. In truth, I prefer my own beliefs in a God that created it all in 6 days!
You and your friends can believe whatever you like. It's a free country (at least for a while longer) We're done here!

getstryker, Christian News Network 6 Comments [2/18/2018 11:19:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 136614

The excuse for 3rd world mass immigration being tied to our displacement of Aboriginals is easily exploded. My experience has been that our Aboriginals don't like "people of colour". I have engaged many Aboriginals in conversations about our immigration policy and why I think it hurts Aboriginals. I have yet to hear one disagree with me. To the SJWs and moronic politicians who spout this nonsense, I ask when they had consulted our Aboriginals on immigration, and what the response was. None had, and none will, because they know, to borrow a phrase from our neighbours to the south, that dog won't hunt.

That makes perfect sense. Before 1960, the vast majority of non-whites in Canada were Amerindians. Today, Amerindians are a minority among the non-whites, who at some time in the future will the majority. If the sole fact of being non-white means that one can claim victim status, then Amerindians now have to share this status with many others. Moreover, there is no reason whatever to assume that the many Asians and Africans who come to Canada will feel any historical guilt about the (very real) misdeeds perpetrated against the ancestors of today's Amerindians. The mass immigration of non-whites to Canada has significantly weakened the political position of the Amerindians here.

Jakob Scheffer, Eurocanadian 1 Comments [2/18/2018 11:18:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 136601

A Godly preacher boy!

My utmost esteemed, glorious, and illustrious fellow Christians:

Most of us engage in open air preaching in the same vein as our Jesus had done in His utmost glorious ministry. But how many are able to get their preaching right like this young preacher boys on the streets of Philadelphia?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PQKettVxvY

[Youtube video of a child, around 10 y.o., "street preaching" and cursing at people at a Harry Potter festival.]

Now here's a question for the true Christians here: what is wrong with this picture? I'll give you just a hint: 1 Timothy 2:12! Makes you wonder what the heck happened to the elder as to not instruct the woman relative to her place in the Godly scheme of things. Nevertheless, I trust that any real Christian will take to heart the modus operandi employed by these most distinguished preachers from Philadelphia, and especially that of the preacher boy rebuking the satanists (Matthew 12:30) as any true Christian should!

The Bible commands us to minister to the heathens, so do not forget to not only support some of the mostest street preachers out there, like the acclaimed Brother Wally Langford or the most eminent Brother Ruben Israel, but also go out there and do your part! And do not skip bringing the young preachers with you when you go to various heathen locales, like the comic book festivals, Papist churches, sodomite parades, Mooslim events, and other satanic gatherings. It is our absolute duty to Jesus to train our children to be young warriors for Christ, to spread His Gospel, in His Name, just as so many others done before us. Acts 17:17.

In the name of our Savior,
Brother T

Addendum:
Relative to those that say he's too harsh on the satanist, let's not forget the manner in which our beloved Jesus conversed with the reprobate. John 8:44


Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D., Disqus Grace and Truth 1 Comments [2/18/2018 10:57:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 136599

Mary Lou Wallner was given the distinction of being “Very Unsupportive (Initially)” Mary Lou’s lesbian daughter, Anna, committed suicide. Mary Lou Wallner is now an advocate for gay rights and has been touring the nation in support of the movie. In one part of the movie she tells the videographer that she blames Dr. James Dobson for the suicide of her daughter. At that time in her life Mary Lou was a member of a conservative Christian church that believed homosexual behavior was sin. She also followed the advice of Dr. James Dobson and did not accept her daughter’s homosexuality. The movie portrays that lack of acceptance as the cause of Anna’s suicide. The Poteat family was listed as “Partially Supportive.” This family kept an open relationship with their lesbian daughter. They too were conservative Christians, who did not approve of their daughter’s homosexuality, but their daughter was always welcome at her childhood home and she always knew her family loved her, even though they did not approve of her lesbian relationships. Having been a follower of Dr. James Dobson myself and having attended their controversial “Love Won Out” conferences on homosexuality, I can attest that Focus on the Family does not teach parents to reject their children. Obviously, Jake has never personally investigated Dr. Dobson or Focus on the Family, but relied on second hand information from Soulforce to make his damning accusation. Focus on the Family and their Love Won Out conferences teach parents to continue to openly love their children while continuing their disapproval of the child’s sexual behavior. Focus tells parents the truth that homosexual attractions are usually not a choice, that sexual orientation change is possible but not easy, and that parents need to love their children just as God loves them, even in their sin. The Poteat family is actually a good example of what Focus and Dr. Dobson teach. Mary Lou Wallner was present at the screening of the movie I attended in Flint. In my research on homosexuality I have read reports and heard lectures by clinical psychologists that lesbians do not usually seek counseling because of conflicts with their sexual orientation, but rather for distress from broken relationships. In the Q and A following the movie I asked Mary Lou if her daughter had any recent relationship problems before the suicide. Mary Lou revealed that her daughter had recently broken up with her long-time lover and moved in with another lesbian who had three teenage children. About two and a half months into this new relationship the woman asked Mary Lou’s daughter to move out. Shortly after this breakup, the daughter committed suicide. Mary Lou also revealed that her daughter was always welcome at her childhood home. When her daughter and lesbian partners visited, Mary Lou and her husband let them sleep in the same bed. It became clear very quickly how distorted the movie had portrayed Anna’s suicide and the conservative Christian beliefs Mary Lou once held. The Wallner’s were at least as supportive of their lesbian daughter as the Poteats were, and maybe even more so. Anna Wallner’s suicide had little to do with her parent’s disapproval of homosexual behavior, but a lot to do with the destructive aspects of lesbian relationships. The movie intentionally distorted this fact and used this terrible tragedy to smear an innocent man and the organization he represents. But this is nothing new, it is standard gay propaganda.

Thomas Coy, Ex Gay Truth 1 Comments [2/18/2018 10:54:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 136598

(Just one section of the site's "Full Calibration List". The rest makes even less sense)

Statement | One`s exact time of death is set at birth | True
Statement | One`s consciousness level is set at birth | True
Statement | Humans can live on prana energy | True
Statement | Chi energy exists | True
Statement | Wait three days before burial or cremation | True
Statement | Reincarnation is real | True
Statement | Stigmata are real phenomenons | True
Statement | Free will is an illusion | True
Statement | It is possible to come up from lower regions of hell - with the exception of blasphemy | True
Statement | God`s will for you is happiness. To be happy is pleasing to God | True
Statement | There are angels in bodies | True
Statement | Praying is beneficial. It benefits yourself, loved ones, the world, all of humanity | True
Statement | By our mere existence we are - all is - Divine | True
Statement | It is safe to pray for the sources of hate | True
Statement | It is NOT already determined which lifetime someone will become enlightened in | True
Statement | All things are God True
Statement | The Light of God is Consciousness | True
Statement | Consciousness is the Mind of God | True
Statement | At any age, the brain is constantly producing new neurons | True
Statement | The number of causes for any event is infinite | True
Statement All living things are aware as you walk by | True
Statement | The purpose of this human life is to undo negative karma and gain positive karma. That is the sole purpose of human life. | True
Statement | Whatever problem you have in life, if you apply the 12 Steps to it, that will solve it True
Statement | Discretion of Speech is a higher good than freedom of speech | True
Statement | It is safe to die | True
Statement | It is my understanding that the disciples (who calibrated in the 900s at the time) saw Jesus` etheric body | True
Statement | As we sacrifice our personal lives for the sake of the world, we sanctify the life of the world, This is personified in the life of Jesus Christ. | True
Statement | There`s multiple heaven, and the heaven that you go to is aligned with your calibrated level of your consciousness | True
Statement | Now, very rarely, but on occasion, the LOC can go over 1000. That`s the first time in history. | True
Statement | In order to be able to handle higher energy mankind up to now could only handle an energy of up to 1000 | True
Statement | So the alignment with the pathway we talk about then is the direct pathway to enlightenment and according to this understanding?the following of the direct pathway speeds up the likelyhood of enlightenment more than one thousand times | True
Statement | To Thee O Lord do I devote my life.'?- there is nothing beyond that that you as a human can say.That is the ultimate that can be said. | True
Statement | The Thee O Lord'?- you don't have to worry if God is listening.?'To Thee O Lord'?- God hears ?'To You O God'?- God is not obligated.? He is not involved, you see. You are talking to yourself.?'To Thee O Lord'?indicated devotion. [...]?'Those who are devoted to Me are mine.' | Truth

David R. Hawkins, M.D., Ph.D., CCRT Blog 7 Comments [2/18/2018 10:52:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136585

two mature and consenting adults who are of able mind and legal age to consent

In some countries gays are called fags, and treated in the same way as pedophiles (faggotry is criminally prosecuted, fags are shamed by general population). Yet, just as pedophiles, fags can't help themselves, regardless of the law and moral qualms.

forced encounter between a grown adult and a child.

I've seen CP, and, based on my "research", most ****** seem to be genuinely into it, there is nothing forced about it. Some are not. You can say that pedophiles are taking advantage of ******** , and ******** can't consent, but it is rarely forced.

I can't help but wonder how much of the damage attributed to sexual abuse is made by the good samaritans telling the ******* how "wrong" and "dirty" it was post factum.

So you are arguing that children are not forced to be in child pornography, but are in fact choosing to be? "rarely forced" - you genuinely believe this?

Yes, in most cases I observed on video, "forced" would be totally inappropriate term. The word you are looking for is "manipulated". They are genuinely excited, and they like what's going on.

30% of CP is made by ****** anyway, try your mental acrobatics to explain who's the victim here.

Children obviously do engage in sexual exploration. Which is different from being sexually abused. What I was questioning was your assertion that they genuinely enjoy being raped on camera, in many cases by a parent. There is a lot of testimony to be found on the internet, from victims of sexual abuse, describing how their abusers threatened and beat them into acting as if they enjoyed themselves on camera. I've included only one of many articles:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/magazine/how-much-can-restitution-help-victims-of-child-pornography.html

I'll ask you again: do you really believe that these raped and violated children were enjoying themselves? You don't have to be honest with me, but be honest with yourself - if you can.

Nobody enjoys getting raped, on camera or not. ****** that get raped don't enjoy it. On the other hand, some 5 y.o. giving a head to her dad often enjoys it. Think (I know, it's hard for you, but try it for once), why wouldn't she? She loves her dad, she spends time with her dad, they play fun games, and nobody told her that it is bad yet. For her, sucking his dick is no different from scratching his back. She sees that her dad enjoys it, and it makes her enjoy it too.

I don't say it's good, I don't say it will not damage her in the future, I'm just stating the facts. The facts don't give a fuck about how you feel about them, they just are
I can see bad acting from a mile away - in adults. I can detect when most adults are lying, or scared.

You implying that I can't see when a ***** is pretending (which I've seen in some videos - ****** scared and acting for camera), and when he genuinely likes what's going on is just laughable.

User8423, Reddit 6 Comments [2/18/2018 10:47:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 136584

The funny thing is, they are not only shamed for having these urges, they are punished for trying to fight their urges.

Like, if you are a pedophile, and want to have a fap material to keep your sex drive low, it will get you in prison. You will also lose all friends, and your mom will make a post on reddit saying she wants you to die. Nice.

Criminalizing CP made it so. hard to find that it's just easier to go and molest a real kid.

the children in CP ARE "real children". are you actually making an argument for the legalization of child porn?

It's already shot, destroying the footage helps no one. I totally support tracking the author and cutting his balls off, but downloading CP is a victimless crime.

A child is revictimized every time those pictures are shared.

Yeah, because he somehow senses every HTTP request, even in his sleep.

We allow gore, we allow /r/watchpeopledie, just for amusement. We don't care what the family of the people who died think about it.

If decriminalizing CP will reduce abuse of other children, I'm all for it.

A child is victimized when those pictures are taken.

Honestly, it seems like at least in some cases child is victimized by people telling him he was victimized



User8423, Reddit 5 Comments [2/18/2018 10:45:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 136742

(Description of the book "Evolution 2.0: Breaking the Deadlock Between Darwin and Design". Emphasis original.)

Creation Evolution Debate: 150 Years Later, it Still Rages. Both Sides Are Half-Right. And Both Are Wrong.

Meet the opponents:

In one corner - Proponents of Intelligent Design like William Dembski, Stephen Meyer, and Michael Behe. Many defy scientific consensus, maintaining evolution is a fraud. They challenge decades of data in biology, chemistry, genetics and paleontology.

In the other corner - Devout Neo-Darwinists like Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Jerry Coyne, who insist evolution happens "willy nilly." Strangely, they sidestep the latest science, glossing over crucial questions and fascinating details.?? But what if both sides are half-right?

What if both sides are missing vital details, clinging on to outdated views, theories, and interpretations?

There is a third way. Evolution 2.0 is the first book to lay out the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis in plain English. This new paradigm is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology right now.

Evolution 2.0 reveals experiments which prove that, while evolution is not a hoax, neither are changes random nor accidental. They are targeted, adaptive, and aware.

You will discover:

-Nearly every cell in your body can edit its own DNA, combating random destructive copying errors, charting a path for its transformation (page 82)

-Genes - far from being set in stone - actually change and adapt to the environment.

-How germs re-engineer their genetic destiny in real time by borrowing DNA from other organisms (page 94) (it's why your doctor tells you to never stop taking antibiotics halfway through your prescribed course)

-How bacteria communicate, organize themselves into armies, then stage coordinated attacks on your immune system (page 110)

-Brand new species in 18 months, sometimes 24 hours - Through two empirically proven, reliable systems of natural genetic engineering (page 146)

-How and when cells generate new information and genes that did not exist before (page 150)

-Why DNA, which is digital instructions for building proteins, is not merely like code but is code, the same way as the software on your smartphone is (page 38)

-How cells switch genes on and off in response to the environment, activating new traits that get passed from parents to kids (page 115)

If creationism seemed leave out important potentials, here you'll find missing clues.

You will discover fascinating real-time evolutionary lab experiments by an eminent scientist in the 1940s, whose work was recognized in 1983 by a Nobel prize & US postage stamp, but then... is still rarely mentioned in school science curricula.

High priests of scientific establishment actively oppose research that threatens antiquated theories, labeling results in scientific publications a "media fiasco".

This book explores 70+ years of under-reported evolutionary science. Evolution 2.0 chronicles bestselling author Perry Marshall's 10-year journey of in-depth research. As an Electrical Engineer, author of an Ethernet book and world-renowned business consultant, Mr. Marshall connects the dots in a new refreshing way. He tackles hard questions about evolution with precision, making it clear when information is proven with hard data and when it can only be inferred.

This book will open your eyes and transform your thinking about life, evolution, and creationism. You'll gain a deeper appreciation for our place in the universe. You'll the see the world around you as you've never seen it before: adaptive, efficient, and incredibly elegant.

$3 Million Technology Prize: Origin of Information is one of the central problems in modern biology. No one knows where the genetic code came from; no one knows how the first cell developed. To solve this, the author has organized a Private Equity Investment group, Natural Code LLC. They are offering a prize, reminiscent of the X-Prize, for a natural process that produces coded information. The prize amount is $3 million USD as of November 2016. Details in Chapter 23 and Appendix 4.

Perry Marshall, Amazon 14 Comments [2/18/2018 7:44:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep